johncons

Stikkord: Ministy of Justice.

  • E-mail to the Ministry of Justice, 23/6/08.







    Google Mail – Our ref: TO08/2153







    Google Mail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    Our ref: TO08/2153





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 2:20 PM





    To:

    "Holmes, Ryan" <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk>



    Hi,

    I've already been in contact with the Complaints Manager at the IPCC, but this hasn't resovled the problems.

    I suspect could be some corruption involved there, because something is obviouslly wrong there in my opinion.

    Also I wondering a bit on how to escalate the case I've been in contact with the FBI, or the American Embassy,

    about.

    Also, I've been in contact with the Norwegian equivalent, of the IPCC, that's Spesialenheten, regarding another,

    but linked, matter.

    And they sort under the Norwegian Ministry of Justice.

    So, I think that the IPCC are sorting under the British Ministy of Justice(?)

    If not, who should they then be sorting under?

    Sorry if I'm asking stupid questions.

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog


    On 6/23/08, Holmes, Ryan <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:


    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    Thank you for your email reply of 19 June.

    The Ministry of Justice is unable to submit a complaint on your behalf to the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC). Additionally, a complaint against the IPCC cannot be directed to the Ministry of Justice for review as this does not fall within the remit of this Department. If you wish to make a complaint against the IPCC you must do this by addressing your concerns to the IPCC directly. The information provided below outlines how to do this.

    If you have a complaint or query about a casework decision, the IPCC will do their best to clearly explain the reason for their decisions and answer any concerns you have. Please note however that IPCC casework decisions are final and they will not necessarily be able to change the outcome. For further information or advice on your rights you can contact a Citizens Advice Bureau, solicitor or your local MP.

    If you have a complaint about a member of staff at the IPCC, in the first instance you can contact the person concerned and the matter may be resolved there and then. As mentioned in my previous email, Casework Manager Sarah Brown is one of a number of IPCC staff that has conducted an investigation into your file and she can be contacted on 0207 166 3934 should you wish to discuss the details of your complaint further. However, since you mention that Miss Brown has not contacted you in the past, you may wish to raise any issues of concern through a line manager, or write to the Internal Complaints Manager. Alternatively, you can download a complaint form via the link

    http://www.ipcc.gov.uk/index/contact-us/complaints_ipcc.htm and make your complaint against the IPCC using the contact details below.

    Internal Complaints Manager

    Independent Police Complaints Commission

    90 High Holborn

    London

    WC1V 6BH

    Fax: 0207 404 0695

    Email:

    internal.complaints.unit@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk.

    I do hope that this information is of some use to you.

    Yours sincerely,

    Ryan Holmes

    Legal Services Regulation and Redress Division

    —–Original Message—–
    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]


    Sent: 19 June 2008 20:35
    To: Holmes, Ryan
    Subject: Re: Our ref: TO08/2153


    Hi,

    thank you very much for your e-mail, and the advice!

    I wanted to complain about the IPCC, since the whole case is a mess, and they don't reply to my e-mails,

    and they don't call me, you mention Brown, she has been supposed to call me, regarding the problems

    with the missing answers on the e-mails, but she haven't called.

    I think that the IPCC must have some serious problems, with handeling the complaints I sent them,

    which I view as one case really.

    So I was wondering, how I could submit this complaint, on the IPCC, to the Ministry of Justice.

    If you think that you could please submit this complaint for me.

    Also, I've contacted the FBI, in the American Embassy, in London.

    And I asked them, on how should go forward, regarding reporting a crime in the US, that someone,

    has set up a hate-blog against me there.

    The FBI/The American Embassy Legal Advice, tells me to contact my local police-station, about this.

    But I've lost a bit of confidence, with the Merseyside Police, due to the things mentioned in the

    complaints, sent to the IPCC, and more.

    And then I thought, that I could contact the IPCC about this then, since I didn't think I could contact

    the local Police about this.

    But now there has been so much problems, with the IPCC, so that I've lost a bit of confidence, in

    the IPCC, as well.

    So then I have to contact the Ministry of Justice about this, since I don't think that eighter the

    Merseyside Police or the IPCC, have showed themselves, to be worthy, of much confidence,

    unfortunatly.

    So I'm mentioning this now.

    Hope this is alright!

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On 6/19/08, Holmes, Ryan <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:


    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    Thank you for your email reply of 5 June. I am also in receipt of your email dated 13 June.

    As explained in my previous reply, the Law Society is the regulatory body for solicitors in England and Wales and will keep a comprehensive list of solicitors practising in your local area. Their website promotes a searchable database to help you find a solicitor which allows you to search by firm name, area of law and/or post code. To alleviate your concerns about contacting the Law Society due to previous personal experiences, I should point out that this list is a resource to assist the public locate suitable legal representation and promote solicitors across England and Wales. You can access the facility via the following link:

    http://www.lawsociety.org.uk/choosingandusing/findasolicitor.law.

    Alternatively, you could also look through a local directory, such as the Yellow Pages, which might help identify a suitable firm. As suggested in my previous reply, you may wish to contact the Law Centres Federation on 0207 428 4401 who can provide contact details for your local Law Centre. Also, you may find it helpful to access the Community Legal Services Direct website for information on providers of legal advice at

    www.clsdirect.org.uk. These are all alternative options available to you that do not involve the assistance of the Law Society.

    With regard to the complaint you have submitted to the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC), I have contacted the IPCC to investigate the status of your complaint. Senior lawyers at the IPCC inform me that without your expressed consent, I am unable to obtain any information that relates to your complaint. I was informed however that Casework Manager Sarah Brown is one of a number of IPCC staff that has conducted an investigation into your file and she can be contacted on 0207 166 3934 should you wish to discuss the details of your complaint further.

    I do hope that this information is of some use to you.


    Yours sincerely,

    Ryan Holmes

    Legal Services Regulation and Redress Division


    —–Original Message—–
    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 05 June 2008 01:51
    To: Holmes, Ryan
    Subject: Re: Our ref: TO08/2153



    Hi,

    thank you very much for your e-mail!

    I have been thinking about contacting the Law Society, regarding getting a list, like you say,

    for law firms, who take on law-cases on a 'pro bono' service basis.

    But, like I might have forgotten to explain, the Law Society, are already involved in this,

    I have complained about them to the Legal Services Ombudsman, who I have been contacting

    you about.

    So I've maybe lost a bit of confidence, in the Law Society, since I think they gave a bit of wrong

    information, and some errors, that I thought were a bit strange, so they are really involved in this

    from before.

    So then I was wondering about, if it would be right to involve the Law Society again, since they

    are involved from before.

    Maybe there is someone else one could contact about getting the name of companies like this?

    Sorry if I'm asking a lot of questions.

    I've also sent a complaint, on the Merseyside Police, to the IPCC.

    But the IPCC, aren't dealing with the complaint at all, it seems, so I was wondering who I should

    contact then, if I wanted to compain about the IPCC not dealing with the complaint on the Police?

    Sorry again that I'm asking so many questions!

    Thanks in advance for the reply!

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On 4/25/08, Holmes, Ryan <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    Thank you for your email reply of 7 April, in which you request further advice on ways to proceed forward with your complaint against the Legal Services Ombudsman (LSO). To assist you with your concerns, I shall set out the avenues of legal assistance available to you that acknowledge your specific financial concerns.

    Firstly, while I understand you have already been in contact with the Citizen's Advice Bureau (CAB), you may also wish to consider contacting your local Law Centre. Contact details for your local Law Centre can be found via the Law Centres Federation on 0207 428 4401, or by accessing their website www.lawcentres.org.uk. You may also find it helpful to access the Community Legal Services Direct website for information on providers of legal advice at www.clsdirect.org.uk. Alternatively, you may choose to contact Community Legal Advice for free confidential help regarding your legal queries on 0845 345 4345.

    Secondly, it may be worth investigating the possibility of a Conditional Fee Agreement (CFA). This allows a solicitor to accept a case on a 'no won, no fee' basis, under which they receive a fee from you only if the case is won. It is worth pointing that the solicitor's standard fees can be increased by up to 100% to reflect the degree of risk to the solicitor in taking the case on (the 'success fee'). However, should you lose your case, you may still be liable to pay the successful party's costs, as well as expert witness fees and other disbursements. There are insurance schemes that, for a premium, provide cover for these items. As part of the implementation of the Access to Justice Act 1999, we have made it possible for the successful side to recover their lawyer's success fee and insurance premium form the loser. Effectively, this has made the operation of conditional fees fairer and more attractive to clients.

    Thirdly, some solicitors may be prepared to take on your case on a pro bono agreement (i.e. provide you with a free service). You can contact the Law Society who can provide you with a list of solicitors that may provide pro bono services. The Law Society is the regulatory body for solicitors in England and Wales and you can write to them at the following address:

    The Law Society

    113 Chancery Lane

    London

    WC2A 1SX

    Tel: 0870 606 2555.

    Alternatively, you can access the Law Society's website at www.solicitors-online.com.

    I do hope that you find this information useful.

    Yours sincerely

    Ryan Holmes

    Legal Services Regulation and Redress Division

    This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

    Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail.

    This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

    The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.

    Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.

    This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk.

    Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.


    This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

    Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail.

    This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

    The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.

    Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.

    This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk.

    Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.


    This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

    Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail.

    This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

    The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.

    Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.






  • E-mail to the Ministry of Justice, 19/6/08.







    Google Mail – Our ref: TO08/2153







    Google Mail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    Our ref: TO08/2153





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 8:35 PM





    To:

    "Holmes, Ryan" <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk>



    Hi,

    thank you very much for your e-mail, and the advice!

    I wanted to complain about the IPCC, since the whole case is a mess, and they don't reply to my e-mails,

    and they don't call me, you mention Brown, she has been supposed to call me, regarding the problems

    with the missing answers on the e-mails, but she haven't called.

    I think that the IPCC must have some serious problems, with handeling the complaints I sent them,

    which I view as one case really.

    So I was wondering, how I could submit this complaint, on the IPCC, to the Ministry of Justice.

    If you think that you could please submit this complaint for me.

    Also, I've contacted the FBI, in the American Embassy, in London.

    And I asked them, on how should go forward, regarding reporting a crime in the US, that someone,

    has set up a hate-blog against me there.

    The FBI/The American Embassy Legal Advice, tells me to contact my local police-station, about this.

    But I've lost a bit of confidence, with the Merseyside Police, due to the things mentioned in the

    complaints, sent to the IPCC, and more.

    And then I thought, that I could contact the IPCC about this then, since I didn't think I could contact

    the local Police about this.

    But now there has been so much problems, with the IPCC, so that I've lost a bit of confidence, in

    the IPCC, as well.

    So then I have to contact the Ministry of Justice about this, since I don't think that eighter the

    Merseyside Police or the IPCC, have showed themselves, to be worthy, of much confidence,

    unfortunatly.

    So I'm mentioning this now.

    Hope this is alright!

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog


    On 6/19/08, Holmes, Ryan <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:


    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    Thank you for your email reply of 5 June. I am also in receipt of your email dated 13 June.

    As explained in my previous reply, the Law Society is the regulatory body for solicitors in England and Wales and will keep a comprehensive list of solicitors practising in your local area. Their website promotes a searchable database to help you find a solicitor which allows you to search by firm name, area of law and/or post code. To alleviate your concerns about contacting the Law Society due to previous personal experiences, I should point out that this list is a resource to assist the public locate suitable legal representation and promote solicitors across England and Wales. You can access the facility via the following link:

    http://www.lawsociety.org.uk/choosingandusing/findasolicitor.law.

    Alternatively, you could also look through a local directory, such as the Yellow Pages, which might help identify a suitable firm. As suggested in my previous reply, you may wish to contact the Law Centres Federation on 0207 428 4401 who can provide contact details for your local Law Centre. Also, you may find it helpful to access the Community Legal Services Direct website for information on providers of legal advice at

    www.clsdirect.org.uk. These are all alternative options available to you that do not involve the assistance of the Law Society.

    With regard to the complaint you have submitted to the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC), I have contacted the IPCC to investigate the status of your complaint. Senior lawyers at the IPCC inform me that without your expressed consent, I am unable to obtain any information that relates to your complaint. I was informed however that Casework Manager Sarah Brown is one of a number of IPCC staff that has conducted an investigation into your file and she can be contacted on 0207 166 3934 should you wish to discuss the details of your complaint further.

    I do hope that this information is of some use to you.


    Yours sincerely,

    Ryan Holmes

    Legal Services Regulation and Redress Division


    —–Original Message—–
    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 05 June 2008 01:51
    To: Holmes, Ryan
    Subject: Re: Our ref: TO08/2153



    Hi,

    thank you very much for your e-mail!

    I have been thinking about contacting the Law Society, regarding getting a list, like you say,

    for law firms, who take on law-cases on a 'pro bono' service basis.

    But, like I might have forgotten to explain, the Law Society, are already involved in this,

    I have complained about them to the Legal Services Ombudsman, who I have been contacting

    you about.

    So I've maybe lost a bit of confidence, in the Law Society, since I think they gave a bit of wrong

    information, and some errors, that I thought were a bit strange, so they are really involved in this

    from before.

    So then I was wondering about, if it would be right to involve the Law Society again, since they

    are involved from before.

    Maybe there is someone else one could contact about getting the name of companies like this?

    Sorry if I'm asking a lot of questions.

    I've also sent a complaint, on the Merseyside Police, to the IPCC.

    But the IPCC, aren't dealing with the complaint at all, it seems, so I was wondering who I should

    contact then, if I wanted to compain about the IPCC not dealing with the complaint on the Police?

    Sorry again that I'm asking so many questions!

    Thanks in advance for the reply!

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On 4/25/08, Holmes, Ryan <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    Thank you for your email reply of 7 April, in which you request further advice on ways to proceed forward with your complaint against the Legal Services Ombudsman (LSO). To assist you with your concerns, I shall set out the avenues of legal assistance available to you that acknowledge your specific financial concerns.

    Firstly, while I understand you have already been in contact with the Citizen's Advice Bureau (CAB), you may also wish to consider contacting your local Law Centre. Contact details for your local Law Centre can be found via the Law Centres Federation on 0207 428 4401, or by accessing their website www.lawcentres.org.uk. You may also find it helpful to access the Community Legal Services Direct website for information on providers of legal advice at www.clsdirect.org.uk. Alternatively, you may choose to contact Community Legal Advice for free confidential help regarding your legal queries on 0845 345 4345.

    Secondly, it may be worth investigating the possibility of a Conditional Fee Agreement (CFA). This allows a solicitor to accept a case on a 'no won, no fee' basis, under which they receive a fee from you only if the case is won. It is worth pointing that the solicitor's standard fees can be increased by up to 100% to reflect the degree of risk to the solicitor in taking the case on (the 'success fee'). However, should you lose your case, you may still be liable to pay the successful party's costs, as well as expert witness fees and other disbursements. There are insurance schemes that, for a premium, provide cover for these items. As part of the implementation of the Access to Justice Act 1999, we have made it possible for the successful side to recover their lawyer's success fee and insurance premium form the loser. Effectively, this has made the operation of conditional fees fairer and more attractive to clients.

    Thirdly, some solicitors may be prepared to take on your case on a pro bono agreement (i.e. provide you with a free service). You can contact the Law Society who can provide you with a list of solicitors that may provide pro bono services. The Law Society is the regulatory body for solicitors in England and Wales and you can write to them at the following address:

    The Law Society

    113 Chancery Lane

    London

    WC2A 1SX

    Tel: 0870 606 2555.

    Alternatively, you can access the Law Society's website at www.solicitors-online.com.

    I do hope that you find this information useful.

    Yours sincerely

    Ryan Holmes

    Legal Services Regulation and Redress Division

    This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

    Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail.

    This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

    The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.

    Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.

    This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk.

    Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.


    This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

    Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail.

    This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

    The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.

    Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.






  • E-mail to the Ministry of Justice, 13/6/08.







    Google Mail – Our ref: TO08/2153







    Google Mail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    Our ref: TO08/2153





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:35 AM





    To:

    Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk



    Hi,

     

    I can't see that I've received an answer to this e-mail yet, that's why I'm sending it again.

     

    By the way, I've also been in contact with the IPCC again, and it seems like the situation there is

    a bit complicated/problematic, with the complaints and correspondence etc.
     

    I was told earlier this week, that I would hear back from the IPCC, but I haven't heard back from

    them yet.

    But I thought I should update you about this, since I've already mentioned this, in the e-mail I'm

    sending again now.

    Hope this is alright!

     

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog


     

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: Jun 5, 2008 1:50 AM

    Subject: Re: Our ref: TO08/2153
    To: "Holmes, Ryan" <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk>

     

    Hi,

     

    thank you very much for your e-mail!

     

    I have been thinking about contacting the Law Society, regarding getting a list, like you say,

    for law firms, who take on law-cases on a 'pro bono' service basis.

    But, like I might have forgotten to explain, the Law Society, are already involved in this,

    I have complained about them to the Legal Services Ombudsman, who I have been contacting

    you about.

    So I've maybe lost a bit of confidence, in the Law Society, since I think they gave a bit of wrong

    information, and some errors, that I thought were a bit strange, so they are really involved in this

    from before.

    So then I was wondering about, if it would be right to involve the Law Society again, since they

    are involved from before.

    Maybe there is someone else one could contact about getting the name of companies like this?

    Sorry if I'm asking a lot of questions.

    I've also sent a complaint, on the Merseyside Police, to the IPCC.

    But the IPCC, aren't dealing with the complaint at all, it seems, so I was wondering who I should

    contact then, if I wanted to compain about the IPCC not dealing with the complaint on the Police?

     

    Sorry again that I'm asking so many questions!

    Thanks in advance for the reply!

     

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

     


    On 4/25/08, Holmes, Ryan <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    Thank you for your email reply of 7 April, in which you request further advice on ways to proceed forward with your complaint against the Legal Services Ombudsman (LSO).  To assist you with your concerns, I shall set out the avenues of legal assistance available to you that acknowledge your specific financial concerns.

    Firstly, while I understand you have already been in contact with the Citizen's Advice Bureau (CAB), you may also wish to consider contacting your local Law Centre.  Contact details for your local Law Centre can be found via the Law Centres Federation on 0207 428 4401, or by accessing their website www.lawcentres.org.uk. You may also find it helpful to access the Community Legal Services Direct website for information on providers of legal advice at www.clsdirect.org.uk.  Alternatively, you may choose to contact Community Legal Advice for free confidential help regarding your legal queries on 0845 345 4345.

    Secondly, it may be worth investigating the possibility of a Conditional Fee Agreement (CFA).  This allows a solicitor to accept a case on a 'no won, no fee' basis, under which they receive a fee from you only if the case is won.  It is worth pointing that the solicitor's standard fees can be increased by up to 100% to reflect the degree of risk to the solicitor in taking the case on (the 'success fee').  However, should you lose your case, you may still be liable to pay the successful party's costs, as well as expert witness fees and other disbursements.  There are insurance schemes that, for a premium, provide cover for these items.  As part of the implementation of the Access to Justice Act 1999, we have made it possible for the successful side to recover their lawyer's success fee and insurance premium form the loser. Effectively, this has made the operation of conditional fees fairer and more attractive to clients.

    Thirdly, some solicitors may be prepared to take on your case on a pro bono agreement (i.e. provide you with a free service).  You can contact the Law Society who can provide you with a list of solicitors that may provide pro bono services.  The Law Society is the regulatory body for solicitors in England and Wales and you can write to them at the following address:

    The Law Society

    113 Chancery Lane

    London

    WC2A 1SX

    Tel: 0870 606 2555.

    Alternatively, you can access the Law Society's website at www.solicitors-online.com.

    I do hope that you find this information useful.

    Yours sincerely

    Ryan Holmes

    Legal Services Regulation and Redress Division

    This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

    Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail.

    This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

    The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.

    Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.







  • E-mail to the Ministry of Justice, 5/6/08.







    Google Mail – Our ref: TO08/2153







    Google Mail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    Our ref: TO08/2153





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 1:50 AM





    To:

    "Holmes, Ryan" <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk>



    Hi,

     

    thank you very much for your e-mail!

     

    I have been thinking about contacting the Law Society, regarding getting a list, like you say,

    for law firms, who take on law-cases on a 'pro bono' service basis.

    But, like I might have forgotten to explain, the Law Society, are already involved in this,

    I have complained about them to the Legal Services Ombudsman, who I have been contacting

    you about.

    So I've maybe lost a bit of confidence, in the Law Society, since I think they gave a bit of wrong

    information, and some errors, that I thought were a bit strange, so they are really involved in this

    from before.

    So then I was wondering about, if it would be right to involve the Law Society again, since they

    are involved from before.

    Maybe there is someone else one could contact about getting the name of companies like this?

    Sorry if I'm asking a lot of questions.

    I've also sent a complaint, on the Merseyside Police, to the IPCC.

    But the IPCC, aren't dealing with the complaint at all, it seems, so I was wondering who I should

    contact then, if I wanted to compain about the IPCC not dealing with the complaint on the Police?

     

    Sorry again that I'm asking so many questions!

    Thanks in advance for the reply!

     

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

     


    On 4/25/08, Holmes, Ryan <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    Thank you for your email reply of 7 April, in which you request further advice on ways to proceed forward with your complaint against the Legal Services Ombudsman (LSO).  To assist you with your concerns, I shall set out the avenues of legal assistance available to you that acknowledge your specific financial concerns.

    Firstly, while I understand you have already been in contact with the Citizen's Advice Bureau (CAB), you may also wish to consider contacting your local Law Centre.  Contact details for your local Law Centre can be found via the Law Centres Federation on 0207 428 4401, or by accessing their website www.lawcentres.org.uk. You may also find it helpful to access the Community Legal Services Direct website for information on providers of legal advice at www.clsdirect.org.uk.  Alternatively, you may choose to contact Community Legal Advice for free confidential help regarding your legal queries on 0845 345 4345.

    Secondly, it may be worth investigating the possibility of a Conditional Fee Agreement (CFA).  This allows a solicitor to accept a case on a 'no won, no fee' basis, under which they receive a fee from you only if the case is won.  It is worth pointing that the solicitor's standard fees can be increased by up to 100% to reflect the degree of risk to the solicitor in taking the case on (the 'success fee').  However, should you lose your case, you may still be liable to pay the successful party's costs, as well as expert witness fees and other disbursements.  There are insurance schemes that, for a premium, provide cover for these items.  As part of the implementation of the Access to Justice Act 1999, we have made it possible for the successful side to recover their lawyer's success fee and insurance premium form the loser. Effectively, this has made the operation of conditional fees fairer and more attractive to clients.

    Thirdly, some solicitors may be prepared to take on your case on a pro bono agreement (i.e. provide you with a free service).  You can contact the Law Society who can provide you with a list of solicitors that may provide pro bono services.  The Law Society is the regulatory body for solicitors in England and Wales and you can write to them at the following address:

    The Law Society

    113 Chancery Lane

    London

    WC2A 1SX

    Tel: 0870 606 2555.

    Alternatively, you can access the Law Society's website at www.solicitors-online.com.

    I do hope that you find this information useful.

    Yours sincerely

    Ryan Holmes

    Legal Services Regulation and Redress Division

    This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

    Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail.

    This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

    The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.

    Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.







  • Svar på e-post sendt leder i Høyre, Erna Solberg, fra Marianne Fagerli, førstekonsulent, Høyres stortingsgruppe. (In Norwegian).

    Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Problemer med maktmisbruk/korrupsjon fra myndighetene i Norge og Storbritannia.

    Fagerli Marianne <marianne.fagerli@stortinget.no>

    Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:59 PM

    To: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Tusen takk for dine tilbakemeldinger. Jeg skal bringe denne videre til Erna Solberg.

    Med vennlig hilsen

    Marianne Fagerli
    førstekonsulent
    Høyres stortingsgruppe
    tlf: 23 31 33 46
    mobil: 416 46 094

    —–Opprinnelig melding—–
    Fra: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:
    eribsskog@gmail.com]
    Sendt: 25. april 2008 20:33
    Til:
    erna.solberg@hoyre.no
    Emne: Problemer med maktmisbruk/korrupsjon fra myndighetene i Norge og Storbritannia.

    Hei Erna Solberg,

    sorry at jeg driver å skrive til deg, sånn helt uten videre.


    Men jeg ble så imponert, over det prinsipprogrammet, som du presanterte på Høyre-møte, tidligere

    denne uke, om at dere ønsker å fordele makten i samfunnet, og at dere ikke ønsker, at det skal gå

    politikk i enkeltavgjørelse, om enkeltmenneskers skjebner osv.


    Det er i hvertfall sånn jeg skjønte det.


    Og det synes jeg virker som en veldig god ide, siden det virker litt for meg, som at det er en ny elite,

    som, mer eller mindre, styrer og ‘herjer’ som de vil i landet nå, uten noe tanke i det hele tatt, for

    medborgernes universale menneskerettigheter, og sivile rettigheter.


    Jeg blir i hvertfall tullet med, av alt som heter myndigheter i landet, det vil si Kripos, Politidirektoratet,

    Justisdepartementet, Ambassaden i London, Konsulatet i Liverpool (hvor jeg bor), UD; SMK,

    Sivilombudsmannen, Fylkesmannen i Oslo og Akershus, Spesialenheten, og også uavhengige

    organisasjoner, som Amnesty Norge, og Norsk Røde Kors og Statsministerens Kontor.


    Pluss da i tillegg, organisasjoner i Storbritannia, som det Britiske Politiet, IPCC, Liverpool City Council,

    the Local Government Ombudsman, the Financial Ombudsman, the Citizens Advice Bureau,

    the Law Society, the Legal Services Ombudsman, the Legal Services Commission, the Ministry

    of Justice, Amnesty UK.


    Listen går bare videre og videre, det virker som at det er noe lignende, av det som er beskrevet i den

    boken, som heter ‘Mafiaen i Eiker’, hvor en enkeltperson, blir systematisk motarbeidet, av offentlige

    myndigheter, til de klarer å knuse han.

    Det virker ikke, som at det, nå for tiden, er noe som helst tanke for, hva som er rett og galt, og hva

    som er folks rettigheter.

    Jeg har ikke klart å finne noen, ikke en eneste organisasjon, som bryr seg en døyt, om hva som

    er rett og galt, og hva som er folks sivile rettigheter, og folks menneskerettigheter.


    Så jeg synes det var veldig bra å høre om det programmet dere har lagt fram nå i Høyre, hvor dere

    ønsker å motarbeide nettopp slik behandling av enkeltpersoner, fra myndighetene.


    For dette synes jeg ikke, sånn som jeg ser det, at er verdig for et demokratisk samfunn.


    Og det viker som at det er like ille, her i Storbritannia, hvor jeg måtte flykte til, ettersom, at

    jeg ble jaget fra gården til onkelen min, i Kvelde i Larvik, på 35 års dagen min, i july 2005.

    Av folk som hadde våpen og hunder, så det kan virke som at det var noe politi, eller noe,

    for meg.


    Og jeg overhørte, at de sa de ønsket å skyte meg, så det var bare flaks at jeg kom meg unna.

    Så hva det er som foregår, det vet ikke jeg.


    Jeg får ikke noe hjelp, fra noen som helst myndigheter, eller private/uavhengige organisasjoner.


    Så sånn som jeg ser det, så har verden gått helt av hengslene.


    Jeg prøver å skrive, om det skjer, på en blogg jeg har, med håp, om at noen kanskje skal reflektere,

    eller reagere, over det som foregår.


    Pressen har jeg kontaktet flere ganger, de er ikke interessert i å hjelpe meg.

    Så at pressen, er involvert, i noe samrøre, med offentlig forvaltning, og også til og med frivillige/private

    organisasjoner, i både Norge og Storbritannia.


    Det er i hvertfall sånn jeg ser det, at dette er realiteten, i dag, i min situasjon, jeg klarer ikke få noe

    som helst hjelp/råd/informasjon, om hva det egentlig er som foregår.

    Jeg har kontaktet politet i Norge og Storbritannia, veldig mange ganger, men de vil ikke fortelle hva som

    foregår, så jeg tror nok at du har rett i det du la fram, i det prinsipprogrammet, at myndighetene, nå

    for tiden, ikke bryr seg noe om folks rettigheter, men at de lar politikken sin, gå foran folks rettigheter.

    Og dette er jeg enig, som i det det stod i en nettavis, at du sa, at folks universale rettigheter blir ignorert.


    Så da kan jeg gi den tilbakemeldingen, at sånn som jeg ser det, så har du og Høyre helt skjønt hva som

    foregår.


    Så da må jeg innrømme, at jeg ble imponert, når jeg leste det prinsipprogrammet til Høyre, i en nettavis

    her, tidligere denne uken.


    Så det synes jeg var veldig bra!

    Jeg var faktisk selv, på et eller to møter, i Høires Hus, skrives det vel, i Oslo, på begynnelsen av 90-tallet.


    Det var vel, i forbindelse med Unge Høyres program, til skolevalgene osv., i forkant, av kommunevalget, i 91.

    Og da, pratet jeg og en kamerat, i hvertfall tidligere kamerat, Magne Winnem, med noen av Unge Høyres,

    politiske strateger, eller i hvertfall, de som skulle utarbeide valgkampmateriale til Unge Høyre da.


    Så fikk vi si vår mening om det, vi var jo fra Røyken og Svelvik vi, så hadde vel kanskje et litt annet

    perspektiv, enn de fleste som var på møtet i Høires Hus der, tror jeg, for dem var nok mest fra Oslo

    Vest osv., så da kanksje vi la merke til ting, som vi trodde ville gi et dårlig inntrykk, i f.eks. i Buskerud,

    eller Vestfold da.


    Men jeg får håpe at vi ikke fikk dem til å moderere programmet for mye.

    Jeg husker ikke navna på de her nå.


    Den eneste jeg husker navnet på, det var at den var en jentene der, som het Huitfeldt vel, og det var ikke

    Anniken Huitfeldt, men ei som var datter av en Høyre politiker, eller noe tror jeg.


    Det var kameraten min, Winnem, som kjente til dette.


    Men samme det.

    Så jeg må innrømme det, at jeg ble veldig imponert, over det prinsipprogrammet, som Høyre la frem, her

    nå nettopp.

    Jeg hadde ikke tid, til å drive med politikk, på begynnelsen av 90-tallet, og jeg synes egentlig ikke, at det

    var rett av meg, som bare hadde sittet på skolebenken hele livet, til da, å bli aktiv i Unge Høyre osv.,

    og diskutere, og si at dette er best, osv., når jeg ikke hadde noe erfaring fra annet enn skolebenken selv.


    Jeg synes det ble litt dumt, og visste ikke om jeg da egentlig visste noe særlig, om de temaene, som

    ble diskutert, på møtet der osv.

    Det var vel mest at jeg gjentok det, som lærerne hadde sagt på skolen, at Norge burde satse på kunnskap,

    og forskning.

    Men jeg hadde jo ikke helt oversikten selv, jeg mener det jeg synes ikke det var noe hensikt, for meg,

    som ikke kjente så mye til verden, å drive for mye med politikk, ettersom, at jeg jo ikke egentlig hadde

    noe særlig livserfaring, og da ville det vel antagelig ikke vært så hensiktsmessig, at jeg skulle prøve,

    å finne løsninger på alt mulig forskjellige, når jeg ikke selv syntes, at jeg visste så særlig mye om

    hvordan verden var.

    Så derfor, så ble det ikke til, at jeg gikk noe mer på møter på Høires Hus osv.


    Men, i de siste årene, så har jeg jo skjønt det, at det er noe, som ikke er som det burde være, i det hele

    tatt, i Norge. (Og nok også andre land).


    Så nå skjønner jeg jo det, at det er faktisk er veldige viktige temaer, dette med maktfordeliing, og

    det som kan synes, å være samarbeid, mellom forskjellige offentlige etater etc., for å motarbeide

    enkeltpersoner.


    Det virker som at det en mafia i offentlig adminstrasjon.


    Og jeg har skrevet før, at det kan virke som at det er noe i forbindelse med noe New World Order agenda.


    At man skal ha en underklasse, som blir styrt og kontrollert helt, av den nye overklassen/den nye eliten.


    Og middelklassen, den forsvinner, så det blir bare eliten, og undersåttene igjen, så og si, kan det

    virke som, for meg.

    I hverfall så synes jeg det jeg har opplevd de siste årene, passer godt med det jeg har hørt om, angående

    de her New World Order-teoriene da.

    Men jeg vet ikke helt, jeg lurer litt på, om kanskje det hadde vært smart for meg, å for eksempel begynne

    med politikk?

    For eksempel, disse statelige og offentlige myndigheter, inkludert politiet, virker det som, de er jo i hælene

    mine hele tida, så det er ikke fred å få, må man vel si.

    Og det virker som at det er ‘Street Theater’ og ‘Group Stalking’ operasjoner, som iverksettes rundt meg,

    av noe overvåkningspoliti, eller hva det kan være.


    Enda jeg har aldri vært noe kriminell, og jeg har jobbet og betalt skatt hele livet.

    Det virker som at disse operasjonene, som er på nettet, hvis jeg diskuterer, f.eks. på Veggavisen,

    eller en Facebook diskusjonsgruppe, så dukker det opp en organsiert gjeng, som mobber og trakasserer

    meg systematisk og planlagt.

    Og dette har også skjedd når jeg går ut døra. At det virker som at politiet, eller noen andre, har en slags

    overvåkningaksjon, for å få brutt meg ned, virker det som.


    Dette går på ting som ‘Mind Control’, virker det som for meg.


    Og dette er ting, som går på, at de bryter ned folk, så de blir traumatiske, osv., og så, så får de kontroll

    på personene, og personene gjøre det, som dette nettverket vil.


    Det er i hvertfall sånn det virker for meg, jeg har lest om det på nettet, og jeg kjenner igjen det som står

    beskrevet der.

    Jeg skal legge ved noen linker, til blogg osv., som forklarer mer om det jeg mener.

    Nå bor jo jeg i Storbritannia da, så jeg vet ikke om Høyre har noe regler, for at man må bo i Norge,

    hvis man har lyst til drive med politikk osv., men det går vel mye på møter osv., så da er det vel

    antagelig en fordel å bo i Norge ja.

    Men jeg, er som jeg sier, nå i det siste, etter at jeg har fått tenkt gjennom dette.


    Jeg er en flyktning fra Norge jeg nå.

    Jeg ble jagd bort fra gården til onkelen min, i Kvelde i Larvik, sommeren 2005, av noen folk med våpen

    og hunder, som jeg ikke vet hvem er, eller hvorfor de skulle ha tak i meg, og skyte meg, som jeg

    overhørte de sa, når jeg var inni skogen ved gården der.

    Så jeg har tatt kontakt med FN’s høykommisær for flyktninger, avdeling Storbritannia, for å få råd om

    hva jeg burde gjøre i forbindelse med dette.


    De sa bare, at de kunne ikke involvere seg i enkeltsaker, og ga meg to telefonnumre, til et par

    advokatfirmaer, tror jeg det var, som jeg ikke har kontaket enda, for jeg lurer på om dette ikke er

    mer generelle tema, som kanskje burde vært tatt opp med f.eks. FN da


    Jeg vil jo gjerne vite, f.eks., om jeg formelt oppfyller kravene, til å være en flyktning, for da ville kanskje

    dette hjelpe, til å få politiet i Norge, til å gi meg råd, informasjon, eller hjelp i forbindelse med den

    situasjonen, som er, at jeg blir forfulgt av noe slags kriminelt nettverk da, virker det som.


    Hvis det ikke er politiet da, som en jeg pratet med på nettet, mente det kunne være.

    For dette har holdt på, siden 2003, og det er helt umulig å få et eneste råd., eller ord omtrent, ut

    av politiet, så hva det er som foregår, det er vanskelig å si, men at noe er galt, det er nok sikkert.

    Jeg vet ikke helt hvorfor, at jeg bestemte meg for å skrive den her e-posten, men mye av grunnen,

    var vel, at jeg synes det prinsipprogrammet som dere presanterte, i avisene, tidligere denne uken,

    var veldig bra, så det virker i hvertfall som at det er noen oppegående folk igjen i landet, synes jeg,

    og det er ikke så mange andre jeg kan si det om, i forbindelse med de tingene som foregår nå,

    synes jeg det virker som.


    Så det synes jeg var veldig positivt, og jeg tror Høyres politikk, med konservatisme, osv., ikke

    vil være på langt nær så ille, som AP’s New World Order politikk, vil jeg kalle det, med en ny

    elite, som får i pose og sekk, og men en underklasse, som må stå i køer, til Aker Sykehus,

    osv., og dit ville ikke jeg dratt for å operere eller noe igjen, etter at jeg opererte kneet der,

    i 1996.

    Der var det mye rart, jeg mistenker at dette nettverket, av offentlig forvaltning, som er beskrevet,

    i den boken, ‘mafiaen i Eiker’, jeg mistenker at dette eller lignende netteverk, også har sine

    representanter, på sykehusene.


    Uten at jeg skal gå mer i detalj om det nå.

    Jeg tror, at i et samfunn med Høyres politikk, så vil det være mulig, for enkeltmennesker, å komme

    seg f.eks. over fra arbeiderklassen, eller hvilket utrykk man skal bruke nå, og oppover, til middelklassen,

    eller overklassen da, hvis de jobber og står på, uten å bli motarbeidet, av diverse jantelover, som

    kanskje egentlig er et slags nettverk da, i tillegg til de netteverkene som er i offentlig admistrasjon osv.

    Men jeg tror ikke, at folk har så særlig muligheter, til å komme seg oppover, i samfunnet, i det

    samfunnet som vi har nå, med AP’s poltitikk, med en overlegen elite, et såkalt plutokrati, som

    det skrives i avisene hele tiden.


    Jeg tror i et sånt samfunn, så er det så og si umulig, å komme seg over, fra ‘undersåttene’, til

    denne eliten, som styrer, i dette plutokratiet da.


    Som jeg selv har selv mange referanser til, i aviser osv, at Norge er egentlig et plutokrati.

    Og da mistenker jeg, at dette er samfunnet, som man får av, AP’s politikk, med overformynderi,

    en ny elite, som kan kjøpe seg forbi køene, på de dårligere og dårligere offentlige sykhusene.


    Så dette AP/New World Order/den nye eliten samfunnet, det tror jeg man burde gjøre noe med,

    hvis man har noe som helst sympati, med de mange, altså flertallet som havner i denne,

    ‘undersått’ gruppen.


    Så dette håper jeg at det er mulig å gjøre noe med, dette AP-samfunnet.

    Er 2/3 samfunnet de kaller det?

    Betyr dette, at den siste tredelen ikke har noen rettigheter, men får rettighetene sine ignorert,

    av offentlig forvaltning og non-profit organisasjoner osv.

    Det er i hvertfall sånn det virker for meg, må jeg innrømme


    At noen av de her 2/3 av folka i samfunnet da, har bestemt seg for, at jeg er i den siste tredelen,

    og da ikke har noen rettigheter, og alle kan fritt tulle med meg.


    Det er i hvertfall sånn det virker for meg.


    Hvordan dette blir organisert i detalj, det kan jeg ikke si sikkert, men det er vel muligens noe

    frimurere, eller Illuminati f.eks., inne i bildet da, uten at jeg skal si dette hundre prosent sikkert.


    Men jeg ønsker i hvertfall lykke til videre med den høyre prisippolitikken, som jeg synes virket

    veldig bra.


    Jeg tror, at hvis Høyre, klarer å forklare velgerne, kanskje litt enklere, hva dette vil si, med at

    det går politikk i enkeltsaker, og at folks universale rettigheter blir ignorert av myndighetene.


    Kanskje hvis Høyre tok fram noen eksempler, på hva som faktisk foregår, av maktmisbruk

    og det som værre er, fra myndighetene.


    For jeg tror ikke det er alle som skjønner det som står i prinsipprogrammet om universale

    rettigheter, og at avgjørelser i enkeltsaker, tas med en poltisk agenda i bakhodet, og at

    man overkjører folks sivile rettigheter, og menneskerettigheter


    Men det er kanskje ting som kommer senere, i valgkampen neste år osv?

    Men jeg får i hvertfall ønske lykke til med det nye prinsipprogrammet, og si mange takk, for

    at det i hvertfall er noen oppegående personer tilbake i Norge, for det synes jeg det bli litt

    mangelvare på nå, hvis jeg skal være ærlig, så det synes jeg var et veldig bra og fornuftig

    program, å komme med nå, fra Høyre!

    Så beklager hvis jeg skriver mye her, jeg legger med noen linker, bare i tilfelle, at noen

    har tid å lese dette.


    Da håper dette er i orden, og igjen takk for at det dukker opp noen bra nyheter i mediene.

    Så beklager jeg skrev for mye i denne e-posten, jeg bare fikk en ide, om at kunne jo prøve å

    sende, en e-post i hvertfall, så da tenkte jeg at jeg kunne jo prøve å gjøre det.

    Så da får jeg håpe, at det var i orden!

    Med vennlig hilsen


    Erik Ribsskog


    PS.


    Her er de nevnte linkene:

    https://johncons-blogg.net/ (Dette er til bloggen min, som det er ca. 1700 innlegg på nå,

    og som jeg holder på å indeksere ferdig, så dette burde forhåpentligvis være gjort innen ikke

    alt for lenge).

    https://johncons-blogg.net/2008/02/lack-of-openness-from-government.html (Her er link,

    til den posten på bloggen, hvor jeg har skrevet, om det jeg vet, om hva som egentlig foregår, noe

    jeg gjerne skulle ha ønsket var mer).

    http://www.linkedin.com/pub/6/86a/455 (Her er til siden min på linkedin, som jeg nettopp har

    skaffet meg, jeg har lagt inn arbeidserfaring, så det skulle være mulig å se der, at jeg er en

    person, som har jobbet og studert hele livet, og som aldri vært kriminell, i det hele tatt, og

    som det ikke burde være noen grunn, for politiet, å tulle med).

    http://xiandos.info/Surveillance,_Psychotronics_and_(Gang-)Stalking_Operations (Her står det, om

    begreper, som ‘Street Theater’, ‘Group Stalking’, og ‘Mind Control’. Dette som står nevnt her, passer

    veldig bra, med det jeg har opplevd selv, her i Liverpool, de siste par årene. Uten at jeg vet om dette

    er styrt av noen lokale nettverk, eller om det er føderale, eller hva de kaller det i Storbritannia, som

    jeg kanskje mistenker at det også kan være, og muligens også linket til nettverk i Norge, uten at

    jeg skal påstå hvordan dette er, for sikkert).

  • E-post om problemer med maktmisbruk og korrupsjon, fra myndighetene, sendt leder i Høyre, Erna Solberg, 25. april 2008. (In Norwegian).







    Google Mail – Problemer med maktmisbruk/korrupsjon fra myndighetene i Norge og Storbritannia.







    Google Mail


    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Problemer med maktmisbruk/korrupsjon fra myndighetene i Norge og Storbritannia.





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 7:32 PM





    To:

    erna.solberg@hoyre.no



    Hei Erna Solberg,

     

    sorry at jeg driver å skrive til deg, sånn helt uten videre.

    Men jeg ble så imponert, over det prinsipprogrammet, som du presanterte på Høyre-møte, tidligere

    denne uke, om at dere ønsker å fordele makten i samfunnet, og at dere ikke ønsker, at det skal gå

    politikk i enkeltavgjørelse, om enkeltmenneskers skjebner osv.

    Det er i hvertfall sånn jeg skjønte det.

    Og det synes jeg virker som en veldig god ide, siden det virker litt for meg, som at det er en ny elite,

    som, mer eller mindre, styrer og 'herjer' som de vil i landet nå, uten noe tanke i det hele tatt, for

    medborgernes universale menneskerettigheter, og sivile rettigheter.

    Jeg blir i hvertfall tullet med, av alt som heter myndigheter i landet, det vil si Kripos, Politidirektoratet,

    Justisdepartementet, Ambassaden i London, Konsulatet i Liverpool (hvor jeg bor), UD; SMK,

    Sivilombudsmannen, Fylkesmannen i Oslo og Akershus, Spesialenheten, og også uavhengige

    organisasjoner, som Amnesty Norge, og Norsk Røde Kors og Statsministerens Kontor.

    Pluss da i tillegg, organisasjoner i Storbritannia, som det Britiske Politiet, IPCC, Liverpool City Council,

    the Local Government Ombudsman, the Financial Ombudsman, the Citizens Advice Bureau,

    the Law Society, the Legal Services Ombudsman, the Legal Services Commission, the Ministry

    of Justice, Amnesty UK.

    Listen går bare videre og videre, det virker som at det er noe lignende, av det som er beskrevet i den

    boken, som heter 'Mafiaen i Eiker', hvor en enkeltperson, blir systematisk motarbeidet, av offentlige

    myndigheter, til de klarer å knuse han.

     

    Det virker ikke, som at det, nå for tiden, er noe som helst tanke for, hva som er rett og galt, og hva

    som er folks rettigheter.

     

    Jeg har ikke klart å finne noen, ikke en eneste organisasjon, som bryr seg en døyt, om hva som 

    er rett og galt, og hva som er folks sivile rettigheter, og folks menneskerettigheter.

    Så jeg synes det var veldig bra å høre om det programmet dere har lagt fram nå i Høyre, hvor dere

    ønsker å motarbeide nettopp slik behandling av enkeltpersoner, fra myndighetene.

    For dette synes jeg ikke, sånn som jeg ser det, at er verdig for et demokratisk samfunn.

    Og det viker som at det er like ille, her i Storbritannia, hvor jeg måtte flykte til, ettersom, at 

    jeg ble jaget fra gården til onkelen min, i Kvelde i Larvik, på 35 års dagen min, i july 2005.

     

    Av folk som hadde våpen og hunder, så det kan virke som at det var noe politi, eller noe, 

    for meg.

    Og jeg overhørte, at de sa de ønsket å skyte meg, så det var bare flaks at jeg kom meg unna.

     

    Så hva det er som foregår, det vet ikke jeg.

    Jeg får ikke noe hjelp, fra noen som helst myndigheter, eller private/uavhengige organisasjoner.

    Så sånn som jeg ser det, så har verden gått helt av hengslene.

    Jeg prøver å skrive, om det skjer, på en blogg jeg har, med håp, om at noen kanskje skal reflektere,

    eller reagere, over det som foregår.

    Pressen har jeg kontaktet flere ganger, de er ikke interessert i å hjelpe meg.

     

    Så at pressen, er involvert, i noe samrøre, med offentlig forvaltning, og også til og med frivillige/private

    organisasjoner, i både Norge og Storbritannia.

    Det er i hvertfall sånn jeg ser det, at dette er realiteten, i dag, i min situasjon, jeg klarer ikke få noe

    som helst hjelp/råd/informasjon, om hva det egentlig er som foregår.

     

    Jeg har kontaktet politet i Norge og Storbritannia, veldig mange ganger, men de vil ikke fortelle hva som

    foregår, så jeg tror nok at du har rett i det du la fram, i det prinsipprogrammet, at myndighetene, nå

    for tiden, ikke bryr seg noe om folks rettigheter, men at de lar politikken sin, gå foran folks rettigheter.

     

    Og dette er jeg enig, som i det det stod i en nettavis, at du sa, at folks universale rettigheter blir ignorert.

    Så da kan jeg gi den tilbakemeldingen, at sånn som jeg ser det, så har du og Høyre helt skjønt hva som

    foregår.

    Så da må jeg innrømme, at jeg ble imponert, når jeg leste det prinsipprogrammet til Høyre, i en nettavis

    her, tidligere denne uken.

    Så det synes jeg var veldig bra!

     

    Jeg var faktisk selv, på et eller to møter, i  Høires Hus, skrives det vel, i Oslo, på begynnelsen av 90-tallet.

    Det var vel, i forbindelse med Unge Høyres program, til skolevalgene osv., i forkant, av kommunevalget, i 91.

     

    Og da, pratet jeg og en kamerat, i hvertfall tidligere kamerat, Magne Winnem, med noen av Unge Høyres,

    politiske strateger, eller i hvertfall, de som skulle utarbeide valgkampmateriale til Unge Høyre da.

    Så fikk vi si vår mening om det, vi var jo fra Røyken og Svelvik vi, så hadde vel kanskje et litt annet

    perspektiv, enn de fleste som var på møtet i Høires Hus der, tror jeg, for dem var nok mest fra Oslo

    Vest osv., så da kanksje vi la merke til ting, som vi trodde ville gi et dårlig inntrykk, i f.eks. i Buskerud,

    eller Vestfold da.

    Men jeg får håpe at vi ikke fikk dem til å moderere programmet for mye.

     

    Jeg husker ikke navna på de her nå.

    Den eneste jeg husker navnet på, det var at den var en jentene der, som het Huitfeldt vel, og det var ikke

    Anniken Huitfeldt, men ei som var datter av en Høyre politiker, eller noe tror jeg.

    Det var kameraten min, Winnem, som kjente til dette.

    Men samme det.

     

    Så jeg må innrømme det, at jeg ble veldig imponert, over det prinsipprogrammet, som Høyre la frem, her

    nå nettopp.

     

    Jeg hadde ikke tid, til å drive med politikk, på begynnelsen av 90-tallet, og jeg synes egentlig ikke, at det

    var rett av meg, som bare hadde sittet på skolebenken hele livet, til da, å bli aktiv i Unge Høyre osv.,

    og diskutere, og si at dette er best, osv., når jeg ikke hadde noe erfaring fra annet enn skolebenken selv.

    Jeg synes det ble litt dumt, og visste ikke om jeg da egentlig visste noe særlig, om de temaene, som

    ble diskutert, på møtet der osv.

     

    Det var vel mest at jeg gjentok det, som lærerne hadde sagt på skolen, at Norge burde satse på kunnskap,

    og forskning.

     

    Men jeg hadde jo ikke helt oversikten selv, jeg mener det jeg synes ikke det var noe hensikt, for meg,

    som ikke kjente så mye til verden, å drive for mye med politikk, ettersom, at jeg jo ikke egentlig hadde

    noe særlig livserfaring, og da ville det vel antagelig ikke vært så hensiktsmessig, at jeg skulle prøve,

    å finne løsninger på alt mulig forskjellige, når jeg ikke selv syntes, at jeg visste så særlig mye om

    hvordan verden var.

     

    Så derfor, så ble det ikke til, at jeg gikk noe mer på møter på Høires Hus osv.

    Men, i de siste årene, så har jeg jo skjønt det, at det er noe, som ikke er som det burde være, i det hele

    tatt, i Norge. (Og nok også andre land).

    Så nå skjønner jeg jo det, at det er faktisk er veldige viktige temaer, dette med maktfordeliing, og

    det som kan synes, å være samarbeid, mellom forskjellige offentlige etater etc., for å motarbeide

    enkeltpersoner.

    Det virker som at det en mafia i offentlig adminstrasjon.

    Og jeg har skrevet før, at det kan virke som at det er noe i forbindelse med noe New World Order agenda.

    At man skal ha en underklasse, som blir styrt og kontrollert helt, av den nye overklassen/den nye eliten.

    Og middelklassen, den forsvinner, så det blir bare eliten, og undersåttene igjen, så og si, kan det

    virke som, for meg.

     

    I hverfall så synes jeg det jeg har opplevd de siste årene, passer godt med det jeg har hørt om, angående

    de her New World Order-teoriene da.

     

    Men jeg vet ikke helt, jeg lurer litt på, om kanskje det hadde vært smart for meg, å for eksempel begynne

    med politikk?

     

    For eksempel, disse statelige og offentlige myndigheter, inkludert politiet, virker det som, de er jo i hælene

    mine hele tida, så det er ikke fred å få, må man vel si.

     

    Og det virker som at det er 'Street Theater' og 'Group Stalking' operasjoner, som iverksettes rundt meg,

    av noe overvåkningspoliti, eller hva det kan være.

    Enda jeg har aldri vært noe kriminell, og jeg har jobbet og betalt skatt hele livet.

     

    Det virker som at disse operasjonene, som er på nettet, hvis jeg diskuterer, f.eks. på Veggavisen,

    eller en Facebook diskusjonsgruppe, så dukker det opp en organsiert gjeng, som mobber og trakasserer

    meg systematisk og planlagt.

     

    Og dette har også skjedd når jeg går ut døra. At det virker som at politiet, eller noen andre, har en slags

    overvåkningaksjon, for å få brutt meg ned, virker det som.

    Dette går på ting som 'Mind Control', virker det som for meg.

    Og dette er ting, som går på, at de bryter ned folk, så de blir traumatiske, osv., og så, så får de kontroll

    på personene, og personene gjøre det, som dette nettverket vil.

    Det er i hvertfall sånn det virker for meg, jeg har lest om det på nettet, og jeg kjenner igjen det som står

    beskrevet der.

    Jeg skal legge ved noen linker, til blogg osv., som forklarer mer om det jeg mener.

     

    Nå bor jo jeg i Storbritannia da, så jeg vet ikke om Høyre har noe regler, for at man må bo i Norge,

    hvis man har lyst til drive med politikk osv., men det går vel mye på møter osv., så da er det vel

    antagelig en fordel å bo i Norge ja.

     

    Men jeg, er som jeg sier, nå i det siste, etter at jeg har fått tenkt gjennom dette.

    Jeg er en flyktning fra Norge jeg nå.

     

    Jeg ble jagd bort fra gården til onkelen min, i Kvelde i Larvik, sommeren 2005, av noen folk med våpen

    og hunder, som jeg ikke vet hvem er, eller hvorfor de skulle ha tak i meg, og skyte meg, som jeg

    overhørte de sa, når jeg var inni skogen ved gården der.

     

    Så jeg har tatt kontakt med FN's høykommisær for flyktninger, avdeling Storbritannia, for å få råd om

    hva jeg burde gjøre i forbindelse med dette.

    De sa bare, at de kunne ikke involvere seg i enkeltsaker, og ga meg to telefonnumre, til et par

    advokatfirmaer, tror jeg det var, som jeg ikke har kontaket enda, for jeg lurer på om dette ikke er

    mer generelle tema, som kanskje burde vært tatt opp med f.eks. FN da.

    Jeg vil jo gjerne vite, f.eks., om jeg formelt oppfyller kravene, til å være en flyktning, for da ville kanskje

    dette hjelpe, til å få politiet i Norge, til å gi meg råd, informasjon, eller hjelp i forbindelse med den

    situasjonen, som er, at jeg blir forfulgt av noe slags kriminelt nettverk da, virker det som.

    Hvis det ikke er politiet da, som en jeg pratet med på nettet, mente det kunne være.

     

    For dette har holdt på, siden 2003, og det er helt umulig å få et eneste råd., eller ord omtrent, ut

    av politiet, så hva det er som foregår, det er vanskelig å si, men at noe er galt, det er nok sikkert.

     

    Jeg vet ikke helt hvorfor, at jeg bestemte meg for å skrive den her e-posten, men mye av grunnen,

    var vel, at jeg synes det prinsipprogrammet som dere presanterte, i avisene, tidligere denne uken,

    var veldig bra, så det virker i hvertfall som at det er noen oppegående folk igjen i landet, synes jeg,

    og det er ikke så mange andre jeg kan si det om, i forbindelse med de tingene som foregår nå,

    synes jeg det virker som.

    Så det synes jeg var veldig positivt, og jeg tror Høyres politikk, med konservatisme, osv., ikke

    vil være på langt nær så ille, som AP's New World Order politikk, vil jeg kalle det, med en ny

    elite, som får i pose og sekk, og men en underklasse, som må stå i køer, til Aker Sykehus,

    osv., og dit ville ikke jeg dratt for å operere eller noe igjen, etter at jeg opererte kneet der,

    i 1996.

     

    Der var det mye rart, jeg mistenker at dette nettverket, av offentlig forvaltning, som er beskrevet,

    i den boken, 'mafiaen i Eiker', jeg mistenker at dette eller lignende netteverk, også har sine

    representanter, på sykehusene.

    Uten at jeg skal gå mer i detalj om det nå.

     

    Jeg tror, at i et samfunn med Høyres politikk, så vil det være mulig, for enkeltmennesker, å komme

    seg f.eks. over fra arbeiderklassen, eller hvilket utrykk man skal bruke nå, og oppover, til middelklassen,

    eller overklassen da, hvis de jobber og står på, uten å bli motarbeidet, av diverse jantelover, som 

    kanskje egentlig er et slags nettverk da, i tillegg til de netteverkene som er i offentlig admistrasjon osv.

     

    Men jeg tror ikke, at folk har så særlig muligheter, til å komme seg oppover, i samfunnet, i det 

    samfunnet som vi har nå, med AP's poltitikk, med en overlegen elite, et såkalt plutokrati, som 

    det skrives i avisene hele tiden.

    Jeg tror i et sånt samfunn, så er det så og si umulig, å komme seg over, fra 'undersåttene', til

    denne eliten, som styrer, i dette plutokratiet da.

    Som jeg selv har selv mange referanser til, i aviser osv., at Norge er egentlig et plutokrati.

     

    Og da mistenker jeg, at dette er samfunnet, som man får av, AP's politikk, med overformynderi,

    en ny elite, som kan kjøpe seg forbi køene, på de dårligere og dårligere offentlige sykhusene.

    Så dette AP/New World Order/den nye eliten samfunnet, det tror jeg man burde gjøre noe med,

    hvis man har noe som helst sympati, med de mange, altså flertallet som havner i denne, 

    'undersått' gruppen.

    Så dette håper jeg at det er mulig å gjøre noe med, dette AP-samfunnet. 

     

    Er 2/3 samfunnet de kaller det?

     

    Betyr dette, at den siste tredelen ikke har noen rettigheter, men får rettighetene sine ignorert, 

    av offentlig forvaltning og non-profit organisasjoner osv.

     

    Det er i hvertfall sånn det virker for meg, må jeg innrømme.

    At noen av de her 2/3 av folka i samfunnet da, har bestemt seg for, at jeg er i den siste tredelen,

    og da ikke har noen rettigheter, og alle kan fritt tulle med meg.

    Det er i hvertfall sånn det virker for meg.

    Hvordan dette blir organisert i detalj, det kan jeg ikke si sikkert, men det er vel muligens noe 

    frimurere, eller Illuminati f.eks., inne i bildet da, uten at jeg skal si dette hundre prosent sikkert.

    Men jeg ønsker i hvertfall lykke til videre med den høyre prisippolitikken, som jeg synes virket 

    veldig bra.

    Jeg tror, at hvis Høyre, klarer å forklare velgerne, kanskje litt enklere, hva dette vil si, med at 

    det går politikk i enkeltsaker, og at folks universale rettigheter blir ignorert av myndighetene.

    Kanskje hvis Høyre tok fram noen eksempler, på hva som faktisk foregår, av maktmisbruk

    og det som værre er, fra myndighetene.

    For jeg tror ikke det er alle som skjønner det som står i prinsipprogrammet om universale 

    rettigheter, og at avgjørelser i enkeltsaker, tas med en poltisk agenda i bakhodet, og at 

    man overkjører folks sivile rettigheter, og menneskerettigheter.

    Men det er kanskje ting som kommer senere, i valgkampen neste år osv?

     

    Men jeg får i hvertfall ønske lykke til med det nye prinsipprogrammet, og si mange takk, for

    at det i hvertfall er noen oppegående personer tilbake i Norge, for det synes jeg det bli litt

    mangelvare på nå, hvis jeg skal være ærlig, så det synes jeg var et veldig bra og fornuftig

    program, å komme med nå, fra Høyre!

     

    Så beklager hvis jeg skriver mye her, jeg legger med noen linker, bare i tilfelle, at noen 

    har tid å lese dette.

    Da håper dette er i orden, og igjen takk for at det dukker opp noen bra nyheter i mediene.

     

    Så beklager jeg skrev for mye i denne e-posten, jeg bare fikk en ide, om at kunne jo prøve å

    sende, en e-post i hvertfall, så da tenkte jeg at jeg kunne jo prøve å gjøre det.

     

    Så da får jeg håpe, at det var i orden!

     

    Med vennlig hilsen

    Erik Ribsskog

    PS.

    Her er de nevnte linkene:

     

    http://johncons-mirror.blogspot.com/ (Dette er til bloggen min, som det er ca. 1700 innlegg på nå,

    og som jeg holder på å indeksere ferdig, så dette burde forhåpentligvis være gjort innen ikke 

    alt for lenge).

     

    til den posten på bloggen, hvor jeg har skrevet, om det jeg vet, om hva som egentlig foregår, noe

    jeg gjerne skulle ha ønsket var mer).

     

    http://www.linkedin.com/pub/6/86a/455 (Her er til siden min på linkedin, som jeg nettopp har

    skaffet meg, jeg har lagt inn arbeidserfaring, så det skulle være mulig å se der, at jeg er en

    person, som har jobbet og studert hele livet, og som aldri vært kriminell, i det hele tatt, og

    som det ikke burde være noen grunn, for politiet, å tulle med).

     

    begreper, som 'Street Theater', 'Group Stalking', og 'Mind Control'. Dette som står nevnt her, passer

    veldig bra, med det jeg har opplevd selv, her i Liverpool, de siste par årene. Uten at jeg vet om dette

    er styrt av noen lokale nettverk, eller om det er føderale, eller hva de kaller det i Storbritannia, som

    jeg kanskje mistenker at det også kan være, og muligens også linket til nettverk i Norge, uten at

    jeg skal påstå hvordan dette er, for sikkert).

     

     







  • E-mail from the Ministry of Justice, 25/4/08.

    From: Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk Holmes, Ryan
    To: eribsskog@gmail.com
    Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 14:30:07 +0100
    Subject: Our ref: TO08/2153

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    Thank you for your email reply of 7 April, in which you request further advice on ways to proceed forward with your complaint against the Legal Services Ombudsman (LSO). To assist you with your concerns, I shall set out the avenues of legal assistance available to you that acknowledge your specific financial concerns.

    Firstly, while I understand you have already been in contact with the Citizen’s Advice Bureau (CAB), you may also wish to consider contacting your local Law Centre. Contact details for your local Law Centre can be found via the Law Centres Federation on 0207 428 4401, or by accessing their website www.lawcentres.org.uk. You may also find it helpful to access the Community Legal Services Direct website for information on providers of legal advice at www.clsdirect.org.uk. Alternatively, you may choose to contact Community Legal Advice for free confidential help regarding your legal queries on 0845 345 4345.

    Secondly, it may be worth investigating the possibility of a Conditional Fee Agreement (CFA). This allows a solicitor to accept a case on a ‘no won, no fee’ basis, under which they receive a fee from you only if the case is won. It is worth pointing that the solicitor’s standard fees can be increased by up to 100% to reflect the degree of risk to the solicitor in taking the case on (the ‘success fee’). However, should you lose your case, you may still be liable to pay the successful party’s costs, as well as expert witness fees and other disbursements. There are insurance schemes that, for a premium, provide cover for these items. As part of the implementation of the Access to Justice Act 1999, we have made it possible for the successful side to recover their lawyer’s success fee and insurance premium form the loser. Effectively, this has made the operation of conditional fees fairer and more attractive to clients.

    Thirdly, some solicitors may be prepared to take on your case on a pro bono agreement (i.e. provide you with a free service). You can contact the Law Society who can provide you with a list of solicitors that may provide pro bono services. The Law Society is the regulatory body for solicitors in England and Wales and you can write to them at the following address:

    The Law Society
    113 Chancery Lane
    London
    WC2A 1SX
    Tel: 0870 606 2555.

    Alternatively, you can access the Law Society’s website at www.solicitors-online.com.

    I do hope that you find this information useful.

    Yours sincerely

    Ryan Holmes
    Legal Services Regulation and Redress Division

    This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

    This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

    This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

    The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
    Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.

  • European Human Rights Court: E-mail sent 12/4/08.

    From: eribsskog@gmail.com Erik Ribsskog
    To: ECHRvisitors@echr.coe.int
    Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 00:14:59 +0100
    Subject: Being used as a ‘target guy’ by three different governments.

    Hi,

    I’m a Norwegian citizen living in Britain.

    I have to say I’m a refugee from Norway.

    I know I’m supposed to send a letter to the Hich Court of Human Rights in
    Europe, but I’m having some problems with my printer,
    so I hope it’s alright that I’m sending an e-mail.

    I’ve overheard that I have been followed by some ‘mafia’ in Norway, in 2003.

    In 2005, I was chased away from my uncles farm in Norway, by some people
    with guns and dogs, that I overheard saying that were going
    to shoot me.

    This year, I’ve overheard that I’ve been used as a ‘target-guy’.

    And it seems that I have been having phoney water-meter inspectors from
    probably the CIA in my flat, in 2007.

    I think this started when I went to Detroit in 2005.

    Then I had to wait at the imigration-control, for several hours, being
    questioned, inbetwen the questioning-offices was taking phone-calls.

    Then he said they couldn’t let me in, since I didn’t have a bond in Norway.

    So then I think they started to use me as a target-guy.

    And I also suspect that the Norwegian and British governments are involved.

    Then americans sent me back to Oslo, via Paris, in what seemed like a
    ‘terminal’ (like in the movie) plot, since they had written something in my
    passport,
    that I suspect would have led the French imigration-control, to send me back
    to America again, had they seen what the Americans had written in my
    passport.

    Also, in Britain, the Police have refused to give me any help, but I think
    have just let me go on, even if I suspect there was some mafia, in the
    company, Arvato
    Service Ltd., that I have been working in, in Liverpool, in 2005 and 2006.

    The Police didn’t give me any help or advice, even if I contacted them many
    times, and they still just pretend that there is nothing going on.

    And there are collegues that were working there, that I suspect something
    could have happened with, but the Police just pretend there have been
    nothing going
    on, even if I think it is my right to know what has been going on there,
    since I was working there.

    It was like slavery, working there, and I’m trying to a case ran throug the
    British court-system.

    But the Police wont even look at the case, even if there were being used
    illigal management methods there etc.

    The Police sent me to the CAB, to get the case up for the Crowns Court, but
    no lawyers want to help me, under the Duty Solicitors Programme, and the
    British Police are just harassing and lying etc, so I suspect that there
    could be some type of intellegence-activity, behind this, that no
    organisations or
    institutions want to help me in Norway or Britain, including Amnesty, the
    Red Cross and Human Rights Watch etc.

    I suspect that this could be due to some type of Goverment cover-up plan, in
    connection with what went on at Arvato, where I suspect Nordic women were
    being the subject of traficcing etc.

    I’ve been contacting the Norwegian Special Police, Kripos, but they dont
    anser my calls/emails.

    The organisation responsible for them, Politidirektoratet, dont answer my
    emails.

    The Norwegian embassy in London, and three Norwegian ministries,
    Justisdepartementet (The Justice Dep.), UD (The Foreign Ministry), and
    Fornyings og
    Adminstrasjonsdepartementet. (Translates to Renewal and Administration
    Minstry).

    Neighter of these institutions/ministries are answering my emails.

    I contacted the SMK (The Prime-ministers Office), in Norway.

    And complained on the three ministries.

    But they are ignoring my complaint, they are acting irresponsible, I would
    say, and are just refering me to the Sivilombudsmannen.

    Who is the Ombudsman, in Norway, that deals with irregularitites from the
    Goverment administration.

    But I think, that the Prime Ministers Office, should have a look at this,
    because this is regarding three ministries.

    I think, that the SMK probably are involved, since they wont even look at
    this.

    And it’s not allowed to use ones citizens as target-guys/spies, which it
    seem’s to me that has been going on.

    And I’m not sure if the Sivilombudsmannen, have any real power over the
    Government.

    And I think, using ones citizens as target-guys/spies, on some mafia etc.,
    without even asking the citizen if he want’s this.

    I think this is a serious crime towards the human rights.

    And neighter the Norwegian or British Amnesty or Human Rights Watch, wants
    to help me with this, so I think they are probably being
    told by some Government inteligence not to help me, or something like this.

    So I don’t really know who else that could look at this.

    So I hope the European Human Rights Court have the chance to have a look at
    this!

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

  • E-mail to the Ministry of Justice, 7/8/08.

    From: eribsskog@gmail.com Erik Ribsskog
    To: Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk Holmes, Ryan
    Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 16:28:40 +0100
    Subject: Re:

    Hi,

    thank you very much for your answer!

    You write that I should seek legal advice.

    But thats what these problems are about.

    That there has been problems, surrounding that I have been trying to get
    legal advice.

    I’m really a refugee, from Norway, I think I must say, so I haven’t got that
    much fonds.

    So I can’t finance a court-case myself, so I try to get help through the
    legal aid program
    etc., since I was sent by the Police to the CAB, to bring the harassment at
    work-case up
    for the Crowns Court, like they said.

    But then all the problems started, that led me to the Ministry of Justice,
    in the way explained
    in the earlier correspondence.

    So I’m not really sure how I should go forward, regarding bringing this up
    in the legal-system,
    since I haven’t really managed to get any help from this system.

    But maybe I should try once more, with this case.

    I was just wondering if you have any advice on how you think I should go
    forward with this, when
    I’m a refugee from Norway, and haven’t got that much fonds.

    Thank you very much in advance for any advice!

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On 4/7/08, Holmes, Ryan wrote:
    >
    > Dear Mr Ribsskog
    >
    > Thank you for your email of 19 March, addressed to the Ministry of
    > Justice, regarding making a complaint against the Legal Services Ombudsman
    > (LSO). The letter has been forwarded to the Legal Services Regulation and
    > Redress Division as we are responsible for the policy relating to this
    > matter.
    >
    > While I am sorry to hear of the difficulties you have experienced, I
    > should explain from the outset that the legal profession is both independent
    > and self-regulating and therefore, neither Ministers nor their officials are
    > able to intervene in, or comment on individual cases.
    >
    > Similarly, the Legal Services Ombudsman (LSO) is independent of both the
    > legal profession and the Government and, in order to preserve that
    > independence, Ministers and officials are not able to comment on, intervene
    > in, or vary her conclusions. However, with regard to your query about the
    > complaints procedure of the LSO, if you do have a complaint about the
    > service that the Ombudsman provides – for example, they failed to reply to
    > your correspondence or did not answer your telephone calls – you should
    > write to their Corporate Services Manager. She will investigate your
    > complaint, and provide you with a response within ten working days.
    > However, the Corporate Services Manager has no authority to review decisions
    > taken by the Ombudsman. If you have a complaint about the Ombudsman’s
    > report, you should address your concerns to the Ombudsman.
    >
    > If you wish to complain about the service you have received from the LSO
    > (but not the decision – see below) you must contact your MP who will decide
    > whether to pass the complaint on to the Parliamentary and Health Services
    > Ombudsman (PHSP). The PHSO can look at the service you have received and,
    > if it finds any evidence of poor service, can take action to put the matter
    > right. There is usually a twelve month limit, from the time you were aware
    > that there was a reason to complain, upon this kind of complaint. The
    > Ombudsman’s powers and responsibilities are set out in an Act of Parliament
    > (the Parliamentary Commissioner Act 1967) which says that complaints must be
    > sent to them through Members of Parliament.
    >
    > There is no appeal against the LSO’s decision. However, the LSO’s
    > decisions, like the decisions of other public authorities, are open to
    > judicial review and you may consider taking your case to the High Court in
    > order to have a judicial review of the LSO’s decision. It is important to
    > bear in mind that judicial review is not an appeal procedure and is not
    > generally concerned with the merits of the decision. Instead, it examines
    > whether the decision reached by a public body was done in a lawful manner.
    > Therefore, I would recommend that you seek independent legal advice should
    > you wish to pursue this course of action.
    >
    > Additionally, you may be interested to know that the Government has
    > brought forward legislation to overhaul the regulatory structure of legal
    > services in England and Wales. The Legal Services Act 2007 provides for the
    > creation of the Legal Services Board (the Board), a single oversight body,
    > independent of both the Government and the legal professions. It will be a
    > publicly accountable body with the power to enforce high standards in the
    > legal sector, replacing the current maze of regulators with overlapping
    > responsibilities. Its Chair and the majority of its members will be lay
    > persons.
    >
    > The Act will also establish a single and fully independent Office for
    > Legal Complaints (OLC). Its Chair and the Majority of its members will also
    > be lay. The OLC will administer an ombudsman scheme providing a single
    > point of entry for consistent handling of all consumer complaints about
    > providers of regulated legal services. This will replace the current system
    > whereby complaints against the different types of legal professionals are
    > handled by their own representative bodies.
    >
    > I am sorry that I cannot be of more assistance, although I do hope that
    > this information is of some use to you.
    >
    > Yours sincerely,
    >
    > *Ryan Holmes*
    >
    > *Legal Services Regulation and Redress Division*
    >
    > This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the
    > addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not
    > permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies
    > and inform the sender by return e-mail.
    >
    > Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be
    > intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding
    > whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail.
    >
    > This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
    > monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
    > monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read
    > at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when
    > composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
    > The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government
    > Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in
    > partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On
    > leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
    > Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
    > recorded for legal purposes.
    >
    >

  • E-mail from the Ministry of Justice, 7/4/08.

    From: Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk Holmes, Ryan
    To: eribsskog@gmail.com
    Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 16:09:19 +0100
    Subject:

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    Thank you for your email of 19 March, addressed to the Ministry of Justice, regarding making a complaint against the Legal Services Ombudsman (LSO). The letter has been forwarded to the Legal Services Regulation and Redress Division as we are responsible for the policy relating to this matter.

    While I am sorry to hear of the difficulties you have experienced, I should explain from the outset that the legal profession is both independent and self-regulating and therefore, neither Ministers nor their officials are able to intervene in, or comment on individual cases.

    Similarly, the Legal Services Ombudsman (LSO) is independent of both the legal profession and the Government and, in order to preserve that independence, Ministers and officials are not able to comment on, intervene in, or vary her conclusions. However, with regard to your query about the complaints procedure of the LSO, if you do have a complaint about the service that the Ombudsman provides – for example, they failed to reply to your correspondence or did not answer your telephone calls – you should write to their Corporate Services Manager. She will investigate your complaint, and provide you with a response within ten working days. However, the Corporate Services Manager has no authority to review decisions taken by the Ombudsman. If you have a complaint about the Ombudsman’s report, you should address your concerns to the Ombudsman.

    If you wish to complain about the service you have received from the LSO (but not the decision – see below) you must contact your MP who will decide whether to pass the complaint on to the Parliamentary and Health Services Ombudsman (PHSP). The PHSO can look at the service you have received and, if it finds any evidence of poor service, can take action to put the matter right. There is usually a twelve month limit, from the time you were aware that there was a reason to complain, upon this kind of complaint. The Ombudsman’s powers and responsibilities are set out in an Act of Parliament (the Parliamentary Commissioner Act 1967) which says that complaints must be sent to them through Members of Parliament.

    There is no appeal against the LSO’s decision. However, the LSO’s decisions, like the decisions of other public authorities, are open to judicial review and you may consider taking your case to the High Court in order to have a judicial review of the LSO’s decision. It is important to bear in mind that judicial review is not an appeal procedure and is not generally concerned with the merits of the decision. Instead, it examines whether the decision reached by a public body was done in a lawful manner. Therefore, I would recommend that you seek independent legal advice should you wish to pursue this course of action.

    Additionally, you may be interested to know that the Government has brought forward legislation to overhaul the regulatory structure of legal services in England and Wales. The Legal Services Act 2007 provides for the creation of the Legal Services Board (the Board), a single oversight body, independent of both the Government and the legal professions. It will be a publicly accountable body with the power to enforce high standards in the legal sector, replacing the current maze of regulators with overlapping responsibilities. Its Chair and the majority of its members will be lay persons.

    The Act will also establish a single and fully independent Office for Legal Complaints (OLC). Its Chair and the Majority of its members will also be lay. The OLC will administer an ombudsman scheme providing a single point of entry for consistent handling of all consumer complaints about providers of regulated legal services. This will replace the current system whereby complaints against the different types of legal professionals are handled by their own representative bodies.

    I am sorry that I cannot be of more assistance, although I do hope that this information is of some use to you.

    Yours sincerely,

    Ryan Holmes
    Legal Services Regulation and Redress Division

    This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

    This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

    This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

    The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
    Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.