Forfatter: Erik Ribsskog
-
Enclosure 4, letter to Burger King, 7/2.
Thursday December 27, 2007
Burger King, late order, agressive guy looking at face etc.
Order was very late processed.Many other customers were served before me, even if I ordered first, like I could understand it.
Suddently a guy, maybe 18-20 y.o. with short dark hair, maybe shaved #1 or #2.
Maybe 1.80 m tall.
Was starring at my face, I looked back, then he tryed to stare again, I looked back again.
Looked agressive, full of adrenalin.
My order wasn’t servered, I couldn’t see where the Burger King representative had put the receipt, who should have been on eg. a tray.
I had to ask twice, after the starring guy had disappered, about were my order had gone, and then I think, maybe that the Burger King representative fetched the receipt somewere, and put it on a paper-bag.
I can’t remember seeing the paper-bag or the receipt, untill I asked for my order, after the starring guy had left, and mabye four or five customers had got served before me, and I don’t think many of these could have ordered before, and these customers also bought meals.
So it seems to me now that the representatives hid my receipt, and delay serving my order.
A blond girl maybe 18 years was also working with serving the orders, but she disappeared, and the representative in the check-out, I think was maybe from Asia, or something, and maybe even younger than the other Burger King representative.
And I had to ask twice to get the order served, after waiting for maybe ten minuttes, even if I only ordered a Whopper Cheese burger, and a lot of people got served before me, meals, even if I think it’s clear that they must have been ordering after me.
Posted by johncons at 03:45
http://johncons.blog.com/2461167/
-
Enclosure 3, letter to Burger King, 7/2.
Erik Ribsskog
Flat 3
5 Leather Lane
Liverpool
L2 2AE 9. January 2008
Burger King
Louise Mander
Lakeside House
1 Furzeground Way
Stockley Park East
Uxbridge
Middlesex
UB11 1BD
COMPLAINT #203372
I’m refering to our phone-call yesterday, and I’m sending a copy of the explanation I wrote, about the
incident, some hours after the incident, which was on boxing-day.
Theres is also a web-link:
http://johncons.blog.com/2461167/
Where it also says the time and date for when the explanation was written etc.
I think, like I said in the phone-call yesterday, that this should be formally investigated.Since it seems clear to me that the staff was involved, and that this probably must have been an
atempt to attack me physically in some way, or something like this.
And it seems clear to me that the staff must have been involved.
I think the asian girl must have hidden the receipt, and one of the other staff must have called the
person acting aggressive, and who is described about in the explanation.
So I would think that the right thing to do, would be to investigate this formally, and report about thisto the appropriate goverment institutions etc.
So I hope that this is alright!
Yours sincerely,
Erik RibsskogEnclosures:
– Copy of receipt.
– Copy of explanation written on 27/12.
– Copy of letter from Burger King, written on 3. January 2008.
-
Letter to Burger King, 7/2.
Erik Ribsskog
Flat 3
5 Leather Lane
Liverpool 7. February 2008
L2 2AE
Burger King Ltd.
Lakeside House
1 Furzeground Way
Stockley Park East
Uxbridge
Middlesex
UB11 1BD
COMPLAINT
1. I called your customer service department, on 28/12, and spoke with Louise, regarding
an incident in your Liverpool Lord St. Branch, on boxing day.
In the call, I explained that it seemed to me that there could have been a criminal
network involved in the incident there, that the incident on Burger King could be
linked with other, similar incidents I had experienced, at my former work-place,
and in other shops etc. in town.
I told your representative, that it seemed that the staf could have called another
person, who a few minutes later showed up in the resturant, and agressive and
was starring intensly at me, agressively, for no obvious reason at all.
I told this to your representative, but I think something must have gone wrong with the
comunication, because when I spoke with customer services Team Manager Jo,
on 25/1, then she explained that your customer services representative had been
investigating if the staff had been acting rude.
But I hadn’t mentioned anything about the staff being rude at all.And when I explained this, that it seemed a bit strange that I explained to your
representative, that there could have been a set-up from a criminal network that had
been taking place in your resturant.
And then it was only investigated if the staff had been rude.
I think this was a bit strange, so I thought I should maybe complain about this,
since I think this could maybe have been more than just a misunderstanding.
At least I think that this should be investigated, what it is that has really been going on.
2. I recieved a letter from your representative, on 5/1, and on 8/1, I spoke with your
representative Lousie again.
I wasn’t sure if there had been a misunderstanding surrounding what went on withthe incident or not, but we agreed, that I’d instead send a letter, with an explanation,
regarding what happend in the mentioned incident on Burger King on Boxing Day.
Yet, your Team Manager Jo, told me, on 25/1, that the complaint-file, had been
closed on 9/1, before my letter had reached Burger Kings customer services
departments address.
I thought it was maybe a bit strange, that the complain-file would be closed, before
the agreed letter was recieved by Burger King, so I’m wondering a bit if this maybe
should be had a looked on, what the reason was for this.
3. When I spoke with your Team Manager Jo, on 25/1, I explained that I wasn’t sure
if the investigation regarding the incident, on Boxing Day, had been investigated
correctly.
Especially since, Jo, told me in the phone-call 25/1, that it had been investigated if
the staff were rude.
Because this was not what I had complained about at all.
So to me, it didn’t seem that my complaint had been investigated, like it shouldhave been.
Yet, your team-manager, insisted that the investigation mirrored the letter I sent
on 9/1.
Even if the complaint-file was closed the same day, before the letter was recievedby Burger King, and even if Jo herself, said that it had been investigated if the
staff were rude.
And this, if the staff were rude, were not being brought up in the letter at all.
So I think it was a bit strange that Jo, insisited that your representative Louise,hadn’t corrupted the investigaton, or misunderstood, even if it was obvious to
me, that the investigation didn’t mirror the letter I sent on 9/1 at all.
Like your Team Manager Jo, claimed that it did.
So I was wondering a bit, if this shouldn’t maybe be had a look upon.
It seemed to me, a bit, like the Team Manager, was maybe covering up a bit,
for mistakes done by your customer services representative Louise, and your
Team Manager, wouldn’t admit that it could seem like there could have been
some mistakes conducted during the investigation.
So I think this seemed a bit strange, that the Team Manager was insisting that
the investigation mirrored the letter, even if it was obvious to me, that it didn’t.
So I think this should maybe be had a look upon.
The Team Manager and myself, agreed that an investigation, surrounding if
a criminal network or not, were involved in the incident on boxing day, should
be investigated by the Police, and not by Burger King.
We agreed on this, since Jo told me that Burger King wouldn’t investigate this,since she thought it was a matter for the Police.
And she explained that Burger King would not contact the Police, (due to somecompany policy or something like that, it could seem to me from how she
explained it), but that this was my preogative, she said.
So I have contacted the Police regarding the incident on Boxing Day, but I
think that maybe also the actions from your Customer Service Representative,
and also Team Manager, should maybe be had a looked on, since it seems
a bit to me, that there could have been some corruption of the investigation,
and also covering up, going on.
And I don’t think it’s right that one as a customer at Burger King, should be
subject to customer support of belove standard quality, so this is why I’m
complaining about this, having worked with customer support for many
years myself in many different food-stores and also as a Customer Service
Representative answering calls on behalf of Microsoft etc.
And could also maybe seem that your staff could maybe be a bit involved in
covering up the episode at Burger King on boxing day, I think, from the
mistakes in the investigation, and from what which could maybe, a bit, be
seen as covering up by your Team Manager.
So I hope you have the chance to look at this in a responsible way!
I’ll enclose copies of the mentioned documents.
Hope this is alright, and thank you very much for your help in advance!
Yours sincerely,Erik Ribsskog
-
Message board posting, 36 milliarder grunner til at Orkla faller, 6/2. (In Norwegian).
Kvalitet på kjøttblanding på Grandiosa 2
cons
06/02 19:05
Det virker som om den vanlige Grandiosaen, produsert på Stranda, ikke gikk gjennom den svenske statlige matvarekontrollen, altså tilsvaret mattilsynet i Norge. Her er en link med en kopi av en e-post jeg sendte Stein Erik Hagen, tidligere i år, så får vi se om det dukker opp noe svar da: https://johncons-blogg.net/2008/01/svar-p-brev.html
Anmeldinnlegg
Kvalitet på kjøttblandinen på Grandiosa?
cons
06/02 19:04
Jeg lurer på om det kan også være noe med at kvaltieten på kjøttblandingen på Pizza Grandiosa, ikke vel er helt god antagelig, i allefall er det tvil om hva den består av. Altså hvilket pattedyr som brukes, kan man vel lure på, siden svenskene ikke selger vanlig Grandiosa lenger. -
Enclosure 8, letter to McDonalds, 6/2.
From: postmaster@agilisys.co.uk System Administrator
To: eribsskog@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 14:26:48 +0000
Subject: Undeliverable: Fwd: Complaint – Food PoisoningYour message
To: customerservices@mcdonalds.co.uk
Subject: Fwd: Complaint – Food Poisoning
Sent: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 14:27:44 -0000did not reach the following recipient(s):
customerservices@mcdonalds.co.uk on Wed, 9 Jan 2008 14:26:45 -0000
Unable to deliver the message due to a communications failure
The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=us;a=
;p=netdecisions;l=UKLDNBH010801091426ZWTYKQ3Y
MSEXCH:IMS:Netdecisions:NETDECISIONS:UKLDNBH01 0 (00120345) Too Many
Hops -
Enclosure 7, letter to McDonalds, 6/2.
From: eribsskog@gmail.com Erik Ribsskog
To: customerservices@mcdonalds.co.uk
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 14:27:44 +0000
Subject: Fwd: Complaint – Food Poisoning———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Dec 23, 2007 8:11 AM
Subject: Fwd: Complaint – Food Poisoning
To: customerservices@mcdonalds.co.uk———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Dec 10, 2007 12:08 PM
Subject: Fwd: Complaint – Food Poisoning
To: customerservices@mcdonalds.co.ukHi,
I got an error-message with this e-mail, so I’m trying to send it again.
Yours sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog < eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Dec 10, 2007 12:03 PM
Subject: Complaint – Food Poisoning
To: customerservices@mcdonalds.co.ukHi,
I think I must have been food-poisoned at your resturant in Lord St. in
Liverpool, the
day before yesterday.I’ve explained about this on my blog, so I’m going to link to the blog,
since I’m still
not feeling very good, so I’m just linking it to the blog:https://johncons-blogg.net/2007/12/big-mac.html
and
https://johncons-blogg.net/2007/12/big-mac-ii.html
So I was wondering if I could please complain about this formally.
And I hope very much that you have the chance to deal with a responsible
way!Thank you very much for you help in advance!
Yours sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog








