johncons

Stikkord: E-post

  • Jeg sendte en ny e-post til Akademikerforbundet


    Gmail – Invitasjon til medlemskveld for Region Øst






    Gmail

    Erik Ribsskog
    <eribsskog@gmail.com>






    Invitasjon til medlemskveld for Region Øst





    Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 2:50 PM



    To:
    Ane Nyrud Dreyer <ane.n.dreyer@akademikerforbundet.no>

    Cc:
    alfred.sorbo@akademikerforbundet.no






    Hei,

    hva skal dette bety? Jeg bor i utlandet og ikke øst-Norge? Hvorfor svarer dere ikke på klagen min som jeg har sendt dere på hu skrulla hos dere, (Nyen), som finner opp egne regler for meg?
     Erik Ribsskog
    2013/9/18 Ane Nyrud Dreyer <ane.n.dreyer@akademikerforbundet.no>
    Kjære medlemmer i Akademikerforbundet Region Øst,

    se vedlagt invitasjon til medlemsmøte.
    Påmeldingsfrist er 3. oktober.

    Vel møtt!
    Med vennlig hilsen

    http://www.akademikerforbundet.no/sfiles/4/90/1/picture/signaturlogo.png
    Ane Nyrud Dreyer
    Konsulent Akademikerforbundet / Tollbugt. 35 / 0157 Oslo
    Telefon: 21 02 33 66 / Faks: 21 02 33 61 / Mobil: 957 06 112
    cid:image002.jpg@01CDFF9F.8CDFC2D0


  • Jeg sendte enda en e-post til the Post Office


    Gmail – RE: Post Office Ref: 1-2609935163






    Gmail

    Erik Ribsskog
    <eribsskog@gmail.com>






    RE: Post Office Ref: 1-2609935163





    Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 2:19 PM



    To:
    “customercare@postoffice.co.uk” <customercare@postoffice.co.uk>






    Hi again,
    the reason I want these certificates of posting is that I read, (in 2010 when I started the business), that one could get compensation, if packets are lost in the post, with these certificates.

    The compensation was then up to £30-40, as I remember it.

    It seems from your web-site that its now just £20.

    The branch manager ridiculed me when I mentioned that I wanted the certificate, to ‘insure’ the packet.
    Since the ‘insurance-amount’ was only: ‘that’s only about twenty pounds’.
    (Like he said).

    So you’ve halfed the ‘insurance-amount’, since 2010, it seems.
    And you ridicule the customers who wants to have this ‘insurance’.

    It’s inpolite and more or less hostile, from the Post Office, I think. Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 12:34 PM
    Subject: Fwd: Post Office Ref: 1-2609935163
    To: “customercare@postoffice.co.uk” <customercare@postoffice.co.uk>
    Hi,

    I’m refering to your letter from 17/9, which I received today.
    The Post Office told me in an e-mail from 15/8 that I could use the Bulk Certificate of Posting, for as little as one customer/item.
    Yet, when I try to do this, they refuse to stamp the form.
    They’ve also earlier refused to issue me with certificates of posting, (even the manual ones), when I’ve sent packets from my web-shop, from this Post Office.
    Yet, you don’t give me a voucher, as an apology, since you have failed to give me good customer service and since you have given me the wrong information.
    Or have you?
    Is it so that Bulk Certificate of Posting-forms can’t be used for only one customer/item? Was the Branch Manager wrong? If so, why don’t you teach your staff about all your different forms? You also have a fourth Certificate of Posting, I remember, that is printed by PayPal, when one buy PayPal-stamps. Your website only seem to explain about one type, (the bulk one): http://www.royalmail.com/personal/help-and-support/online-postage-what-is-a-certificate-of-posting
    Why don’t you inform about all the different types of Certificates of Posting, on your website? It seems like you’re run by the mafia, (or something), when you don’t give compensation/vouchers, when you ‘mess up’, like this.
    Could you please escalate to your line-manager? Your letter is also sloppy, with different left margins. And you say all types of Certificates of Posting are normally used when sending a high number of items? Surely thats just right for the bulk one? And you write that this is something I feel? This is something you’ve written to me in e-mails that I can use the Bulk certificates for only one item.
    And you say this is something I feel? Paula Loach from the Post Office wrote to me on 6/9, (about the Branch Manager): ‘He explained that he associates the Bulk Certificate of Posting for customer posting several mail items’.
    But is he right or wrong? This isn’t about my feelings, I think.

    This is about that the Branch Manager isn’t sure about how to deal with Bulk Certificate of Posting-forms.
    You have told me on 15/8, in an e-mail that I can use these forms, for as little as one item. But the Branch Manager ‘associates’ in a special type of way. What was right here? Was the information you gave me on 15/8 right? Or was the association made by the Branch Manager right? Why do you give me information, (that I can use those forms for only one item), that you haven’t told the Post Office-staff? Is this just to ridicule me since my business isn’t that big yet, and I sometimes only post one item? I must have bought stamps from you for around a thousand pounds now. When you treat your customers like this, they start to hope that the Post Office gets more competition. Then I wonder if e.g. the Danish Post Office are going to open branches in the UK, since its now the EU.

    Please be so kind as to escalate this to your line-manager so that he/she can have a look at this and perhaps explain about this a bit clearer.

    And perhaps give some type of compensation to me, in a ‘western’ way, and not like in communist-Russia, where they didn’t treat customers that fine, I think.
    (Much like the Post Office, one could say, I think). Erik Ribsskog
    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: customercare@postoffice.co.uk <customercare@postoffice.co.uk>
    Date: Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 8:20 AM
    Subject: RE: Post Office Ref: 1-2609935163
    To: eribsskog@gmail.com
    Dear Mr Ribsskog


    Thank you for your email, which I have passed to our Customer Care Team who were dealing with your complaint.


    If you need to contact us, please phone us on the number shown below quoting the above reference number. Or you can email us via customercare@postoffice.co.uk


    Kind regards


    Kevin Storr

    Customer Service Advisor.


    Telephone: 08457 22 33 44

    Textphone : 08457 22 33 55 (For the Deaf and Hard of Hearing)



    —— ORIGINAL MESSAGE —–
    FROM: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    TO: “customercare@postoffice.co.uk” <customercare@postoffice.co.uk>
    SENT: 30 August 2013 18:35:30 (GMT Standard Time) 
    Hi,
    today I was at the Post Office in Winslow St. / County Rd., again. I had brought my Bulk Certificate of Posting. The man there, (in his 50’s), refused to stamp the Certificate of
    Posting, that I’d made. He just made a ‘proof of posting’. I wanted a ‘Certificate of Posting’. Why do you operate with both certificates and proofs of posting? Is it to confuse the custommers? When I lived in Sunderland, I got something called ‘Horizon
    Certificate of Posting’. Then next time I go there, I’m going to print out your e-mail, from
    15/8, and show them that the form I made can be used for as little as
    one custommer. The post-office man today said it was only if I wanted to send ‘many
    letters’. I get annoyed, it’s like the Post Office is just telling me a lot of
    different lies everytime I go there. This doesn’t add up. I try to run a web-shop fine and I get cr*p like this. It’s a scandal I think. Erik Ribsskog PS. I attach what I got today. It seems your staff doesn’t want to serve me, and make certificates of
    posting. Is it because then you think you can ‘mess’ with the packets, if I
    don’t have the certificates?
    On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Paula Loach <paula.loach@royalmail.com>
    wrote:
    > Customer Service Centre
    > PO Box 740
    > Brampton
    > BARNSLEY
    > S73 0ZJ
    > Tel 0845 722 33 44
    > Fax 01226 273690
    > Textphone (for people who are deaf
    > or hard of hearing) 08457 22 33 55
    > Email customercare@postoffice.co.uk
    >
    > Ref: 1-2609935163
    >
    >
    >
    > Date: 15 August 2013
    >
    >
    > Dear Mr Ribsskog
    >
    >
    >
    > Thank you for your email dated 14 August 2013.
    >
    >
    >
    > I understand you would like to know if you are able to use the online
    Bulk
    > Certificate of Posting form for each individual customer.  I confirm that
    > this form can be used from 1 to 30 customers, there is no minimum
    > requirement.
    >
    > It may help if I explain that you can also print an individual
    Certificate
    > of Posting once you have bought a postage label by Royal Mail Online
    Postage
    > or through eBay. The certificate needs to be stamped by Post Office staff
    to
    > be a valid proof of postage.
    >
    >
    >
    > I do hope that the above information will be of assistance.
    >
    >
    >
    > If we can be of any further assistance please do not hesitate to contact
    us
    > again by emailing customercare@postoffice.co.uk or by clicking reply to
    this
    > message.
    >
    > Yours sincerely
    >
    > Paula Loach
    >
    > Paula Loach
    > Customer Care
    > Telephone: 08457 22 33 44
    > Textphone: 08457 22 33 55 (For the deaf and Hard of Hearing)
    > Email address: customercare@postoffice.co.uk
    >
    > If you have difficulty reading this e-mail, it is available in a
    different
    > format free of charge. Just telephone 08457 22 33 44
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > ________________________________
    > **********************************************************************
    > This email and any attachments are confidential and intended for the
    > addressee only. If you are not the named recipient, you must not use,
    > disclose, reproduce, copy or distribute the contents of this
    communication.
    > If you have received this in error, please contact the sender and then
    > delete this email from your system.
    >
    > ROYAL MAIL GROUP LIMITED registered in England and Wales at 100 VICTORIA
    > EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0HQ with the registered company number 04138203
    >
    > **********************************************************************
    (See attached file: proof of posting.jpg) ***********************************************************************
    This email and any attachments are confidential and intended for the
    addressee only. If you are not the named recipient, you must not use,
    disclose, reproduce, copy or distribute the contents of this communication.
    If you have received this in error, please contact the sender and then
    delete this email from your system. ROYAL MAIL GROUP LIMITED registered in England and Wales at 100 VICTORIA
    EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0HQ with the registered company number 04138203 POST OFFICE LIMITED registered in England and Wales at 148 OLD STREET,
    LONDON  EC1V 9HQ with the registered company number 02154540 **********************************************************************


    2 attachments
    post office 1.jpg
    126K
    post office 2.jpg
    46K

  • Jeg sendte en ny e-post til the Post Office


    Gmail – RE: Post Office Ref: 1-2609935163






    Gmail

    Erik Ribsskog
    <eribsskog@gmail.com>






    RE: Post Office Ref: 1-2609935163





    Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 12:34 PM



    To:
    “customercare@postoffice.co.uk” <customercare@postoffice.co.uk>






    Hi,

    I’m refering to your letter from 17/9, which I received today.
    The Post Office told me in an e-mail from 15/8 that I could use the Bulk Certificate of Posting, for as little as one customer/item.
     Yet, when I try to do this, they refuse to stamp the form.
    They’ve also earlier refused to issue me with certificates of posting, (even the manual ones), when I’ve sent packets from my web-shop, from this Post Office.
    Yet, you don’t give me a voucher, as an apology, since you have failed to give me good customer service and since you have given me the wrong information.
    Or have you?

    Is it so that Bulk Certificate of Posting-forms can’t be used for only one customer/item? Was the Branch Manager wrong? If so, why don’t you teach your staff about all your different forms? You also have a fourth Certificate of Posting, I remember, that is printed by PayPal, when one buy PayPal-stamps. Your website only seem to explain about one type, (the bulk one): http://www.royalmail.com/personal/help-and-support/online-postage-what-is-a-certificate-of-posting
    Why don’t you inform about all the different types of Certificates of Posting, on your website? It seems like you’re run by the mafia, (or something), when you don’t give compensation/vouchers, when you ‘mess up’, like this.
    Could you please escalate to your line-manager? Your letter is also sloppy, with different left margins. And you say all types of Certificates of Posting are normally used when sending a high number of items? Surely thats just right for the bulk one? And you write that this is something I feel? This is something you’ve written to me in e-mails that I can use the Bulk certificates for only one item.

    And you say this is something I feel? Paula Loach from the Post Office wrote to me on 6/9, (about the Branch Manager): ‘He explained that he associates the Bulk Certificate of Posting for customer posting several mail items’.
    But is he right or wrong? This isn’t about my feelings, I think.

    This is about that the Branch Manager isn’t sure about how to deal with Bulk Certificate of Posting-forms.
    You have told me on 15/8, in an e-mail that I can use these forms, for as little as one item. But the Branch Manager ‘associates’ in a special type of way. What was right here? Was the information you gave me on 15/8 right? Or was the association made by the Branch Manager right? Why do you give me information, (that I can use those forms for only one item), that you haven’t told the Post Office-staff? Is this just to ridicule me since my business isn’t that big yet, and I sometimes only post one item? I must have bought stamps from you for around a thousand pounds now. When you treat your customers like this, they start to hope that the Post Office gets more competition. Then I wonder if e.g. the Danish Post Office are going to open branches in the UK, since its now the EU.

    Please be so kind as to escalate this to your line-manager so that he/she can have a look at this and perhaps explain about this a bit clearer.

    And perhaps give some type of compensation to me, in a ‘western’ way, and not like in communist-Russia, where they didn’t treat customers that fine, I think.
    (Much like the Post Office, one could say, I think). Erik Ribsskog
    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: customercare@postoffice.co.uk <customercare@postoffice.co.uk>
    Date: Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 8:20 AM
    Subject: RE: Post Office Ref: 1-2609935163
    To: eribsskog@gmail.com
    Dear Mr Ribsskog


    Thank you for your email, which I have passed to our Customer Care Team who were dealing with your complaint.


    If you need to contact us, please phone us on the number shown below quoting the above reference number. Or you can email us via customercare@postoffice.co.uk


    Kind regards


    Kevin Storr

    Customer Service Advisor.


    Telephone: 08457 22 33 44

    Textphone : 08457 22 33 55 (For the Deaf and Hard of Hearing)



    —— ORIGINAL MESSAGE —–
    FROM: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    TO: “customercare@postoffice.co.uk” <customercare@postoffice.co.uk>
    SENT: 30 August 2013 18:35:30 (GMT Standard Time) 
    Hi,
    today I was at the Post Office in Winslow St. / County Rd., again. I had brought my Bulk Certificate of Posting. The man there, (in his 50’s), refused to stamp the Certificate of
    Posting, that I’d made. He just made a ‘proof of posting’. I wanted a ‘Certificate of Posting’. Why do you operate with both certificates and proofs of posting? Is it to confuse the custommers? When I lived in Sunderland, I got something called ‘Horizon
    Certificate of Posting’. Then next time I go there, I’m going to print out your e-mail, from
    15/8, and show them that the form I made can be used for as little as
    one custommer. The post-office man today said it was only if I wanted to send ‘many
    letters’. I get annoyed, it’s like the Post Office is just telling me a lot of
    different lies everytime I go there. This doesn’t add up. I try to run a web-shop fine and I get cr*p like this. It’s a scandal I think. Erik Ribsskog PS. I attach what I got today. It seems your staff doesn’t want to serve me, and make certificates of
    posting. Is it because then you think you can ‘mess’ with the packets, if I
    don’t have the certificates?
    On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Paula Loach <paula.loach@royalmail.com>
    wrote:
    > Customer Service Centre
    > PO Box 740
    > Brampton
    > BARNSLEY
    > S73 0ZJ
    > Tel 0845 722 33 44
    > Fax 01226 273690
    > Textphone (for people who are deaf
    > or hard of hearing) 08457 22 33 55
    > Email customercare@postoffice.co.uk
    >
    > Ref: 1-2609935163
    >
    >
    >
    > Date: 15 August 2013
    >
    >
    > Dear Mr Ribsskog
    >
    >
    >
    > Thank you for your email dated 14 August 2013.
    >
    >
    >
    > I understand you would like to know if you are able to use the online
    Bulk
    > Certificate of Posting form for each individual customer.  I confirm that
    > this form can be used from 1 to 30 customers, there is no minimum
    > requirement.
    >
    > It may help if I explain that you can also print an individual
    Certificate
    > of Posting once you have bought a postage label by Royal Mail Online
    Postage
    > or through eBay. The certificate needs to be stamped by Post Office staff
    to
    > be a valid proof of postage.
    >
    >
    >
    > I do hope that the above information will be of assistance.
    >
    >
    >
    > If we can be of any further assistance please do not hesitate to contact
    us
    > again by emailing customercare@postoffice.co.uk or by clicking reply to
    this
    > message.
    >
    > Yours sincerely
    >
    > Paula Loach
    >
    > Paula Loach
    > Customer Care
    > Telephone: 08457 22 33 44
    > Textphone: 08457 22 33 55 (For the deaf and Hard of Hearing)
    > Email address: customercare@postoffice.co.uk
    >
    > If you have difficulty reading this e-mail, it is available in a
    different
    > format free of charge. Just telephone 08457 22 33 44
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > ________________________________
    > **********************************************************************
    > This email and any attachments are confidential and intended for the
    > addressee only. If you are not the named recipient, you must not use,
    > disclose, reproduce, copy or distribute the contents of this
    communication.
    > If you have received this in error, please contact the sender and then
    > delete this email from your system.
    >
    > ROYAL MAIL GROUP LIMITED registered in England and Wales at 100 VICTORIA
    > EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0HQ with the registered company number 04138203
    >
    > **********************************************************************
    (See attached file: proof of posting.jpg) ***********************************************************************
    This email and any attachments are confidential and intended for the
    addressee only. If you are not the named recipient, you must not use,
    disclose, reproduce, copy or distribute the contents of this communication.
    If you have received this in error, please contact the sender and then
    delete this email from your system. ROYAL MAIL GROUP LIMITED registered in England and Wales at 100 VICTORIA
    EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0HQ with the registered company number 04138203 POST OFFICE LIMITED registered in England and Wales at 148 OLD STREET,
    LONDON  EC1V 9HQ with the registered company number 02154540 **********************************************************************


    2 attachments
    post office 1.jpg
    126K
    post office 2.jpg
    46K
    PS. Her er vedleggene: post office 1 post office 2

  • Jeg sendte en ny e-post til Wescot


    Gmail – Your letter from 7/9/Fwd: Wescot Response 49597867 RE: Correspondence Reply






    Gmail

    Erik Ribsskog
    <eribsskog@gmail.com>






    Your letter from 7/9/Fwd: Wescot Response 49597867 RE: Correspondence Reply





    Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 11:50 AM



    To:
    offers <offers@wescot.co.uk>






    Hi,
    my date of birth is 25/7/70.

    Which part of the Data Protection Act are you refering to?
    It this something new you’ve started with? You normally just ask for the reference-number, (which I’ve provided), I think.
     Regards, Erik Ribsskog
    On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 11:06 AM, offers <offers@wescot.co.uk> wrote:




    Dear Mr Ribsskog


    Wescot Reference: DM/472365139

    Further to your recent email.  
    We acknowledge your comments and would like to confirm that Wescot always attempt to respond as quickly as possible.
    In order to proceed with your enquiry, please confirm your date of birth for security purposes and to prevent a breach of the Data Protection Act.

     

    Please accept our apologies for any inconvenience you may have been caused whilst contacting us.


    Yours sincerely


    Sarah Stark

    Account Controller







    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 13 September 2013 22:25
    To: Contact Us
    Subject: Your letter from 7/9/Fwd: Wescot Response 49597867 RE: Correspondence Reply


    Hi

    I’m refering to your letter from 7/9, (with Wescot reference 472365139), which I received today and which I attach a scanned copy of.


    I’ve earlier informed you that I’m unemployed and only can afford to pay you token-payments until I find new employment.

    I have unfortunately not found new employment, (even if I apply for new jobs every day), but I hope to find a new job soon. In the mean-time I can unfortunately only repeat my offer of one pound monthly token-payments.


    (Like I have agreed with you earlier).

    This is also what I pay my other creditors, by the way. But I’m going to pay you more, and contact you about this, as soon as possible, when I get a new job. Hope this is alright! Yours sincerely, Erik Ribsskog




    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Contact Us <contactus@wescot.co.uk>
    Date: Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 8:27 AM
    Subject: Wescot Response 49597867 RE: Correspondence Reply
    To: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    02 November 2012


    Dear Mr Ribsskog


    Further to your recent email, I am sorry to note there appears to be some confusion over the account. To resolve this and offer a detailed explanation I have referred the points you have raised to our client
    and we are currently awaiting an update from them.

    I trust the above answers your query and I apologise you had to contact us again to confirm the details.



    Yours sincerely


    Funmi Olugbenga-Dada

    Account Controller


    email:   
    contactus@wescot.co.uk

    Description: untitled




    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2012 3:29 PM
    To: Contact Us
    Cc: Q&A
    Subject: Re: Wescot ResponseRE: Correspondence Reply


    Hi,



    I have explained that in the e-mail where you have highlighted a sentence in red.


    That your partner Capital One told me last year my signature wasn’t mine.


    And that you this year have lied about me not replying to your correspondence.


    And that you have made me waste my time since your partner Capital One and yourselves haven’t been able to accept my token-payment-offer like other companies like Swalec, DML and United Utilities have accepted,
    almost a year ago.


    This is sabotage, I think.


    I suspect you and Capital One have a secret agenda here.


    And you really should contact your English-teacher about this.


    Because I get anoyed when I have to explain the same again and again.


    And it’s a saying you have here in the UK, which says it’s no excuse for ignorance.


    So eighter you’re ignorant or slow.


    So I think you should perhaps find another job.


    Like putting spread on sandwiches, or something like that.


    Just an advice.


    Best regards,


    Erik Ribsskog



    On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Contact Us <contactus@wescot.co.uk> wrote:



    Date 30th October 2012


    Dear Mr Ribsskog


    Further to your recent email regarding your email below. I acknowledge your comments and would like to confirm that Wescot always attempt to respond with an explanation
    or resolution as quickly as possible.

    Please advise as to why this account would be deleted, we have no details in regards to a query for this account. If you believe this balance is not due we would require
    the full details of dispute on this account. Which would allow us to investigate your query with our client.

    Please accept my apologies for any inconvenience you may have been caused whilst contacting us.


    Yours sincerely


    Ms H Thundercliffe

    Accounts Controller


    Description: image002


    Registered in Scotland No. SC84131, Registered Office: Kyleshill House, 1 Glencairn Street, Saltcoats, Ayrshire KA21 5JT



    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 30 October 2012 14:54
    To: Contact Us
    Subject: Re: Correspondence Reply

    Hi,



    this about that my debt has been deleted is something I’m still looking forward to hearing from you about.


    Perhaps you should ask your old English-teacher for advice as to what my writings meant.

    Best regards,

    Erik Ribsskog



    On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Contact Us <contactus@wescot.co.uk> wrote:



    Date 30th October 2012


    Dear Mr Ribsskog


    Further to your recent email regarding the below account. I acknowledge your comments and would like to confirm that Wescot always attempt to respond with an explanation
    or resolution as quickly as possible.

    In your email below you have you look forward to hearing that this debt has been deleted. Please could you advise further on this, as we haveno details in regards to
    the balance being deleted.

    Please accept my apologies for any inconvenience you may have been caused whilst contacting us.


    Yours sincereley



    Ms H Thundercliffe

    Accounts Controller


    Description: image002



    Registered in Scotland No. SC84131, Registered Office: Kyleshill House, 1 Glencairn Street, Saltcoats, Ayrshire KA21 5JT



    From: Erik Ribsskog
    [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com] Sent: 19 October 2012 10:40

    To: Correspondence Queries
    Cc: offers
    Subject: Re: Correspondence Reply




    Hi,



    ok, I don’t think I have gotten their sort-code and account-number.


    Do you know this?


    I also sent you an update, on Saturday, after the e-mail you replied to now.


    I’ll paste that in this e-mail now.

    Best regards,

    Erik Ribsskog


    PS.


    Here’s the update e-mail from Saturday:

    Hi,


    I got a new income and expenditure-form in the post from you today.


    From 11/10, with the reference D3/49597867.


    I contacted your partned Capital One last automn, regarding my new budget.



    I offered you a token-payment-agreement on £1 a month, untill I got a full-time-job.



    Capital One told me my signature wasn’t mine, so this process have stalled, since last year.



    Now you get back to me.



    I’m still unemployed but I’m trying to set a business up, on my spare-time.



    And the Jobcentre is ‘messing’ with my jobseekers allowance.



    So at the moment, I have to say I don’t have any income.


    I could get back to you when I get the jobseekers allowance back.



    And then I would offer you the same as last time, £1 a month in token-payments.



    I’ve since last year gotten a flat witch was unfurnitured.

    So any money I have left after token-payments each month I now buy furniture and other things for the flat with.




    And I was going to set up a new budget, when I got a full-time job.


    And I’m going to do that.



    But I don’t think it’s right that I have to set up a new budget now, because your partner said my signature wasn’t mine, and didn’t accept my new budget, last year.




    This has taken so much of my time now, so you should really just delete the debt, I think.



    I’m on Ladders, so I have a high income-potential.



    All the hours I’ve spent on you and Captial One should add up to arround the debt I owe you, I think.




    So I’m looking forward to hearing from you that my debt with you has been deleted! Hope this is alright! Best regards,



    Erik Ribsskog





    On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Correspondence Queries <client@cccs.co.uk> wrote:



    Good morning Erik,


    Thank you for contacting us about Wescot.


    To make token payments to Wescot you do not need to fill in a giro slip. All you need is their sort code and account number and also the Wescot reference
    number starting with DM or D3. You then need to go into your bank and ask them to send £1 payment to Wescot by bank transfer. They may reject the offer of payment but they won’t reject the £1 payment you send and this will reduce the debt in time.

    If you need any advice then please do not hesitate to call us.


    Kind regards


    Faye

    Correspondence Advisor


    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 12 October 2012 16:13
    To: Correspondence Queries
    Cc: offers
    Subject: Re: Update/Fwd: *****7867/Fwd: CCCS

    Hi,



    thank you for your e-mail!

    I’m not paying token-payments at the moment.

    Wescot have sent me a budget-form again now.

    But as your collegue there have previously told me I don’t have to fill out this form to get token-payments. It should be enought that I’ve explained about my situation.


    I’ve offered Wescot a token-payment-arrangement like a ‘million’ times.

    But they haven’t sent me giros or anything.

    And this is taking a lot of my time now.


    Because I’ve been offering Wescot, (and Capital One), a token-payment-arrangement since last year now.

    And all I get are standard letters which tells lies like that I haven’t replied to their letters.

    When I’ve sent about a million e-mails to them, which I haven’t gotten replies to.

    So I now copy this e-mail to Wescot.

    And I hope they’ll send me some giros for the token-payment arrangement of £1 a month now.

    Or tell me what information they need from me to set up a direct-debit-agreement.


    So I hope this will be sorted now.

    Thanks again for the e-mail! Best regards,

    Erik Ribsskog



    On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 8:07 AM, Correspondence Queries <client@cccs.co.uk> wrote:



    Hello Eric


    Thank you for copying us in to the email you have sent to Wescot.


    Please try not to worry about the contact you have received as this is a standard procedure for creditors to take. Nelson Guest & Partners
    are an internal collections department who work on behalf of Wescot to collect the outstanding balance.

    As you have contacted this creditor to advise of your current financial situation and are making token payments, you are doing all you
    can at this time. If you receive any further contact regarding this matter, please advise of this.

    I hope this is helpful and reassuring.


    If you have any queries or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact us on  0845 272 5400. Lines are open 8am to 6pm, Monday
    to Friday. Email us at
    client.services@cccs.co.uk
    or go online to www.cccs.co.uk
    and follow the links to send us a web mail.                                                    

    Kind regards


    Hannah

    Correspondence Advisor



    From: Erik Ribsskog
    [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com] Sent: 08 October 2012 01:14
    To: offers@wescot.co.uk
    Cc: Q&A
    Subject: Update/Fwd: *****7867/Fwd: CCCS


    Hi,



    on Saturday I got a letter from Nelson Guest & Partners Solicitiors, witch I attach a scanned copy of.

    I’m don’t have the chance to pay 50% of the dept, av the moment, unfortunately.

    I’m repeating my offer of a token-payment-arrangement again.


    (Which I’ve done many times earlier).


    I hope you can ‘stop messing around’ now, (like I think I have to call it), and just accept my token-payment-offer, like the other companies have done.


    I don’t understand why you do so much ‘mumbo-jumbo’ surrounding this.

    This should be a straight forward tokey-payment agreement.


    I hope the CCCS can tell you to stop with your funny letters and just accept my token-payment-agreement, which I have offered you, a million times, (to exaggerate, but anyway).

    Captial One even have a football-cup named after you, but you don’t seem to be a serious company.

    It’s like being on the candid camera to try get a token-payment-agreement agreed with you.

    Erik





    ———- Forwarded message ———-



    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 3:32 PM
    Subject: Re: *****7867/Fwd: CCCS
    To: offers <offers@wescot.co.uk>
    Cc: Q&A <contactus@cccs.co.uk>
    Hi,




    it should be D3/49597867, (like I wrote in the subject-line in the e-mail I sent you on 20/9).


    I repeat my token-payment offer on £1 a month, like I offer all my other creditors untill I find new employment.



    Hope this is alright!

    Best regards,


    Erik Ribsskog






    On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 8:30 AM, offers <offers@wescot.co.uk> wrote:



    Good morning,


    Please provide the wescot reference beginning with D3 or DM


    Kind regards






    Rebecca Stearman

    Offers Administrator


    email:  
    offers@wescot.co.uk

    Description: Description: Description: cid:image001.jpg@01CA4CD1.636A7F00



    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 28 September 2012 14:34
    To: Correspondence Queries
    Cc: offers
    Subject: Re: *****7867/Fwd: CCCS



    Hi,



    thank you for your e-mail!

    Yes, I send a copy of this e-mail to Wescot as a reminder of my token-payment-offer, of one pound a month untill I find new employement.

    I thought it was like you write here, with the budget-form etc., from when I went to business-school, in the eighties.

    Even if that was in Norway, I think business-law is mostly the same in the western world.

    Mostly based on old British business-law, if I’m not mistaking.


    Thank you very much for the help with this!

    The information I sent to Capital One was a new token payment-offer after I had to move to Sunderland for some months last year.

    If I remember it right.

    I now found a letter on my blog, from Capital One, from 2009, when they also complained about my signature, (so this has happened in both 2009 and 2011), which I attach.


    Thanks again for the advice!

    Best regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Correspondence Queries <client@cccs.co.uk> wrote:




    Hi Erick


    Thank you for your email about your Wescot and Capital One accounts.


    If you have concerns over the wording of the letter from Wescot, I would advise you to raise a complaint directly with them.


    The complaint procedure can take up to 8 weeks and if you are unhappy with any response they give you, you can raise this further with the financial ombudsman service.


    You don’t need to fill out the budget form that Wescot have sent you. You have advised them that you have already completed a budget with us. Both forms cover the
    same areas. If you need a copy of the budget that you completed with us, please let me know as I can send this out to you. The budget can also be sent to Capital One.

    I wouldn’t advise you to stop making payments towards the Wescot account. It is in your best interest and benefit that you carry on making a token payment. It will
    show that you are willing to pay the account off.

    If you don’t make a payment, the creditor can take further action.


    I understand you would like to keep the contact in writing but it is also best that you call them to discuss your concerns. This will eliminate any responses about
    them not receiving your letters.

    You can ask for a Data Access Request from them which will provide you with all the notes made on your account. There may be a charge for this request.


    Can you advise me what information you sent to Capital One for them to reject your signature? If your signature hasn’t changed, I would advise you to contact Capital
    One and ask for a further explanation, i.e. are they comparing your signature to the signature on the original credit agreement?

    Again, you can ask for a Data Access Request to see what has been noted on your account and there may be a charge for this request.


    I hope this has been helpful.


    If you have any further queries, please contact us on 0845 272 5400, lines are open 8am to 6pm, Monday to Friday, you can email us at
    client.service@cccs.co.uk.

    Kind regards





    Paul Marshall

    Correspondence Co-ordinator








    From: Erik
    [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com] Sent: 26 September 2012 00:05
    To: Correspondence Queries
    Subject: Re: *****7867/Fwd: CCCS
    Hi,



    I’ve gone to business-school and letters shouldn’t contain lies even if they are standard letters.


    Here it’s obvious that the standard letter is used wrongly.



    I’m not making a token-payment here, you haven’t read up.


    Please escalate to your line manager.



    Regards,



    Erik Ribsskog


    PS.


    And I don’t think it’s a good idea to call these companies.



    It’s better to keep the correspondence in writing, so to keep documentation about what has been agreed.



    PS 2.



    You haven’t commented on that Capital One told me my signature wasn’t mine.



    I want to please escalate this to your line-manager.




    On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Correspondence Queries <client@cccs.co.uk> wrote:

    Hi Erik

    Thank you for contacting us about your account with Wescot. Creditors will often send standard collection letters out to you. Standard letters will include certain phrases that may not fit entirely, such as “we have not received a reply”. Unfortunately even though you are making a token payment we cannot stop creditors from contacting you. You should continue to keep your creditors up to date with your financial situation and offer them the most fair and reasonable offer you can. It may be best to call your creditors and speak to someone directly. That way all issues can be discussed there and then. If you have any further questions or need some more advise, you can call us on 0845 272 5400. Lines are open from 8am to 6pm, Monday to Friday. You can also email us at
    client.service@cccs.co.uk. Kind regards Gurj
    Correspondence Advisor
    We are altering the way in which we handle your correspondence to ensure we safeguard your personal information at all times. In order for us to do this we will be making some changes to the way in which we validate your identity.
    The next time you contact us, we will require you to provide us with at least 2 pieces of information from the list below: ·         Client reference number
    ·         Postal address
    ·         Postcode
    ·         Telephone number
    ·         Email address Please make sure you provide this information along with your full name on every communication you send to us. If not, we will prompt you for these details and this may delay your reply.
    Thank you The Correspondence Team
    We are altering the way in which we handle your correspondence to ensure we safeguard your personal information at all times.


    In order for us to do this we will be making some changes to the way in which we validate your identity.

    The next time you contact us, we will require you to provide us with at least 2 pieces of information from the list below:


    ·         

    Client reference number
    ·         

    Postal address
    ·         

    Postcode
    ·         

    Telephone number
    ·         

    Email address

    Please make sure you provide this information along with your full name on every communication you send to us. If not, we will prompt you for these
    details and this may delay your reply.


    Thank you


    The Correspondence Team





    Twitter Follow us on Twitter
    http://twitter.com/moneyaware


    Facebook Like us on Facebook
    http://www.facebook.com/moneyaware


    Read the MoneyAware blog

    http://moneyaware.co.uk



    P 

    Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.





    We are altering the way in which we handle your correspondence to ensure we safeguard your personal information at all times.


    In order for us to do this we will be making some changes to the way in which we validate your identity.

    The next time you contact us, we will require you to provide us with at least 2 pieces of information from the list below:


    ·         

    Client reference number
    ·         

    Postal address
    ·         

    Postcode
    ·         

    Telephone number
    ·         

    Email address

    Please make sure you provide this information along with your full name on every communication you send to us. If not, we will prompt you for these
    details and this may delay your reply.


    Thank you


    The Correspondence Team



    We are altering the way in which we handle your correspondence to ensure we safeguard your personal information at all times.


    In order for us to do this we will be making some changes to the way in which we validate your identity.

    The next time you contact us, we will require you to provide us with at least 2 pieces of information from the list below:


    ·         

    Client reference number
    ·         

    Postal address
    ·         

    Postcode
    ·         

    Telephone number
    ·         

    Email address

    Please make sure you provide this information along with your full name on every communication you send to us. If not, we will prompt you for these
    details and this may delay your reply.


    Thank you


    The Correspondence Team































    —–Original Message—–







































    From: Erik ******* [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
    Sent: 20 September 2012 14:41
    To: offers
    Cc: Q&A
    Subject: Your ref: ******7867/Fwd: CCCS Hi, I’m refering to your Final Notice-letter from 17/9, which I recieved today. You there write: ‘but we have not received a replyto our previous correspondence’. But this isn’t right, I’ve earlier written to you e-mails a lot of times offering a token-payment. Is this the Candid Camera? Your partner Capital One also did a practical joke like this, when they told me my signature wasn’t mine last year. Please stop with the monkey-business, and be serious. I hope the CCCS can stop your funny bailiff-actions and lies. Erik ****
    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Q&A <contactus@cccs.co.uk>
    Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 17:37:39 +0100
    Subject: CCCS
    To: Erik******** <eribsskog@gmail.com> Good afternoon Thank you for your email. There isn’t anything in the Consumer credit Act that states you must supply these details to a creditor. You can always provide them a copy of the budget and list of creditors that you have done through us. Regardless of whether they accept the offer or not please continue to make the token payment. Kind regards
    Jonathan  Follow us on Twitter
    http://twitter.com/moneyaware  Like us on Facebook
    http://www.facebook.com/moneyaware  Read the MoneyAware blog
    http://moneyaware.co.uk/ P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. ________________________________
    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
    Sent: 19 August 2012 20:59
    To: Q&A
    Cc: offers@wescot.co.uk
    Subject: Problems with Wescot/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Wescot reference:
    *******867 (Regarding Capital One-debt).
    Hi, I’ve told Wescot I’m unemployed and have offered them a £1 monthly token-payment untill I find new employment. (Like I’ve offered my other creditors). Wescot don’t accept but wants me to fill out an income and expenditure-form. I can’t remember that you at CCCS have mentioned that I have to fill out a form like that, when I do budget-work. It’s like they go a bit to close, and this seems unecessary, to me. What do you think at CCCS about this? Does the law say that I have to fill out a form like that? I attach the letter from Wescot. Yours sincerely, Erik *******
    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 10:35 PM
    Subject: Update/Fwd: Wescot reference: *******867 (Regarding Capital One-debt).
    To: offers@wescot.co.uk
    Hi, I got an income and expenditure-form, in the post, from you, earlier this week. I don’t understand the point in me filling out that form. I’ve already told you that I’m on budget in co-operation, with the CCCS, and that I only can afford to pay a token-payment, (on £1), untill I find new employment. So this is my offer. I don’t understand why you send me this form. I think is unnessesary paper-work then. None of my other creditors have sent me a form like that. They have just accepted my token-payment-offer. So I hope you can set up a direct debit-agreement, for £1 a month, for this debt. Hope this is alright! Best regards, Erik *********
    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 10:31 AM
    Subject: Wescot reference: ******867 (Regarding Capital One-debt).
    To: offers@wescot.co.uk
    Hi, I’m refering to your letter from 19/7, which I got in the post today. I’m currently unemployed, and on a budget in co-operation, with CCCS. My offer to you is the same as to my other creditors, and that is that I pay a one pound token-payment, each month, until I find new employment. Hope this is alright! Yours sincerely, Erik ********
    VISIT OUR WEBSITE AT http://www.cccs.co.uk/
    ———————————————————————
    This email message is intended for the individual to whom it’s addressed
    and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If you are
    not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use or dissemination
    of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information
    in error, please return it to us immediately and delete it from your computer.
    The contents or opinions expressed within this email are not intended to
    represent the views of CCCS unless specifically stated to be so.
    This email is not guaranteed to be free from any computer viruses, although
    it has been checked using the Trend Virus Suite. You should check this email
    and any attachments for the presence of viruses before downloading any files.
    Foundation for Credit Counselling, trading as Consumer Credit Counselling Service (“CCCS”).
    Registered Office: Wade House, Merrion Centre, Leeds, LS2 8NG. Registered in England
    Company No 2757055. Registered Charity No. 1016630″




    VISIT OUR WEBSITE AT

    http://www.cccs.co.uk
    ———————————————————————This email message is intended for the individual to whom it’s addressed
    and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If you are
    not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use or dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information in error, please return it to us immediately and delete it from your computer.

    The contents or opinions expressed within this email are not intended to

    represent the views of CCCS unless specifically stated to be so.


    This email is not guaranteed to be free from any computer viruses, although

    it has been checked using the Trend Virus Suite. You should check this email
    and any attachments for the presence of viruses before downloading any files.


    Foundation for Credit Counselling, trading as Consumer Credit Counselling Service (“CCCS”).

    Registered Office: Wade House, Merrion Centre, Leeds, LS2 8NG. Registered in England Company No 2757055. Registered Charity No. 1016630″



     Registered in Scotland No. SC84131, Registered Office: Kyleshill House, 1 Glencairn Street, Saltcoats, Ayrshire KA21 5JT
    Please consider the environment before printing this email. Wescot, helping to make a difference Confidentiality Notice. The information in this e-mail is confidential and for use by the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient (or responsible for delivery of the message
    to the intended recipient) please notify us immediately (on 01482 590590 (UK) or
    +44 1482 590590 (international)) and delete this message from your computer: you may not copy or forward it, or use or disclose its contents to any other person.
    As Internet communications are capable of data corruption, Wescot Credit Services Ltd does not accept any responsibility for changes made to this message after it was sent. Please notethat Wescot Credit Services Ltd does not accept any liability or responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan attachments (if any). Opinions and views expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and may not reflect the opinions and
    views of Wescot Credit Services Ltd.





    VISIT OUR WEBSITE AT

    http://www.cccs.co.uk
    ———————————————————————This email message is intended for the individual to whom it’s addressed
    and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If you are
    not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use or dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information in error, please return it to us immediately and delete it from your computer.

    The contents or opinions expressed within this email are not intended to

    represent the views of CCCS unless specifically stated to be so.


    This email is not guaranteed to be free from any computer viruses, although

    it has been checked using the Trend Virus Suite. You should check this email
    and any attachments for the presence of viruses before downloading any files.


    Foundation for Credit Counselling, trading as Consumer Credit Counselling Service (“CCCS”).

    Registered Office: Wade House, Merrion Centre, Leeds, LS2 8NG. Registered in England Company No 2757055. Registered Charity No. 1016630″




    VISIT OUR WEBSITE AT

    http://www.cccs.co.uk
    ———————————————————————This email message is intended for the individual to whom it’s addressed
    and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If you are
    not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use or dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information in error, please return it to us immediately and delete it from your computer.

    The contents or opinions expressed within this email are not intended to

    represent the views of CCCS unless specifically stated to be so.


    This email is not guaranteed to be free from any computer viruses, although

    it has been checked using the Trend Virus Suite. You should check this email
    and any attachments for the presence of viruses before downloading any files.


    Foundation for Credit Counselling, trading as Consumer Credit Counselling Service (“CCCS”).

    Registered Office: Wade House, Merrion Centre, Leeds, LS2 8NG. Registered in England Company No 2757055. Registered Charity No. 1016630″



    Registered in Scotland No. SC84131, Registered Office: Kyleshill House, 1 Glencairn Street, Saltcoats, Ayrshire KA21 5JT

    Please consider the environment before printing this email. Wescot, helping to make a difference

    Confidentiality Notice. The information in this e-mail is confidential and for use by the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient (or responsible for delivery of the message to the intended
    recipient) please notify us immediately (on 01482 590590 (UK) or
    +44 1482 590590
    (international)) and delete this message from your computer: you may not copy or forward it, or use or disclose its contents to any other person.
    As Internet communications are capable of data corruption, Wescot Credit Services Ltd does not accept any responsibility for changes made to this message after it was sent. Please note that Wescot Credit Services
    Ltd does not accept any liability or responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan attachments (if any). Opinions and views expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and may not reflect the opinions and views of Wescot Credit Services
    Ltd.
    Registered in Scotland No. SC84131, Registered Office: Kyleshill House, 1 Glencairn Street, Saltcoats, Ayrshire KA21 5JT

    Please consider the environment before printing this email. Wescot, helping to make a difference

    Confidentiality Notice. The information in this e-mail is confidential and for use by the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient (or responsible for delivery of the message to the intended
    recipient) please notify us immediately (on 01482 590590 (UK) or
    +44 1482 590590
    (international)) and delete this message from your computer: you may not copy or forward it, or use or disclose its contents to any other person.
    As Internet communications are capable of data corruption, Wescot Credit Services Ltd does not accept any responsibility for changes made to this message after it was sent. Please note that Wescot Credit Services
    Ltd does not accept any liability or responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan attachments (if any). Opinions and views expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and may not reflect the opinions and views of Wescot Credit Services
    Ltd.


     Registered in Scotland No. SC84131, Registered Office: Kyleshill House, 1 Glencairn Street, Saltcoats, Ayrshire KA21 5JT
    Please consider the environment before printing this email. Wescot, helping to make a difference Confidentiality Notice. The information in this e-mail is confidential and for use by the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient (or responsible for delivery of the message to
    the intended recipient) please notify us immediately (on 01482 590590 (UK) or
    +44 1482 590590
    (international)) and delete this message from your computer: you may not copy or forward it, or use or disclose its contents to any other person. As Internet communications are capable of data corruption, Wescot Credit Services Ltd does not accept any responsibility for changes made to this message after it was sent. Please note thatWescot Credit Services Ltd does not accept any liability or responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan attachments (if any). Opinions and views expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and may not reflect the opinions and views
    of Wescot Credit Services Ltd.

    Registered in Scotland No. SC84131, Registered Office: Kyleshill House, 1 Glencairn Street, Saltcoats, Ayrshire KA21 5JT Please consider the environment before printing this email. Wescot, helping to make a difference Confidentiality Notice. The information in this e-mail is confidential and for use by the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient (or responsible for delivery of the message to the intended recipient)
    please notify us immediately (on 01482 590590 (UK) or +44 1482 590590 (international)) and delete this message from your computer: you may not copy or forward it, or use or disclose its contents to any other person. As Internet communications are capable of data corruption, Wescot Credit Services Ltd does not accept any responsibility for changes made to this message after it was sent. Please note that Wescot Credit Services Ltd
    does not accept any liability or responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan attachments (if any). Opinions and views expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and may not reflect the opinions and views of Wescot Credit Services
    Ltd.

  • Jeg fortsetter å søke på jobber. Denne gang som Store Manager Designate


    Gmail – Store Manager Designate (Ellesmere Port)






    Gmail

    Erik Ribsskog
    <eribsskog@gmail.com>






    Store Manager Designate (Ellesmere Port)





    Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:46 PM



    To:
    LJohnston@martinmccoll.co.uk






    Hi, I read about this vacancy on the Direct Gov-website, and I wanted to
    please apply for this job. I’ve worked as a Store Manager for four years, (I was a
    Cashier/Stocker from 1992 to 1994, then a Key Holder in the summer of
    1994, then an Aspiring Manager the rest of 1994, then an Assistant
    Manager, (in two different stores), from 1995 til 1998, then a Store
    Manager, (in three different stores), from 1998 to 2002, then Key
    Holder, (in two different stores while I studied full-time), from 2002
    to 2004), in the Norwegian grocery-chain Rimi, (now owned by ICA). I was responsible for motivating, training and developing up to 25
    employees, at a time, when I worked as a Store Manager, in Rimi, and
    one of the shops I worked as a Store Manager in, (Rimi Kalbakken, in
    Oslo), from 2000 to 2001, had a weekly turn-over, at around 850.000
    NOK, (which is around £90.000). I’ve also worked as a full-time Cashier, (later part-time Cashier and
    Delicatessen-employee, while studying), in the big hypermarked
    Matland, (which was bought by Coop while I worked there, and changed
    its name to OBS! Triaden), in Lørenskog in Norway. I attach my CV and hope to hear back from you! Yours sincerely, Erik Ribsskog


    CV (Retail) – Erik Ribsskog.doc
    49K

  • Jeg sendte en ny e-post til Steffen Heegaard, (som er min avdøde mors danske fetter, som jobber, som direktør, i forsikring)


    Gmail – Påminnelse/Fwd: Påminnelse/Fwd: Ny oppdatering/Fwd: Oppdatering om tull fra IF/Fwd: Klage/Fwd: Skadenummer: SA59484-001-BIK (H163117989M)






    Gmail

    Erik Ribsskog
    <eribsskog@gmail.com>






    Påminnelse/Fwd: Påminnelse/Fwd: Ny oppdatering/Fwd: Oppdatering om tull fra IF/Fwd: Klage/Fwd: Skadenummer: SA59484-001-BIK (H163117989M)





    Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 9:01 PM



    To:
    she@topdanmark.dk






    Hei,
    i denne forsikringssaken, så er det nordmennene, (og ikke britene), som tuller Steffen.

    Du får se på det hvis du har tid.

    (Siden du er min avdøde mors fetter og jobber som direktør i forsikring, mener jeg).
     Mvh. Erik Ribsskog
    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: 2013/5/3
    Subject: Påminnelse/Fwd: Påminnelse/Fwd: Ny oppdatering/Fwd: Oppdatering om tull fra IF/Fwd: Klage/Fwd: Skadenummer: SA59484-001-BIK (H163117989M)
    To: Postmottak Sivilombudsmannen <postmottak@sivilombudsmannen.no>
    Cc: Robin MacKenzie-Robinson <RoMa@tilsynet.no>
    Hei,
    jeg får ikke noe svar fra Tilsynsrådet for Advokatvirksomhet her.
    Jeg ber de bare bekrefte hvilket forsikringsselskap som er riktig.


    Det er vanskelig for meg å gå videre, i denne saken, før de har svar på den e-posten.


    Kan dere ‘banke dem opp’ litt, og få dem til å bekrefte hvilket selskap som er det riktige? På forhånd takk for svar! Mvh.

    Erik Ribsskog
    ———- Forwarded message ———-

    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: 2013/2/25
    Subject: Påminnelse/Fwd: Ny oppdatering/Fwd: Oppdatering om tull fra IF/Fwd: Klage/Fwd: Skadenummer: SA59484-001-BIK (H163117989M)
    To: RoMa@tilsynet.no
    Cc: Postmottak Sivilombudsmannen <postmottak@sivilombudsmannen.no>
    Hei,

    jeg kan ikke se at jeg har mottatt noe svar, på denne e-posten, så jeg sender en påminnelse, om dette.

    Håper dette er i orden! Mvh. Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Date: 2013/1/17
    Subject: Ny oppdatering/Fwd: Oppdatering om tull fra IF/Fwd: Klage/Fwd: Skadenummer: SA59484-001-BIK (H163117989M)
    To: Robin MacKenzie-Robinson <RoMa@tilsynet.no>
    Cc: Bjorge.Skjeldestad@tryg.no, kundeservice@if.no, post <post@finanstilsynet.no>, postmottak@fd.dep.no
    Hei,
    jeg sjekket det igjen nå, og jeg klagde første gang på Rukke, til Tilsynsrådet for advokatvirksomhet, i juni:
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Date: 2012/6/21
    Subject: Klage på tre advokater/Fwd: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen
    To: post@tilsynet.no
    Og ettersom jeg har forstått nå, (fra deres siste e-post), så bytta Rukke til IF, i august.

    Så da blir det Tryg som er riktig selskap likevel, (virker det som for meg nå).
    Så hun IF hadde vel da rett.

    (Selv om hun kanskje ikke forklarte den paragrafen riktig).
    Er dere hos Tilsynsrådet for advokatvirksomhet enig i at det er Tryg som er riktig selskap, for å si det sånn?

    (Sorry at jeg surrer litt, men jeg er ikke vant til å drive med sånt her.

    Min fetter Tommy A. L. Olsen jobber visst nå i Borg forsikring, og har Tryg e-post-adresse, så jeg på nettet.


    Men jeg har ikke snakket med han siden rett etter jeg var i bryllupet hans, i 2002 vel.
    Så dette var nytt for meg.

    Men han er kanskje da inhabil hos både IF og Tryg?).

    Vennligst bekreft at Tryg er riktig selskap.
    (Som jeg vel ba dere om å gjøre i min forrige e-post.

    Så tar vi en ting av gangen liksom, i den her saken da, hvis det er greit).


    Mvh.

    Erik Ribsskog
    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Date: 2013/1/17
    Subject: Oppdatering om tull fra IF/Fwd: Klage/Fwd: Skadenummer: SA59484-001-BIK (H163117989M)
    To: post <post@finanstilsynet.no>
    Cc: postmottak@fd.dep.no
    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Date: 2013/1/17
    Subject: Re: Klage/Fwd: Skadenummer: SA59484-001-BIK (H163117989M)
    To: Robin MacKenzie-Robinson <RoMa@tilsynet.no>
    Cc: Bjorge.Skjeldestad@tryg.no
    Hei,
    ok, da fikk jeg klarhet i dette.
    Da virker det for meg som om IF har forsøkt å lure meg.

    Jeg sender derfor kopi til IF og Tryg.

    Så håper jeg at IF skjerper seg.

    For det her syntes jeg at var rimelig sleipt.

    Jeg har som sagt en fetter i IF, som heter Tommy Løff Olsen.

    (Hvis han jobber der enda da).
    Og har overhørt at jeg er forfulgt av ‘mafian’.


    Så her kan det være mafia i IF, frykter jeg.
    Så dette er også en formell klage på lureri fra IF.

    Mvh.

    Erik Ribsskog


    2013/1/17 Robin MacKenzie-Robinson <RoMa@tilsynet.no>

    Det vises til dine e-poster av 12. desember 2012 og 12. januar 2013 hvor De ønsker å klage på saksbehandlingen til Tilsynsrådet for advokatvirksomhets medarbeider Jonas Haugsvold.

    Tilsynsrådet for advokatvirksomhet kan ved forespørsel informere om advokaters sikkerhetsstiller. I dette tilfellet ønsket De informasjon om sikkerhetsstiller for advokat Ida Valen Rukke. På det tidspunktet De ønsket denne informasjonen var IF sikkerhetsstiller for advokat Rukke. Det informerte Jonas Haugsvold Dem om.

    De ønsker nå å få opplyst hvem som var sikkerhetsstiller for advokat Rukke før hun tegnet sikkerhetsstillelse hos If Skadeforsikring.

    Fra 16. februar 2009 og frem til 1. august 2012 har Tryg vært sikkerhetsstiler for advokat Rukke.

    Til Deres informasjon følger det av advokatforskriften § 2-4 første ledd at:    ”Den sikkerhetsstilleren som advokaten har når skadelidte fremsetter krav om erstatning, er ansvarlig overfor skadelidte. Dette gjelder selv om tapet ble forårsaket mens advokaten hadde en annen sikkerhetsstiller”.


    Med vennlig hilsen

    Robin Mackenzie-Robinson
    Rådgiver
    Tilsynsrådet for advokatvirksomhet
    Postboks 720 Sentrum, 0106 Oslo | Rådhusgt. 23
    Tlf: 22 00 75 03 | Sentralbord: 22 00 75 00
    *  post@tilsynet.no   þ  www.tilsynet.no  




    Fra: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
    Sendt: 12. januar 2013 20:03
    Til: Tilsynsrådet for Advokatvirksomhet
    Kopi: Bjorge.Skjeldestad@tryg.no
    Emne: Klage/Fwd: Skadenummer: SA59484-001-BIK (H163117989M)
    Hei,
    jeg vil klage på deres medarbeider Haugsvold, for å ha villedet meg.


    Først så opplyste han ikke om sikringsstiller, for advokaten, enda jeg mener at det burde ha fremgått av mine e-poster, at det var det jeg ønsket at han skulle opplyse meg om.

    Den andre klagen går på at deres nevnte medarbeider så skrev at IF var riktig sikringsstiller, men IF sier at Tryg var riktig selskap.


    Jeg mener at det fremgikk av min korrespondanse, med deres medarbeider, at dette gjaldt et forhold da advokat Rukke jobbet for Advokat.no.
    Så her mener jeg at deres medarbeider Haugsvold ved to anledninger har vært ‘vrang’ og bevisst har prøvd å lure meg.

    Jeg skal kopiere den første e-posten jeg sendte dere om dette, i denne e-posten, så burde dette da være mulig å se.

    Jeg ser frem til å motta deres kommentar om dette.

    Kan dere også bekrefte det som IF sier at Tryg var riktig sikringsstiller for denne saken, som var fra da Rukke jobbet hos Advokat.no, med min sak, som var fra 16. april til 18. juni, som jeg har skrevet til Tryg.

    Mvh.
    Erik Ribsskog
    PS.
    Her er mer om dette:

    2012/9/3 Jonas Haugsvold <JoHa@tilsynet.no>

    Det vises til dine e-poster av 22.6.2012 og 1.9.2012.


    Tilsynsrådet for advokatvirksomhet fører tilsyn med landets praktiserende advokater og rettshjelpere, bl.a. ved gjennomgang av deres regnskaper og behandling av betrodde midler. Tilsynsrådet er tillagt ansvaret for å påse at den som driver advokat- og øvrig rettshjelpvirksomhet har stillet lovbestemt sikkerhet for sin virksomhet. Som et av sine hovedmål skal Tilsynsrådet gjennom aktiv tilsynsvirksomhet søke å forebygge ansvarsskader.

    Tilsynsrådet kan ikke bistå deg i denne saken. Det vises til at Tilsynsrådet, ut fra sin kompetanse, verken har anledning til å anbefale særskilte advokater eller til å ta nærmere stilling til konkrete rettstvister mellom private parter. Tilsynsrådet kan heller ikke bistå med et skifte.

    Dersom du mener at en advokat har opptrådt i strid med gjeldende regler for god advokatskikk, gjør vi oppmerksom på at klage eventuelt kan fremsettes skriftlig til Disiplinærnemnden for advokater på følgende adresse:

    Disiplinærnemnden
    Kr. Augustgt. 9
    0164 Oslo

    Vennlig hilsen


    Jonas Haugsvold

    Rådgiver

    Tilsynsrådet for advokatvirksomhet
    Postboks 720 Sentrum, 0106 Oslo | Rådhusgt. 23
    Tlf: 22 00 75 02 | Sentralbord: 22 00 75 00
    *  post@tilsynet.no   þ  www.tilsynet.no


    Fra: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
    Sendt: 1. september 2012 14:50
    Til: Tilsynsrådet for Advokatvirksomhet
    Emne: Påminnelse/Fwd: Klage på tre advokater/Fwd: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen


    Hei,
    jeg kan ikke se at jeg har mottatt noe svar på denne e-posten, så jeg sender en påminnelse om dette.

    Håper dette er i orden!

    Mvh. Erik Ribsskog
    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: 2012/6/21
    Subject: Klage på tre advokater/Fwd: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen
    To: post@tilsynet.no
    Cc: larvik.tingrett@domstol.no
    Hei,
    min mormor døde for tre år siden, på tirsdag neste uke.


    Jeg har bare fått tre tusen i arv, enda hun var etter dansk adel og kongelige og hadde malerier fra Højris slott på veggen, da hun døde, og også mange andre artige ting, som brev og møbler og alt mulig, fra sine adelige slektninger, (Gjedde, Nyholm, Fog, Adeler, etc).

    Jeg ville først at advokat Erik Øvergård, i Hurum, skulle selge min eiendom der, (del av sameie), sånn at jeg kunne betale 30.000 til Tingretten i Larvik, for offentlig skifte.


    Øvergård sluttet plutselig å svare meg.

    Så jeg kontaktet Tingretten i Drammen, (via Namsmannen i Hurum/Røyken), og de villedet meg om salg av sameie, (Høysæter der), så jeg fikk ikke ordnet dette, for man måtte betale gebyr, og sånn, og Høysæter bare lot som om hun skulle ordne det, så mange måneder gikk tapt da, og etter dette så har jeg fått en umøblert leilighet, så jeg har ikke hatt penger til gebyr for salg av sameie.

    Jeg fikk derimot dekke litt fri rettshjelp for en barnevernssak mot Svelvik kommune, av Fylkesmannen i Oslo og Akershus.


    Jeg sendte dette til Advokat.no og spurte om jeg kunne få en advokat i Drammen, siden dette er den nærmeste store byen, fra Svelvik.


    Jeg fikk en advokat i Oslo, og tenkte at det var greit.

    Men nå så jeg senere at hun Ida Valen Rukke, som jeg ble tildelt som advokat av Advokat.no, ikke har barnevern som hovedfelt.

    Og at syv andre advokater hos Advokat.no hadde barnevern som hovedfelt.

    Da jeg klagde på at Rukke var ineffektiv, antagelig siden hun ikke var vant til å jobbe med barnevernsaker, så slutten hun i jobben, (av en eller annen grunn), og jeg ble ikke tilbudt ny advokat, av Advokat.no.

    Og dette var etter at Rukke hadde opplyst meg om at hun hadde en timelønn på over 2000, og etter at jeg hadde bedt henne om å ordne med det offentlige skiftet, i Larvik, for meg, samt oppløsing av sameie, i Holmsbu, og andre saker.

    Jeg sendte så e-post til en advokat Bille, i Drammen, som ikke har svart meg.

    Jeg mister nå antagelig den arven, etter min mormor, morfar og mor, (siden min mor og morfar døde før min mormor).

    For fristen der er mandag eller tirsdag, neste uke, å be om offentlig skifte.

    Og jeg har vært arbeidsledig i England, under finanskrisen, så jeg har ikke klart å spare opp penger, og salget av sameiet i Holmsbu har jo ikke latt seg gjennomføre grunnet sabotasje, (må jeg kalle det), fra Øverland og Tingretten i Drammen.

    Jeg ønsker jo selvfølgelig først og fremst at jeg får innvilget offentlig skifte, etter min mormor, hos Tingretten i Larvik.

    Kanskje kan gjøre dette for meg?

    Sender kopi til Tingretten i Larvik og advokat Bille i Drammen.


    Jeg ønsker også erstatning på grunn av tullet fra de nevnte advokatene.

    Jeg har måttet gått rundt i Newcastle, en hel natt, med alt jeg har hatt av eiendom her borte, (City Self Storage vil ikke sende meg de ‘norske’ tingene mine), og nesten fryst ihjel, fordi jeg ikke har fått solgt eiendom i Norge og vært prislagt diverse lugubre britiske hosteller, osv.

    Så disse advokatene kan man få billig av meg, og jeg håper dere lar de miste bevilgningen.


    Jeg blir systematisk tullet med, synes jeg det virker som, og jeg ønsker å få mye penger i erstatning, for at det skal være enklere for meg, å beskytte meg mot slik systematisk tulling og jeg har også overhørt at jeg er forfulgt av ‘mafian’, som var grunnen til at jeg flytta fra Norge, i 2004.

    Så jeg håper på amerikansk metode her, med mye erstatning til folk som er offer for maktmisbruk, osv.


    Fikk også noen dokumenter etter de kjente slektningene mine Anders Gjedde Nyholm, en general og en dommer i Haag, Didrik Nyholm, av min mormor, på 80-tallet.


    Men så skulle Ingeborg ha tilbake dette.

    Og hu var jo gammel allerede da, så jeg sa det var greit.

    Men nå som hun er død, så er jo dette egentlig mitt, mener jeg, man kan jo ikke ta tilbake en gave.

    Og min mormor hadde også masse andre artige brev fra Maren Gjedde, mm., som jeg syntes at virker interessant både for meg selv og også historisk.

    Og jeg er den eneste som har interesse for sånt, i slekta, sa min mormor, mens hun levde.

    Også skal jeg liksom bare få 3000 i arv, enda min mormor og morfar hadde det største huset i Nevlugnhavn, på 80-tallet, og de så ut som en antikkforretning eller museum.


    Hvor har det blitt av verdiene? Det er ikke riktig at jeg bare skal få 3000 etter min mor, mormor og morfar, mener jeg.


    Her er det noe alvorlig tull.

    Hvorfor skal ikke jeg få offentlig skifte? Kan dere ordne det? Pluss erstatning også for det andre tøyset.


    Men offentlig skifte-fristen går visst ut på mandag eller tirsdag neste uke.

    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Mona Mjøen McKiernan <mmm@advokatforeningen.no>
    Date: 2012/6/21
    Subject: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen
    To: “eribsskog@gmail.com” <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Erik Ribsskog,


    Det vises til din henvendelse av 20.juni 2012, vedrørende klage på advokat.

    Av henvendelsen fremgår det at du ønsker å klage på advokat.no.
    Vi viser til vårt tidligere svar av 18.juni 2012, der det fremgår at en klage må sendes per post og gjelde en navngitt advokat.
    All informasjon om hvordan du skriver en klage finner du her: http://www.advokatenhjelperdeg.no/artikler/kan-jeg-klage-pa-advokaten/
    Vedrørende hva en klage kan føre til finner du informasjon om dette her:http://www.advokatenhjelperdeg.no/artikler/kan-jeg-klage-pa-advokaten/#hvafrerklagenetil
    Til ditt spørsmål om hva du skal gjøre med det offentlige skiftet minner vi om at Advokatforeningen ikke kan tilby juridisk rådgivning. Vi kan heller ikke tildele en advokat til deg.
    Vi råder deg til å ta kontakt med en advokat for å få hjelp med dette. Din advokat finner du her:
    http://www.advokatenhjelperdeg.no/finn-advokat/
    Alle som praktiserer som advokat, er lovpålagt å gi sine klienter økonomisk trygghet for eventuelle feil de gjør som advokat. Du finner mer informasjon om erstatning og hvordan du kan rette et erstatningskrav mot advokaten her: http://www.advokatenhjelperdeg.no/artikler/kan-jeg-klage-pa-advokaten/#kanjegferstatning

    Med vennlig hilsen

    Mona Mjøen McKiernan

    ADVOKATFORENINGEN / THE NORWEGIAN BAR ASSOCIATION

    Kristian Augusts gate 9, N-0164 Oslo T +47 22 03 50 50 E mmm@advokatforeningen.no
    www.advokatforeningen.no www.advokatenhjelperdeg.no  

    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
    Sent: 20. juni 2012 20:57
    To: Mona Mjøen McKiernan
    Cc: Disiplinærnemnden for advokater
    Subject: Re: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen
    Hei,
    ok, jeg videresender denne korrespondansen til dem, så får jeg håpe at de tar kontakt.
    Også ønsker jeg samtidig å klage på Advokat.no.


    Som tidligere nevnt, så ba jeg om en advokat i Drammen, siden dette er den nærmeste store byen, fra Bergeråsen, hvor omsorgssvikten fant sted.

    (Etter at jeg ble innvilget Fri Rettshjelp, fra Fylkesmannen i Oslo og Akershus).


    Jeg ble tilbudt en advokat i Oslo.

    Og jeg tenkte at det var greit.

    Men da jeg sjekket nettsidene til Advokat.no nærmere, så så jeg det, at Advokat.no hadde syv advokater i Oslo, som var spesialister på barnevern.
    Og selv om min sak er en barnevernssak, (min far lot meg bo alene fra jeg var ni år, og jeg fikk fri rettshjelp til en barnevernssak mot Svelvik kommune).

    Så ble jeg gitt en advokat som _ikke_ hadde barnevern som hovedfelt.


    Og så, her om dagen, slutter plutselig den advokaten.

    Advokat.no skulle jo da selvfølgelig ha tilbudt meg en ny advokat.

    Men det gjorde de ikke.


    De bare sa at de var ferdig med saken.

    Og dette etter at jeg hadde forklart for hun Rukke der, at jeg blir snytt for arv også, og trenger hjelp av en advokat, til å få Tingretten i Larvik, til å ha offentlig skifte, etter min mormor, og fristen der er 26. juni, altså på tirsdag neste uke.

    Så at Advokat.no bare sluttet å jobbe med sakene mine, det kan koste meg arven etter min mor, (som døde i 1999), og min mormor som var fra danske kongelige og adelige.

    Så jeg synes Advokat.no oppfører seg så besynderlig, at jeg ønsker å klage.


    Samtidlig så lurer jeg på hva vitsen er med å klage, for Øvergård fikk bare 2000 i bot, og jeg fikk ingenting i erstatning.


    Og dette gjaldt salg av min del av et sameie i Holmsbu, som jeg ville selge for å ha råd til det nevnte offentlige skiftet da.

    For meg så virker det som at jeg bare blir systematisk tullet med av norske advokater, (er det mafian som trekker i tråder, jeg har overhørt i 2003 at jeg er forfulgt av dem).


    Hvordan skal jeg liksom få ordnet med det offentlige skiftet da.

    Hvorfor kan liksom ingen i Norge hjelpe meg med det, nå er det bare noen dager igjen til fristen går ut.

    Men Advokatforeningen er så idiotisk organisert at dere ikke gir erstatning til ofre for deres mafia-advokater, og kun gir mindre enn en timelønn i bot til disse mafia-advokatene så det er jo helt håpløst.


    Det burde vært som i USA hvor folk får store erstatninger.

    Ellers så kommer de aldri av flekken.
    Jeg blir litt kvalm her jeg sitter i England av dette mafia-opplegget som foregår i Norge.

    Så nå må dere forte dere å gi Advokat.no 2000 i bot, de også.

    Hva skal liksom løse seg da, tenker dere?

    Dette er jo helt meningsløst egentlig.
    Kan dere ikke tilby meg advokathjelp, eller noe, i det minste? Hvordan skal jeg få ordnet med dette offentlige skiftet hvor fristen går ut 26. juni.

    Det kan jo være at den egentlige grunnen til at Advokat.no oppførte seg så besynderlig var for at jeg skulle miste kontrollen over det arveoppgjøret, pga. at en mafia står bak, og trekker i tråder.

    Jeg rekker jo ikke nå å få en ny advokat til å ordne med dette.


    Så om dere kan ordne med det.

    Jeg har skrevet om disse problemene på blogg i tre år nå, og ingen i Norge gjør en dritt, så jeg er rimelig oppgitt, for å si det sånn.

    Jeg vet nesten ikke hva jeg skal si.


    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: 2012/12/10
    Subject: Re: Skadenummer: SA59484-001-BIK (H163117989M)
    To: ansvarskade@if.no
    Cc: arne.einar.brun@tryg.no
    Hei,
    ok, det var en ‘premie-idiot’, hos Tilsynsrådet for Advokatvirksomhet, som sa at IF var riktig selskap, skjønner du.


    Jeg sender nå e-post til en i Tryg, så håper jeg at jeg får erstatning tilsvarende det denne nå ødelagte saken, (må man vel si), ville vært verdt, etter å ha vunnet den, i retten.


    Takk for deres forklaring om dette! Og hils min fetter Tommy.

    Dere må ikke glemme å bytte ut Audi-en hans, med jevne mellomrom, sånn at han slipper å kjøre rundt i et gammelt vrak som snart må kondemneres.

    Mvh.

    Erik Ribsskog
    2012/12/10 <ansvarskade@if.no>
    [image]





    Vedr. erstatningskrav mot Advokat.no/Ida Valen Rukke

    Det vises til mottatt erstatningskrav under sikkerhetsstillelsen/forsikringen til advokat Ida Valen Rukke. På bakgrunn av denne henvendelsen har vi opprettet et referansenummer SA59484-BIK. Jeg ber om at det vises til dette referansenummeret ved henvendelser vedrørende saken.

    Ida Valen Rukke sluttet i Advokat.no og tegnet ny forsikring og sikkerhetsstillelse hos If Skadeforsikring 01.08.12 gjennom ny arbeidsgiver. Det fremgår av forsikringsbeviset hos oss at et krav må være reist mot sikrede eller forsikringsselskapet i forsikringstiden for å falle inn under ordningen.

    Ut fra dokumentasjonen vi har mottatt synes kravet i nærværende sak å være rettet mot Advokat.no/Rukke i perioden før If Skadeforsikring tegnet forsikringen/sikkerhetsstillelsen. Kravet må således gjøres gjeldende mot det forsikringsselskapet der Advokat.no/Rukke hadde sin forsikring tidligere. Jeg har fått opplyst at dette er Tryg.

    Ut fra ovenstående vil forholdet ikke bli behandlet videre hos If skadeforsikring.


    Vennlig hilsen

    If


    Birgitte Knudtzon
    Advokat – Ansvar Skade

    Telefon: 21495821

  • Jeg sendte en ny e-post til Wescot


    Gmail – Your letter from 7/9/Fwd: Wescot Response 49597867 RE: Correspondence Reply






    Gmail

    Erik Ribsskog
    <eribsskog@gmail.com>






    Your letter from 7/9/Fwd: Wescot Response 49597867 RE: Correspondence Reply





    Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 10:24 PM



    To:
    Contact Us <contactus@wescot.co.uk>






    Hi I’m refering to your letter from 7/9, (with Wescot reference 472365139), which I received today and which I attach a scanned copy of.
    I’ve earlier informed you that I’m unemployed and only can afford to pay you token-payments until I find new employment.


    I have unfortunately not found new employment, (even if I apply for new jobs every day), but I hope to find a new job soon. In the mean-time I can unfortunately only repeat my offer of one pound monthly token-payments.

    (Like I have agreed with you earlier).

    This is also what I pay my other creditors, by the way. But I’m going to pay you more, and contact you about this, as soon as possible, when I get a new job.
    Hope this is alright! Yours sincerely, Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Contact Us <contactus@wescot.co.uk>
    Date: Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 8:27 AM
    Subject: Wescot Response 49597867 RE: Correspondence Reply
    To: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    02 November 2012


    Dear Mr
    Ribsskog

    Further to your recent email, I am sorry to note there appears to be some confusion over the account. To resolve this and offer a detailed explanation I have
    referred the points you have raised to our client and we are currently awaiting an update from them.

    I trust the above answers your query and I apologise you had to contact us again to confirm the details.



    Yours sincerely


    Funmi Olugbenga-Dada

    Account Controller




    Description: untitled




    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2012 3:29 PM
    To: Contact Us
    Cc: Q&A
    Subject: Re: Wescot ResponseRE: Correspondence Reply

    Hi,



    I have explained that in the e-mail where you have highlighted a sentence in red.


    That your partner Capital One told me last year my signature wasn’t mine.


    And that you this year have lied about me not replying to your correspondence.


    And that you have made me waste my time since your partner Capital One and yourselves haven’t been able to accept my token-payment-offer like other companies like Swalec, DML and United Utilities have accepted, almost a year ago.


    This is sabotage, I think.


    I suspect you and Capital One have a secret agenda here.


    And you really should contact your English-teacher about this.

    Because I get anoyed when I have to explain the same again and again.


    And it’s a saying you have here in the UK, which says it’s no excuse for ignorance.


    So eighter you’re ignorant or slow.


    So I think you should perhaps find another job.

    Like putting spread on sandwiches, or something like that.

    Just an advice.

    Best regards,

    Erik Ribsskog



    On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Contact Us <contactus@wescot.co.uk> wrote:



    Date 30th October 2012


    Dear Mr Ribsskog


    Further to your recent email regarding your email below. I acknowledge your comments and would like to confirm that Wescot always attempt to respond with
    an explanation or resolution as quickly as possible.

    Please advise as to why this account would be deleted, we have no details in regards to a query for this account. If you believe this balance is not due
    we would require the full details of dispute on this account. Which would allow us to investigate your query with our client.

    Please accept my apologies for any inconvenience you may have been caused whilst contacting us.


    Yours sincerely


    Ms H Thundercliffe

    Accounts Controller


    Description: image002


    Registered in Scotland No. SC84131, Registered Office: Kyleshill House, 1 Glencairn Street, Saltcoats, Ayrshire KA21 5JT



    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 30 October 2012 14:54
    To: Contact Us
    Subject: Re: Correspondence Reply

    Hi,



    this about that my debt has been deleted is something I’m still looking forward to hearing from you about.


    Perhaps you should ask your old English-teacher for advice as to what my writings meant.

    Best regards,


    Erik Ribsskog



    On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Contact Us <contactus@wescot.co.uk> wrote:



    Date 30th October 2012


    Dear Mr Ribsskog


    Further to your recent email regarding the below account. I acknowledge your comments and would like to confirm that Wescot always attempt to respond with
    an explanation or resolution as quickly as possible.

    In your email below you have you look forward to hearing that this debt has been deleted. Please could you advise further on this, as we haveno details
    in regards to the balance being deleted.

    Please accept my apologies for any inconvenience you may have been caused whilst contacting us.


    Yours sincereley



    Ms H Thundercliffe

    Accounts Controller


    Description: image002



    Registered in Scotland No. SC84131, Registered Office: Kyleshill House, 1 Glencairn Street, Saltcoats, Ayrshire KA21 5JT



    From: Erik Ribsskog
    [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com] Sent: 19 October 2012 10:40


    To: Correspondence Queries
    Cc: offers
    Subject: Re: Correspondence Reply




    Hi,



    ok, I don’t think I have gotten their sort-code and account-number.


    Do you know this?


    I also sent you an update, on Saturday, after the e-mail you replied to now.


    I’ll paste that in this e-mail now.


    Best regards,


    Erik Ribsskog


    PS.


    Here’s the update e-mail from Saturday:
    Hi,


    I got a new income and expenditure-form in the post from you today.


    From 11/10, with the reference D3/49597867.


    I contacted your partned Capital One last automn, regarding my new budget.



    I offered you a token-payment-agreement on £1 a month, untill I got a full-time-job.



    Capital One told me my signature wasn’t mine, so this process have stalled, since last year.



    Now you get back to me.



    I’m still unemployed but I’m trying to set a business up, on my spare-time.



    And the Jobcentre is ‘messing’ with my jobseekers allowance.



    So at the moment, I have to say I don’t have any income.


    I could get back to you when I get the jobseekers allowance back.



    And then I would offer you the same as last time, £1 a month in token-payments.



    I’ve since last year gotten a flat witch was unfurnitured.

    So any money I have left after token-payments each month I now buy furniture and other things for the flat with.




    And I was going to set up a new budget, when I got a full-time job.


    And I’m going to do that.



    But I don’t think it’s right that I have to set up a new budget now, because your partner said my signature wasn’t mine, and didn’t accept my new budget, last year.




    This has taken so much of my time now, so you should really just delete the debt, I think.



    I’m on Ladders, so I have a high income-potential.



    All the hours I’ve spent on you and Captial One should add up to arround the debt I owe you, I think.




    So I’m looking forward to hearing from you that my debt with you has been deleted! Hope this is alright! Best regards,



    Erik Ribsskog





    On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Correspondence Queries <client@cccs.co.uk> wrote:



    Good morning Erik,


    Thank you for contacting us about Wescot.


    To make token payments to Wescot you do not need to fill in a giro slip. All you need is their sort code and account number and also
    the Wescot reference number starting with DM or D3. You then need to go into your bank and ask them to send £1 payment to Wescot by bank transfer. They may reject the offer of payment but they won’t reject the £1 payment you send and this will reduce the debt
    in time.

    If you need any advice then please do not hesitate to call us.


    Kind regards


    Faye

    Correspondence Advisor


    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 12 October 2012 16:13
    To: Correspondence Queries
    Cc: offers
    Subject: Re: Update/Fwd: *****7867/Fwd: CCCS

    Hi,



    thank you for your e-mail!

    I’m not paying token-payments at the moment.


    Wescot have sent me a budget-form again now.


    But as your collegue there have previously told me I don’t have to fill out this form to get token-payments. It should be enought that I’ve explained about my situation.


    I’ve offered Wescot a token-payment-arrangement like a ‘million’ times.


    But they haven’t sent me giros or anything.


    And this is taking a lot of my time now.


    Because I’ve been offering Wescot, (and Capital One), a token-payment-arrangement since last year now.


    And all I get are standard letters which tells lies like that I haven’t replied to their letters.


    When I’ve sent about a million e-mails to them, which I haven’t gotten replies to.


    So I now copy this e-mail to Wescot.


    And I hope they’ll send me some giros for the token-payment arrangement of £1 a month now.


    Or tell me what information they need from me to set up a direct-debit-agreement.


    So I hope this will be sorted now.


    Thanks again for the e-mail! Best regards,


    Erik Ribsskog



    On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 8:07 AM, Correspondence Queries <client@cccs.co.uk> wrote:



    Hello Eric


    Thank you for copying us in to the email you have sent to Wescot.


    Please try not to worry about the contact you have received as this is a standard procedure for creditors to take. Nelson Guest & Partners are an
    internal collections department who work on behalf of Wescot to collect the outstanding balance.

    As you have contacted this creditor to advise of your current financial situation and are making token payments, you are doing all you can at this
    time. If you receive any further contact regarding this matter, please advise of this.

    I hope this is helpful and reassuring.


    If you have any queries or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact us on  0845 272 5400. Lines are open 8am to
    6pm, Monday to Friday. Email us at
    client.services@cccs.co.uk
    or go online to www.cccs.co.uk
    and follow the links to send us a web mail.                                                    

    Kind regards


    Hannah

    Correspondence Advisor



    From: Erik Ribsskog
    [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com] Sent: 08 October 2012 01:14
    To: offers@wescot.co.uk
    Cc: Q&A
    Subject: Update/Fwd: *****7867/Fwd: CCCS


    Hi,



    on Saturday I got a letter from Nelson Guest & Partners Solicitiors, witch I attach a scanned copy of.


    I’m don’t have the chance to pay 50% of the dept, av the moment, unfortunately.


    I’m repeating my offer of a token-payment-arrangement again.


    (Which I’ve done many times earlier).


    I hope you can ‘stop messing around’ now, (like I think I have to call it), and just accept my token-payment-offer, like the other companies have done.


    I don’t understand why you do so much ‘mumbo-jumbo’ surrounding this.


    This should be a straight forward tokey-payment agreement.


    I hope the CCCS can tell you to stop with your funny letters and just accept my token-payment-agreement, which I have offered you, a million times, (to exaggerate, but anyway).


    Captial One even have a football-cup named after you, but you don’t seem to be a serious company.


    It’s like being on the candid camera to try get a token-payment-agreement agreed with you.


    Erik





    ———- Forwarded message ———-




    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 3:32 PM
    Subject: Re: *****7867/Fwd: CCCS
    To: offers <offers@wescot.co.uk>
    Cc: Q&A <contactus@cccs.co.uk>
    Hi,




    it should be D3/49597867, (like I wrote in the subject-line in the e-mail I sent you on 20/9).


    I repeat my token-payment offer on £1 a month, like I offer all my other creditors untill I find new employment.



    Hope this is alright!

    Best regards,


    Erik Ribsskog






    On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 8:30 AM, offers <offers@wescot.co.uk> wrote:



    Good morning,


    Please provide the wescot reference beginning with D3 or DM


    Kind regards






    Rebecca Stearman

    Offers Administrator


    email:  
    offers@wescot.co.uk

    Description: Description: Description: cid:image001.jpg@01CA4CD1.636A7F00



    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 28 September 2012 14:34
    To: Correspondence Queries
    Cc: offers
    Subject: Re: *****7867/Fwd: CCCS



    Hi,



    thank you for your e-mail!

    Yes, I send a copy of this e-mail to Wescot as a reminder of my token-payment-offer, of one pound a month untill I find new employement.


    I thought it was like you write here, with the budget-form etc., from when I went to business-school, in the eighties.


    Even if that was in Norway, I think business-law is mostly the same in the western world.


    Mostly based on old British business-law, if I’m not mistaking.


    Thank you very much for the help with this!

    The information I sent to Capital One was a new token payment-offer after I had to move to Sunderland for some months last year.


    If I remember it right.


    I now found a letter on my blog, from Capital One, from 2009, when they also complained about my signature, (so this has happened in both 2009 and 2011), which I attach.


    Thanks again for the advice!

    Best regards,


    Erik Ribsskog

    On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Correspondence Queries <client@cccs.co.uk> wrote:




    Hi Erick


    Thank you for your email about your Wescot and Capital One accounts.


    If you have concerns over the wording of the letter from Wescot, I would advise you to raise a complaint directly with them.


    The complaint procedure can take up to 8 weeks and if you are unhappy with any response they give you, you can raise this further with the financial
    ombudsman service.

    You don’t need to fill out the budget form that Wescot have sent you. You have advised them that you have already completed a budget with us. Both forms
    cover the same areas. If you need a copy of the budget that you completed with us, please let me know as I can send this out to you. The budget can also be sent to Capital One.

    I wouldn’t advise you to stop making payments towards the Wescot account. It is in your best interest and benefit that you carry on making a token payment.
    It will show that you are willing to pay the account off.

    If you don’t make a payment, the creditor can take further action.


    I understand you would like to keep the contact in writing but it is also best that you call them to discuss your concerns. This will eliminate any responses
    about them not receiving your letters.

    You can ask for a Data Access Request from them which will provide you with all the notes made on your account. There may be a charge for this request.


    Can you advise me what information you sent to Capital One for them to reject your signature? If your signature hasn’t changed, I would advise you to
    contact Capital One and ask for a further explanation, i.e. are they comparing your signature to the signature on the original credit agreement?

    Again, you can ask for a Data Access Request to see what has been noted on your account and there may be a charge for this request.


    I hope this has been helpful.


    If you have any further queries, please contact us on 0845 272 5400, lines are open 8am to 6pm, Monday to Friday, you can email us at
    client.service@cccs.co.uk.

    Kind regards





    Paul Marshall

    Correspondence Co-ordinator








    From: Erik
    [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com] Sent: 26 September 2012 00:05
    To: Correspondence Queries
    Subject: Re: *****7867/Fwd: CCCS
    Hi,



    I’ve gone to business-school and letters shouldn’t contain lies even if they are standard letters.


    Here it’s obvious that the standard letter is used wrongly.



    I’m not making a token-payment here, you haven’t read up.


    Please escalate to your line manager.



    Regards,



    Erik Ribsskog


    PS.


    And I don’t think it’s a good idea to call these companies.



    It’s better to keep the correspondence in writing, so to keep documentation about what has been agreed.



    PS 2.



    You haven’t commented on that Capital One told me my signature wasn’t mine.



    I want to please escalate this to your line-manager.




    On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Correspondence Queries <client@cccs.co.uk> wrote:

    Hi Erik

    Thank you for contacting us about your account with Wescot. Creditors will often send standard collection letters out to you. Standard letters will include certain phrases that may not fit entirely, such as “we have not received a reply”. Unfortunately even though you are making a token payment we cannot stop creditors from contacting you. You should continue to keep your creditors up to date with your financial situation and offer them the most fair and reasonable offer you can. It may be best to call your creditors and speak to someone directly. That way all issues can be discussed there and then. If you have any further questions or need some more advise, you can call us on 0845 272 5400. Lines are open from 8am to 6pm, Monday to Friday. You can also email us at
    client.service@cccs.co.uk. Kind regards Gurj
    Correspondence Advisor
    We are altering the way in which we handle your correspondence to ensure we safeguard your personal information at all times. In order for us to do this we will be making some changes to the way in which we validate your identity.
    The next time you contact us, we will require you to provide us with at least 2 pieces of information from the list below: ·         Client reference number
    ·         Postal address
    ·         Postcode
    ·         Telephone number
    ·         Email address Please make sure you provide this information along with your full name on every communication you send to us. If not, we will prompt you for these details and this may delay your reply.
    Thank you The Correspondence Team
    We are altering the way in which we handle your correspondence to ensure we safeguard your personal information at all times.


    In order for us to do this we will be making some changes to the way in which we validate your identity.

    The next time you contact us, we will require you to provide us with at least 2 pieces of information from the list below:


    ·         

    Client reference number
    ·         

    Postal address
    ·         

    Postcode
    ·         

    Telephone number
    ·         

    Email address

    Please make sure you provide this information along with your full name on every communication you send to us. If not, we will prompt you
    for these details and this may delay your reply.


    Thank you


    The Correspondence Team





    Twitter Follow us on Twitter
    http://twitter.com/moneyaware


    Facebook Like us on Facebook
    http://www.facebook.com/moneyaware


    Read the MoneyAware blog

    http://moneyaware.co.uk



    P 

    Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.





    We are altering the way in which we handle your correspondence to ensure we safeguard your personal information at all times.


    In order for us to do this we will be making some changes to the way in which we validate your identity.

    The next time you contact us, we will require you to provide us with at least 2 pieces of information from the list below:


    ·         

    Client reference number
    ·         

    Postal address
    ·         

    Postcode
    ·         

    Telephone number
    ·         

    Email address

    Please make sure you provide this information along with your full name on every communication you send to us. If not, we will prompt you
    for these details and this may delay your reply.


    Thank you


    The Correspondence Team



    We are altering the way in which we handle your correspondence to ensure we safeguard your personal information at all times.


    In order for us to do this we will be making some changes to the way in which we validate your identity.

    The next time you contact us, we will require you to provide us with at least 2 pieces of information from the list below:


    ·         

    Client reference number
    ·         

    Postal address
    ·         

    Postcode
    ·         

    Telephone number
    ·         

    Email address

    Please make sure you provide this information along with your full name on every communication you send to us. If not, we will prompt you
    for these details and this may delay your reply.


    Thank you


    The Correspondence Team































    —–Original Message—–







































    From: Erik ******* [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
    Sent: 20 September 2012 14:41
    To: offers
    Cc: Q&A
    Subject: Your ref: ******7867/Fwd: CCCS Hi, I’m refering to your Final Notice-letter from 17/9, which I recieved today. You there write: ‘but we have not received a replyto our previous correspondence’. But this isn’t right, I’ve earlier written to you e-mails a lot of times offering a token-payment. Is this the Candid Camera? Your partner Capital One also did a practical joke like this, when they told me my signature wasn’t mine last year. Please stop with the monkey-business, and be serious. I hope the CCCS can stop your funny bailiff-actions and lies. Erik ****
    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Q&A <contactus@cccs.co.uk>
    Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 17:37:39 +0100
    Subject: CCCS
    To: Erik******** <eribsskog@gmail.com> Good afternoon Thank you for your email. There isn’t anything in the Consumer credit Act that states you must supply these details to a creditor. You can always provide them a copy of the budget and list of creditors that you have done through us. Regardless of whether they accept the offer or not please continue to make the token payment. Kind regards
    Jonathan  Follow us on Twitter
    http://twitter.com/moneyaware  Like us on Facebook
    http://www.facebook.com/moneyaware  Read the MoneyAware blog
    http://moneyaware.co.uk/ P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. ________________________________
    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
    Sent: 19 August 2012 20:59
    To: Q&A
    Cc: offers@wescot.co.uk
    Subject: Problems with Wescot/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Wescot reference:
    *******867 (Regarding Capital One-debt).
    Hi, I’ve told Wescot I’m unemployed and have offered them a £1 monthly token-payment untill I find new employment. (Like I’ve offered my other creditors). Wescot don’t accept but wants me to fill out an income and expenditure-form. I can’t remember that you at CCCS have mentioned that I have to fill out a form like that, when I do budget-work. It’s like they go a bit to close, and this seems unecessary, to me. What do you think at CCCS about this? Does the law say that I have to fill out a form like that? I attach the letter from Wescot. Yours sincerely, Erik *******
    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 10:35 PM
    Subject: Update/Fwd: Wescot reference: *******867 (Regarding Capital One-debt).
    To: offers@wescot.co.uk
    Hi, I got an income and expenditure-form, in the post, from you, earlier this week. I don’t understand the point in me filling out that form. I’ve already told you that I’m on budget in co-operation, with the CCCS, and that I only can afford to pay a token-payment, (on £1), untill I find new employment. So this is my offer. I don’t understand why you send me this form. I think is unnessesary paper-work then. None of my other creditors have sent me a form like that. They have just accepted my token-payment-offer. So I hope you can set up a direct debit-agreement, for £1 a month, for this debt. Hope this is alright! Best regards, Erik *********
    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 10:31 AM
    Subject: Wescot reference: ******867 (Regarding Capital One-debt).
    To: offers@wescot.co.uk
    Hi, I’m refering to your letter from 19/7, which I got in the post today. I’m currently unemployed, and on a budget in co-operation, with CCCS. My offer to you is the same as to my other creditors, and that is that I pay a one pound token-payment, each month, until I find new employment. Hope this is alright! Yours sincerely, Erik ********
    VISIT OUR WEBSITE AT http://www.cccs.co.uk/
    ———————————————————————
    This email message is intended for the individual to whom it’s addressed
    and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If you are
    not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use or dissemination
    of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information
    in error, please return it to us immediately and delete it from your computer.
    The contents or opinions expressed within this email are not intended to
    represent the views of CCCS unless specifically stated to be so.
    This email is not guaranteed to be free from any computer viruses, although
    it has been checked using the Trend Virus Suite. You should check this email
    and any attachments for the presence of viruses before downloading any files.
    Foundation for Credit Counselling, trading as Consumer Credit Counselling Service (“CCCS”).
    Registered Office: Wade House, Merrion Centre, Leeds, LS2 8NG. Registered in England
    Company No 2757055. Registered Charity No. 1016630″




    VISIT OUR WEBSITE AT

    http://www.cccs.co.uk
    ———————————————————————This email message is intended for the individual to whom it’s addressed
    and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If you are
    not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use or dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information in error, please return it to us immediately and delete it from your computer.

    The contents or opinions expressed within this email are not intended to

    represent the views of CCCS unless specifically stated to be so.


    This email is not guaranteed to be free from any computer viruses, although

    it has been checked using the Trend Virus Suite. You should check this email
    and any attachments for the presence of viruses before downloading any files.


    Foundation for Credit Counselling, trading as Consumer Credit Counselling Service (“CCCS”).

    Registered Office: Wade House, Merrion Centre, Leeds, LS2 8NG. Registered in England Company No 2757055. Registered Charity No. 1016630″



     Registered in Scotland No. SC84131, Registered Office: Kyleshill House, 1 Glencairn Street, Saltcoats, Ayrshire KA21 5JT
    Please consider the environment before printing this email. Wescot, helping to make a difference Confidentiality Notice. The information in this e-mail is confidential and for use by the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient (or responsible for delivery
    of the message to the intended recipient) please notify us immediately (on 01482 590590 (UK) or
    +44 1482 590590 (international)) and delete this message from your computer: you may not copy or forward it, or use or disclose its contents to any other person.
    As Internet communications are capable of data corruption, Wescot Credit Services Ltd does not accept any responsibility for changes made to this message after it was sent.Please note that Wescot Credit Services Ltd does not accept any liability or responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan attachments (if any). Opinions and views expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and may not reflect the
    opinions and views of Wescot Credit Services Ltd.





    VISIT OUR WEBSITE AT

    http://www.cccs.co.uk
    ———————————————————————This email message is intended for the individual to whom it’s addressed
    and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If you are
    not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use or dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information in error, please return it to us immediately and delete it from your computer.

    The contents or opinions expressed within this email are not intended to

    represent the views of CCCS unless specifically stated to be so.


    This email is not guaranteed to be free from any computer viruses, although

    it has been checked using the Trend Virus Suite. You should check this email
    and any attachments for the presence of viruses before downloading any files.


    Foundation for Credit Counselling, trading as Consumer Credit Counselling Service (“CCCS”).

    Registered Office: Wade House, Merrion Centre, Leeds, LS2 8NG. Registered in England Company No 2757055. Registered Charity No. 1016630″




    VISIT OUR WEBSITE AT

    http://www.cccs.co.uk
    ———————————————————————This email message is intended for the individual to whom it’s addressed
    and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If you are
    not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use or dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information in error, please return it to us immediately and delete it from your computer.

    The contents or opinions expressed within this email are not intended to

    represent the views of CCCS unless specifically stated to be so.


    This email is not guaranteed to be free from any computer viruses, although

    it has been checked using the Trend Virus Suite. You should check this email
    and any attachments for the presence of viruses before downloading any files.


    Foundation for Credit Counselling, trading as Consumer Credit Counselling Service (“CCCS”).

    Registered Office: Wade House, Merrion Centre, Leeds, LS2 8NG. Registered in England Company No 2757055. Registered Charity No. 1016630″





     Registered in Scotland No. SC84131, Registered Office: Kyleshill House, 1 Glencairn Street, Saltcoats, Ayrshire KA21 5JT
    Please consider the environment before printing this email. Wescot, helping to make a difference Confidentiality Notice. The information in this e-mail is confidential and for use by the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient (or responsible for delivery of the message to
    the intended recipient) please notify us immediately (on 01482 590590 (UK) or
    +44 1482 590590
    (international)) and delete this message from your computer: you may not copy or forward it, or use or disclose its contents to any other person. As Internet communications are capable of data corruption, Wescot Credit Services Ltd does not accept any responsibility for changes made to this message after it was sent. Please note thatWescot Credit Services Ltd does not accept any liability or responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan attachments (if any). Opinions and views expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and may not reflect the opinions and views
    of Wescot Credit Services Ltd.


     Registered in Scotland No. SC84131, Registered Office: Kyleshill House, 1 Glencairn Street, Saltcoats, Ayrshire KA21 5JT
    Please consider the environment before printing this email. Wescot, helping to make a difference Confidentiality Notice. The information in this e-mail is confidential and for use by the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient (or responsible for delivery of the message to
    the intended recipient) please notify us immediately (on 01482 590590 (UK) or
    +44 1482 590590
    (international)) and delete this message from your computer: you may not copy or forward it, or use or disclose its contents to any other person. As Internet communications are capable of data corruption, Wescot Credit Services Ltd does not accept any responsibility for changes made to this message after it was sent. Please note thatWescot Credit Services Ltd does not accept any liability or responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan attachments (if any). Opinions and views expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and may not reflect the opinions and views
    of Wescot Credit Services Ltd.
    Registered in Scotland No. SC84131, Registered Office: Kyleshill House, 1 Glencairn Street, Saltcoats, Ayrshire KA21 5JT Please consider the environment before printing this email. Wescot, helping to make a difference Confidentiality Notice. The information in this e-mail is confidential and for use by the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient (or responsible for delivery of the message to the intended recipient)
    please notify us immediately (on 01482 590590 (UK) or +44 1482 590590 (international)) and delete this message from your computer: you may not copy or forward it, or use or disclose its contents to any other person. As Internet communications are capable of data corruption, Wescot Credit Services Ltd does not accept any responsibility for changes made to this message after it was sent. Please note that Wescot Credit Services Ltd
    does not accept any liability or responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan attachments (if any). Opinions and views expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and may not reflect the opinions and views of Wescot Credit Services
    Ltd.


    wescot brev.jpg
    89K
    PS. Her er vedlegget: wescot brev

  • Jeg fortsetter å søke jobber. Denne gang som Store Manager


    Gmail – Store Manager – Chester (Job reference code GBR/283559_1376558364)






    Gmail

    Erik Ribsskog
    <eribsskog@gmail.com>






    Store Manager – Chester (Job reference code GBR/283559_1376558364)





    Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:56 PM



    To:
    Poundworld <poundworldretailltd@manpower.co.uk>






    Hi, I read about this vacancy on the Direct Gov-website, and I wanted to
    please apply for this job. I’ve worked as a Store Manager for four years, (I was a
    Cashier/Stocker from 1992 to 1994, then a Key Holder in the summer of
    1994, then an Aspiring Manager the rest of 1994, then an Assistant
    Manager, (in two different stores), from 1995 til 1998, then a Store
    Manager, (in three different stores), from 1998 to 2002, then Key
    Holder, (in two different stores while I studied full-time), from 2002
    to 2004), in the Norwegian grocery-chain Rimi, (now owned by ICA). I was responsible for motivating, training and developing up to 25
    employees, at a time, when I worked as a Store Manager, in Rimi, and
    one of the shops I worked as a Store Manager in, (Rimi Kalbakken, in
    Oslo), from 2000 to 2001, had a weekly turn-over, at around 850.000
    NOK, (which is around £90.000). I’ve also worked as a full-time Cashier, (later part-time Cashier and
    Delicatessen-employee, while studying), in the big hypermarked
    Matland, (which was bought by Coop while I worked there, and changed
    its name to OBS! Triaden), in Lørenskog in Norway. I attach my CV and hope to hear back from you! Yours sincerely, Erik Ribsskog


    CV (Retail) – Erik Ribsskog.doc
    49K

  • Jeg sendte en ny e-post til Hugh Baird College


    Gmail – Problems with course start






    Gmail

    Erik Ribsskog
    <eribsskog@gmail.com>






    Problems with course start





    Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 4:39 PM



    To:
    Marc Bailey <Marc.Bailey@hughbaird.ac.uk>

    Cc:
    Contact-Us <Contact-Us@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk>, pamela.woods@connexionslive.com, “Kershaw, Danielle” <Danielle.Kershaw@workinglinks.co.uk>, Landsleder UK <landsleder.uk@ansa.no>, NITH Oslo <oslo@nith.no>, postmottak@hioa.no, Akademikerforbundet <post@akademikerforbundet.no>






    Hi, by the way. Perhaps the college could write a bachelor-degree for me, since I’m
    enrolled there? I have 99 study-credits from NHI, (in Oslo). (Where I studied Information Management, in 1989/90 and 1991/92). And I have 90 study-credits from Oslo University College. (Where I studied IT, in 2002/03 and 2003/04). So I have 189 study-credits, from Information Management and IT. And the limit, fom bachelor-degrees, are 180 credits. So I really have a bachelor-degree in IT and a bachelor-degree in
    Information Management, I think. Perhaps the college could sort this for me, (since my
    home-universities are very slow, for some reason). Since you have dragged me to your college, three times, and wasted my time. (Since this was for no reason, since you canceled the course, that I
    read about, on your web-site). Because my Norwegian-degree, (‘Høgskolekandidat’), is perhaps not so
    well known, here in the UK. And a bachelor-degree is also a better degree. Thanks in advance for the help with this! Best regards, Erik Ribsskog
    On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Marc Bailey
    <Marc.Bailey@hughbaird.ac.uk> wrote:
    > I am sorry we have been unable to support your training needs, Mr Ribsskog. Good luck with your future.
    >
    > Kind Regards,
    > Marc
    >
    >
    > ________________________________________
    > From: Erik Ribsskog [eribsskog@gmail.com]
    > Sent: 13 September 2013 14:39
    > To: Marc Bailey
    > Cc: Contact-Us; Landsleder UK; pamela.woods@connexionslive.com; Kershaw, Danielle
    > Subject: Re: Problems with course start
    >
    > Hi,
    >
    > I think you still show lack of respect by calling me by my first name.
    >
    > I don’t want anything more to do with your college.
    >
    > You have dragged me three times to your college, for enrolment, to
    > pick up a letter, and for a fist course-day on a wrong day.
    >
    > And a false letter and a disappairing e-mail is involved.
    >
    > And a guy at the college who clapped me on the back, and patronised me.
    >
    > I’ve had enough of your college.
    >
    > I already have enough credits for a bachelor degree.
    >
    > That’s just something to do with admistration, in Norway.
    >
    > This, (that I went to your college), was to do with my carreer-plan with NCS.
    >
    > And nothing to do with degrees.
    >
    > Like I’ve told you earlier.
    >
    > In 2011 I was thrown out of University of Sunderland-accomodation ‘nazi-style’.
    >
    > When I woke up today I wondered if my problems in the UK was due to
    > that my great-great-grandfather, in Denmark, before the was had to
    > give up a big factory in Fredriksverk, in Denmark, to his sisters
    > British husband.
    >
    > (A Danish family-company.
    >
    > They built the harbour for the town, etc).
    >
    > This was after a conflict, and the British in-law-guy Stephenson, got
    > the Danish familiy-factory.
    >
    > (My grandmother in Norway told me a few years ago, while I lived in
    > Liverpool City Centre).
    >
    > So to cover up this, Brits still mess with this guys, (Heegaard’s), desendants.
    >
    > Is that it?
    >
    > Erik Ribsskog
    >
    >
    > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Marc Bailey
    > <Marc.Bailey@hughbaird.ac.uk> wrote:
    >>
    >> Hi Erik,
    >>
    >> I don’t know why the email has gone astray, I find email systems fairly reliable these days.
    >>
    >> I am sorry to hear that you have had courses cancelled before. Luckily, in my 14 years at Hugh Baird College this is only the second time I have been in the unfortunate position of having to cancel a class.
    >>
    >> We do try and ensure that our courses are in keeping with the demands of our community and regional needs, however the ability to operate courses is contingent on applicable funding. For this reason, we must ensure that we have enough students to at least meet our basic operating costs for the course. Although I cannot comment on your past experiences with Liverpool Community College, these are the reasons behind our decision in this case.
    >>
    >> I understand that the IT industry is a fast paced one with constant changes and developments, however perhaps as you have already gained a Foundation Degree in IT, you could explore the possibility of progressing on to a BA/BSc (top-up) course with a University or Partner College to gain your full degree in IT. If you were to pursue this route it would require a larger financial and time commitment, but it may be an avenue you hadn’t considered. I will hold my hands up and say, I don’t know whether your Foundation Degree would meet their entry requirements, however it may be worth exploring.
    >>
    >> Again, it is with regret that we need to close this class, and please accept our apologies for the inconvenience that this may have caused.
    >>
    >>
    >> Kind Regards,
    >> Marc
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> ________________________________________
    >> From: Erik Ribsskog [eribsskog@gmail.com]
    >> Sent: 12 September 2013 22:44
    >> To: Marc Bailey
    >> Cc: Contact-Us; pamela.woods@connexionslive.com; Landsleder UK; Kershaw, Danielle
    >> Subject: Re: Problems with course start
    >>
    >> Hi,
    >>
    >> I can’t see that I’ve recieved any e-mail from you on 9/9.
    >>
    >> And the false letter seems a bit strange.
    >>
    >> I’m used with colleges canceling the courses I register for.
    >>
    >> Liverpool Community College did this a couple of times, (for courses I
    >> registered on), some years ago.
    >>
    >> So that’s why I though I’d try the college in Bootle now.
    >>
    >> (Since NCS informed me about your college.
    >>
    >> Pamella Woods there at a meeting at Aintree jobcentre).
    >>
    >> This is the third time, (if I’m not mistaking), that this happens to
    >> me, here in Liverpool.
    >>
    >> So I think it’s a bit like being hit by the lightning three times.
    >>
    >> I can’t recommend for people in Norway to study at Merseyside, because
    >> the courses are ‘always’ changed.
    >>
    >> This was very dissapointing, I think.
    >>
    >> I’ll just hear with Aintree jobcentre, (or NCS it they reply), about
    >> taking one of more courses with e.g. Learn Direct, in stead.
    >>
    >> I already have a foundation-degree in IT, from Norway.
    >>
    >> So I don’t really have the ‘update-courses’ on a college, (I think).
    >>
    >> (It’s just that Michelle Kershaw at an organisation the Jobcentre sent
    >> me to, some years ago, in the city centre, adviced me to study at
    >> Liverpool Comunity College, (if I remember it right).
    >>
    >> And NCS adviced me to update my skills at a college as well).
    >>
    >> I have good experience with Learn Direct, so I’m just going to try to
    >> take some courses there instead.
    >>
    >> Thanks for informing me.
    >>
    >> Regards,
    >>
    >> Erik Ribsskog
    >>
    >>
    >> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 10:04 PM, Marc Bailey
    >> <Marc.Bailey@hughbaird.ac.uk> wrote:
    >>> Hello Erik,
    >>>
    >>> Thank you for getting in touch. I have tried to contact you by telephone a couple of times which I have unfortunately been unsuccessful. I had also sent you an email (see below) informing you of the course cancellation.
    >>>
    >>> I was unaware that a letter had been sent to you with an incorrect start date for the course, so I can only apologise for that. The courses scheduled start date for induction should have been Wednesday 11th, so as you can imagine I was expecting a couple of days for you to receive this information.
    >>>
    >>> Sorry for the inconvenience this miss communication has caused.
    >>>
    >>> Regards,
    >>> Marc
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> ———————————————————————-
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> From: Marc Bailey
    >>> Sent: 09 September 2013 09:43
    >>> To: ‘eriksskog@gmail.com‘
    >>> Subject: AutoCAD Training – Cancelled
    >>> Importance: High
    >>>
    >>> Hi Erik,
    >>>
    >>> I have just tried to phone you.
    >>>
    >>> I am sorry to say that due to a low number of applicants for the CAD course, we have made the decision that it would not be viable to run the course this year. It’s a shame as historically we have had good enrolment on the course, however I think that it is a casualty of current economic times that courses like this are not as sought after as they used to be.
    >>>
    >>> Anyway, sorry we will not be able help you with your CAD training this year. If you require CAD specifically, I believe Liverpool Community is advertising the course, I am not sure about other institutions. If you are just generally looking for courses to develop your career or skill set, please feel free to look through the our website, or contact the college careers advice to see if there is anything else you would be interested in.
    >>>
    >>> In relation to your fees that you have paid on enrolment (if applicable), I will inform our office of the status of the course, and you will be able to claim a refund from them.
    >>>
    >>> Again, I’m sorry about this situation.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> Kind Regards,
    >>>
    >>> Marc Bailey
    >>> Programme Manager for CAD
    >>>
    >>> ———————————————————————-
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> —–Original Message—–
    >>> From: Elaine Evans
    >>> Sent: 12 September 2013 15:50
    >>> To: Marc Bailey
    >>> Subject: FW: Problems with course start
    >>>
    >>> Hello Marc,
    >>>
    >>> Please see the email below.
    >>>
    >>> Thanks
    >>> Elaine
    >>>
    >>> —–Original Message—–
    >>> From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
    >>> Sent: 09 September 2013 20:21
    >>> To: Student Services
    >>> Cc: Contact-Us; pamela.woods@connexionslive.com; Landsleder UK
    >>> Subject: Problems with course start
    >>>
    >>> Hi,
    >>>
    >>> i was at Pembroke Building today at 17.50 for the first course-day.
    >>>
    >>> (See attached scans about CAD-course).
    >>>
    >>> I asked the guy in the reception, about the course.
    >>>
    >>> He told me to sit down, and waited for ten minutes, and then he used five minutes, to ask in another room, about the course, after I gave the files I’ve attached.
    >>>
    >>> This guy, (who said he was Terry from Security), told me, that you have written the wrong day, on the letter.
    >>>
    >>> And he said he couldn’t find the person responsible for the course.
    >>>
    >>> (After I’d waited for around fifteen minutes).
    >>>
    >>> I was wondering whats going on.
    >>>
    >>> I see now that someone from the college have called me earlier today.
    >>>
    >>> I thought it was from the computer repair shop, because the motherboard on my computer has been replaced.
    >>>
    >>> What’s going on I’m wondering?
    >>>
    >>> Can you e-mail me the course timetable, please?`
    >>>
    >>> Best regards,
    >>>
    >>> Erik Ribsskog
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> [http://development.hughbaird.ac.uk/footer/footer.jpg]
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> The information contained in this message or in any of its attachments
    >>> may be privileged and confidential and intended for the exclusive use of the
    >>> stated recipient(s) only. Access to this e-mail by any other person is
    >>> unauthorised.
    >>>
    >>> If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail please note that
    >>> you must not copy, disclose, reproduce or distribute its contents.  To do so
    >>> may be deemed unlawful. If you have received this email in error then you
    >>> must immediately delete it from your system.
    >>>
    >>> Any views expressed in this e-mail are those of the author only.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> Visit our web site www.hughbaird.ac.uk
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>
    >>
    >> [http://development.hughbaird.ac.uk/footer/footer.jpg]
    >>
    >
    >
    > [http://development.hughbaird.ac.uk/footer/footer.jpg]
    >

  • Jeg sendte en ny e-post til Hugh Baird College


    Gmail – Problems with course start






    Gmail

    Erik Ribsskog
    <eribsskog@gmail.com>






    Problems with course start





    Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 2:39 PM



    To:
    Marc Bailey <Marc.Bailey@hughbaird.ac.uk>

    Cc:
    Contact-Us <Contact-Us@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk>, Landsleder UK <landsleder.uk@ansa.no>, pamela.woods@connexionslive.com, “Kershaw, Danielle” <Danielle.Kershaw@workinglinks.co.uk>






    Hi, I think you still show lack of respect by calling me by my first name. I don’t want anything more to do with your college. You have dragged me three times to your college, for enrolment, to
    pick up a letter, and for a fist course-day on a wrong day. And a false letter and a disappairing e-mail is involved. And a guy at the college who clapped me on the back, and patronised me. I’ve had enough of your college. I already have enough credits for a bachelor degree. That’s just something to do with admistration, in Norway. This, (that I went to your college), was to do with my carreer-plan with NCS. And nothing to do with degrees. Like I’ve told you earlier. In 2011 I was thrown out of University of Sunderland-accomodation ‘nazi-style’. When I woke up today I wondered if my problems in the UK was due to
    that my great-great-grandfather, in Denmark, before the was had to
    give up a big factory in Fredriksverk, in Denmark, to his sisters
    British husband. (A Danish family-company. They built the harbour for the town, etc). This was after a conflict, and the British in-law-guy Stephenson, got
    the Danish familiy-factory. (My grandmother in Norway told me a few years ago, while I lived in
    Liverpool City Centre). So to cover up this, Brits still mess with this guys, (Heegaard’s), desendants. Is that it? Erik Ribsskog
    On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Marc Bailey
    <Marc.Bailey@hughbaird.ac.uk> wrote:
    >
    > Hi Erik,
    >
    > I don’t know why the email has gone astray, I find email systems fairly reliable these days.
    >
    > I am sorry to hear that you have had courses cancelled before. Luckily, in my 14 years at Hugh Baird College this is only the second time I have been in the unfortunate position of having to cancel a class.
    >
    > We do try and ensure that our courses are in keeping with the demands of our community and regional needs, however the ability to operate courses is contingent on applicable funding. For this reason, we must ensure that we have enough students to at least meet our basic operating costs for the course. Although I cannot comment on your past experiences with Liverpool Community College, these are the reasons behind our decision in this case.
    >
    > I understand that the IT industry is a fast paced one with constant changes and developments, however perhaps as you have already gained a Foundation Degree in IT, you could explore the possibility of progressing on to a BA/BSc (top-up) course with a University or Partner College to gain your full degree in IT. If you were to pursue this route it would require a larger financial and time commitment, but it may be an avenue you hadn’t considered. I will hold my hands up and say, I don’t know whether your Foundation Degree would meet their entry requirements, however it may be worth exploring.
    >
    > Again, it is with regret that we need to close this class, and please accept our apologies for the inconvenience that this may have caused.
    >
    >
    > Kind Regards,
    > Marc
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > ________________________________________
    > From: Erik Ribsskog [eribsskog@gmail.com]
    > Sent: 12 September 2013 22:44
    > To: Marc Bailey
    > Cc: Contact-Us; pamela.woods@connexionslive.com; Landsleder UK; Kershaw, Danielle
    > Subject: Re: Problems with course start
    >
    > Hi,
    >
    > I can’t see that I’ve recieved any e-mail from you on 9/9.
    >
    > And the false letter seems a bit strange.
    >
    > I’m used with colleges canceling the courses I register for.
    >
    > Liverpool Community College did this a couple of times, (for courses I
    > registered on), some years ago.
    >
    > So that’s why I though I’d try the college in Bootle now.
    >
    > (Since NCS informed me about your college.
    >
    > Pamella Woods there at a meeting at Aintree jobcentre).
    >
    > This is the third time, (if I’m not mistaking), that this happens to
    > me, here in Liverpool.
    >
    > So I think it’s a bit like being hit by the lightning three times.
    >
    > I can’t recommend for people in Norway to study at Merseyside, because
    > the courses are ‘always’ changed.
    >
    > This was very dissapointing, I think.
    >
    > I’ll just hear with Aintree jobcentre, (or NCS it they reply), about
    > taking one of more courses with e.g. Learn Direct, in stead.
    >
    > I already have a foundation-degree in IT, from Norway.
    >
    > So I don’t really have the ‘update-courses’ on a college, (I think).
    >
    > (It’s just that Michelle Kershaw at an organisation the Jobcentre sent
    > me to, some years ago, in the city centre, adviced me to study at
    > Liverpool Comunity College, (if I remember it right).
    >
    > And NCS adviced me to update my skills at a college as well).
    >
    > I have good experience with Learn Direct, so I’m just going to try to
    > take some courses there instead.
    >
    > Thanks for informing me.
    >
    > Regards,
    >
    > Erik Ribsskog
    >
    >
    > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 10:04 PM, Marc Bailey
    > <Marc.Bailey@hughbaird.ac.uk> wrote:
    >> Hello Erik,
    >>
    >> Thank you for getting in touch. I have tried to contact you by telephone a couple of times which I have unfortunately been unsuccessful. I had also sent you an email (see below) informing you of the course cancellation.
    >>
    >> I was unaware that a letter had been sent to you with an incorrect start date for the course, so I can only apologise for that. The courses scheduled start date for induction should have been Wednesday 11th, so as you can imagine I was expecting a couple of days for you to receive this information.
    >>
    >> Sorry for the inconvenience this miss communication has caused.
    >>
    >> Regards,
    >> Marc
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> ———————————————————————-
    >>
    >>
    >> From: Marc Bailey
    >> Sent: 09 September 2013 09:43
    >> To: ‘eriksskog@gmail.com‘
    >> Subject: AutoCAD Training – Cancelled
    >> Importance: High
    >>
    >> Hi Erik,
    >>
    >> I have just tried to phone you.
    >>
    >> I am sorry to say that due to a low number of applicants for the CAD course, we have made the decision that it would not be viable to run the course this year. It’s a shame as historically we have had good enrolment on the course, however I think that it is a casualty of current economic times that courses like this are not as sought after as they used to be.
    >>
    >> Anyway, sorry we will not be able help you with your CAD training this year. If you require CAD specifically, I believe Liverpool Community is advertising the course, I am not sure about other institutions. If you are just generally looking for courses to develop your career or skill set, please feel free to look through the our website, or contact the college careers advice to see if there is anything else you would be interested in.
    >>
    >> In relation to your fees that you have paid on enrolment (if applicable), I will inform our office of the status of the course, and you will be able to claim a refund from them.
    >>
    >> Again, I’m sorry about this situation.
    >>
    >>
    >> Kind Regards,
    >>
    >> Marc Bailey
    >> Programme Manager for CAD
    >>
    >> ———————————————————————-
    >>
    >>
    >> —–Original Message—–
    >> From: Elaine Evans
    >> Sent: 12 September 2013 15:50
    >> To: Marc Bailey
    >> Subject: FW: Problems with course start
    >>
    >> Hello Marc,
    >>
    >> Please see the email below.
    >>
    >> Thanks
    >> Elaine
    >>
    >> —–Original Message—–
    >> From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
    >> Sent: 09 September 2013 20:21
    >> To: Student Services
    >> Cc: Contact-Us; pamela.woods@connexionslive.com; Landsleder UK
    >> Subject: Problems with course start
    >>
    >> Hi,
    >>
    >> i was at Pembroke Building today at 17.50 for the first course-day.
    >>
    >> (See attached scans about CAD-course).
    >>
    >> I asked the guy in the reception, about the course.
    >>
    >> He told me to sit down, and waited for ten minutes, and then he used five minutes, to ask in another room, about the course, after I gave the files I’ve attached.
    >>
    >> This guy, (who said he was Terry from Security), told me, that you have written the wrong day, on the letter.
    >>
    >> And he said he couldn’t find the person responsible for the course.
    >>
    >> (After I’d waited for around fifteen minutes).
    >>
    >> I was wondering whats going on.
    >>
    >> I see now that someone from the college have called me earlier today.
    >>
    >> I thought it was from the computer repair shop, because the motherboard on my computer has been replaced.
    >>
    >> What’s going on I’m wondering?
    >>
    >> Can you e-mail me the course timetable, please?`
    >>
    >> Best regards,
    >>
    >> Erik Ribsskog
    >>
    >>
    >> [http://development.hughbaird.ac.uk/footer/footer.jpg]
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> The information contained in this message or in any of its attachments
    >> may be privileged and confidential and intended for the exclusive use of the
    >> stated recipient(s) only. Access to this e-mail by any other person is
    >> unauthorised.
    >>
    >> If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail please note that
    >> you must not copy, disclose, reproduce or distribute its contents.  To do so
    >> may be deemed unlawful. If you have received this email in error then you
    >> must immediately delete it from your system.
    >>
    >> Any views expressed in this e-mail are those of the author only.
    >>
    >>
    >> Visit our web site www.hughbaird.ac.uk
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >
    >
    > [http://development.hughbaird.ac.uk/footer/footer.jpg]
    >