Stikkord: Klage

Jeg sendte en ny e-post til the Jobcentre

Gmail – Your letter from yesterday, ref: TO 0124786

Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Your letter from yesterday, ref: TO 0124786

Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 6:44 PM

To:

sue.riley2@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk

Hi,

you write that what happened was 'staff error', but I complained about this error, to your representative, (the young woman with the scars from the pimples on her chin).

And then she just took back, the litterature, from Pretemps.

So at first this was an error.

But when I complained, she should have given me the full information-pack, like you write in your letter.

I have had many similar problems, at the Jobcentre, at the Merseryside Police, and at work, and more.

So I think this could be due to that I'm being mobbed, by some kind of communist-mob, or other mob, (maybe since my grandmother were from fine noble-families in Denmark).

So I would please want to escalate this complaint.

So I hope you can send this e-mail on to your Chief Executive, like you write in the e-mail that I should contact.

Hope it's alright that I send this by e-mail and not by letter, for practical reasons!

Best Regards,

Erik Ribsskog

25. juni 2010

Jeg sendte en ny e-post til ICE

Gmail – FW: RESTRICTED – PERSONAL DATA Independent Case Examiner's Office

Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>

FW: RESTRICTED – PERSONAL DATA Independent Case Examiner’s Office

Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 3:20 PM

To:

DWP ICE gateway team <ICE@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>

Hi,

yes, I would like the correspondance, to be in writing.

Since that's from Norway, then I think it's less chance for me being 'overrun', by faster speakers.

Also, I still think Mr. Lee provoked me, by calling me ten minutes before the end of the business hours, and then ridiculed me, by saying that I couldn't speak with then, right after.

That wasn't what this was about.

You say you didn't know when I wanted to be called.

But, you knew I was unemployed, so then I think you should call within the business-hours, since I think ICE-cases, are part of being unemployed, (which then is like my job).

So this I still think, if you know someone are unemployed, then you should call them within the business-hours.

I still don't understand why Mr. Temple didn't do this.

Also, you call people on their mobiles, when they are at Tesco etc.

To discuss an ICE-case.

Do you think it's smart, to discuss an ICE-case over the mobile?

I don't think this is smart, because people don't have their notes with them, in the shop.

So I want you to please escalate this complaint, since I don't think you have explained this good enough.

Best Regards,

Erik Ribsskog

On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 11:41 AM, DWP ICE gateway team <ICE@dwp.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:

Thank

you

Karen Grace
Customer

Services Team

**********************************************************************

This document is strictly confidential and is intended only for use by the addressee.

If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or other

action taken in reliance of the information contained in this e-mail is strictly prohibited.

Any views expressed by the sender of this message are not necessarily those of the Department

for Work and Pensions.

If you have received this transmission in error, please use the reply function to tell us

and then permanently delete what you have received.

This email was scanned for viruses by the Department for Work and Pensions' anti-virus services and on leaving the Department was found to be virus free.

Please note: Incoming and outgoing e-mail messages are routinely monitored for compliance

with our policy on the use of electronic communications.

**********************************************************************

25. juni 2010

Jeg sendte en ny klage til Tesco

Gmail – Complaint about you Tesco-shops at Clayton Sq. and Liverpool One, in Liverpool

Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Complaint about you Tesco-shops at Clayton Sq. and Liverpool One, in Liverpool

Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 3:16 PM

To:

Tesco Customer Service <customer.service@tesco.co.uk>

Hi,

this isn't about the carrier-bags, this is about the harrassment.

I also mentioned which shops it was in the subject-line.

I've been working as a shop-manager in Norway, and I know that only old women brings old bags to the shop.

I would sometimes sit in the check-out, and I asked everyone, 'do you want a carrier'.

And sometimes men would reply, 'Of course I want a carrier, do you think I'm an old woman ("gammel kjærring" in Norwegian)'.

I don't think you take my complaint seriously.

And your spelling isn't even right.

Could you please escalate this complaint, as I've overheard that I'm being used as a 'target guy', I think this could be some mobster-activity.

I've also had more or less similar complaints against Tesco from before, which you neighter took serious.

So I'm going to put a lawyer on you if you don't take this serious now, if I get the oppertunity later.

My patience with you is ran out, unfortunately.

Bag for life, and poppy-bags, this isn't what I contact you about, it's the harassment.

Is this so difficult for you to understand?

Bags for life and poppy-bags are fine.

But only as long as you also have the regular bags.

But you have made this into a discussion about bags, when it really is about harrassment, so you just make me more annoyed really.

Is 'customer-support' something that your company don't know what means?

Erik Ribsskog

On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Tesco Customer Service <customer.service@tesco.co.uk> wrote:

Dear Erik

I'm sorry to hear that you have been having problems obtaining carrier bags recently when you visit our Stores in Liverpool recently. I can understand how frustrating this must be for you.

I have been unable to contact anyone as you have not said which stores you shop in. However, if you let me know I wold be more than happy to contact the stores concerned.

However, If I might suggest that perhaps you may be able to purchase a Bag for Life when you visit one of our Stores. They start at 45pence and go up to over a £1.

You would get Clubcard points for buying the bag, and an extra point in store every time that you used the bag. It would actually pay for itself in no time at all.

These bags are heavy duty and have special slots for bottles to stand up in at the side so you can balance your shop.

Once again, I'd like to apologise for any inconvenience this may have caused you.

If you have any further queries please do not hesitate to contact me at customer.service@tesco.co.uk quoting TES7755298X.

Kind Regards

Frances Brierley

Customer Service Manager

Tesco Customer Service

—– Original Message —–

From: "Erik Ribsskog" <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Date: 24 June 2010

Subject: Complaint about you Tesco-shops at Clayton Sq. and Liverpool One, in Liverpool

Hi,

lately, your shops in Liverpool, (the two shops mentioned above), have

stopped ordering enough carrier-bags.

So I have to buy the poppy-bags, if I can find them.

But, your representative, at Liverpool One, the other day, was harrassing

the customers.

She told me to put more food in the carriers, than I had done.

I think you staff go to close.

I'm from Norway, and when I studied in Sunderland, my flat-mates and fellow

exchange-students, from around Europe, told me I shouldn't drink the

tap-water here.

So I buy like 4 liters perhaps, (around 8 pints), of tap-water, in the shop,

or carbonated water, or 'pop', if I can afford it, since I'm unemployed, and

sometimes even lager.

So Tesco can't expect me to carry like five kilos, in one carrier-bag,

because they are very thin.

I remember once, when I was a child, and lived in Mellomhagen, in Norway,

and my mother sent me to the Co-op shop, (Samvirkelaget), to buy several

liters of milk etc.

And then the carrier-bag, tore apart, from the weight of the milk, when I

was half-way home.

I was maybe six years old.

What are one supposed to do then.

One can put all of this in ones pocket.

One have to stand there and look stupid.

Like I had to, untill my mother came to find me, maybe 15 minutes later.

The woman who I met who lived close to where this happened, didn't want to

give me a carrier.

So I don't think you can expect people to not use enough carriers, to get

ones shopping home, with the carriers in one piece.

This is harassment and patronising, that your representatives do.

This I wanted do complain about.

This seems like something they would do in the Soviet-union.

I used to be a shop-manager in Norway, (in Rimi), and if we ran out of

carrier-bags, I would drive to a another Rimi-shop, and borrow carrier-bags

from them, untill we got more ourselves.

This has happened to me three times, in the last week or two, in Liverpool.

And if I complain, then I'm being harrassed by inpolite shop-workers, who

tell me to put more food, in each bag.

Next time, I'll ask them to go home with me then, and pick up everything

that falls out, when the bags tear from the weight of to much food in them.

And don't give me line that I got from the same shop-woman, about that I

should save the enviroment.

That's also to patronise your customers.

I go to the shop to get food, not to be preached at.

Is Tesco a food-shop or a radical environmental-organisation at war?

Please explain this to me.

And please get your shops to order enough carrier-bags.

This is annoying, that you haven't got enough of them, and I think I'm going

to shop a lot at Aldi, when that shop starts now this automn, in Liverpool

City Center, because this never happened, when I lived in Sunderland, and

shopped at Aldi there.

Regards,

Erik Ribsskog

PS.

Her er mer om dette:

24. juni 2010

Jeg sendte en ny e-post til Utenriksdepartementet

Gmail – Problemer med EU-kommisjonen/Fwd: Complaint about the Local Goverment Ombudsman/Fwd: Complaint against Liverpool City Council

Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Problemer med EU-kommisjonen/Fwd: Complaint about the Local Goverment Ombudsman/Fwd: Complaint against Liverpool City Council

Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 4:57 PM

To:

post@mfa.no

Hei,

kan ikke dere høre hva de kjepphøye EU-folka driver med?

Jeg har klaget til EU-kommisjonen, på at jeg ikke får svar på en IPCC-klage i England, mm.

Men de sier her at jeg har fått ordentlig svar fra de, men det har jeg ikke.

Og de trakasserer meg også, og sier at de ikke vil svare på korrespondansen min, for å spare skattepenger.

Dette er korrupsjon og EU-imperalisme i praksis.

Jeg håper dere kan jekke dem ned litt, selv om Norge kanskje ikke er så stort land, og er redde for tyskere og det som er, hvis jeg skjønte det riktig på ambassaden i London.

Men men.

Mvh.

Erik Ribsskog

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Date: Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 4:26 PM
Subject: Re: Complaint about the Local Goverment Ombudsman/Fwd: Complaint against Liverpool City Council
To: Arthur.Pooley@ec.europa.eu

Hi,

I think I should remind you that Norway pay the EU a lot of money each year, for the EEA-agreement.

Just to be treated like shit, by assholes like you.

EU sucks!

EU is a catholic club!

This is patetic.

Erik Ribsskog

On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 3:48 PM, <Arthur.Pooley@ec.europa.eu> wrote:

dear sir

i refer to your email of 7 june and to your previous

emails, some in norwegian which is not an official language for

us,

and i refer to the commission answers including an email

from mrs wigbold on 2-9-2009 and a letter from me on

22-12-2009

unfortunately i find your communications rather strange and

apparently on subjects far from the competences of the

commission

your suggestion that the commission could make the

liverpool city council or the local government ombudsman pay you

money

is quite eccentric, and really not a subject for

correspondence, apart from your repeated references to "a sweaty

gym"

your suggestion that the commission should be seaching

about you on the internet is not understood either

in these circumstances i have reached the conclusion that

the commission will not enter into further correspondence with

you

on these subjects, to avoid wasting taxpayers money, so any

further such emails will not receive any answer

your

faithfully

af

pooley

head of unit

SG-R2

mail and document management
From: Erik Ribsskog

[mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 4:50

PM
To: SG PLAINTES
Subject: Complaint about the Local

Goverment Ombudsman/Fwd: Complaint against Liverpool City

Council

Hi,

I'm from Norway, but live in the UK.

Here one can see how some people treats Norwegians in the UK.

They bully me and call me 'Ms', like mobsters, and they suggest to

meet foreigners at a sweaty Gym, instead of replying in writing, like I

wanted.

I think that some mobsters attacked me at the Liverpool City

Council Gym and that some mobsters in the Council and at the Local

Government Ombudsman covered it up.

I guess this could be, since I'm Norway.

And according to the EEA-agreement, I have the same rights as

EU-citizens, in the UK.

So I think you should make the Liverpool City Counil and the Local

Government Ombudsman, pay me a lot of money in compensation, for all their

crap, that I have to take, since I'm from Norway, or why they do this.

Best Regards,

Erik Ribsskog
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Date:

Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 3:36 PM
Subject: Re: Complaint against Liverpool City

Council
To: LGOAT Mailbox <L.Mailbox@lgo.org.uk>

Hi,

ok, I guess it's nothing to do about that case then.

I thought you let the Coucil get away to easy.

I mean, I send them a written complaint, and the offer to meet me

in a sweaty gym.

I go to the gym to work-out, not to have meetings.

Meetings I think should be held somewhere with less sweat,

endorfines and hormones in the air.

So I thought it was just riddiculus, that you let the Council get

away.

All I wanted was a reply in writing from them.

Which I think is the norm, if one send a written complaint.

But all this non-sense with the Council suggesting meetings at the Gym,

and you at the Ombudsman letting Liverpool City Council getting away with

that.

I think that this reminds me of another smell than the one at the

gym.

All of this smells really, I think.

But I guess it's nothing to do about this.

Regards,

Erik Ribsskog
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 3:21 PM, LGOAT Mailbox <L.Mailbox@lgo.org.uk> wrote:
Dear Ms

Ribsskog,

Thank you for your

reply.

You could continue with

the case that you regard more serious if you wish but the previous advice

would still apply and you would need to provide us with evidence that the

council’s complaints process has been completed (The council would

normally respond in writing at each stage of a formal

complaint)

If the issue regarding

harassment at the gym is something that we have considered before however

we would not be able to consider it again.

Yours

Sincerely

Kerry Anne

Hartnett

Customer Service

Advisor |

LGO Advice Team

| DL: 02476 820 132 | 0300 061 0614

The Oaks, No 2 | Westwood Way | Westwood Business Park | Coventry | CV4 8JB |

www.lgo.org.uk

From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sent: 07 June 2010 15:04
To: LGOAT

Mailbox
Subject: Re: Complaint against Liverpool City

Council

Hi,

I don't think one phone-call like that, is something to

make a fuss about.

But I thought the problems with the harassment

against me at the Council Gym, was more important.

So I thougth that maybe I could go on with that case,

since I didn't think it was properly sorted.

Best Regards,

Erik Ribsskog
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:08 PM, LGOAT Mailbox <L.Mailbox@lgo.org.uk> wrote:
Dear Mr

Ribsskog,

Thank you for your

email.

I have established from

searching for your details that you had a complaint investigated by the

Local Government Ombudsman which was closed in February 2009. (08 000

279)

If you have a new

complaint with the council you will need to complete the council’s own

complaints procedure before requesting that the Ombudsman considers your

complaint for investigation

Please also note that we

do not simply tell councils what to do, we would only make recommendations

to a council in the event that fault was found during a complaint

investigation by the Ombudsman.

If you would like to

raise a new complaint because you have completed the council’s complaints

procedure then please fill out the attached form and return it with a copy

of the council’s final response to your complaint.

Yours

Sincerely

Kerry Anne

Hartnett

Customer Service

Advisor |

LGO Advice Team

| DL: 02476 820 132 | 0300 061 0614

The Oaks, No 2 | Westwood Way | Westwood Business Park | Coventry | CV4 8JB |

www.lgo.org.uk

Error!

Filename not specified.

From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sent: 06 June 2010 23:46
To: LGOAT

Mailbox
Subject: Complaint against Liverpool City

Council

Hi,

I had a complaint against Liverpool City Council,

(Lifestyles Gym), that I wanted them to reply to in writing, (back in

2006!).

You at the Ombudsman said they didn't have to, since

they offered to meet me at the gym.

On 28/5, Lifestyles called me, wanting me to reply to a

customer survey.

I tried to explain, that I had a complaint against

them, and because of this, didn't want to be part of the survey.

But the person calling didn't speak that good

English, I think I have to say.

So it ended with me having to hang up.

Can't you please tell the Council to reply to my

complaint in writing, so that we get this case over with?

Best Regards,

Erik

Ribsskog
NOTICE - This message contains information intended only for the use of the addressee named above.  If you have received this message in error please advise us at once and do not make any use of the information.
NOTICE - This message contains information intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you have received this message in error please advise us at once and do not make any use of the information.

21. juni 2010

Jeg ble litt irritert på EU

Gmail – Complaint about the Local Goverment Ombudsman/Fwd: Complaint against Liverpool City Council

Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Complaint about the Local Goverment Ombudsman/Fwd: Complaint against Liverpool City Council

Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 4:26 PM

To:

Arthur.Pooley@ec.europa.eu

Hi,

I think I should remind you that Norway pay the EU a lot of money each year, for the EEA-agreement.

Just to be treated like shit, by assholes like you.

EU sucks!

EU is a catholic club!

This is patetic.

Erik Ribsskog

On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 3:48 PM, <Arthur.Pooley@ec.europa.eu> wrote:

dear sir

i refer to your email of 7 june and to your previous

emails, some in norwegian which is not an official language for

us,

and i refer to the commission answers including an email

from mrs wigbold on 2-9-2009 and a letter from me on

22-12-2009

unfortunately i find your communications rather strange and

apparently on subjects far from the competences of the

commission

your suggestion that the commission could make the

liverpool city council or the local government ombudsman pay you

money

is quite eccentric, and really not a subject for

correspondence, apart from your repeated references to "a sweaty

gym"

your suggestion that the commission should be seaching

about you on the internet is not understood either

in these circumstances i have reached the conclusion that

the commission will not enter into further correspondence with

you

on these subjects, to avoid wasting taxpayers money, so any

further such emails will not receive any answer

your

faithfully

af

pooley

head of unit

SG-R2

mail and document management
From: Erik Ribsskog

[mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 4:50

PM
To: SG PLAINTES
Subject: Complaint about the Local

Goverment Ombudsman/Fwd: Complaint against Liverpool City

Council

Hi,

I'm from Norway, but live in the UK.

Here one can see how some people treats Norwegians in the UK.

They bully me and call me 'Ms', like mobsters, and they suggest to

meet foreigners at a sweaty Gym, instead of replying in writing, like I

wanted.

I think that some mobsters attacked me at the Liverpool City

Council Gym and that some mobsters in the Council and at the Local

Government Ombudsman covered it up.

I guess this could be, since I'm Norway.

And according to the EEA-agreement, I have the same rights as

EU-citizens, in the UK.

So I think you should make the Liverpool City Counil and the Local

Government Ombudsman, pay me a lot of money in compensation, for all their

crap, that I have to take, since I'm from Norway, or why they do this.

Best Regards,

Erik Ribsskog
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Date:

Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 3:36 PM
Subject: Re: Complaint against Liverpool City

Council
To: LGOAT Mailbox <L.Mailbox@lgo.org.uk>

Hi,

ok, I guess it's nothing to do about that case then.

I thought you let the Coucil get away to easy.

I mean, I send them a written complaint, and the offer to meet me

in a sweaty gym.

I go to the gym to work-out, not to have meetings.

Meetings I think should be held somewhere with less sweat,

endorfines and hormones in the air.

So I thought it was just riddiculus, that you let the Council get

away.

All I wanted was a reply in writing from them.

Which I think is the norm, if one send a written complaint.

But all this non-sense with the Council suggesting meetings at the Gym,

and you at the Ombudsman letting Liverpool City Council getting away with

that.

I think that this reminds me of another smell than the one at the

gym.

All of this smells really, I think.

But I guess it's nothing to do about this.

Regards,

Erik Ribsskog
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 3:21 PM, LGOAT Mailbox <L.Mailbox@lgo.org.uk> wrote:
Dear Ms

Ribsskog,

Thank you for your

reply.

You could continue with

the case that you regard more serious if you wish but the previous advice

would still apply and you would need to provide us with evidence that the

council’s complaints process has been completed (The council would

normally respond in writing at each stage of a formal

complaint)

If the issue regarding

harassment at the gym is something that we have considered before however

we would not be able to consider it again.

Yours

Sincerely

Kerry Anne

Hartnett

Customer Service

Advisor |

LGO Advice Team

| DL: 02476 820 132 | 0300 061 0614

The Oaks, No 2 | Westwood Way | Westwood Business Park | Coventry | CV4 8JB |

www.lgo.org.uk

From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sent: 07 June 2010 15:04
To: LGOAT

Mailbox
Subject: Re: Complaint against Liverpool City

Council

Hi,

I don't think one phone-call like that, is something to

make a fuss about.

But I thought the problems with the harassment

against me at the Council Gym, was more important.

So I thougth that maybe I could go on with that case,

since I didn't think it was properly sorted.

Best Regards,

Erik Ribsskog
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:08 PM, LGOAT Mailbox <L.Mailbox@lgo.org.uk> wrote:
Dear Mr

Ribsskog,

Thank you for your

email.

I have established from

searching for your details that you had a complaint investigated by the

Local Government Ombudsman which was closed in February 2009. (08 000

279)

If you have a new

complaint with the council you will need to complete the council’s own

complaints procedure before requesting that the Ombudsman considers your

complaint for investigation

Please also note that we

do not simply tell councils what to do, we would only make recommendations

to a council in the event that fault was found during a complaint

investigation by the Ombudsman.

If you would like to

raise a new complaint because you have completed the council’s complaints

procedure then please fill out the attached form and return it with a copy

of the council’s final response to your complaint.

Yours

Sincerely

Kerry Anne

Hartnett

Customer Service

Advisor |

LGO Advice Team

| DL: 02476 820 132 | 0300 061 0614

The Oaks, No 2 | Westwood Way | Westwood Business Park | Coventry | CV4 8JB |

www.lgo.org.uk

Error!

Filename not specified.

From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sent: 06 June 2010 23:46
To: LGOAT

Mailbox
Subject: Complaint against Liverpool City

Council

Hi,

I had a complaint against Liverpool City Council,

(Lifestyles Gym), that I wanted them to reply to in writing, (back in

2006!).

You at the Ombudsman said they didn't have to, since

they offered to meet me at the gym.

On 28/5, Lifestyles called me, wanting me to reply to a

customer survey.

I tried to explain, that I had a complaint against

them, and because of this, didn't want to be part of the survey.

But the person calling didn't speak that good

English, I think I have to say.

So it ended with me having to hang up.

Can't you please tell the Council to reply to my

complaint in writing, so that we get this case over with?

Best Regards,

Erik

Ribsskog
NOTICE - This message contains information intended only for the use of the addressee named above.  If you have received this message in error please advise us at once and do not make any use of the information.
NOTICE - This message contains information intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you have received this message in error please advise us at once and do not make any use of the information.

21. juni 2010

Jeg sendte en klage til Politidirektoratet, på Visepolitimester Sponheim, i Oslo

Gmail – Klage på Visepolitimester Sponheim i Oslo

Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Klage på Visepolitimester Sponheim i Oslo

Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 2:57 PM

To:

politidirektoratet@politiet.no

Hei,

i et e-brev fra Visepolitimester Sveinung Sponheim idag, så finner jeg det vanskelig å finne hva han egentlig svarer på.

Det virker som at han svarer på mange henvendelser, og roter disse sammen til en grøt, eller noe sånt.

Så da får jeg ta det viktigste.

Sponheim nevner, at jeg har overhørt, i Oslo, i 2003, at jeg er forfulgt av noe som de kaller 'mafian' der.

Det refererer han til i e-brevet.

Men jeg lurer på hvem dette er, og om Politiet kan etterforske dette.

Men det kommer ikke Sponheim inn på, i e-brevet sitt.

Jeg er klar over at Sponheim også tar opp en hel drøss andre ting, men det blir for uoversiktlig, hvis jeg skal ta opp hver og enkelt tema som han er inne på e-brevet sitt.

Men jeg ville kanskje forventet at han kunne svare meg på hvem denne mafiaen er da, som jeg har overhørt av butikksjef i Kiwi, St. Hanshaugen, Tom fra Lørenskog vel, at forfølger meg, i 2003, (da jeg gikk forbi butikken hans på vei hjem fra jobb eller om det var ingeniørhøyskolen, som jeg også studerte på da).

Mvh.

Erik Ribsskog

15. juni 2010

Det var visst noe krøll på Avhopperforumet nå. Er det Johanitterordenen som slår til? Han heter jo Johan han som jobber der så

Gmail – Account activated

Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Account activated

Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 8:24 PM

To:

johan@avhopperforum.org

Hei,

takk for hjelp!

Nå får jeg plutselig ikke logget meg inn på avhopperforumet lenger, med brukernavn johncons.

Har du muligheten til å se på dette, en dag du har tid?

(Det er ikke noe stress altså, men jeg bare tenkte jeg skulle skrive litt om Johanitterordenen, siden jeg har disse i slekta).

Mvh.

Erik Ribsskog

On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 5:23 PM, <johan@avhopperforum.org> wrote:

Hello johncons,

Your account on "Avhopperforums diskusjonsforum" has now been activated,

you may login using the username and password you received in a previous

e-mail.

—

Thanks, The Management

14. juni 2010

Jeg sendte en klage til sjefen til Mr. Lee

Gmail – To the superior of Mr. Lee/Fwd: Complaint about Michael Lee/Fwd: Complaint about Mr. Temple

Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>

To the superior of Mr. Lee/Fwd: Complaint about Michael Lee/Fwd: Complaint about Mr. Temple

Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 1:01 AM

To:

ice@dwp.gsi.gov.uk

Hi,

at the end of last week, I received a letter from Mr. Lee.

I was wondering why they called me, outside of the business-hours.

And I asked Mr. Lee to write me a letter, explaining this.

When I read the letter now, this still doesn't seem clear to me.

So I wanted to complain about this.

The ICE reference for the letter is: DWP00811/09.

Best Regards,

Erik Ribsskog

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Date: Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 5:38 PM
Subject: Complaint about Michael Lee/Fwd: Complaint about Mr. Temple
To: ice@dwp.gsi.gov.uk

Hi,

Mr. Lee called me now, at 4.50 pm, and pretended he was confused.

I wondered why you called me outside of the business hours, on Friday.

And now, it seemed to me, that he called me right before the end of the business-hours, as a provocation.

He also ridiculed me, in the phone-call, and said that I couldn't speak with Mr. Temple, at 5.30.

(Since that was after the business-hours).

So I think I was provoced and ridiculed by Mr. Lee.

So I wanted to complain about this.

Best Regards,

Erik Ribsskog

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Date: Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 5:44 PM
Subject: Complaint about Mr. Temple
To: DWP ICE gateway team <ice@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>

Hi,

Mr. Temple called me now, at 5.30 pm, to discuss a Jobcentre-complaint.

I would like to complain about, that Mr. Temple call me outside of the business-hours.

Mr. Temple knows I'm unemployed, and then I think this should be done within the business-hours, and not on my spare-time.

I think this must be that you are pulling my leg, and harassing me.

Regards,

Erik Ribsskog

14. juni 2010

Jeg sendte en ny e-post til Follo Tingrett

Gmail – Oppdatering/Fwd: Offentlig skifte etter Karen Margrethe Ribsskog, død 13.09.1999

Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Oppdatering/Fwd: Offentlig skifte etter Karen Margrethe Ribsskog, død 13.09.1999

Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:40 PM

To:

follpost@domstol.no

Cc:

borgadm@domstol.no

Hei,

altså, man kan kanskje stole på det dem sier.

Men dem kan være litt sånn sleipe og lure og utspekulerte uti der, synes jeg.

F.eks. så var den butikken, Rimi Langhus, så dårlig drevet, når jeg begynte som butikksjef der.

(Det var den mest bomba Rimi-en jeg noen gang har sett.

Med masse restvarer, som bare lå spred ut på en stygg pall, med en gang man kom inn i butikken, som det første man fikk se, som kunde.

Og hyllene var helt bomba, og standarden på butikken var også dårlig, når det gjaldt plakatering og fruktavdelinga osv.).

Så hvis dere driver retten like dårlig, uti der.

Så stoler jeg ikke mye på dere, for å si det sånn.

Så derfor sender jeg det her videre.

Med hilsen

Erik Ribsskog

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Date: 2010/6/10
Subject: Fwd: Offentlig skifte etter Karen Margrethe Ribsskog, død 13.09.1999
To: follpost@domstol.no
Cc: borgadm@domstol.no

Hei,

nå var det med svart skrift igjen ja.

Jeg har jobba som butikksjef ute i Langhus, så jeg vet det at det ikke er sånn at man stole 100% på alt folk sier ute i Follo der.

Så jeg har sendt om det her til Borgarting.

Så får vi ta det derfra.

Med hilsen

Erik Ribsskog

———- Forwarded message ———-

From: Follo tingrett (postmottak) <follpost@domstol.no>

Date: 2010/6/10
Subject: SV: Offentlig skifte etter Karen Margrethe Ribsskog, død 13.09.1999
To: eribsskog@gmail.com

Det svar jeg har gitt er endelig,

fristen for mottak av sikkerhetsstillelsen er fortsatt 18. juni

2010.

Med vennlig hilsen
Britt Bergman Johansen
Follo

tingrett
telf. 64 00 30 00

—–Opprinnelig melding—–
Fra: Erik Ribsskog

[mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sendt: 10. juni 2010

11:14

Til: Follo tingrett (postmottak)
Emne: Re: Offentlig

skifte etter Karen Margrethe Ribsskog, død 13.09.1999

Hei,

dere får vel penger av staten til driften, tenker jeg.

Jeg får sjekke det videre.

Hvorfor bruker du plutselig blå bokstaver nå, når du brukte svarte

tidligere idag?

Med hilsen

Erik Ribsskog

2010/6/10 Follo tingrett (postmottak) <follpost@domstol.no>

Ja, et av kriteriene er at

sikkerhetsstillelsen må foreligge. Tingretten har ingen midler som kan

benyttes til dette formål.

Med vennlig hilsen
Britt Bergman Johansen
Follo

tingrett
telf. 64 00 30 00

—–Opprinnelig

melding—–
Fra: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sendt: 10. juni 2010

10:49
Til: Follo tingrett (postmottak)
Emne: Re:

Offentlig skifte etter Karen Margrethe Ribsskog, død

13.09.1999

Ok,

jeg synes det er feil at dere blander sånn.

Offentlig skifte er en ting, mener jeg.

Så kunne man heller fått gjeld til Tingretten, som man kunne

betalt senere.

Det er for ille at man ikke skal få rettferdighet fordi man er

arbeidsledig.

Er dere sikre på at dere gjør dette riktig?

Med hilsen

Erik Ribsskog

2010/6/10 Follo tingrett (postmottak) <follpost@domstol.no>

Kr.

21.500,- er ikke mottatt. Du gjøres oppmerksom på at beløpet

må være betalt innen fredag 18. juni 2010. Hvis ikke beløpet er

registrert innbetalt innen denne dato, vil begjæringen om offentlig

skifte anses som ikke innkommet.

Med vennlig hilsen
Britt

Bergman Johansen
Follo tingrett
telf. 64 00 30

00

10. juni 2010

Jeg sendte en klage til Borgarting Lagmannsrett

Gmail – Klage på Follo Tingrett/Fwd: Offentlig skifte etter Karen Margrethe Ribsskog, død 13.09.1999

Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Klage på Follo Tingrett/Fwd: Offentlig skifte etter Karen Margrethe Ribsskog, død 13.09.1999

Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:22 AM

To:

borgadm@domstol.no

Hei,

jeg vil gjerne klage på Follo Tingrett, at de 'skusler', når det gjelder arveoppgjør.

Jeg mener det er en ting, å få offentlig skifte.

Og en annen ting når man betaler gjelden for dette.

Dette går på folk sin rettferdighet løs.

Det kan ikke være sånn, at man ikke kan får rettferdighet, fordi man er arbeidsledig.

Da burde man heller fått en tilbakebetalingsavtale, for gjelden, mener jeg.

Dessuten kan man se det, at det egentlig er to personer som svarer, fra Follo Tingrett, idag, siden den ene skriver med blå skrift og den andre med svart skrift.

Men begge personene undertegner med samme navn.

Det mener jeg må sies å være bedrageri.

Så dette vil jeg også klage på.

Så klagen har to punkter, at Tingretten blander, når det gjelder offentlig skifte, og tilbakebetaling av gjeld.

Og at tingretten lar forskjellige folk skrive under samme navn.

Håper dere kan rydde opp i dette!

Mvh.

Erik Ribsskog

———- Forwarded message ———-

From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: 2010/6/10
Subject: Re: Offentlig skifte etter Karen Margrethe Ribsskog, død 13.09.1999

To: "Follo tingrett (postmottak)" <follpost@domstol.no>

Hei,

dere får vel penger av staten til driften, tenker jeg.

Jeg får sjekke det videre.

Hvorfor bruker du plutselig blå bokstaver nå, når du brukte svarte tidligere idag?

Med hilsen

Erik Ribsskog

2010/6/10 Follo tingrett (postmottak) <follpost@domstol.no>

Ja, et

av kriteriene er at sikkerhetsstillelsen må foreligge. Tingretten har

ingen midler som kan benyttes til dette formål.

Med vennlig hilsen
Britt Bergman Johansen
Follo

tingrett
telf. 64 00 30 00

—–Opprinnelig melding—–
Fra: Erik Ribsskog

[mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sendt: 10. juni 2010

10:49
Til: Follo tingrett (postmottak)
Emne: Re: Offentlig

skifte etter Karen Margrethe Ribsskog, død 13.09.1999

Ok,

jeg synes det er feil at dere blander sånn.

Offentlig skifte er en ting, mener jeg.

Så kunne man heller fått gjeld til Tingretten, som man kunne betalt

senere.

Det er for ille at man ikke skal få rettferdighet fordi man er

arbeidsledig.

Er dere sikre på at dere gjør dette riktig?

Med hilsen

Erik Ribsskog

2010/6/10 Follo tingrett (postmottak) <follpost@domstol.no>

Kr.

21.500,- er ikke mottatt. Du gjøres oppmerksom på at beløpet må

være betalt innen fredag 18. juni 2010. Hvis ikke beløpet er

registrert innbetalt innen denne dato, vil begjæringen om offentlig skifte

anses som ikke innkommet.

Med vennlig hilsen
Britt Bergman

Johansen
Follo tingrett
telf. 64 00 30

00

10. juni 2010