johncons
  • From: eribsskog@gmail.com Erik Ribsskog
    To: Richard.Little@liverpool.gov.uk
    Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 04:06:15 +0000
    Subject: Complaint

    Hi,

    I’m refering to phone-call last week (4/7). I know I said I’d send this
    e-mail no
    later than Wednesday, but I didn’t get to start on it untill late on
    Wednesday,
    so it’s probably going to be Thursday untill I get to actually send the
    e-mail,
    so sorry about that!

    *Problems with washing women/girls in the mens changing-room during opening
    hours:*

    The first thing I wondered about, was regarding the problems described in
    the e-mail I sent to Linda Lennon on 8/6, about the washing girl/women in
    the mens changing-room.

    I’ll copy the text from that e-mail into this e-mail, since I have some
    questions
    regarding that episode:

    to linda.lennon@liverpool.gov.uk date Jun 8, 2007 10:58 PM subject Fwd:
    Statement mailed-by gmail.com Hi,

    I just got back from the gym, it closed at 9 pm.

    I just had to eat a bit and relax a bit after the work-out, or else I would
    have sent the
    email at once.

    Because what I’m wondering about with the gym, is:

    Is it really right that there should be female washing-staf in the mens
    wardrobe
    at 8.45 pm, when the gym closes at 9pm?

    This happened again today, and it has also happened once before.

    I used to workout a bit when I lived in Oslo and Sunderland as well, but
    they never
    used to start washing the wardrobe until after the closing hours.

    So I think that since the gym is run by the Council, I think that they
    shouldn’t
    have the washing-routines that includes female staff starting to wash in the

    mens wardrobe as early as 8.45 pm.

    I think they should wait until after closing-hours to wash the mens
    wardrobe,
    and that if they have to wash, then they could maybe instead wash the
    machines
    in the gym or something else before the gym is closed.

    When I went into the mens wardrobe at 8.45 pm then there was a female
    washing
    staff washing there, about 40 years maybe with dark hair.

    I think she was talking with a colleague in there, it was probably the other
    washing-
    woman.

    I was working out on the tread-mill by the reception untill a bit before
    8.45 pm, and
    then I saw the washing-staff walking around in the reception-area at around
    8.40 pm.

    And one of the washing-staff looked quite young, maybe 16-17 years.

    I think it must have been her that the washing-woman with dark hair spoke
    with in
    the mens wardrobe at 8.45.

    I don’t think there should be that young female washing staff in the mens
    wardrobe
    at 8.45, when the gym closes at 9.00pm.

    It has happened once earlier as well that there were female washing staff in
    the
    mens wardrobe at around 8.45, and I just think that this isnt right.

    I think that both the staff in the gym and the washing staff should
    understand by
    themselves that the female washing staff shouldnt start to wash in the mens
    wardrobe untill after the closing hours at 9 pm, so thats why I havent
    complained
    about this to the staff in the gym or the washing staff.

    I think that it should be unecessary for me to tell this to them, I think
    they should
    have understood this by themselves.

    And Im not really sure whos in charge there in the evenings eighter.

    There has also been other incidents at the gym that I have thought to
    complain
    about, but I havent untill now.

    But with the washing-staff in the mens wardrobe again today at 8.45 pm, was
    a bit like the final drop, so since Im not really sure whos in charge there
    in the
    evening I thought that I could send you an email about this.

    And also since one of the washing women was so young, it makes me a bit
    worried about whats going on in the gym, when they put a washing woman/
    girl that looked like she was maybe 16 or 17 in the mens wardrobe at 8.45pm,
    so therefore I thought I should really just write the email now, because
    that this
    is a bit unacceptable for a gym thats run by the Council.

    I know its a bit late to send emails at this hour, but it thought that since
    I think
    that this way of organising the washing-routines in the gym is a bit
    unaceptable,
    I thought that if I sent the email about this right after I got back from
    the gym,
    then there would be less possibilites that eg. someone could say that I must
    have
    mistaken the time etc, since now its just a quite short time since I left
    the gym,
    so I reckoned that its best to send it right away, while I still have the
    details at
    mind so to speak.

    So I hope that this is alright!

    Sorry that I send the email this late.

    Regards,

    Erik Ribsskog
    – Show quoted text –

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog
    Date: Jun 8, 2007 3:45 PM
    Subject: Statement
    To: linda.lennon@liverpool.gov.uk

    Hi,

    I refer to the phone-call earlier today, and send the statement from
    the bank about the duplicate payment with the direct-debit.

    Pleare just contact me if there is anything else I should have remembered.

    Hope that this is alright!

    Regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    So my questions regarding this is:

    1. How come that there are washing women/girls in the mens changing-room at
    8.45 pm,
    when the gym closes at 9 pm?

    2. Is the gym going to change its washing-routine, so that the washing
    women/girls dont
    start to wash the mens changing-room untill after the gym is closed.
    (Because like I explained
    in the e-mail to Linda Lennon, this with the washing women in the mens
    changing-room has
    also happened earlier at the Millenium gym, but I’ve never seen it in other
    gyms).

    *Problems with direct-debit processing errors/duplicate payments:*
    **
    Also, I have been in contact with Lesley Southern, about some problems
    regarding processing
    errors/duplicate direct debits from the gym.

    I explained to him that I would also bring up some the issues regarding this
    with you, so I think
    its alright if I also copy the contents of that e-mail:

    from
    Erik Ribsskog

    hide details
    Jul 10 (2 days ago)

    to
    “Southern, Lesley”

    date

    Jul 10, 2007 6:18 PM

    subject

    Re: Earlier e-mails

    mailed-by

    gmail.com

    Hi,

    thank you very much for your answer.

    I think it was very fine that you had the time to answer me, and I also
    think that it was very
    fine that you have taken off my arrears due to the amount of
    time/inconvinience I have had
    due to this.

    But since there were still some things I was wondering about, I thought I
    could try to send
    you an enquiery about this, to try to maybe found out about this.

    I’ve written an explanation below, as comments on your e-mail, since I
    thought it was easier
    to explain/answer this way.

    To summarize my questions:

    1. Shouldn’t the gym have asked me first if they wanted to withdraw an
    extra payment (that they
    had no mandate for) from my account in June?

    2. How come that there were still two payment-requests from the gym waiting
    to be withdrawn
    from my account on 27/6, when firstly, the gym only have a mandate to
    withdraw one monthly
    payment from my account. Secondly, I had agreed with the staff at the
    gym, that I would pay the
    arrears when I recieved the swith-bonus from the bank. And thirdly, I had
    sent Linda Lennon,
    Administration Manager at the Council an e-mail about this problem on 8/6,
    with a copy of the
    statement from the bank, showing that there was a problem with the gym
    charging me duplicate
    payments from my account for the month of June?

    3. How come that the gym still wanted to withdraw a (duplicate) payment from
    my account for the
    month of July, when the gym was closed for refurbishment for six weeks from
    25/6?

    I’m also going to contact the Duty Officer at the gym regarding why the gyms
    members weren’t
    informed about the six weeks closure of the gym and more. So it might be
    that I’ll also ask him
    about some of the same questions. (Like about why the gym still wanted to
    charge me even
    if they were going to be closed etc.)

    I hope you have the time to answer me about this questions, since I thought
    some of these things
    were a bit strange, so it would be nice to be informed about this.

    So I hope that you bear over with me if I’m asking many questions!

    Thank you very much in advance!

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On 7/3/07, Southern, Lesley wrote:

    > Erik
    >
    > Your enquiry regarding your direct debit payments has been passed onto
    > myself for further investigation.
    >
    > Unfortunately we cannot refund a payment to a member that has outstanding
    > arrears, this is for audit purposes as we are required to provide details of
    > all miscellaneous payments made to our members.
    >
    > The action we have taken to date is to take your 1 month overpayment as
    > your cancellation fee (which is normally 2 months) and we have taken your
    > arrears off your membership record for the inconvenience caused as a result
    > of the error.
    >
    – Regarding the overpayment, it wasn’t actually an overpayment, because when
    the bank saw that it had been a
    process error/duplicate payment from the gym, then they transferred the
    duplicate payment back as a
    ‘interbranch payment’ on 6/6.

    (Secondly, I think that I shouldn’t recieve a cancellation fee, when the gym
    suddently closes for 6 weeks
    for refurbishment. I think that then the gym should have first sent its
    members a letter about this, put
    up a poster at the gym about this, and also not charged its members for the
    month that they are closed,
    but I have to contact the Duty Officer at the gym about something else, so
    I’ll bring this up with him.)

    > I have checked the Direct Debit report and it seems that the overpayment
    > dates back to a missed January payment which has been allocated to your
    > account on 30 th May. I will need to speak to our Direct Debit team to
    > determine why a payment for January has been included in June’s Direct Debit
    > report.
    >
    I’ve been speaking with the staff (including the Manager) at the gym several
    times about the arrears, and we agreed that I would
    pay the arrears later, when I recieved some money I was expecting (a
    switch-bonus from the bank).

    This was agreed with Craig at the gym, when we set up the direct-debit
    agreement in May.

    I spoke with Craig about this on 1/6 as well, since I hadn’t recieved the
    switch-bonus yet, and then I was informed
    that the arrear was £70.50, and we agreed that I would pay this when I
    recieved the money from the bank.

    So my point is, that they should have told me first if they wanted to
    withdraw an extra payment from my account
    on 1/6, so that I could have planned this in advance.

    Also, this (RBS) bank account was set up in May, so I don’t really
    understand how a missed direct-debit
    payment to my old (Barclays) account in Januray, could suddently appear on
    my RBS-account in June?

    It seems a bit strange to me that this could happen, when I also had agreed
    several times with the staff
    at the gym (in the month of March and then monthly), that I would pay the
    running bills, and that I’d pay the
    arrears when I recieved the switch-bonus from RBS.

    Also I had been told by the staff at the gym, that there was no hurry at all
    with the arrears, as long as I
    paid the running bills.

    – Also the bank told me when I called them in the beginning of June, that
    the gym wasn’t allowed to
    withdraw more than one payment a month from my account, since they only had
    one mandate.

    – Also, when I called the gym on 26/6, to ask if they were open on 26/6,
    (since they were closed for
    no apparent reason on 25/6), then I was told that the gym was closed for
    refurbishment for six weeks.

    I then thought that it wasn’t right that the gym should charge me for the
    month of July, when they were
    closed. (I also thought they should have informed the members about the six
    weeks closure). So due
    to this, I called my bank (the RBS customer-support line) on 27/6 to cancel
    the direct-debit.

    I was then told that there were still two direct-debits from the gym on my
    account, both with the same,
    reference-number (LIFE 800 1561).

    – So I was wondering, how come that there were still two payment-requests
    from the gym waiting to
    be withdrawn on my account on 27/6, when firstly, the gym only have a
    mandate to withdraw one
    monthly payment from my account. Secondly, I had agreed with the staff at
    the gym, that I would
    pay the arrears when I recieved the swith-bonus from the bank, and thirdly,
    I had sent Linda Lennon,
    Administration Manager at the Council an e-mail about this problem on 8/6,
    with a copy of the
    statement from the bank, showing that there was a problem with the gym
    charging me duplicate
    payments from my account?

    >
    > Your account has now been set to expired and no payment was requested in
    > July.
    >

    Well, there were actually two payments requested in July (see above
    So my questions regarding this is:

    3. Shouldn’t the gym have asked me first if they wanted to withdraw an
    extra payment (that they
    had no mandate for) from my account in June?

    4. How come that there were still two payment-requests from the gym waiting
    to be withdrawn
    from my account on 27/6, when firstly, the gym only have a mandate to
    withdraw one monthly
    payment from my account. Secondly, I had agreed with the staff at the
    gym, that I would pay the
    arrears when I recieved the swith-bonus from the bank. And thirdly, I had
    sent Linda Lennon,
    Administration Manager at the Council an e-mail about this problem on 8/6,
    with a copy of the
    statement from the bank, showing that there was a problem with the gym
    charging me duplicate
    payments from my account for the month of June?

    *Problems around the closure of the gym for six weeks from 25/6 due to
    refurbishment:*

    5. How come that the gym still wanted to withdraw a (duplicate) payment from
    my account for the
    month of July, when the gym was closed for refurbishment for six weeks from
    25/6?

    6. How come that there were no letters sent to the members of the gym
    regarding the closure
    of the gym for six weeks from 25/6 due to refurbishment?

    7. How come that there were no poster in the gym informing the users of the
    gym that the gym
    would be closed for six weeks from 25/6 due to refurbishment?

    8. How come that there was only a makeshift sign on the entrance-door to the
    millenium-
    building saying ‘gym closed’, and nothing more when I went there to work out
    on the
    evening on 25/6. (Shouldn’t it have been a proper sign, with information
    about why the
    gym was closed, how long the gym was closed for, and not just some makeshift

    sign written with an ink-marker)?

    9. How come that there were no information about the fact that the gym was
    closed, when
    I went on the lifestyles website:

    (
    www.liverpool.gov.uk/Leisure_and_culture/Sports/Leisure_Centres_and_Pools/Lifestyles_Millennium/index.asp
    )

    on 26/6 (When the gym had been closed since 25/5)?

    (I can see that it says that the gym is closed there now, but on 26/6, there
    was no information
    about the gym being closed at all. I went there to see if it said anything
    on the website on 26/6,
    since the gym was closed for no obvious reason on 25/6, but it didn’t say
    anything about the gym
    being closed on the website, so I noted down the phone-number to the gym,
    and called the gym,
    and they told me that the gym was closed for six weeks due to
    refurbishment.)

    10. How come that members of the gym were charged for the whole month of
    June, when the gym
    was closed for refurbishment from 25/6? (Shouldn’t the six days from 25/6 to
    30/6 have been
    deducted from the charge?).

    *Other problems at the gym:*
    **
    Like I wrote in my e-mail to Linda Lennon on 8/6, there had also been other,
    earlier incidents at
    the gym which I had thought to complain about.

    But like I also wrote, it wasn’t always easy to know who it was that was in
    charge there after the
    manager had gone home, and him I only spoke with once, since I most often
    worked out in the
    evening.

    And that the incident with the washing girls/women in the mens changing room
    again within the
    opening hours was the last drop, so to speak.

    And then it was easier for me to complain, because then I had her e-mail
    address from before,
    since I had sent her a copy of the statement from the bank, to document the
    problems with
    the duplicate direct debit/processing error from the gym.

    So then it was easier for me to complain.

    I’m going to try explain a bit more about the earlier incidents:

    *Problems with locker:*

    On 26/4, it says in my note-book, I was at the gym.

    I work with office-work, so I try to work out quite often, and I usually use
    different lockers at the
    gym, depending on which locker of the lockers that are free etc.

    And when one work out 3-5 days a week for some time, and you have a
    different locker each time,
    then it could be that one forgets exactly which locker one uses this
    particular time.

    And, since only about half of the key-rings with the keys for the lockers
    had tag-numbers on them,
    this could be a bit confusing.

    So when I was finished with the work-out, and I went to the area of the
    changing-room where my
    locker was, then the locker wouldn’t open.

    Like I wrote, I use different lockers each time, depending on which lockers
    that are free, where in
    the changing-room it is less crowded etc.

    So it isn’t that easy to be exactly sure if it is that particular locker,
    especially since the key-ring
    to the locker (like about half of the other key-rings, i noticed later),
    lacked a number-tag on it,
    to specify which locker it belonged to.

    I usually dont keep things like my wallet etc. in the locker, since its a
    big gym, always many
    people there, and I would get a lot of inconvienience if something happened
    to my wallet etc.,
    so I didn’t keep the most ‘valuble’ things in the locker.

    I use to keep my note-book with my wallet, so I had my note-book still on
    me, and I thought it
    was a bit embarresing going to the reception explaining that I coultn’t find
    my locker, so I decided
    to be 100% sure before I did that.

    So, I just wrote down the numbers of all the lockers in my note-book, and
    then I checked each
    and every locker, and crossed the number for that locker in my note-book.

    I made sure to check each lock thoroughly.

    So, when I had checked each lock in the changing-room, and the key didn’t
    fit in any of them,
    then I went to the reception to explain.

    It was still quite embarresing, but at least now I had the note-book to show
    that I had tryed all
    of the locks.

    There were about 5 or 6 people sitting in the reception, and the woman in
    charge, told Neil to
    help me with this.

    I explained to Neil that maybe the smartest thing for me would be to return
    at closing-time,
    when all the other users of the gym had gone home, then it would only be one
    locker left
    to check.

    I was holding my note-book still, so I wrote down that Neil started acting a
    bit like a sergeant
    in the army, knocking his fist into the side of the enterance to the
    changing-room and screaming
    /comanding: ‘come here’.

    I thought this behaviour was a bit peculiar, but I went after him into the
    changing-room, and then
    he starting to ask if I had been having a few beers. (Since I couldnt
    remember the number for
    the locker).

    I asked him what his name was, and wrote it down.

    Then I showed him that I had tryed all the lockers, and that noone worked,
    and that there wasnt
    any number-tag on the key-chain for the locker.

    He asked me which locker I thought it was, and I told him that I thought it
    was the number 156
    one. (It says in my note-book).

    So he asked me to give him the key, so that he could try the number 156
    locker and the
    surrounding lockers.

    But he couldnt manage to open any of them, so he went to find the
    master-key.

    This took a bit of time, but he returned and then opened the locker with the
    new key.

    It was locker 156, and I showed him in my note-book that I had already tryed
    to open
    locker 156 with the key, because I had crossed out that number in the
    note-book.

    Neil said that ‘the locks often get stuck.’, I can see from my note-book.

    I found a new locker (since I didnt have the key any longer to the 156 one),
    and Neil
    reminded me to remember the key-number.

    I told him that I thought that there should be key-tags on the key-rings for
    the lockers.

    Also, the next time I went to the gym, the woman in charge reminded me that
    I should
    remember the key-number, and then I told the woman in charge that I thought
    that
    there should be key-tags on the key-rings. (But there still wasnt done
    anything
    with this problem, and about half of the key-rings were still missing a
    key-tag
    for the remainder of the time I was working out at the gym).

    So my questions regarding this is:

    11. How come there are so much problems with the locks getting stuck in the
    lockers?
    I mean, surely the gym bought new lockers when they opened? And its the
    Millennium
    building gym, so the building and the gym can’t be that old? (Did someone
    buy used
    lockers for the gym when it opened)?

    12. How come the gym doesn’t use oil in the locks for the lockers, if it,
    like Neil said,
    is a problem with the ‘locks often get stuck’?

    13: And why didn’t the gym put key-tags on the lockers, when about half of
    the key-
    tags were missing, and I had spoken about this problem with both Neil and
    the woman
    who was in charge there on the day this incident ocured, I think it was on
    26/4?

    *Problems with the washing of the machines:*

    When I wrote the e-mail about the problem with the washing women/girls in
    the
    mens changing-room in the opening hours, then it came to mind that maybe
    the washing-should should rather wash the machines, and then wait untill
    the gym has closed, before they washed the changing-rooms.

    The reason I thought about this, is because I remembered an incident from
    when
    I was working out, I think it must have been in April or May.

    Then I was working out at the thread-mill, and this was I seem to remember
    hours
    before closing-time.

    There were a couple of washing-ladys there, even if it was still a few hours
    until
    closing-time.

    They were just walking around a bit, seemingly not certain on the routine.

    But then one of the washing ladies started to wash the stepping-machine in
    front
    of me. But what I thought was a bit strange, was that she only washed the
    tip of
    one of the handles of the stepping machine, and then nothing else. This she
    did
    twice with a few minuttes inbetween.

    Other than that, I couldn’t see that eighter she or her collegue washed any
    of the
    other machines. (They looked a bit lost there, walking around with their
    buckets
    while the gym was still quite crowded, since it was hours till
    closing-time.)

    My question regarding this is:

    14: Shouldn’t the washing-staff put up a sign near the machines when they
    wash
    them during the time of which the gym is open? Couldn’t people get hurt if
    they work out on machines that are slippery from being washed? I seem to
    remember from other places I’ve been working etc., that yellow plastic signs
    are being put on the floor etc., saying that one have to be careful since
    its
    newly washed, so shouldn’t the washing staff in the gym also do this when
    they clean the machines within the opening hours?

    *Problems with staff:*

    Like I’ve written, there have been some incedents before that I have
    wondered
    if I should complain about, but I’m not always sure whos in charge there, so

    this makes it a bit more tricky to complain, and I’ve also had the problem
    with the arrears on my membership, and the manager let me work out
    there and pay the arrears later, so there was a threshold before I would
    complain.

    But I wrote down in my note-book a couple of things I reacted on anyway.

    I was wondering a bit what was going on there, e.g. on 24/5 Craig and
    a blond girl sits in the reception.

    Only Craig logs in the members, even if there is a long queue. The girl
    is only watching. (I think maybe she is his girlfriend, since I noticed
    them sitting very close once when I wanted to log in).

    So I was wondering, if there is a long queue, surely both of them could
    log in the users of the gym, so that they wouldn’t have to wait in a line,
    like if some of the customers are there to sign up for a membership,
    then still everyone have to wait in one line, even if there are more
    staff at work.

    So then I was wondering what is the girl doing there, if she cant log in
    the customers, and is only sitting watching.

    And I think she had been working there a while then, so I dont think
    she was on training.

    So this seemed a bit strange to me, so I thought I could mention it
    while Im writing this e-mail anyway.

    Also, I remember, that one Friday I was working out there, then they
    annonced the closing of the gym like this:

    ‘The gym will be closing in 60 minutes’, ‘The gym will be closing in
    45 minutes’, ‘The gym will be closing in 30 minutes’, ‘The gym will
    be closing in 15 minutes’.

    I think it was the same girl, but it seemed like it was Craig that told
    her to say it.

    Normally they only say ‘The gym will be closing in 20 minuttes’, or
    something like this, so I thought I could mention this as well, even
    if its maybe not so important what they say on the calling-system
    in the Friday evenings? Anyway, I thought I could mention it while
    I was writing the e-mail anyway.

    My question to this is:

    15. How come the staff only sits watching while the customers are
    standing in line?

    16. Shouldn’t the staff have name-tags, where it said name and title,
    so that it would be easier for the users of the gym to know who to
    speak with regarding different problems. (So that they know who
    are in charge)?

    (For instance, on the day when there were washing girls/women in
    the mens changing room, and they must have been there from
    around 8.40 pm. or earlier, because I went in there on 8.45 pm,
    and then they were well into their routine it looked like, before I
    turned and went home.

    On that day (8/6), the staff that were working around closing-time,
    was Neil, a young girl that wears high-healed shoes and blouse,
    and a man around 40 years maybe that I think could maybe is the
    girls father, because I saw him standing very close to the girl once.

    I thought maybe the girl was in a kind of responsible position there,
    since she wear office-clothes, but the guy in his forthies I reckon
    also could be in charge there, since hes the oldest etc., and also
    Neil I reckoned could have been in charge, since he has access
    to the master-keys etc.

    So its a bit embarrasing asking about whos in charge, because
    you wouldn’t want to offend anyone, with asking whos in charge,
    and then its actually that person who is in charge.

    I don’t say that it is impossible for the customers of the gym to
    find out whose in charge, but I thought that it could maybe add
    to the general level of customer-service at the gym if the staff
    was wearing name-tags.

    I wrote down a note of who that was working that day, so that
    I would know later, since I wrote the e-mail that day with the
    complaint about the washing-staff in the chaning-room, so I
    thought I’d write it down, in case it became an issue.)

    17. Should they really anounce that the gym is closing in 60 minutes,
    and that the gym is closing in 45 minutes etc.?

    *Problems with direct-debit agreement on 13/12/06:*

    While I was looking for some notes before I started writing this
    e-mail now, I found a letter from the gym from 8/12/06.

    I’ll just write what it says:

    ‘Dear Mr. Ribsskog,

    RE: Lifestyles Membership No: LDD121346

    As a valued Lifestyles member, I was surprised to find that your monthly
    Lifestyles subscription of £23.50 due earlier this month has not been paid.

    You may be aware of this already and have made payment at the
    Lifestyles centre, if so, please accept my apologies.

    If you have not paid these arrears, I would ask that you pay them at your
    earliest convienience by contacting your nearest Lifestyles Centre. Your
    membership account can be updated at any of the centres and you can
    pay either by cash, cheque, credit or debit card.

    Please contact Liverpool Direct on 0151 233 3007 for the number of your
    nearest Lifestye centre.

    I regret that until any arrears have been paid, standard admission
    charges will apply and you will lose the benefits of your membership.

    Yours feithfully

    Steve Kneale

    Business Development Manager’.

    (I write quite fast, so I thought I could just write it down, so that it
    would be
    easier to understand what I meant.)

    There were some problems regarding me switching from a Barclays Cashcard
    account to a Barclays Current-account at around the end of
    November/beginning
    of December 2006.

    The problem was that my pay from work was switched to the new
    current-account,
    whereas the direct-debits remained connected to the old account.

    I was in a busy period with work etc., so I didnt think about this problem
    before I
    got a letter from the bank about it.

    So I went to the bank, and transfered all my direct-debits from my old
    Barlays
    cashcard account, and to my new Barclays current/visa account.

    The clerk in the bank did this for me, it was a quite routine operation it
    seemed
    to me.

    Exept for the Lifestyles direct-debit for some reason.

    This direct-debit had been canceled right away, in a way so that the clerk
    in the
    bank couldnt transfer it to the new account.

    And when I went to the gym on 13/12, I had to pay the charge for Decemeber
    at
    the gym, and it wasn’t possible for me to just switch the existing
    direct-debit
    agreement from my old Barlays Cashcard account to my new Barclays Current
    account, but I had to fill out a new form all over again to set up the new
    direct debit agreement on my new account.

    I accept that it was my fault with forgetting to transfer the direct-debit
    to the
    new account (It was some comunication-problem at work, with me informing
    work that I had got a new bank-account, but with work not giving me any
    feedback on that they had changed my account information in the payment
    system).

    But because of the later problem with the direct debits now in June, I
    thought
    I could ask a couple of questions regarding this as well, while I’m at it,
    so to
    speak.

    18: How come that the gym canceled my direct-debit between 1/12 and 8/12,
    and sent me a letter on 8/12, where it said that I had to go to the gym and
    pay in cash, when I had never had any payment problems with the gym before
    this, and all the other direct-debits were possible to switch (for the clerk
    at
    the bank to my new account), except the gyms direct-debit? Shouldn’t the
    gym have tryed to collect the payment from my account again 7-14 days
    later, like the clerk in the bank told me that the other companies did?

    19: Why did I have to write my signature on, and fill out a new form all
    over
    again on 13/12, for a new direct-debit. Didn’t the gym have all my
    information
    from before, have one got to fill out and sign a new form just because one
    gets a new account-number, when one are still using the same bank?

    (The signature of the women I spoke with on the gym on 13/12/06, looks
    like it says Probert as a last name by the way, in case that makes it
    any easier to find out about this.

    I remember I thought it was strange that I had to fill out the form all over
    again, just because of the problem of the one payment due to the
    problems with changing the direct-debits and my pay from work to
    the new account, in a coordinated way.

    Because it didn’t seem to be a similiar problem with the other companies
    that also had direct-debits on my account, so therefore I remember that
    I thought that this was a bit strange.

    And now, due to the other problems with the direct-debits again, now in
    June, I thought I’d just ask about the earlier problems, since they came
    to mind now.

    also this:

    How come I got a letter sent 8 days after the missed payment in December,
    where as later, in January, February and March (with the new direct-debit
    set
    up on 13/12), I didn’t get a letter at all.

    It went on for two or three months, it must have been, before someone
    reminded
    me that there were arrears on my membership.

    I was quite busy in this time-periode, even if I was unemployed, so I didn’t

    have so much money then, so I should maybe have spoken with the staff about
    this myself, but I much problems with paying my rent etc., and I was glad to

    have the oppertunity to work-out, since it was a bit stressing not having a
    job, and it helped to work-out to relax from the stress.

    And also, the staff gave different information to me regarding the arrears.
    The
    girl wearing office-wear, and who worked on 8/6, for instance, told me on
    one occation that it wasn’t a hurry paying the arrears at all. (As long as I

    paid the running bills, which I did).

    And other members of staff, Craig for instance, told me that I had to pay
    the
    arrears before a certain date, (I spoke with the manager and got an
    extension,
    and later I agreed with Craig that I would pay the arrears when I got first
    the
    loan I was promised from the bank, and later the switch-bonus I was promised

    from the bank.)

    So the questions regarding this:

    20: How come in December I get a letter for not paying after 8 days, where
    as
    in the new year, it goes in the region of two or three months without
    recieving
    a letter or reminder from the staff, even if I worked out several times a
    week?

    21: How come one member of the staff (the girl with the office-wear who
    worked
    on 8/6), says that there is no hurry with the arrears, where as another
    member
    of staff (Craig), says that I have to pay before this and this date? How is
    this
    really supposed to be, according to the rules?

    (I appriciate very much that I was allowed to work out at the gym even if I
    had
    arrears, so it’s not because I am ungrateful that I ask about these things.
    It’s
    just that due to the other problems, with the washing-women/girls in the
    changing
    room, and the problems with the continuing processing errors and duplicate
    payments with the direct debits.

    And also due to the problems surrounding the unanounced closure of the gym
    for six weeks due to refurbishment.

    Due to these problems, I thought it would be best to mention all the other
    problems while I was at it. Even if some of these problems aren’t maybe
    that serious in themselves, I anyway thought that they were worth bringing
    up, because, I think, thay add to a general picture of things at the gym
    being a bit out of hand, so due to this I’m a bit concerned about whats
    really going on at the gym, and then I thought it would be best to mentioned
    all the things that came to mind, because these things, even if it isn’t
    clear
    to me here and now that there for certain is a problem conected with them,
    it could be a problem, so I thought it would be the most responsible thing
    to do, to also add the latter part of the problems, the ones that are
    mentioned
    under the title ‘other problems’.

    So even if it was the first five or ten questions that made me go to the
    step
    of complaining. Even so, I hope you have the oppertunity to answer me about
    the last part of the questions as well.

    Sorry again that this e-mail got a bit delayed. I know I said I’d send it no
    latter
    than Wednesday, but I reckon that as long as I send it before the office
    hours
    on Thursday, then it hopefully should be ok.

    I’ll also forward this e-mail to Linda Lennon and Lesley Southern, since
    I’ve been
    copying the e-mails I’ve sent to them earlier, in this e-mail now.

    Hope that this is alright, and that you bear over with me if some of the
    last questions
    wasn’t as well stated as they should have been, due to time problems etc.

    Hope that this is alright!

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    **

  • From: eribsskog@gmail.com Erik Ribsskog
    To: st3york@lgo.org.uk st3 york
    Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 10:15:12 +0000
    Subject: Re: Complaint against Liverpool City Council

    Hi,

    sorry about the address, it should be:

    Flat 3
    5 Leather Lane
    Liverpool
    L2 2AE

    (Also just to let you know, g-mail thought that the e-mail you sent me was
    spam. I sometimes check
    the spam-mail, because this has happened before, that regular e-mail is
    classified as spam by g-mail,
    so I guess I should maybe get a new e-mail programme).

    Please just contact me if there is any more information I should have sent!

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On 8/6/07, st3 york wrote:
    >
    > Dear Mr Ribsskog
    >
    >
    >
    > Thank you for your complaint. Could you please let me have your address
    > as this was not on your correspondence.
    >
    >
    >
    > Look forward to hearing from you.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > Carol Harvey
    >
    > Team Secretary
    >
    > Commission for Local Administration in England
    >
    > Tel 01904 380219
    >
    > Website: www.lgo.org.uk
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > NOTICE – This message contains information intended only for the use of
    > the addressee named above. If you have received this message in error
    > please advise us at once and do not make any use of the information.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >

  • From: Steve.Kneale@liverpool.gov.uk Kneale, Steve
    To: eribsskog@gmail.com Erik Ribsskog
    Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 08:41:21 +0000
    Subject: RE: Lifestyles Liverpool complaint.

    Sir,
    I am sorry but I am having difficulty understanding exactly what you are
    asking for. Rather than exchange lengthy e-mails I would suggest
    discussing over the telephone or meeting when you next use Lifestyles
    would be most beneficial.
    Regards

    Steve Kneale
    Sport & Recreation Service – Facility Operations
    Business Development Manager

    Office location:
    1st Floor, Lifestyles Everton Park
    Great Homer Street
    Liverpool L5 5PH

    Tel: +44 (0)151 233 6362
    Fax: +44 (0) 151 233 6300

    Web: http://www.liverpool.gov.uk/lifestyles

    Liverpool – European Capital of Culture 2008

    ________________________________

    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
    Sent: 10 August 2007 19:56
    To: Kneale, Steve
    Subject: Re: Lifestyles Liverpool complaint.

    Hi,

    thank you very much for your answer.

    Like I was writing in the complaint to the ombudsman, I think that the
    council should maybe
    have answered the complaint in public, since I have brought this things
    up in public myself,
    since these are things that concern the other users of the gym, and the
    people who are paying
    tax to the council.

    Also, it would have been very fine if it also was explained why I wasn’t
    recieving any answer
    from the Duty Officer, and also why it is that it isn’t him who is
    answering the complaint.

    Also, I was wondering if my complaint to the Duty Officer isn’t being
    regarded as an official
    complaint?

    Also I think that all the points in the complaint should have been
    answered. Even if some of
    the points are brought up in another e-mail, I’m explaining about this
    in the complaint, and
    making it clear that I think it would have been fine to hear what the
    Duty Officer has to say
    about this, aswell as hearing what Lesley Southern had to say about
    this, since I haven’t
    really been explained what position in the Council he has, and also
    since all the points
    have been mentioned together when I’ve comented on the complaint in
    public, so then
    I think it would be most apropriate if all the points in the complaint
    were answered
    togheter aswell, even if some of the points also has been brought up in
    another context.

    Also I think it add to the general overviewabilty of the answer, if the
    original indexing
    from the complaint was kept.

    I haven’t comented on the indiviadual points from the answer here, I
    think it would be
    smartest to sort with the issues above first, and then deal with the
    individual complaints
    later, if you think this would be alright.

    Hope that this is alright, and please tell me if there is anything else
    I need to take into
    concern, to get my answer in line with your complaint-procedure.

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On 8/10/07, Kneale, Steve wrote:

    Sir,
    Please find attached a response to the matters pertaining to
    Lifestyles Fitness Centres and your recent complaint.

    Regards

    Steve Kneale
    Sport & Recreation Service – Facility Operations
    Business Development Manager

    Office location:
    1st Floor, Lifestyles Everton Park
    Great Homer Street
    Liverpool L5 5PH

    Tel: +44 (0)151 233 6362
    Fax: +44 (0) 151 233 6300

    Web: http://www.liverpool.gov.uk/lifestyles

    Liverpool – European Capital of Culture 2008

    ______________________________________________________________________
    DISCLAIMER:

    The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be read,
    copied or used only by the intended recipient(s). If you have received
    it in error please contact the sender immediately by returning the
    e-mail or by telephoning a number contained in the body of the e-mail
    then and please delete the e-mail without disclosing its contents
    elsewhere. No responsibility is accepted for loss or damage arising from
    viruses or changes made to this message after it was sent. The views
    contained in this email are those of the author and not necessarily
    those of the author’s employer or service provider.

    This email has been automatically scanned for viruses and
    malicious content by MessageLabs for your protection

    ______________________________________________________________________

    ______________________________________________________________________
    This email has been automatically scanned for viruses and malicious
    content by MessageLabs for your protection
    ______________________________________________________________________

    ______________________________________________________________________
    DISCLAIMER:

    The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be read, copied or used only by the intended recipient(s). If you have received it in error please contact the sender immediately by returning the e-mail or by telephoning a number contained in the body of the e-mail then and please delete the e-mail without disclosing its contents elsewhere. No responsibility is accepted for loss or damage arising from viruses or changes made to this message after it was sent. The views contained in this email are those of the author and not necessarily those of the author’s employer or service provider.

    This email has been automatically scanned for viruses and malicious content by MessageLabs for your protection__________________________________________

  • From: eribsskog@gmail.com Erik Ribsskog
    To: Steve.Kneale@liverpool.gov.uk Kneale, Steve
    Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 18:56:24 +0000
    Subject: Re: Lifestyles Liverpool complaint.

    Hi,

    thank you very much for your answer.

    Like I was writing in the complaint to the ombudsman, I think that the
    council should maybe
    have answered the complaint in public, since I have brought this things up
    in public myself,
    since these are things that concern the other users of the gym, and the
    people who are paying
    tax to the council.

    Also, it would have been very fine if it also was explained why I wasn’t
    recieving any answer
    from the Duty Officer, and also why it is that it isn’t him who is answering
    the complaint.

    Also, I was wondering if my complaint to the Duty Officer isn’t being
    regarded as an official
    complaint?

    Also I think that all the points in the complaint should have been answered.
    Even if some of
    the points are brought up in another e-mail, I’m explaining about this in
    the complaint, and
    making it clear that I think it would have been fine to hear what the Duty
    Officer has to say
    about this, aswell as hearing what Lesley Southern had to say about this,
    since I haven’t
    really been explained what position in the Council he has, and also since
    all the points
    have been mentioned together when I’ve comented on the complaint in public,
    so then
    I think it would be most apropriate if all the points in the complaint were
    answered
    togheter aswell, even if some of the points also has been brought up in
    another context.

    Also I think it add to the general overviewabilty of the answer, if the
    original indexing
    from the complaint was kept.

    I haven’t comented on the indiviadual points from the answer here, I think
    it would be
    smartest to sort with the issues above first, and then deal with the
    individual complaints
    later, if you think this would be alright.

    Hope that this is alright, and please tell me if there is anything else I
    need to take into
    concern, to get my answer in line with your complaint-procedure.

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On 8/10/07, Kneale, Steve wrote:
    >
    > Sir,
    > Please find attached a response to the matters pertaining to Lifestyles
    > Fitness Centres and your recent complaint.
    >
    > Regards
    >
    >
    > Steve Kneale
    > Sport & Recreation Service – Facility Operations
    > Business Development Manager
    >
    > *Office location:*
    > 1st Floor, Lifestyles Everton Park
    > Great Homer Street
    > Liverpool L5 5PH
    >
    > Tel: +44 (0)151 233 6362
    > Fax: +44 (0) 151 233 6300
    >
    > Web: http://www.liverpool.gov.uk/lifestyles
    >
    > *Liverpool – European Capital of Culture 2008 *
    >
    > ______________________________________________________________________
    > DISCLAIMER:
    >
    > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be read, copied or
    > used only by the intended recipient(s). If you have received it in error
    > please contact the sender immediately by returning the e-mail or by
    > telephoning a number contained in the body of the e-mail then and please
    > delete the e-mail without disclosing its contents elsewhere. No
    > responsibility is accepted for loss or damage arising from viruses or
    > changes made to this message after it was sent. The views contained in this
    > email are those of the author and not necessarily those of the author’s
    > employer or service provider.
    >
    > This email has been automatically scanned for viruses and malicious
    > content by MessageLabs for your protection
    > ______________________________________________________________________
    >
    >
    >

  • 10th August 2007 Enquiries: Steve Kneale

    Direct Line: 0151 233 6362

    Our ref. SK 10Au 07

    Mr. E. Ribsskog

    via e-mail.

    eribsskog@gmail.com

    Dear Eric,

    Thank you for sending us your comments dated 6th August 2007, that have fed into our ‘Have Your Say’ customer feedback system.

    Your communication raises a number of issues, some of which I understand have resulted in responses. However, if any of your previous communications have not been satisfactorily resolved or even responded to then please accept my sincere apologies. I will however try to address your concerns below.

    1. With regard your direct debit subscription to Lifestyles. I am aware of some problems you encountered. In November 2006 we installed a new It system into the Lifestyles centres that did result in a number of problems with collections. These are now resolved and I understand your account is in balance, as advised via e-mail dated 3rd July 2007.

    2. Within the Lifestyles Millennium we strive to provide a high quality service. We do employ cleaners who should not have entered the male changing areas when persons were present and we have changed the cleaning regime to stop this happening in future.

      Cleaning staff, together with the fitness instructors are required to clean all areas including the fitness equipment but not interfere with member’s enjoyment of using the centre.

    3. Lifestyles Millennium has been closed since 25th June and will re-open on Monday 13th August 2007 to allow essential repairs in the shower areas. Messages were put on the Wellness system and notices displayed in the facility for 2 weeks prior to closure in accordance with our customer charter.

      We have informed Liverpool Direct of updates and tried to keep the internet updated as we received feedback from contractors with regards the re-opening date.

    4. Members who used Lifestyles Millennium were reimbursed due to its closure and were informed in writing to their home address.

    5. All staff are expected to wear identity badges at all times. Although this does not denote their designation nor authority. Members should be encouraged to report any incidents to any member of staff who will attempt to resolve the matter or report it to a senior colleague. If you have any further cause to report a matter at our facilities I would ask you ask to speak with the duty manager. If you feel this is inappropriate at the time, please can you contact me directly, ideally by telephone to discuss at the earliest opportunity.

    I wish to thank you again for your valued feedback.

    If you remain dissatisfied with the response to your complaint, please contact me either via e-mail, telephone or in writing, where the matter can be escalated to a further stage.

    Yours faithfully

    Steve Kneale

    Business Development Manager

    Sport & Recreation Service

    steve.kneale@liverpool.gov.uk

  • From: eribsskog@gmail.com Erik Ribsskog
    To: st3york@lgo.org.uk st3 york
    Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 17:26:38 +0000
    Subject: Re: 07/C/06289/RA

    Hi,

    well I’ve been waiting for the LGO to contact me back, like the letter from
    18/9 says.

    I’m not satisfied with the Councils action, since they aren’t even dealing
    with the right complaint.

    The LGO can’t expect me to exhaust the complaint-procedure regarding a
    complaint that I haven’t sent.

    The LGO should have contacted me back in November, since they write this in
    the letter from 18/9.

    So this is something I want to complain about.

    Because I’m not satisfied with the Council, since they aren’t dealing with
    the right complaint and don’t want
    to deal with the process in writing.

    I’m not going to meet with the Council to discuss another complaint.

    And I want the discussion to be in writing, like I’ve told the LGO in
    e-mails.

    I think that if the LGO write in the letter from 18/9, that they are going
    to contact me back in November,
    then they should do this, and not make up excuses later on.

    This is at how I see it, so I am not content with eighter the Council or the
    LGO’s dealings with this, so I’m
    wondering a bit on how I should go forward then.

    Thank you very much for your answer in advance!

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On 12/14/07, st3 york wrote:
    >
    > Thank you for your email.
    >
    >
    >
    > As you are aware from Mrs Agnew’s previous letters to you your complaint
    > should be exhausted with the Council before referring it back to our office.
    >
    >
    >
    > The Council informs us that it offered you a meeting with Mr Kneale on
    > Monday 24 September and if it did not hear back from you the Council would
    > assume that the matter was closed.
    >
    >
    >
    > If you still wish to pursue this further you should contact the Council
    > explaining why you did not respond to its offer of a meeting. Mrs Agnew
    > has asked me to repeat to you that we would expect you to engage with the
    > Council on this matter.
    >
    >
    >
    > We will not contact you further – however can if you wish contact us once
    > your complaint has been exhausted by the Council if you remain dissatisfied.
    >
    >
    >
    > Yours sincerely
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > *Debbie Hilton*
    >
    > PA to Rosemary Agnew
    >
    > Commission for Local Administration in England
    >
    > Tel: 01904 380201
    >
    > Website: www.lgo.org.uk
    >
    >
    >
    > NOTICE – This message contains information intended only for the use of
    > the addressee named above. If you have received this message in error
    > please advise us at once and do not make any use of the information.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > —–Original Message—–
    > *From:* Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
    > *Sent:* 12 December 2007 14:57
    > *To:* st3 york
    > *Subject:* Ref: 07/C/06289/RA
    >
    >
    >
    > Hi,
    >
    >
    >
    > I’m refering to your letter of 18/9, where you are writing that the LGO is
    > going to contact me back in
    >
    > November, regarding if I’m satisfied with the Councils actions, regarding
    > the complaint I sent you in
    >
    > August (5/8).
    >
    >
    >
    > I haven’t heard anything from you, so I thought I’d send an update.
    >
    >
    > The problem is that the Council don’t want to deal with this in writing.
    >
    >
    >
    > I think that, since I complained in writing, then I, since I started the
    > correspondence, can say that
    >
    > I please want this do be dealt with in writing.
    >
    >
    >
    > But the Council doesn’t want to deal with it in writing, so the process
    > isn’t getting anywhere.
    >
    >
    >
    > So I was wondering why you haven’t contacted me back in November, like you
    > write in the letter
    >
    > from 18/9, that you were going to do.
    >
    >
    >
    > So this is just a reminder regarding this.
    >
    >
    >
    > Hope that this is alright!
    >
    >
    >
    > Yours sincerely,
    >
    >
    > Erik Ribsskog
    >

  • From: eribsskog@gmail.com Erik Ribsskog
    To: Legal.LSC@legalservices.gov.uk Legal LSC
    Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 17:09:10 +0000
    Subject: Re: Your e-mail

    Hi,

    thank you very much for your answer!

    But the Police, told me to go to the CAB, and then get help from a solicitor
    to bring the case
    up with The Crowns Court.

    The contact with the CAB led me to you.

    And now it doesn’t seem like I’m getting anywere with the process.

    Who should I contact regarding this, do you think?

    Thanks in advance for your help!

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On 12/13/07, Legal LSC wrote:
    >
    > Our ref: KPL/MISC/07/07/70(8)
    > Date: 13 December 2007
    >
    >
    > Dear Mr Ribsskog,
    >
    > Thank you for your e-mail of 7 December 2007.
    >
    > I am not advising you to complain about a solicitor but giving you the
    > information should you wish to do so.
    >
    > You must understand that solicitors has the final decision on whether
    > they wish to take a case on and therefore, if they feel they do not have
    > the capacity to take your case on or that they do not wish to take your
    > case on, then they do not have to represent you. It is a solicitor’s
    > discretion on whether they accept a case.
    >
    > All I can suggest is that you continue to search for solicitors or
    > legal advisers using our ‘Find a Legal Adviser’ section of our
    > Community Legal Advice website, which is available by visiting the
    > website at http://www.communitylegaladvice.org.uk/. If you still do not
    > find a solicitor or a legal adviser that will represent you then there
    > is nothing much we can help you with.
    >
    > I apologise that I cannot be of greater assistance.
    >
    > Yours sincerely
    >
    >
    > Ka Poh Ling
    > Central Customer Services Unit
    >
    >
    >
    > ************************************************************************************
    > Disclaimer
    >
    > This e-mail (and any attachment(s)) is private and intended solely for the
    > use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Its unauthorised
    > use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the
    > intended recipient please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return
    > e-mail.
    >
    > Internet e-mail is not a secure medium, as messages can be intercepted and
    > read by someone else. Please bear this in mind when deciding whether to send
    > information by e-mail. Postal addresses for the Legal Services Commission
    > are available from
    > http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/aboutus/our_regional_network.asp
    >
    > The Legal Services Commission reserves the right to monitor, record and
    > retain any incoming and outgoing e-mails for security reasons and for
    > monitoring internal compliance with the Legal Services Commission policy on
    > staff use. E-mail monitoring and/or blocking software may be used and e-mail
    > content may be read. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken
    > when writing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. No contracts can be
    > entered into on our behalf by e-mail.
    >
    > Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not
    > necessarily represent those of the Legal Services Commission.
    >
    > The Legal Services Commission checks all e-mails and attachments for known
    > viruses, however, you are advised that you open any attachments at your own
    > risk.
    >
    > ************************************************************************************
    >
    >

  • From: eribsskog@gmail.com Erik Ribsskog
    To: st3york@lgo.org.uk
    Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:57:05 +0000
    Subject: Ref: 07/C/06289/RA

    Hi,

    I’m refering to your letter of 18/9, where you are writing that the LGO is
    going to contact me back in
    November, regarding if I’m satisfied with the Councils actions, regarding
    the complaint I sent you in
    August (5/8).

    I haven’t heard anything from you, so I thought I’d send an update.

    The problem is that the Council don’t want to deal with this in writing.

    I think that, since I complained in writing, then I, since I started the
    correspondence, can say that
    I please want this do be dealt with in writing.

    But the Council doesn’t want to deal with it in writing, so the process
    isn’t getting anywhere.

    So I was wondering why you haven’t contacted me back in November, like you
    write in the letter
    from 18/9, that you were going to do.

    So this is just a reminder regarding this.

    Hope that this is alright!

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

  • User talk:Johncons
    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    Jump to: navigation, search
    Contents[hide]
    1 Grandiosa
    2 Your recent edits
    3 New user info
    4 December 2007
    5 WQA and ANI
    6 Blocked for 24 hours
    7 Section break for sanity
    8 Blocked
    //

    [edit] Grandiosa
    You appear to be conducting a vendetta against this product and have reverted several efforts to dissuade you. Please stop! Ros0709 11:31, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
    I have started a discussion about your edits on the page talk:Grandiosa. I would invite you to justify the edits you are making, and in particular respond to my criticism that your edits are neither established research nor written from a neutral point of view. Ros0709 11:48, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

    [edit] Your recent edits
    Hi there. In case you didn’t know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! —SineBot 13:19, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

    [edit] New user info
    Welcome!
    Hello, Johncons, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
    The five pillars of Wikipedia
    Tutorial
    How to edit a page
    How to write a great article
    Manual of Style
    I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

    [edit] December 2007
    Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Grandiosa. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article’s talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. You edits are Original research, and non-NPOV. The sources that you cite are not reliable sources. The article has been reverted to how it was at the start of this editing spree Mayalld 13:00, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
    Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Grandiosa. Doing so violates Wikipedia’s verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mayalld 13:02, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

    This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Grandiosa, you will be blocked from editing. Mayalld 13:08, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
    I was simply appealing again, to take this on the articles discussion page.
    Like I also was earlier, but you ignored it, and started discussing here in stead.
    Johncons 13:10, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
    I have explained to you on the article talk page why your edits cannot remain at present, and have explained exactly what you need to do to get the edits accepted there as requested.
    I have issued warnings to you as to your conduct here on your user talk page, because that is the correct place to issue warnings. Mayalld 13:13, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
    You are taking things out of context.
    I was appealing again, before you wrote on the article discussion page.
    ’13:04, 3 December 2007 Johncons (Talk contribs) (13,303 bytes) (Undid revision 175474462 by Mayalld (talk) Could we please take this on the discussion-page?) (undo)’.
    Well, I’ll have a look at it again, at the edits, and see if I can get them better in line with the citation policy.
    But I can’t see that I should be accused of vandalism, when I was only appealing for the discussion to be held on the discussion page.
    And you actually ignored my first appeal, so it was really you who started acting out of line.
    Thats at least the way I see it.
    Just for the record, while I’m writing here.
    Johncons 13:31, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
    The default position, in respect of edits to a page that there is no consensus for is that the page remains as it was before the disputed edits were added, whilst discussion takes place. Your appeal that the edits remain whilst they are discussed isn’t how things are done on Wikipedia.
    I reverted your unsourced contributions twice quoting a lack of reliable sources as a reason, assumed good faith on your part, and warned you on your talk page. When you (again) restored the information, despite having received two warnings about adding unsourced material, it was right and proper to describe your actions as vandalism, and warn you accordingly, as it was clear that you were engaging in edit warring with multiple editors.
    I repeat what I said on the article talk page. I will gladly assist you in vetting the sources to establish what can go up as a NPOV sourced piece, but that is conditional on you ceasing attempting to push an unsourced POV in the article. Mayalld 13:42, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
    I’m just refering to what I was writing in my last post here, and also to the article discussion-page, since I think it’s easier to just discuss one place at a time.
    Johncons 13:51, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
    Sorry I misunderstood what you were saying to me yesterday, I did learn some Swedish many years ago but haven’t used it since. —Rodhullandemu (please reply herecontribs) 17:01, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

    [edit] WQA and ANI
    This is a very dissapointing action on your part.
    I have invested a good deal of time and effort in trying to;
    Help you understand what cannot go into wiki
    Help you pull together some text on the subject that can.
    and all this on an article that is of zero interest to me.
    Throughout this I have remained civil, even in the face of your somewhat testy reactions where people have declined to answer loaded questions.
    In short, I have gone out of my way to try and help you. In return, I find that you have tried very hard to stir up trouble for me.
    I have tried to help you, but no more.
    Mayalld (talk) 22:29, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
    Hi, thank you very much for your comment.
    Like I’ve written in the netiquette-section, I hope you are agreeing with me, that we discuss this one on place at a time, so I’ve commented on both of your posts in this link:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts
    Hope that this is alright, and thanks in advance for the help with the cooperation on this!
    Johncons (talk) 00:37, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
    Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edit(s) to Grandiosa, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. The Evil Spartan (talk) 08:27, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

    [edit] Blocked for 24 hours
    You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia’s blocking policy for disruptiveness, refusal to comply with established policies regarding sourcing of information despite being advised on several occasions, instigating frivolous administrative actions. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblockyour reason here}} below. Manning (talk) 12:43, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
    .
    I’m not sure what this is about, so I think I must have been harassed. Johncons (talk) 08:35, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
    No, you haven’t been harassed.
    You tried to push your fringe theory on an article.
    It was made clear that unsourced POV wasn’t going to be tolerated.
    I tried to work with you to come up with what was acceptable
    You simply complained that nobody would answer your leading questions
    You then started raising multiple complaints of harassment, and the like, which the admins found entirely unconvincing.
    You chose to drag me through the mud, for no more reason than that I wouldn’t answer your questions in a way that allowed you to get around wikipedia policies
    I’m sick of being subjected to these malicious and vexatious complaints from you, and so I made a report of my own, in an attempt to get some respite. Curiously the same audience that failed to see any merit in your multiple complaints about me rapidly came to the conclusion that your behaviour was sufficient breach of policy that you should be blocked for at least 24 hours
    There are two possible conclusions;
    Your behaviour is at fault
    There is a mass conspiracy to get at you
    Choose with care which you think is most likely
    Mayalld (talk) 23:09, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
    Hi Mayalld,
    thank you very much for your answer!
    we had a netiquette/Wikiquette alerts-session, some days ago, from wich you concluded that you had failed in your efforts to teach me, and then you didn’t want to ‘pollute the page with more text’.
    ‘Reply by User:Mayalld No I’m not saying that you are difficult to teach. I am saying that I have failed in my efforts to teach you.
    Having said that, I refuse to pollute this page with even more text, as people really do have better things to do,
    Mayalld (talk) 06:20, 6 December 2007 (UTC)’.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts&oldid=176102388
    SO we didn’t get an agreement, regarding how we should interact in the future.
    You just left the process.
    I think that, you have played yourself a bit out, because if you wanted to interact more with me on Wikipedia or other places, after the Wikiquette-process, then I think you should have finnished the process there, and reached an agreement regarding how we should interact in the future.
    In stead, you choose to say that ‘people had better things to do’, than reading about the netiquette-issue.
    So you didn’t think it was important to reach an agreement regarding future interaction.
    So now, I’m a bit unsure on how you want this interaction to be pursued, since you didn’t appologise at all for the harassment directed at me, from before the netiquette-process.
    You just left the process before any agreement was made.
    So I think you should make your possision regarding this clear, before you continue to write posts that are directed at me.
    I hope that you agree with me in this, and thanks very much in advance for you help!
    Johncons (talk) 03:37, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
    Pursuing agreements isn’t something that you do on admin noticeboards. You go to admin noticeboards when you want somebody else to look at the situation and pronounce on it.
    You went to the noticeboards four times, and four times you failed to find anybody who felt that you had been wronged.
    I went to the admin noticeboards once, and an admin reviewed the situation, and decided that you had behaved contrary to wikipedia policy.
    I offer no apology for my behaviour, because I am satisfied that I have behaved properly, as are the admins that reviewed the reports that were made.
    You really need to accept that you were wrong, and that you can’t get your own way by screaming “harrasment” like a petulant child every time you don’t get your own way.
    As to future interaction, provide you desist from POV-pushing, and from attempting to stir up trouble for me, there will be no need for future interaction. If you continue to try to add fringe theories to Wikipedia, or to attempt to cause trouble for me, I will deal with that as before in a civil fashion. You should be under no illusion though. Continuing in the same vein as you have edited so far will inevitably lead to you being blocked again.
    Mayalld (talk) 08:00, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
    Hi,
    I seem to mean that you exited the nettiquette-session, before the issue was resolved.
    I don’t think we should interact before the issue is resolved.
    So I seem to think that I’m being harassed by you, since I don’t really apprieciate to interact with you.
    At least not until we resolve how this interaction should be conducted.
    I seem to remember, that the different countries also has got laws regarding harassment etc.
    So even if this isn’t dealt with responsibly by Wikipeida, that doesn’t meant that it wont be brought up at all.
    I’m going to seek advice advice on how to deal with different legal-issues from other cases, and then it isn’t that unlikly, that I also try to include incidents, from eg. Wikipedia etc. also as well, if I think that this is called for.
    I wrote on the admin-board four times, thats right.
    But I’m new on Wikipedia, and all of those posts, were not regarding the netiquette issue with you.
    It was regarding an issue with another user, and more.
    I just wanted to ask them for advice, on how to continue, with a nettiquette-process, when one of the users, exits the process, before it is resolved, like you did in the nettiquette-session.
    So I don’t really understand why you are on my back here on Wikipedia.
    I would think that we should have a trust, and don’t direct posts to eachother, for maybe a certain periode of time.
    I don’t seem to think, that the dialog we are having here, is very meaningful.
    So I would think that it would make more sense to have a trust, and not direct posts to eachother, for a certain periode of time.
    What do you think yourself about this?
    Thanks in advance for you reply!
    Johncons (talk) 16:58, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
    I’m not sure what you expect Mayalld to do here because you’ve first asked him not to engage any more, and then asked him a question you expect an answer to.
    Anyway, I have mostly withdrawn from the Grandiosa debate but kept an eye on it to see what happens, mostly because I have become more and more amazed by your behaviour – and, frankly, I really cannot believe what I am seeing. Let me make this absolutely clear: as they were, your updates to the article could not stay. Several people, myself included, removed them and moved on; Mayalld was the only editor who took the time and trouble to attempt to work with you to improve the article so it could stay in some form and yet you turned round and bit him. He was helping you, yet you responded as if he was hindering you. Your attempts to get administrators on your side and have him admonished have just antagonised more and more people and no-one is supporting you. Can you not see this? When you are in a big hole, Stop Digging. Be big enough to accept that an error was made and, please, just move on. Ros0709 (talk) 19:08, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

    Your recent edits could give editors of Wikipedia the impression that you may consider legal or other “off-wiki” action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that this is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia’s policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a genuine dispute with the Community or its members, please use dispute resolution. Shell babelfish 20:40, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
    Ros0709,
    you’ve got it all wrong.
    It was the user Mayalld, who exited the Nettiquetter-session.
    Before it was resolved.
    And then he appeared on this page, on this time and date: ‘User talk:Mayalldtalk]]) 23:09, 10 December 2007’.
    So this is what has been going on.
    After this, I’ve again tryed to get this resolved.
    Since it seems to me, that this user, is a bit on my back here.
    So this is the order of events, regarding this.
    Just to make this clear.
    Also, you say he was trying to help me.
    That might be right.
    But what I reacted to, was that he often gave advice, on questions, that I hadn’t asked advice for.
    (This in my book, is called to patronise).
    Also, even if one are giving advice, then one also should have in the back of ones head, that one should act in accordance to the nettiquette-principles.
    But it was this I was reacting on, since I don’t think one should have to accept being harassed and patronised etc.
    Communication, also on Wikipedia, should be in line with general manners, and nettiquette, I think.
    You say I’ve been trying to get Administatiors to oppose the user, thats not right.
    I’ve been asking for advice on general procedures regarding how to go forward if one are being harassed etc.
    And this has not meant to be personal towards anyone, I’ve just tryed to learn how to deal with things on Wikipedia.
    So I hope I have got to explain this now.
    And please just ask me if there is anyhing, that I should explain more about.
    Hope that this is alright!
    Johncons (talk) 21:03, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
    Shell,
    I’ve tried to use the dispute resolution.
    What happened, was that the user exited the prosess, before it was resolved.
    And I tried to ask on the Adminstrator-board, about advice, on what I should do then.
    But then I was given a 24 hr block.
    And the user, reappeared, on this page, on ’23:09, 10 December 2007′.
    And after that, I’ve tried to negotiate a trust.
    But if you have some advice, regarding how I should go forward, from here.
    Then that would be very fine!
    (I’m going to put a notice on your discussion-page as well, in case you don’t read this).
    Because it would be very fine with some advice regarding this!
    Hope that this is alright!
    Johncons (talk) 21:09, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
    The problem is that you seem to believe that you were involved in a dispute resolution process that works by two users mutually discussing an issue and reacing an agreement as to how to proceed.
    Neither WP:ANI nor WP:WQA are part of such a process. Both are places where you take a complaint and leave it for others to draw a conclusion. Once you have put your case, it is entirely proper to withdraw and say no more. It would be entirely wrong to embark on an extended discussion between the two of us on the noticeboards. The proper place to do that is on either your talk page or mine.
    You need to reflect that your four entries onto the noticeboards were deemed to be a disruptive abuse of process. That is the admins telling you that you were wrong to make those posts as you did.
    People are telling you loud and clear that you are doing things wrong. Yet in the same breath as saying that you don’t understand how things work, you try to tell people that they are doing it wrong.
    As to your original questions… no, people didn’t always answer the questions that you asked directly. People did that because a simple yes/no answer to those questions would very likely give an incorrect impression of wikipedia policy, or because the question was based on certain assumptions that the person answering didn’t feel were correct.
    Mayalld (talk) 21:41, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

    [edit] Section break for sanity
    Ok, first, please stop putting each sentence you type on a new line, you’re taking up an incredible amount of space everywhere and its harder to follow what’s going on. If you’d explain what you believe the problem is, I can try to give you advice on how to resolve it. Shell babelfish 21:49, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
    Hi,
    I think I’ll write the way I’m used to, if thats alright.
    Since I’m not that young, that I can change this from one minute to another.
    Hope that this is alright!
    What it is.
    Is that I initiated a Nettiquette-session, with the user Mayalld
    Since, I thought there had been some nettiquette-issus, between me and the user.
    I thought that I had been harassed, and patroised, by the user, and I wanted us to get an agreement regarding how we should go forward with our interaction in the future, bearing these problems in mind.
    It’s the Wikiquette alert: 4.17 User:Mayalld in this link:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts&oldid=177299522
    In this Wikiquette-session the user writes this:
    ‘No I’m not saying that you are difficult to teach. I am saying that I have failed in my efforts to teach you.
    Having said that, I refuse to pollute this page with even more text, as people really do have better things to do,
    Mayalld (talk) 06:20, 6 December 2007 (UTC)’.
    And then exits the process, without the process being resolved.
    Then, on 23:09, 10 December 2007, the user re-appears, on this page, and start to write posts directed at me, even if we haven’t found a resolution, for the Nettiquette process.
    I had already tried to get advice on the Adminstrator-board, on how to forward, if a user exits a nettiquette resolution process, before it resolved.
    But I didn’t get any advice.
    For some reason, unclear to me, I got a 24 hr block instead.
    Then, after the user have re-appeared on my discussion page, even the resolution process, was exited by the user, and is this still not resolved.
    After this, I’ve been a bit unsure on how to go forward with the interaction with the user.
    So, I’ve amongst other things, tried to negoiate a trust.
    Here on my discussion page, since the user appeared here again.
    But I haven’t managed to do this yet.
    So this is were we’re at now, the way I see it.
    So my position in this, is that I’m trying to get a trust negotiatied.
    I’d like to try to get an agreement on, that the user and myself, give eachother a break, for a certain periode of time, in which we don’t direct any posts to eachoter.
    I haven’t managed this yet.
    But I think this would be a fine way to solve this I think.
    If I could make a suggestion regarding this.
    But I was wondering if you have any advice, regarding how you think this should be dealt with?
    Thanks very much in advance for the help!
    Johncons (talk) 22:17, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
    This is utterly futile!
    Yet again, somebody has given you sound advice, and you decline to take it.
    Yet again, you repeat your claim that I refused to participate in a process, despite being told time and again that the pages that you posted to were NOT for discussions between users, but to request that a third party gives a view.
    Please, read what people write! Mayalld (talk) 23:12, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
    Well, if you’re not even interested in learning how to use the talk page without making people scroll 3 times just to read your message, I’m not sure you’re really interested in any help. Apparently you didn’t like the something Mayalld said, or at least I guess that’s what you’re saying. There is no such thing as this “Netiquette” process you keep referring to. Move on and stop running around everywhere complaining of the problem. 23:53, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

    [edit] Blocked
    What Wikipedia needs least of all, among the very many things it does not need even a little tiny bit, is unrepentant POV-warriors whose only purpose on Wikipedia is to push some bizarre conspiracy theory which lacks any independent reliable sources. We’ve put up with your bullheadedness for more than long enough, your fatuous “wikiquette alert” in an attempt to gain an advantage in a content dispute where you are unambiguously in the wrong, is one step too far. Wikipedia is not Usenet, it is not for everybody, not everybody is able to “get” how Wikipedia works. You seem to be one of those people. Goodbye. Guy (Help!) 00:16, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
    Retrieved from “http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Johncons

'Bokhylla' 70-tallet 80-tallet 90-tallet Anmeldelse Arne Mogan Olsen Berger Bergeråsen Brev Christell Humblen Dagbladet.no Datatilsynet Drammen E-post Facebook Google Haldis Humblen Hm Identitetstyveri Ingeborg Ribsskog irc Jobbsøking i England Johannes Ribsskog johncons-blogg Karen Ribsskog Klage Larvik Liverpool Magne Winnem Mobilbilder Musikk Nettmobbing Online trakassering Oppdatering Oslo Pia Ribsskog Politiet Rimi Slektsforskning StatCounter Svelvik Twitter Wikipedia YouTube Ågot Mogan Olsen