Er det forresten sant, at faren din blir kalt 'Slavekapteinen Kristian', som jeg har sett noen hos Helly Hansen i Moss, har søkt på, på tracking-cookie programmet, på bloggen min.
Gmail – FW: Erik Ribsskog DWP00431/10 – Restricted Personal Data
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
FW: Erik Ribsskog DWP00431/10 – Restricted Personal Data
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 8:27 PM
To:
DWP ICE gateway team <ICE@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>
Hi,
yes.
On A, I would have written it like this:
(Your version: A: On 20 May 2010 Jobcentre Plus (JCP) informed you that you would have to attend an interview on 3 June 2010. It failed to inform you that this was regarding ‘Employment Zones’ or to provide you with the correct literature regarding this. As a result you were not prepared when attending the meeting.)
My verison:
A: On 20 May 2010 Jobcentre Plus (JCP) informed you that you would have to attend an interview on 3 June 2010. You were told that the meeting was regarding Employment Zones, but the Jobcentre, failed to inform you what Empolyment Zones was, and to provide you with the correct litterature, regarding this. As a result you felt socialy alienated, and were not prepared when attending the meeting.
On B, one can say that the Jobcentre Plus-employee, failed to mark/circle the right address, in the folder.
(To be more spesific).
She also failed to give me the referal letter to Sencia, but as I've understood it, from the e-mail I'm answering, that's going to be in a new complaint.
Thank you very much for your e-mail by the way, and I hope you can amend A and B again.
Complaints C, D and E, I'm happy with now.
Hope this is alright!
Best regards,
Erik Ribsskog
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 10:05 AM, DWP ICE gateway team <ICE@dwp.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:
Mr Erik Ribsskog
1 October 2010
ICE Ref No: DWP00431/10
Dear Mr Ribsskog
Further to your recent Email of 29 September 2010, I am writing to clarify the elements of complaint we will now take forward.
Having read your correspondence I have now amended elements ‘B’ & ‘D’ accordingly and have now clarified your elements of complaint as follows:
A: On 20 May 2010 Jobcentre Plus (JCP) informed you that you would have to attend an interview on 3 June 2010. It failed to inform you that this was regarding ‘Employment Zones’ or to provide you with the correct literature regarding this. As a result you were not prepared when attending the meeting.
B: The literature that you received from Sencia (Your Employment Zone provider) contained three different addresses. JCP failed to advise you which was the correct one causing you to miss an appointment, and as a result your Jobseekers Allowance (JSA) was stopped. JCP has failed to fully investigate this.
C: JCP has informed you that a degree you obtained from Oslo University was the equivalent of HND level 4. You have advised that it should be level 5 but it has failed to fully investigate this.
D: On 1 July 2010 you were asked to attend your fortnightly signing on appointment Williamson Square Jobcentre at 11.15 on 14 July 2010. You were not informed that this would also be a sanction meeting and, when attending this appointment, you were informed that you should have been there at 9.30.
E: You have asked JCP to clarify why you were interviewed by two people instead of one at the above meeting. It has failed to provide a satisfactory response.
I would just like to explain that I have noted your other comments in your Email of 29 September 2010 and can confirm that the remaining points that you have raised will be covered as part of our investigation into the elements listed on the previous page. For this reason I have only amended elements ‘B’ and ‘D’ from my original letter of 29 September 2010.
I confirm the elements of complaint detailed above will form the basis of our examination. If you agree that your complaint has been accurately defined please contact me as soon as possible, it would be preferable if you could telephone me to avoid any delay. If you feel this letter does not accurately reflect your complaint, please contact me by 13 October 2010. We have accepted these complaints on the basis that they have not been the subject of legal proceedings or an Ombudsman’s investigation. If this is not the case, you must tell me. Likewise, if you decide to take this action during our investigation, please notify us.
If I do not hear from you by 13 October 2010, I will assume your complaint has been accurately defined, and your complaint will be passed to the Initial Action Team.
Please note that we are currently experiencing a high volume of complaints, and I hope you will understand that we deal with complaints in the order that we receive them to ensure that we provide a consistent level of service.
Your complaint is currently held in a queue, and as soon as a Resolution Officer is available to start the examination of your complaint, he or she will contact you direct to discuss your complaint, and determine the way forward. You will be given the opportunity, if necessary, to provide this office with any further information or evidence in relation to your complaint.
You will not hear from this office until your case has been allocated to a Resolution Officer, but please be assured that your complaint will be dealt with as soon as possible.
**********************************************************************
This document is strictly confidential and is intended only for use by the addressee.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or other
action taken in reliance of the information contained in this e-mail is strictly prohibited.
Any views expressed by the sender of this message are not necessarily those of the Department
for Work and Pensions.
If you have received this transmission in error, please use the reply function to tell us
and then permanently delete what you have received.
This email was scanned for viruses by the Department for Work and Pensions' anti-virus services and on leaving the Department was found to be virus free.
Please note: Incoming and outgoing e-mail messages are routinely monitored for compliance
with our policy on the use of electronic communications.
**********************************************************************
Gmail – FW: Erik Ribsskog DWP00431/10 – Restricted Personal Data
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
FW: Erik Ribsskog DWP00431/10 – Restricted Personal Data
DWP ICE gateway team
<ICE@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>
Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 10:05 AM
To:
Eribsskog@gmail.com
Mr Erik Ribsskog
1 October 2010
ICE Ref No: DWP00431/10
Dear Mr Ribsskog
Further to your recent Email of 29 September 2010, I am writing to clarify the elements of complaint we will now take forward.
Having read your correspondence I have now amended elements ‘B’ & ‘D’ accordingly and have now clarified your elements of complaint as follows:
A: On 20 May 2010 Jobcentre Plus (JCP) informed you that you would have to attend an interview on 3 June 2010. It failed to inform you that this was regarding ‘Employment Zones’ or to provide you with the correct literature regarding this. As a result you were not prepared when attending the meeting.
B: The literature that you received from Sencia (Your Employment Zone provider) contained three different addresses. JCP failed to advise you which was the correct one causing you to miss an appointment, and as a result your Jobseekers Allowance (JSA) was stopped. JCP has failed to fully investigate this.
C: JCP has informed you that a degree you obtained from Oslo University was the equivalent of HND level 4. You have advised that it should be level 5 but it has failed to fully investigate this.
D: On 1 July 2010 you were asked to attend your fortnightly signing on appointment Williamson Square Jobcentre at 11.15 on 14 July 2010. You were not informed that this would also be a sanction meeting and, when attending this appointment, you were informed that you should have been there at 9.30.
E: You have asked JCP to clarify why you were interviewed by two people instead of one at the above meeting. It has failed to provide a satisfactory response.
I would just like to explain that I have noted your other comments in your Email of 29 September 2010 and can confirm that the remaining points that you have raised will be covered as part of our investigation into the elements listed on the previous page. For this reason I have only amended elements ‘B’ and ‘D’ from my original letter of 29 September 2010.
I confirm the elements of complaint detailed above will form the basis of our examination. If you agree that your complaint has been accurately defined please contact me as soon as possible, it would be preferable if you could telephone me to avoid any delay. If you feel this letter does not accurately reflect your complaint, please contact me by 13 October 2010. We have accepted these complaints on the basis that they have not been the subject of legal proceedings or an Ombudsman’s investigation. If this is not the case, you must tell me. Likewise, if you decide to take this action during our investigation, please notify us.
If I do not hear from you by 13 October 2010, I will assume your complaint has been accurately defined, and your complaint will be passed to the Initial Action Team.
Please note that we are currently experiencing a high volume of complaints, and I hope you will understand that we deal with complaints in the order that we receive them to ensure that we provide a consistent level of service.
Your complaint is currently held in a queue, and as soon as a Resolution Officer is available to start the examination of your complaint, he or she will contact you direct to discuss your complaint, and determine the way forward. You will be given the opportunity, if necessary, to provide this office with any further information or evidence in relation to your complaint.
You will not hear from this office until your case has been allocated to a Resolution Officer, but please be assured that your complaint will be dealt with as soon as possible.
**********************************************************************
This document is strictly confidential and is intended only for use by the addressee.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or other
action taken in reliance of the information contained in this e-mail is strictly prohibited.
Any views expressed by the sender of this message are not necessarily those of the Department
for Work and Pensions.
If you have received this transmission in error, please use the reply function to tell us
and then permanently delete what you have received.
This email was scanned for viruses by the Department for Work and Pensions' anti-virus services and on leaving the Department was found to be virus free.
Please note: Incoming and outgoing e-mail messages are routinely monitored for compliance
with our policy on the use of electronic communications.
**********************************************************************
Gmail – Klage på at 'alle' i politiet i Oslo, er fra Toten
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Klage på at ‘alle’ i politiet i Oslo, er fra Toten
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 5:56 AM
To:
politidirektoratet@politiet.no
Cc:
post <post@spesialenheten.no>
Hei,
politiet i Oslo, har dårlig rykte.
Folk som Autopulver-vokalist, Dag Anders Rougseth, aka. Dagga, fra Hamar, har sagt til meg, rundt 2003, at alle i Oslo-politiet "e' frå Toten", (eller hvordan han sa det, på tilgjort Toten-mål).
Så det som skjer da, er at Toten-politi-folka, de spørr de kriminelle i Oslo, hvordan dem skal gjøre det og det.
Den såkalte 'mafian' da sikkert, det vil vel si Tveita-gjengen og Toska og de.
(Og muligens broren min Axel Thomassen).
Noe sånt.
Men, disse kriminelle, de har jo ingen forståelse, for Grunnloven og folks rettigheter.
Så Oslo blir jo da en mafia-kontrollert by.
Som disse byene i Mexico osv., hvor politiet har gitt opp.
Her har Politidirektoratet et ansvar mener jeg.
De skikkelige og dyktige folka, må jobbe i Securitas.
Fordi opptakssystemet deres kanskje trenger å bli sett gjennom.
Jeg husker da jeg ville inn på journalisthøyskolen, i 2002, da fikk jeg beskjed, da jeg leverte søknaden, på HiO, på Bislett, at det valget var uaktuelt.
(Av en sånn mafia-kar da sikkert).
Så da ble det IT-studiet, på Ingeniørhøyskolen.
Men nå er min tålmodighet slutt, med det tullet deres, i Oslo og i Norge.
Så nå får dere rydde opp, og slutte å tro at det holder å lese i leksikon, så ordner alt seg.
Dere får heller ansette fler folk fra Securitas, så klarer sikkert de å rydde opp.
Mvh.
Erik Ribsskog
PS.
Hvor jeg har fått det her fra?
Jo, da jeg flytta til Oslo, for å studere, i 1989.
Så hadde jeg en lillebror der, Axel Thomassen, (halvbroren min).
Og dem leide jeg et rom hos, når jeg hadde et friår fra studier, det andre året jeg bodde i Oslo, (skoleåret 1990/91).
Og da var broren min Axel 12 år da.
Og han var veldig opptatt av Tveita-gjengen og Jan Kvalen, (som Axel sa var veldig tøff da), og Karihaugens Krigere, (som han sa at ‘svogeren’ hans, Lars, som var sammen med stesøstera hans Kirsten Ancona, hadde vært med i vel), og at stebrødrene hans, Bjørn og Erik Ancona, hadde en far i den italiensk-amerikanske mafiaen, og at dansker visstnok var ‘Nordens jøder’, og at han beundret utlendinger, for de var mye tøffere enn nordmenn da, (sa Axel, en gang høsten 1990 vel, da han var 11-12 år da, en gang vi gikk sammen, fra kiosken på Furuset-senteret vel, til leiligheten deres, i Høybråtenveien da).
Sånne ting da.
Og He-man og Masters of the Universe.
(Og Skeletorn).
Og karate-trening.
Sånne ting, det var min halvbror Axel, opptatt av, på Furuset, (i Høybråtenveien), i Oslo, i 1990 da.
Så sånn var det.
Så da fikk jeg første gang høre om Tveita-gjengen og Jan Kvalen og Karihaugens krigere, osv.
(Som jeg egentlig ikke har hørt så mye mer om seinere, skal jeg være ærlig men.
Annet enn det jeg har lest i aviser osv.).
Så Groruddalen er/var nok en egen verden.
Litt ihvertfall.
Men men.
Og i militæret, i Geværkompaniet, i 1992/93, så sa min lagfører, en mulatt vel, (sa ihvertfall Bricen at han var, selv om de andre i militæret, fra distriktene osv., (Schellum osv.), sa at han var ‘neger’), ved navn Marvin Bricen, (broren til Silvanny Bricen, fra TVN osv.), at ‘tyttebærpolitiet’, (som han kalte Securitas, siden de hadde røde sirkler på skuldermerket, på uniformen), det var de som ikke kom inn på politihøyskolen.
Bricen drev også med nærradioen, på Terningmoen, i Elverum.
Og derfor, så spurte han meg en gang, om jeg hadde prøvd hasj.
Som ‘research’, til noe nærradioprogram vel, (sa han ihvertfall).
Nei, svarte jeg, (som den ærlige sjelen jeg var).
‘Har du sett det da’, spurte Bricen da.
‘Nei’, svarte jeg på det og da.
For det hadde jeg ikke.
Jeg var jo fra Berger i Vestfold så.
Så der ute var det vel mest vanlig å drikke.
Men ingen spurte meg i militæret, hvor jeg var fra egentlig.
De regna vel med, at jeg var fra Furuset/Ellingsrudåsen, siden det var der jeg bodde.
Men jeg var jo oppvokst i Larvik og på Berger.
Derfor hadde jeg ikke sett hasj, for eksempel da.
Selv om søstera mi, Pia, pleide å fly rundt i Oslo og i Drammen, for å kjøpe hasj, sammen med Cecilie Hyde, fra Svelvik, på en her tida, og i årene før, husker jeg.
(Det var på Blitz i Oslo, i 1989, husker jeg, og fra noen pakistanere, i Tollbugata, i Drammen, det samme skoleåret, husker jeg, 1989/90, når jeg dro på helgebesøk til farmora mi, så møtte jeg Cecilie Hyde og søstera mi i Drammen da.
Så dro dem med meg, til hu Helene, som var i den pop-gruppa, som covret ‘Take on me’.
For hu hadde frisørsalong, på Bragernes, (som het ‘Cutting Crew’).
(Helene Sommer, het vel hu).
Så dro Hyde med meg og søstera mi, til Tollbugata, i noen nedstille bygårder der, ikke langt fra Drammen Jernbanestasjon, for å kjøpe hasj.
Men hu fikk ikke kjøpt, av han pakistaneren, i 30-40 åra vel.
Kanskje han syntes at jeg så for ‘straight’ ut?
Hva vet jeg).
Så kanskje Marvin Bricen, trodde at jeg var som en purk, fordi jeg ikke hadde sett hasj, i 1992/93, da jeg var i Geværkompaniet?
Hva vet jeg.
Men Bricen, han kjente Toro, (Thor Arild Ødegaard), osv., fra Rimi Bjørndal, (husker jeg at Toro sa).
Kanskje Bricen er med i Tveita-gjengen, tenker jeg nå.
For David Hjort, fra Rimi Bjørndal.
Han pleide å kalle meg for ‘overkonstabel cons’.
Og det er kanskje ‘Tveita Gjengen-navnet’, på meg, tenker jeg nå.
Hm.
At David Hjort var med i Tveita Gjengen/’mafian’ da.
(Eksdama hans, Linn Korneliussen, (fra Florø), skrev jo til meg, på Facebook, (som jeg har publisert om på bloggen, for en del måneder siden), at David Hjort tok henne med på fest en gang, mens hun var dama hans, i Oslo, (og jobbet i butikken jeg var butikksjef i, på Rimi Nylænde), at på den samme festen, så var også David Toska).
Hvem vet.
For han hadde også en del tøffe kamerater.
Som var kriminelle og ‘deala’ dop, osv.
Eller hva de sa.
Men men.
Og da er kanskje Marvin Bricen og David Hjort, i samme gjeng, tenker jeg nå.
Men jeg er jo fra Berger i Vestfold, og har ikke skjønt det, at dem egentlig var med i Tveita-gjengen, f.eks.
Er det sånn dette henger sammen?
Hvem vet.
Så jeg prøver nå, å fundere ut, hvordan dette henger sammen da.
Så vi får se om jeg klarer det.
Vi får se.
Mvh.
Erik Ribsskog
PS 2.
Her er mer fra Helene Sommer, (venninne av min søster Pia Ribsskog, og/eller hennes tidligere bestevenninne Cecilie Hyde.
(Fra tidlig på 90-tallet, før Diva ble kjent).
Søstera mi, Pia Ribsskog, sa det, at hu andre i dette bandet Diva, hu var egentlig brunette, men hu likte å farge håret blondt og være Marilyn Monroe-‘look a like’, osv.
Bare noe jeg tilfeldigvis huska nå):
PS 3.
Her er mer fra Sylvani Bricen, (søstera til min lagfører, fra Geværkompaniet, Marvin Bricen, som han klagde litt på, til oss andre gutta på laget, at var ganske fæl å ha som søster, siden hu var så fin, husker jeg at Bricen sa):
PS 4.
Her er mer fra min tidligere studiekamerat, (som vel utnyttet meg litt, mens vi studerte sammen, siden jeg måtte gjøre mer arbeid vel, vil jeg si, siden Rougseth, ikke lærte seg å programmere, så alt av programmering, (untatt det mest enkle, vil jeg si), falt på meg, under mange av gruppeoppgavene), fra HiO IU, fra 2002 til 2004, Dag Anders Roughseth, (aka. Dagga), og bandet han er/var vokalist i, Autopulver:
