johncons
  • Det ligger mye matematikk bak konstruksjon av byggverk. Alle kjenner vi pyramidene som spesielle. Kanskje vi ikke tenker på at husene rundt oss også inneholder matematiske figurere, fortrinnsvis rektangler og rette vinkler, men også en del trekanter, sylindere og kjegler.

    I Fredrikstad ligger en meget spesiell by, som i dag er et avgrensa område i Fredrikstad: Gamlebyen som opprinnelig var festningsverket i Fredrikstad. Og i denne ligger Infanterikasernen (Dessverre er nettstedet Fredrikstadnett.no avvikla)

    KALENDERKASERNEN:

    Sist endra: Monday, 20. August 2007 14:55:28 – Hans Isdahl
    Arkitektmatematikk

    Bygningen, som ble tatt i bruk i 1788, er betegnet som noe av det beste som er utført av militær arkitektur i Norge. Grunnlagstegningene er utarbeidet i København og tilpasset av ingeniøroffiser Gedde. Bygget skal være tegnet etter det kalendariske system:

    De 365 vinduene representerer årets dager.

    24 ruter døgnets timer.

    12 piper står for årets måneder

    og de 4 hovedinngangene årstidene.

    Infanterikasernen hadde opprinnelig også 52 rom etter antall uker i et år og

    60 dører som sekunder eller minutter. Dette er det blitt forandret på under diverse oppussinger opp gjennom årene.

    Bygningen, som sto ferdig i 1788, er fortsatt i bruk. Dermed er den en av de eldste kasernene som Forsvaret fortsatt bruker. I dag har den 250 sengeplasser, og rundt 140 av disse er besatt. Det er et stort bygg, men 365 vinduer er mye. Arkitekten, H.C. Gedde, måtte derfor gjøre noen prioriteringer.

    – Han jukset litt. Tolv av bygningens vinduer er malt på utsiden av veggen. På avstand ser man ikke forskjell. Arkitekten kom nok fram til at det var nødvendig med litt ekstra veggplass på innsiden, sier Kjetil Føreid, planoffiser ved Østfold regiment.

    Grunnen til at arkitekten ville bygge etter “kalendersystemet”, var sannsynligvis at han ville gjøre den 1550 kvadratmeter store bygningen spesiell. Det klarte han. Bygningen er blitt omtalt i flerfoldige artikler både i pressen og andre steder, og er fortsatt en stor attraksjon.

    Infanterikasernen har endret seg en del i løpet årene, både innvendig og utvendig. På midten av 1980-tallet ble mesteparten av bygget pusset opp. Med linoleumsbelegg og moderne interiør bærer det derfor ikke preg av å være over 200 år gammelt.

    Kasernen har også forandret seg på andre måter: Arbeiderne som sto for oppussingen av huset mente at det ikke var én rett vinkel her. Kasernen er jo bygd på leirgrunn, og da er det fort gjort at den siger litt, til tross for at det er lagt solide treflåter ned under bygget for støtte, sier Føreid.

    Forsvarets Forum, 3/2001. Gudmund Bartnes

    http://209.85.229.132/search?q=cache:lhchX4WD174J:62.63.40.20/fagstoff/arkitektur.htm+”kalendariske+system”&cd=4&hl=no&ct=clnk&gl=no

    PS.

    Det her høres nesten ut som for meg, som noe tante Ellen kunne ha funnet på.

    Dette med ‘det kalendariske system’, det er noe hippie-greier, vil jeg si.

    Ihvertfall noe illuminati-greier.

    Hvem vet.

    Jeg får prøve å søke litt mer i den slekta, det var noen koner i den Gedde-slekta, som var inngifte fra Kurland (i nåværende Latvia, som var under Danmark i noen år i middelalderen, og den familien var visst adelig og), og fra Frankrike, mener jeg å ha lest.

    Så jeg får prøve å finne ut mer om dette på nettet osv.

    Vi får se.

    PS 2.

    Hun som var inngift i Gedde-familien, som var fra kurlandsk adel, (som nok antagelig er fra noen tyske tempelriddere e.l. ridderorden, siden det meste av den kurlandske adelen var etterkommere av en tysk ridderorden, leste jeg, som ble innlemmet i ‘the teutonian knights’).

    Hun het Charlotte von Geidern (eller Geldern).

    Og hun kan søstra mi være oppkalt etter, for hun heter Pia Charlotte Ribsskog.

    Og søstra mi reagerer, hvis man kaller henne Pia Charlotte, og ikke bare Pia.

    Så her kan det være noe skumle tempelridder-greier i Gedde og Ribsskog-familien, som søstra mi er oppkalt etter og veit om.

    Det er en mulighet ihvertfall.

    Det er ikke mye man finner om denne von Geidern på nettet, men jeg får se om jeg klarer å finne mer.

  • kommandant københavn

    http://lokalhistoriewiki.no/index.php/Hans_Christopher_Gedde

    PS.

    Det stedet der i Fredrikstad, var der jeg egentlig skulle ha vært i militæret.

    Men da jeg flytta til Oslo, i 1989, så meldte jeg adresseforrandring, hos Folkeregisteret.

    Selv om dette ikke var vanlig, å gjøre, for studenter.

    Men jeg forklarte det, at den adressen jeg hadde da, hos min onde stemor, må man vel si, Haldis, ikke var ‘brukanes’, som adresse for meg, i tilfelle jeg fikk viktige brev dit.

    For jeg hadde ikke noe kontakt med disse.

    F.eks., da jeg var i militæret så hadde kusina mi, Susanne, konfirmasjon, og da var det ingen som sa fra til meg.

    Og i bryllupet til Tommy, fetteren min, i 2002, (som var i nettopp Fredrikstad), så kjefta kusina mi, Susanne, på meg, for at jeg ikke kom i konfirmasjonen hennes, i 1993.

    Men ingen sa fra til meg, om at hu skulle ha konfirmasjon, så det var nesten ikke noe kontakt, mellom meg og faren min og hans dame Haldis da.

    Så derfor skifta jeg adresse, til Enebakkveien 239 B, på Abildsø, hvor jeg leide en hybelleilighet, i kjelleren hos et eldre par, Gunnar og Berit Hansen, mens jeg studerte.

    Så da ble det forrandret hvor jeg skulle i militæret, fra Fredrikstad til Elverum.

    (Og da slapp jeg også å dra til Nord-Norge, noe jeg var litt skeptiskt til, for jeg var så tynn, så jeg frøys fælt, hvis det ble for kaldt, og jeg var ikke så god til å gå på ski osv, så jeg syntes det var bra å tjenestegjøre i Elverum, hele tjenestetiden, for da kunne jeg dra tilbake til Oslo, hver helg, og til og med gå på byen i Oslo hvis jeg ville, eller jobbe, som jeg for det meste gjorde, og jeg besøkte søstra mi, som bodde sammen med noen ‘blackiser’, Monica og Siv, fra Røyken, på Grunerløkka, noen ganger).

    Så sånn var det.

    Så det var altså bare tilfeldig, at jeg ikke endte opp i Fredrikstad, og ble boende i de kasernene, som min forfar, eller en i slekten til bestemor Ingeborg, visstnok da, konstruerte, i Gamlebyen der.

    (For på det sølvølkruset, som jeg fikk i fødselsdagsgave av bestemor Ingeborg, i 2004, så viste bestemor Ingeborg meg, at det helt tydelig var gravert inn ‘Gedde’, på det sølvkruset, fra 1700-tallet, sikkert fra noen i samme slekten, som han som bygde den kasernebygningen i Fredrikstad da, som sikkert var bra å ha, for å forsvare seg mot svenskene osv.)

    Men men.

    Men hva som skjedde i forbindelse med slagt om København.

    Om den festningen var bra nok, eller ikke, det vet jeg ikke.

    Den festningen har jeg lest om før, tre kroners batteri, og den skulle visstnok være nesten uinntagelig.

    Så noe rart skjedde nok i forbindelse med forberedelsene til slaget om København, hvor vel britene ødela hele Danmark-Norges flåte, mener jeg å ha lest.

    Og det er vel også et av Nelsons største seiere, som jeg mener er symbolisert, på det monumentet, på Exchange Flags, rett borti gata her, i Liverpool.

    Da ser man at fire folk sitter i lenker.

    Og den ene skal symbolisere slaget om København, har jeg lest.

    Så sånn var det.

    Bare noe jeg kom på.

  • ove gjedde

    http://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ove_Gjedde

    PS.

    Det er visst delte meninger, kan det virke som, om bestemor Ingeborgs del av familien stammer fra denne Ove Gjedde.

    Har bestemor Ingeborg fortalt røverhistorier?

    gjedde

    PS 2.

    Her fant jeg det slektstreet.

    Men jeg tror ikke det er copyright, på det slektstreet.

    Det stod ikke noe om det ihvertfall.

    http://www.gedde-dahl.no/







  • Google Mail – SV: Purring/Fwd: Anmeldelse av Spesialenheten til Riksadvokaten for slapphet/unnfallenhet i tjenesten







    Google Mail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    SV: Purring/Fwd: Anmeldelse av Spesialenheten til Riksadvokaten for slapphet/unnfallenhet i tjenesten





    Elisabeth Fredriksen

    <elisabeth.fredriksen@riksadvokaten.no>





    Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 1:40 PM





    To:

    Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    Vedlagt oversendes til Dem som gjenpartsadressat, riksadvokatens

    brev av 27. juli d.å. til Hedmark og Oppland

    statsadvokatembeter.

    —–Opprinnelig melding—–
    Fra: Erik Ribsskog

    [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
    Lagt inn: 23.juli2009 23:04
    Lagt

    inn i:
    Postmottak HPM Riksadvokaten
    Diskusjon: Purring/Fwd:

    Anmeldelse av Spesialenheten til Riksadvokaten for slapphet/unnfallenhet i

    tjenesten
    Emne: Purring/Fwd: Anmeldelse av Spesialenheten til

    Riksadvokaten for slapphet/unnfallenhet i tjenesten

    Hei,

    jeg kan ikke se å ha mottatt noe svar på denne e-posten ennå, og sender

    derfor denne purringen.

    Mvh.

    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date:

    2009/6/6
    Subject: Anmeldelse av Spesialenheten til Riksadvokaten for

    slapphet/unnfallenhet i tjenesten
    To: postmottak@riksadvokaten.no

    Hei,

    jeg jobbet som butikksjef, på Rimi Nylænde, på Lambertseter i Oslo, i

    1999, hvor vi hadde en

    ransbølge der.

    Etter det første ranet, (som var den helgen vi byttet frysere der),

    så ble jeg innkalt til Grønland

    Politistasjon, for å se om jeg kjente igjen raneren, i en boks de hadde

    der, med bilder, fredagen,

    seks dager etter ranet.

    Etterforskeren der, han viste meg en boks med lyshårede kriminelle

    da, regner jeg med, men

    raneren var så 'våken' under ranet, så jeg kunne ikke se han på noen av

    bildene.

    Men etterforskeren, han la tommelen sin, på toppen av bildeesken, sånn at

    et bilde, satt mellom

    tommelen hans og esken.

    Så nikket han liksom mot tommelen sin da.

    Så kikket jeg på det bildet, men han så så trøtt ut, så jeg kunne

    ikke si om det var han raneren,

    for han så så våken ut, under ranet.

    Så jeg forklarte bare at jeg kunne ikke kjenne igjen raneren, på noen av

    bildene.

    Men jeg er helt sikker på, at etterforskeren, han ville at jeg skulle

    si, om han på bildet under tommelen,

    at 'der er han raneren ja'.

    Så dette var forsøk på å påvirke vitne, er jeg 100% sikker på.

    Men så sier Spesialenheten, at jeg er for upresis, i min

    beskrivelse.

    Men, dette ranet stod det jo til og med om i avisa, og var vel

    sikkert i nyhetene på TV og.

    Så at Spesialenheten ikke skal klare å finne ut hvilken etterforsker

    dette er, det ser jeg på

    som svada/slapphet fra Spesialenheten.

    Legg også merke til at de skriver 'Med hilsen' og ikke 'Med vennlig

    hilsen', som vel er vanlig å skrive

    i Norge, det synes jeg er litt ekkelt fra Spesialenheten, og jeg lurer på

    om de har noen slags følelser

    ovenfor meg, som de ikke har klart å bearbeide(?)

    Det synes jeg i såfall er rart, for jeg har ikke vært i Hamar, siden

    1993, da jeg var i militæret i Elverum.

    Kanskje det er derfor de ikke liker meg, siden jeg var i militæret i

    nabobyen og ikke i Hamar?

    Nei, hvem vet, men jeg tror de kanskje er for opptatt av tipping, som

    også er i Hamar, og for lite opptatt

    av politiarbeid, hos Spesialenheten.

    Så det hadde kanskje vært en ide å flytta Spesialenheten til en by

    hvor de ikke har tipping?

    Ihvertfall burde det kikkes på fra dere, hva det kan komme av, at

    Spesialenheten er så slappe.

    (Se også tidligere henvendelser fra meg angående den samme

    Spesialenheten).

    Med vennlig hilsen

    Erik Ribsskog

    Vedlegg: Brev fra Spesialenheten med dato 27.

    mai.





    Felles.PDF
    28K




    PS.

    Her er brevet som Riksadvokaten sendte:

    img004







  • Google Mail – Complaint/Fwd: Reminder/Fwd: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail







    Google Mail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    Complaint/Fwd: Reminder/Fwd: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail





    Service Review Manager

    <srmanager@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>





    Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 11:14 AM





    To:

    Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    Dear Mr Ribsskog


    Thank you for your e-mail. I

    have asked a member of my team to look into your concerns.

    They will make contact with you in due course.

    Service Review Team

    (on behalf of the Service Review Manager)


    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 24 July 2009 20:00
    To: Service Review

    Manager
    Subject: Complaint/Fwd: Reminder/Fwd: Complaint against

    RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail


    Hi,

    the Financial Ombudsman is sending me e-mails, at 7. o'clock, on Sunday

    morning!

    I think this is rude and inpolite and an invasion of my privacy.

    I've tried to contact your operations manager, and ask for an explanation,

    about how this behaviour

    from the Financial Ombudsman, can happen, but she have refused to

    explain.

    I know that 7. o'clock, on a Sunday morning, is the last time of the

    week, that I want to deal

    with bank-complaints.

    How can this happen?

    And why are you treating your staff like this, why don't you let them

    have rest-days?

    Regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Collins, Jackie <jackie.collins@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>
    Date:

    Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 10:42 AM
    Subject: RE: Reminder/Fwd: Complaint against

    RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail
    To: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Dear Mr

    Ribsskog

    I believe I

    have answered all of your questions in my previous email, and I am not

    prepared to enter into any further discussions regarding this

    matter.

    Please feel

    free to email me however, if you have any queries regarding your

    complaint.

    Regards

    Jackie

    Collins

    Operations Manager
    Direct Dial : 020 7964

    0116

    Direct Fax: 020 7964 0117



    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 23 July 2009 22:23
    To: Collins,

    Jackie
    Subject: Reminder/Fwd: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier

    e-mail

    Hi,

    I can't see that I've received an answer to this e-mail yet, so I'm trying

    to send it again.

    Best Regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at

    2:18 PM
    Subject: Re: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail
    To:

    "Collins, Jackie" <jackie.collins@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>

    Hi,

    I think I have the right to know this, when your representatives send me

    e-mails at

    seven o'clock, on a Sunday morning.

    I think you should send your business e-mails within the

    business-hours, and I'm

    conserned about how you treat your staff, and I've contacted Acas about

    this.

    If you do not expect your staff to work 12-14 hours a week, seven days a

    week,

    then why are the working on a Sunday morning at six o'clock.

    People are going to think that your representatives are some kind of

    slaves, if

    they have to work at the time of the week, when the other people in

    England,

    are on their way back from the pub.

    If people get e-mails at this hour, they are going to start writing answers

    while

    they are still drunk.

    This sounds insane to me, to have people working, at six o'clock, on a

    Sunday

    morning, answering e-mails that they could have answered on a Monday.

    You have to pay them overtime, for work they just as well could have

    done on

    a week-day.

    Your institution is extreamly poorly managed, and you are wasting the

    tax-

    payers money, with all the unessesary over-time.

    I think there is a law in this country saying that Government should have

    openness,

    so I think you should explain what the reason for your very strange and

    akward

    working-hours are.

    Sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Collins, Jackie <jackie.collins@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>

    wrote:

    Dear Mr

    Ribsskog

    Thank you

    for your email.

    You will

    excuse me for not going into the finer details of our staffing working hours

    and holiday allowance. I will however, reassure you we certainly

    do not expect or allow our staff to work 12 to 14 hours a day 7 days a

    week.

    Regards

    Jackie

    Collins

    Operations Manager
    Direct Dial : 020 7964

    0116

    Direct Fax: 020 7964 0117



    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 30 June 2009

    16:31

    To: Collins, Jackie
    Subject: Re: Complaint against

    RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail

    Hi,

    Monday to Friday, 8 am to 6 pm, is alright, I think.

    But you also let your staff work Sunday mornings, at 6 am.

    It seems to me that you overload your representatives with work, and that

    they have to

    work 12 to 14 hours 7 days a week.

    I thought slavery was forbidden in our time.

    Why do you let your representatives work every Sunday morning, when other

    people in

    England are on their way home from the pub?

    Do your staff get summer-holiday at all?

    Sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Collins, Jackie <jackie.collins@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>

    wrote:

    Dear Mr

    Ribsskog

    We

    always try to provide the best service we can to our customers, and

    sometimes that means offering our staff the option of working overtime

    during very busy periods.

    Please

    be assured that they have to work within strict time guidelines, and these

    are always checked by Operations Managers to ensure they are not working too

    many hours.

    The

    service our department offers is outside of the usual office hours of

    9am till 5pm because we have found that a lot of our customers have

    difficulties contacting us whilst they are at work themselves during the 9am

    to 5pm times, so we have opening hours of 8am – 6pm, as do many firms

    these days.

    I hope

    this explains.

    Regards

    Jackie

    Collins

    Operations Manager

    Direct

    Dial : 020 7964 0116

    Direct Fax: 020 7964

    0117



    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 29 June 2009

    19:32
    To: Collins, Jackie

    Subject: Re: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier

    e-mail

    Ok,

    that sound very fine!

    But, why is that you let your representatives work over-time every

    Sunday then?

    Shouldn't you as a main rule conduct your business, within the

    business hours?

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Collins, Jackie

    <jackie.collins@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>

    wrote:

    Dear

    Mr Ribsskog

    Rosemary Cox has passed your complaint to me to take over as

    you have requested that she no longer deals with your

    case.

    I can

    confirmed that a letter has been sent to the firm, and we have asked that

    they issue you with a final response letter within 14 days. We have

    also asked them to copy us in on that response.

    If you

    remain unhappy with the firms response, or you have not received a

    response from them within 14 days, please let me know and I will arrange

    for your complaint to be moved forward for investigation by an

    Adjudicator.

    Regards

    Jackie Collins
    Operations

    Manager

    Direct Dial : 020 7964

    0116

    Direct Fax: 020 7964

    0117


    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 28 June 2009 11:17
    To: Cox,

    Rosemary
    Subject: Re: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier

    e-mail

    Hi,

    I don't think it's any use with me repeating myself.

    I don't think you should handle my complaint.

    The reason is, that if you are to overworked, you get to

    tired.

    And in dealing with complaints like these, one obviously needs ones

    judgement, to be like

    it should be.

    If one are out of balance, like I think you could be, then I

    don't think this is good for how the

    complaint is being dealt with.

    So please do as I ask Mrs .Cox, and tell your manager what I

    said, that I want someone else

    to deal with my complaint, due to that I think that you must be

    overworked.

    Haven't you seen how fine the weather is today, you should have a

    day off in the fine weather,

    I think.

    Sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Cox, Rosemary

    <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>

    wrote:


    Dear Mr

    Ribsskog


    Thank you for your

    e-mails


    As previously advised I am not going to

    debate with you the working hours of this

    office.


    I have written to you today to advise the

    steps we are taking with your complaint. If the firm fail to resolve the

    situation for you, your complaint will be passed onto our adjudication

    area for further consideration of the concerns you have

    raised.


    I should add that

    we do not tolerate rude or insulting language at this

    office
    , and would expect any further communication to be sent in

    a more acceptable manner.


    Kind Regards


    Rose Cox


    team manager



    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 28 June 2009 10:43

    To: Cox, Rosemary
    Subject: Re: Complaint

    against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail

    Hi,

    of course you can work on Sundays if you want.

    But business e-mails should just be sent within the

    business-hours.

    Or else, what's going to happen, is obvious.

    Someone are going to come drunk home from town, and answer the

    business-e-mails when they are drunk, which is what has happened today,

    with our correspondence.

    If this is something, you didn't know from before, then I think

    this Financial Ombudsman-stuff is just a load of crap really.

    Try to use the head that God gave you when you were born!

    Sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Cox, Rosemary

    <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>

    wrote:

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    Thank you for your e-mail

    I must admit to being surprised and

    confused with the content of the

    e-mail
    .

    We are an extremely busy department and we often

    work at the weekends, this is obviously of help

    to consumers as we are able to deal with their complaints in

    a more timely manner. I would suggest that

    It is entirely up to each individual business to

    determine which hours their staff will work and I do not intend

    debating this with you.

    By working this weekend I have been able to deal

    with your complaint, which as you can appreciate is of a benefit to

    you.

    Perhaps you can clarify the spelling mistakes you

    are referring to?

    Kind Regards

    Rose Cox

    team manager



    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 28 June

    2009 10:20

    Subject: Re: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier

    e-mail

    Hi again,

    don't you think it's strange for an institutions like yours to

    send e-mails on Sunday mornings then?

    Shouldn't e-mails be sent within normal business hours then

    you think?

    This is what it says on Wikipedia:

    In

    the United

    States
    and United Kingdom, the hours between 9 am and 5 pm are typically considered to be standard

    business hours



    I

    think this is rather akward, as I also think your spelling-mistakes

    are.


    Sincerely,


    Erik

    Ribsskog

    On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Cox, Rosemary

    <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>

    wrote:

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    Thank you for your e-mail

    That's no problem, however I should point out

    that we are not a government department, we are a independent

    complaints body.

    I will be in touch with your again in the next

    few days

    Kind Regards

    Rose Cox

    team manager



    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 28

    June 2009 08:02

    To: Cox, Rosemary
    Subject: Re: Complaint

    against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail

    Hi,

    ok that's very fine, I'm just home from town you see.

    I thought it was a bit strange, since noone in Government

    in Norway, work on Sundays.

    Sorry about this, I forget sometimes that I'm not in Norway

    any longer.

    Sorry about this!

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 7:54 AM, Cox,

    Rosemary <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>

    wrote:

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    Thank you for your e-mail

    I can assure you this is not

    a joke, I am currently in the office working

    today.

    I presume that

    you would like us to deal with your complaint, so am responding to

    your e-mails

    today

    Kind Regards

    Rose Cox

    team manager



    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 28

    June 2009 07:36
    To: Cox, Rosemary
    Subject: Re:

    Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail

    Hi,

    why do send the e-mails early on a Sunday morning, by the

    way.

    Is this some kind of joke?

    Sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Cox,

    Rosemary <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>

    wrote:

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    Thank you for your

    e-mails

    I will contact

    you again once I have considered the

    information.

    Kind Regards

    Rose Cox

    team manager



    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 27

    June 2009 14:59
    To: Cox, Rosemary
    Subject:

    Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail

    Hi,

    thank you for you e-mail, that I recieved today.

    I'll contact your collegue back, regarding the

    Barclays-complaint.

    I sent the complaint on RBS Dale St., to Yvonne Williams at

    RBS, but she

    also harassed me, like this, she writes 'Dear Ms Ribsskog',

    even if my name

    is Erik, and in Britain, you have a movie called 'Erik the

    Viking', and Eric is

    also a quite usual name, in English-speaking

    countries.

    So I think Yvonne Williams, the complaint-investigator,

    also bullied me.

    I think this must have been a deliberate mistake.

    This ended with the complaint being partly resolved, in the

    way that RBS,

    gave me the bonus of £100, for moving my account to them,

    from Barclays,

    (who I also had problems with, that I'll exlain about to

    your collegue, like I

    mentioned earlier).

    I'll also find the actual complaint against RBS Dale

    St. now, and forward it

    to you.

    What I meant with the complaint-form, was that it

    didn't look anything at all

    like the ones you've sent me now.

    Maybe the complaint-form I was sent, was to do with

    other financial institutions,

    than banks?

    Like share-fonds etc?

    Have you also got other complaint-forms, other than to

    banks, perhaps someone

    sent me the wrong form intentionally?

    Just a thought I had.

    But anyway, thank you very much for your e-mail, and

    I'll also find the actual

    RBS Dale St. complaint, and e-mail it to you now.

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message

    ———-
    From: Williams, Yvonne

    (CRU)
    <Yvonne.Williams@rbs.co.uk>
    Date:

    Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 4:30 PM
    Subject: RE: Earlier

    e-mail
    To: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Dear Ms Ribsskog

    Could you please arrange another copy of your email to be

    sent to me for my investigation

    Regards

    Yvonne Williams


    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
    Sent: 19 June

    2007 14:04
    To: Williams, Yvonne

    (CRU)
    Subject: Earlier e-mail

    *** WARNING : This message

    originates from the Internet ***


    Hi,

    I'm refering to the e-mail I sent you on 5/6.

    I was just wondering if you have recieved this e-mail,

    because I cant see

    that I have recieved any answer to it yet.

    Please just contact me if you want me to send you the

    e-mail again.

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    The Royal

    Bank of Scotland plc, Registered in Scotland No. 90312.

    Registered Office: 36 St Andrew Square, Edinburgh EH2

    2YB

    Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services

    Authority.

    This e-mail message is confidential and for

    use by the addressee only. If the message is received by anyone

    other than the addressee, please return the message to the

    sender by replying to it and then delete the message from your

    computer. Internet e-mails are not necessarily secure. The Royal

    Bank of Scotland plc does not accept responsibility for changes

    made to this message after it was sent.

    Whilst all

    reasonable care has been taken to avoid the transmission of

    viruses, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure

    that the onward transmission, opening or use of this message and

    any attachments will not adversely affect its systems or data.

    No responsibility is accepted by The Royal Bank of Scotland plc

    in this regard and the recipient should carry out such virus and

    other checks as it considers

    appropriate.



    This e-mail and any attachments

    are confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you

    are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender

    immediately and delete this e-mail and any attachment from your

    system. If you are not the intended recipient you must not copy,

    disclose or take any action in reliance to it.

    This e-mail and any attachments have

    been checked by virus detection software before transmission.

    You should carry out your own virus checks on the contents of

    this communication. We accept no liability for any loss or

    damage which may be caused by software viruses or by

    interception or interruption of this mail.

    Unless otherwise indicated, this

    e-mail has no contractual effect and may only be used for the

    purpose(s) indicated in it. The statements and opinions

    expressed in this e-mail are those of the author and do not

    necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service

    Ltd.

    This email has originated from the

    Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh

    Wall, London E14 9SR, United Kingdom. Registered as a limited

    company in England and Wales No. 3725015. Registered office as

    above.




    This e-mail and any attachments are

    confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not

    the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and

    delete this e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are

    not the intended recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any

    action in reliance to it.

    This e-mail and any attachments have

    been checked by virus detection software before transmission. You

    should carry out your own virus checks on the contents of this

    communication. We accept no liability for any loss or damage which

    may be caused by software viruses or by interception or

    interruption of this mail.

    Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail

    has no contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s)

    indicated in it. The statements and opinions expressed in this

    e-mail are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect

    those of the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd.

    This email has originated from the

    Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall,

    London E14 9SR, United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in

    England and Wales No. 3725015. Registered office as above.




    This e-mail and any attachments are

    confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not

    the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and

    delete this e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are

    not the intended recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any

    action in reliance to it.

    This e-mail and any attachments have been

    checked by virus detection software before transmission. You should

    carry out your own virus checks on the contents of this

    communication. We accept no liability for any loss or damage which

    may be caused by software viruses or by interception or interruption

    of this mail.

    Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail

    has no contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s)

    indicated in it. The statements and opinions expressed in this

    e-mail are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those

    of the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd.

    This email has originated from the

    Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall,

    London E14 9SR, United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in

    England and Wales No. 3725015. Registered office as above.




    This e-mail and any attachments are

    confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the

    intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete

    this e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the

    intended recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any action in

    reliance to it.

    This e-mail and any attachments have been

    checked by virus detection software before transmission. You should

    carry out your own virus checks on the contents of this communication.

    We accept no liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by

    software viruses or by interception or interruption of this mail.

    Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has

    no contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s)

    indicated in it. The statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail

    are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the

    Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd.

    This email has originated from the

    Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall,

    London E14 9SR, United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in

    England and Wales No. 3725015. Registered office as above.




    This e-mail and any attachments are

    confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the

    intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this

    e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended

    recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to

    it.

    This e-mail and any attachments have been

    checked by virus detection software before transmission. You should

    carry out your own virus checks on the contents of this communication.

    We accept no liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by

    software viruses or by interception or interruption of this mail.

    Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has

    no contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated

    in it. The statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of

    the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Financial

    Ombudsman Service Ltd.

    This email has originated from the Financial

    Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR,

    United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No.

    3725015. Registered office as above.




    This e-mail and any attachments are

    confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the

    intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this

    e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended

    recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to

    it.

    This e-mail and any attachments have been

    checked by virus detection software before transmission. You should carry

    out your own virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept

    no liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by software

    viruses or by interception or interruption of this mail.

    Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no

    contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in

    it. The statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the

    author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman

    Service Ltd.

    This email has originated from the Financial

    Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR,

    United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No.

    3725015. Registered office as above.




    This e-mail and any attachments are

    confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the

    intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this

    e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended

    recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to

    it.

    This e-mail and any attachments have been checked

    by virus detection software before transmission. You should carry out your

    own virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept no

    liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or

    by interception or interruption of this mail.

    Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no

    contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it.

    The statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author

    and do not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service

    Ltd.

    This email has originated from the Financial

    Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR,

    United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No.

    3725015. Registered office as above.




    This e-mail and any attachments are

    confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the

    intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this

    e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended

    recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to

    it.

    This e-mail and any attachments have been checked

    by virus detection software before transmission. You should carry out your own

    virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept no liability for

    any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or by interception

    or interruption of this mail.

    Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no

    contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it.

    The statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author

    and do not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service

    Ltd.

    This email has originated from the Financial

    Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR,

    United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No.

    3725015. Registered office as above.




    This e-mail and any attachments are confidential

    and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient,

    please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail and any attachment

    from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you must not copy,

    disclose or take any action in reliance to it.

    This e-mail and any attachments have been checked by

    virus detection software before transmission. You should carry out your own

    virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept no liability for

    any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or by interception or

    interruption of this mail.

    Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no

    contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it. The

    statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author and do

    not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd.

    This email has originated from the Financial

    Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR, United

    Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No. 3725015.

    Registered office as above.




    This e-mail and any attachments are confidential

    and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient,

    please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail and any attachment

    from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you must not copy,

    disclose or take any action in reliance to it.

    This e-mail and any attachments have been checked by

    virus detection software before transmission. You should carry out your own

    virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept no liability for

    any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or by interception or

    interruption of this mail.

    Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no

    contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it. The

    statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author and do

    not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd.

    This email has originated from the Financial

    Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR, United

    Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No. 3725015.

    Registered office as above.













  • Google Mail – English-test







    Google Mail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    English-test





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 4:22 PM





    To:

    gateway@sunderland.ac.uk



    Hi,

    I studied at the University of Sunderland in 2004 and 2005, on the study
    abroad programme.
    I had some problems with my study-finance from Norway, so I had to end
    my studies before I got my degree, due to the problems with this, and with

    my home university not wanting to accept the modules I'd chosen, for some
    reason.
    But, I think it looks a bit stupid, not to have any files from when I studied
    in Sunderland, so I thought that perhaps I could try to get a file with the

    result of my English-test, that all study abroad students had to take,
    where I got the best result, so that I didn't have to take English courses.
    That file would have been very fine to have.

    So I was wondering if you know who I should contact then, that has to do
    with files like this, at the Language-study department.
    Thanks in advance for the help!
    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog






'Bokhylla' 70-tallet 80-tallet 90-tallet Anmeldelse Arne Mogan Olsen Berger Bergeråsen Brev Christell Humblen Dagbladet.no Datatilsynet Drammen E-post Facebook Google Haldis Humblen Hm Identitetstyveri Ingeborg Ribsskog irc Jobbsøking i England Johannes Ribsskog johncons-blogg Karen Ribsskog Klage Larvik Liverpool Magne Winnem Mobilbilder Musikk Nettmobbing Online trakassering Oppdatering Oslo Pia Ribsskog Politiet Rimi Slektsforskning StatCounter Svelvik Twitter Wikipedia YouTube Ågot Mogan Olsen