-
Google Mail – From Sue at Language is Everything

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
From Sue at Language is Everything
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 9:09 PM
To:
Sue Daddy <sue@languageiseverything.com>
Hi Sue,yes that sounds interesting.
I’ve been working at a call-center earlier, taking calls on behalf of
Microsoft, from
Scandinavia.
And I’ve also been working with customer-support, as a food-shop employee and
manager, in Norway, for many years.
So I think this sounds like a job that would suit me well, so please send more
information about when you want me to start etc.
Thanks again for your e-mail!
Yours sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Sue Daddy <sue@languageiseverything.com> wrote:
> Good morning Erik
> I have spoken with my colleague Steph this morning. Would you be at
> all interested in working with us as a telephone interpreter? We are
> very busy in this particular area.
>
>
> The telephone interpreting is for one of our customers.
> We take the calls at the end of every month
>
> The calls would be during the hours os 08.30 to 17.30 and are for the
> Esso company.
>
> This is when our clients customers get their posters and leaflets for
> the garage forecourt promotions, you know the sort, fill up and get free
> wine glasses etc. We take the calls requesting more info, posters and
> whatever .
>
>
>
> If you had a spare hour or a day off, or if you could take calls whilst
>
> at work, we could tick you in on our system as being available
>
> The calls would be a regular thing at the same monthly intervals Would
>
> you be at all interested?
>
> I have attached a glossary of terms used regarding the calls, and the
> payment is 50 pence per minute per call.
> This is an on going regular request for this client.
>
> Many thanks for your time Erik
> Best regards
> Sue
>
> Sue Daddy
> Operations Team
>
> Language is Everything Ltd
> EITI House
> Bridgegate
> Howden
> DN14 7AE
>
> Freephone: 0800 731 7878
>
> Tel: 01430 435300
> Fax: 01430 435301
>
> www.languageiseverything.com
>
>
> Privileged/confidential information may be contained in this e-mail and
> is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the
> addressee or the person responsible for delivering it to the person
> addressed, you may not copy or deliver this to anyone else. If you
> receive this e-mail by mistake, please notify us immediately by
> telephone. Thank you
>
> Language is Everything Ltd registered in England and Wales No: 03464388
>
>
-
Google Mail – From Sue at Language is Everything

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
From Sue at Language is Everything
-
Google Mail – To the American Embassy in London. (One of your citizens in problems?)

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
To the American Embassy in London. (One of your citizens in problems?)
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 12:48 AM
To:
SCSLondon@state.gov
Hi,I’ve been corresponding with a person who says he is an American P.I.
living in London.
(About some problems to do with some mafia, set up by Jens Christian
Hauge, it seems, in Norway).
But your citizen who calls himself Mr. Nick Ewans, (even if he says
that this is not his real name).
He now seems to be under control.
Even if I call him things that are insulting, and explaines, that I
don’t want anything more to do with him.
Still he goes on.
(Like a maniac, I think one have to say).
So I think something must be wrong, if ‘Mr Ewans’, an American, who is
from the mightiest country in
the World, acts like a maniac.
So I wanted to express to you my worry about this, that he could be
under control.
Yours sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
PS.
Here one can see the conversation, and that Mr. Ewans still went on,
(a bit like a maniac), even if I
wrote insults to him, to get him to stop:
Ewans Nick
Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 12:18 AM
To:
11:47 PM
Ewans: hi Erik
12 minutes
12:00 AM
Ewans: I think you should return to Norway. It’s safer there (my experience)
me: who is this?
Ewans: Nick Ewans
12:01 AM
me: where’s your name gone from the chat
Ewans: ?
You don’t see my name?
me: it doesn’t say your name on the chat
nope
Ewans: weird
Did you get my email?
me: yes, i read your email
12:02 AM
Ewans: I’m in Oslo now
me: i think it’s a bit strange, that you have turned 180 degrees in everything
ok
Ewans: I haven’t turned 180 degrees. But after spending more time
investigating, I came to some new conclusions
12:03 AM
which I think are good news
me: ok, i thought it was a bit strange that you spoke with my old
coleguess, without asking me first
12:04 AM
Ewans: You’ve mentioned the name of a lot of them on your blog, so I
had much background material (I can read Norwegian)
me: ok, but you didn’t say that you spoke on behalf of me, i hope
Ewans: No.
me: and how can you know who to trust?
Ewans: I don’t now, quite.
12:05 AM
But I’ve spoken to several people, and I feel I’ve reached a conclusin
that is correct
me: ok, but don’t you think it’s a bit strange, that the whole suburb
of Bjørndal should be involved in a practical joke against me?
12:06 AM
Ewans: The whole suburb?
me: practicly
do they say that it was just a joke?
Ewans: Please elaborate
me: well i overheard about this from several people at Bjørndal
12:07 AM
and several people acted strange
Ewans: yes, one of your former co-workers who remembered what happened
told me it was a (silly) joke
me: I overheard about it from at least four people
Ewans: Well, I haven’t spoken to all of them, but
me: why would two women in their 50’s, who i didn’t know, have a silly
joke against me
12:08 AM
i don’t think this add up
Ewans: I guess they could have heard of the joke from the others and
repeated it, because they believed you believed it?
me: are you sure that you haven’t been tricked by the people on Bjørndal?
the two established women in their 50’s?
12:09 AM
you obviously don’t know how established Norwegian women act
Ewans: I told them I was working on a book, I didn’t say I knew you
personally or something like that
I couldn’t identify the two women
me: ok, but you are aware of that I’ve published our conversations on
my blog, which is being read mostly in Norway?
12:10 AM
i don’t think this adds up
Ewans: But I believe you may have been scared after hearing of it (the
joke) and possibly "imagined" some of it (very usual)
me: ok
what about my father
you said it was a dane
have you got the file perhaps?
how could you mix up my father with a dane?
Ewans: No, I have the information from a bank-employee in Frankfurt
12:11 AM
me: I think you are a bit inpolite saying that this is just something
I’ve imagined
Ewans: I didn’t say that
me: so I don’t think it’s any point of going on
Ewans: Some people made a joke, obviously
So there is some substance
me: i also got my face distroyed
was that also a practical joke?
Ewans: an accident?
12:12 AM
me: I’m sorry Mr. Ewans, I doubt you a bit now
Ewans: ok
me: no, i think i have explained about that to you
12:13 AM
and the stuff with my grandfather
Ewans: About your face?
me: was that also a joke?
yeah, I thought i had explained about it
Ewans: No joke, but your sister isn’t persecuted because of that
It’s a long time ago
me: my sister?
Ewans: most people are dead
me: my sister is in on what
Ewans: your sister is the grandchild of Johannes as well
me: on whats going on
yes, like my brother
Ewans: yes
12:14 AM
me: but i don’t trust my sister
she’
Ewans: ok
me: she
she’s in on this the way i see it
she
she’s an illuminist i think
Ewans: I see
12:15 AM
me: she was using a norwegian boy as a slave in Karl Johan
Ewans: For how long has she been an illuminist, do you think?
me: was that a joke as well?
i dont know, ask the boy from Karl Johan
i dont i should speak more with you
Ewans: Idon’t know his identity
12:16 AM
why?
me: you are obviously thinking that im imagening things
we arent on the same level
Ewans: No
me: you speak down to me
Ewans: I’m not thinking you are imagining everything
me: thats my opinion
Ewans: But some incidents may have other explanations
me: my opinion is that you are speaking down to me
ok?
12:17 AM
did that get throug?
Ewans: I don’t feel it that way, it’s not my intention
me: ..
ok, but this is still my opinion
ok?
Ewans: Ok
me: ok, so i say goodbye then
ok?
Ewans: Are you sure?
me: now your doing it again
Ewans: I would really like to speak to you some more
12:18 AM
me: piss off mr ewans
piss off
Ewans: I see
me: fuck off
Ewans: Why?
me: blody yankee bastard
ive had enough
piss off
piss off
Ewans: What’s going on?
me: do you hear me?
Ewans: Why are you so angry at me?
me: i dont want anything more to do with you
aren’t you listening
im out
bye
12:19 AM
Ewans: erik, please
-
Google Mail – Chat with Ewans Nick

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Chat with Ewans Nick
Ewans Nick
<ewans.nick@gmail.com>
Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 12:18 AM
To:
eribsskog@gmail.com
11:47 PM Ewans: hi Erik
12 minutes 12:00 AM Ewans: I think you should return to Norway. It's safer there (my experience)me: who is this?Ewans: Nick Ewans12:01 AM me: where's your name gone from the chatEwans: ?You don't see my name?me: it doesn't say your name on the chatnopeEwans: weirdDid you get my email?me: yes, i read your email12:02 AM Ewans: I'm in Oslo nowme: i think it's a bit strange, that you have turned 180 degrees in everythingokEwans: I haven't turned 180 degrees. But after spending more time investigating, I came to some new conclusions12:03 AM which I think are good newsme: ok, i thought it was a bit strange that you spoke with my old coleguess, without asking me first12:04 AM Ewans: You've mentioned the name of a lot of them on your blog, so I had much background material (I can read Norwegian)me: ok, but you didn't say that you spoke on behalf of me, i hopeEwans: No.me: and how can you know who to trust?Ewans: I don't now, quite.12:05 AM But I've spoken to several people, and I feel I've reached a conclusin that is correctme: ok, but don't you think it's a bit strange, that the whole suburb of Bjørndal should be involved in a practical joke against me?12:06 AM Ewans: The whole suburb?me: practiclydo they say that it was just a joke?Ewans: Please elaborateme: well i overheard about this from several people at Bjørndal12:07 AM and several people acted strangeEwans: yes, one of your former co-workers who remembered what happened told me it was a (silly) jokeme: I overheard about it from at least four peopleEwans: Well, I haven't spoken to all of them, butme: why would two women in their 50's, who i didn't know, have a silly joke against me12:08 AM i don't think this add upEwans: I guess they could have heard of the joke from the others and repeated it, because they believed you believed it?me: are you sure that you haven't been tricked by the people on Bjørndal?the two established women in their 50's?12:09 AM you obviously don't know how established Norwegian women actEwans: I told them I was working on a book, I didn't say I knew you personally or something like thatI couldn't identify the two womenme: ok, but you are aware of that I've published our conversations on my blog, which is being read mostly in Norway?12:10 AM i don't think this adds upEwans: But I believe you may have been scared after hearing of it (the joke) and possibly "imagined" some of it (very usual)me: okwhat about my fatheryou said it was a danehave you got the file perhaps?how could you mix up my father with a dane?Ewans: No, I have the information from a bank-employee in Frankfurt12:11 AM me: I think you are a bit inpolite saying that this is just something I've imaginedEwans: I didn't say thatme: so I don't think it's any point of going onEwans: Some people made a joke, obviouslySo there is some substanceme: i also got my face distroyedwas that also a practical joke?Ewans: an accident?12:12 AM me: I'm sorry Mr. Ewans, I doubt you a bit nowEwans: okme: no, i think i have explained about that to you12:13 AM and the stuff with my grandfatherEwans: About your face?me: was that also a joke?yeah, I thought i had explained about itEwans: No joke, but your sister isn't persecuted because of thatIt's a long time agome: my sister?Ewans: most people are deadme: my sister is in on whatEwans: your sister is the grandchild of Johannes as wellme: on whats going onyes, like my brotherEwans: yes12:14 AM me: but i don't trust my sistershe'Ewans: okme: sheshe's in on this the way i see itsheshe's an illuminist i thinkEwans: I see12:15 AM me: she was using a norwegian boy as a slave in Karl JohanEwans: For how long has she been an illuminist, do you think?me: was that a joke as well?i dont know, ask the boy from Karl Johani dont i should speak more with youEwans: Idon't know his identity12:16 AM why?me: you are obviously thinking that im imagening thingswe arent on the same levelEwans: Nome: you speak down to meEwans: I'm not thinking you are imagining everythingme: thats my opinionEwans: But some incidents may have other explanationsme: my opinion is that you are speaking down to meok?12:17 AM did that get throug?Ewans: I don't feel it that way, it's not my intentionme: ..ok, but this is still my opinionok?Ewans: Okme: ok, so i say goodbye thenok?Ewans: Are you sure?me: now your doing it againEwans: I would really like to speak to you some more12:18 AM me: piss off mr ewanspiss offEwans: I seeme: fuck offEwans: Why?me: blody yankee bastardive had enoughpiss offpiss offEwans: What's going on?me: do you hear me?Ewans: Why are you so angry at me?me: i dont want anything more to do with youaren't you listeningim outbye12:19 AM Ewans: erik, please
Google Mail – Interesting news

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Interesting news
Ewans Nick
<ewans.nick@gmail.com>
Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 4:43 PM
To:
Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Erik,I’m currently visiting Oslo, and have been investigating your case
today, because it would indeed be highly interesting if a normal guy
like you had been persecuted by the mafia. I’ve talked to some of your
former co-workers and other people you’ve mentioned. It appears the
incident in 2003 was meant as a joke, according to a former co-worker
who had overheard it from someone, and was not seriously meant (I
promised not to mention his name, because of your blog). I’ve also
spoken to some people who know the "mafia", that is, Albanian (among
others) criminals in Oslo. They could confirm that the criminals have
no interest in you. It also appears that the incident in Kveld in 2005
was not connected to you, it was just some people trying to capture(?)
some animals, according to a local guy.
My conclusion is that it is completely safe for you to return to
Norway, should you wish to do so.
I’ve also discussed the bank transfer with the guy in Frankfurt that I
know, and there seems to be a mistake. It was a Danish guy with
almost the same name who received the money for two cars he sold to a
company in Munich.
Nick
-

PS.
It’s maybe a bit strange, that they use red ink(?)
(Shouldn’t only teachers use red ink?)
Shouldn’t official files have blue or black ink on them?
Hm.
Sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
PS 2.
Nå gikk jeg nesten ut for å kaste på Home Office:
Vi får se hva som skjer, nå ble jeg irritert her.
Vi får se.
Jeg tror det med rødt blekk er noe ‘køddings’.
Vi får se.
PS 3.
Jeg hadde egentlig tenkt å avblåse protest-aksjon.
Da jeg posta bildet av tomatboksen.
Men så hadde jeg allerede tatt på meg skoa.
Så da ble det fristende å gå ut, for å få meg litt frisk luft.
Så bomma jeg tre ganger på den jævla ruta da.
Traff noe betong-greier en gang og metall-ramma rundt vinduene to ganger.
Utrolig nok.
Så jeg hadde ikke egna meg noe bra som palestiner.
Det var dårlig kasting alts., tre bom av tre mulige.
Er det mulig.
Fy faen.
PS 4.
I was at the Home Office, in Water St., on Monday.
Right before twelve noon.
And then a woman fell in the stairs, and got uncontious.
They called an ambulance.
But the stairs there are very hard, made of stone.
And I reacted on, when I went out, that they put a jacket on the woman, like she was dead, almost.
A yellow jacket.
So it almost covered her face.
She was wearing thight trousers, I could see.
Could it have been an Illuminati-plot, against a dark-haired woman, who acted a bit to western?
Remember, on Sunday, I wrote on the blog, that a young woman from Lithuania, that I met on town, (and who I think was perhaps an illuminist or a kabalist), said that a person is better the darker hair, that the person has.
(Even if the girl had light hair, which she covered with a hat).
So maybe this also goes the other way.
That it was an honour-killing, from the Illuminati, since the woman falling in the stairs, had dark hair and thight trousers?
Just a thought.
PS 5.
I don’t think they did it right, at the Home Office.
Because I remember, when I worked as a shop-manager, in Norway.
(Security is very thight there, btw., one are almost not allowed to move.
And when I took a photo, of the clock there, (since the time has been an issue,
when I was there last year), then I got told, by a female officer, with light hair, that I had to turn the phone off, for some reason).But, this happened on a couple of occations, when I was shop-manager in Norway.
And then, I called 113, I think it was.
And asked them what to do.
But I think that the Home Office did it wrong.
Because I heard what the security-woman said to the people in the reception.
She said, can you call an ambulance, someone fell in the stairs.
But they should have just called themselves.
Because they just let the woman lay there.
And she looked dead.
They should have called 113, or 999, or what it is, and asked what to do.
They should have given first aid.
But they didn’t.
I was being observed, by security staff there.
It’s more security than on an airport.
One have to empty ones pockets, like on an airport, and your stuff is being sent through a machine.
But the woman laid there, for the five minutes, or ten minutes, or what it was, that I was there.
With the people in the reception carrying on their regular work, it seemed, like they didn’t react on the woman laying there.
The first clerk, said I had to wait, for the second clerk.
So while I waited, I noticed the woman.
This could have been an Illuminati-plot.
Because I had told my Landlord, that I was going to the Home Office.
(On Friday, was the plan, but they close at 12 noon, and I overslept on Friday.
And this maybe is a thing one should do on a Monday).
And I knew they close at 12, from last year.
At right before 11 am, a person buzzed on the calling-system here, waking me up.
I slept tightly, so I think I would have overslept, for the Home Office, if the Scottish Power-guy hadn’t used the calling.
He wanted to check the electricity-meter.
But, I think they should have sent me a letter about this(?)
Even if I’m not from Britain, but I think they should have sent letters.
So this could have been part of the plot.
And they didn’t give first aid.
They just put a jacket, on the woman, it seemed to me.
As far as I could see.
But it could be that they did it right, I’m not so good at first aid, and I stood a bit away.
But I thought they should have called the ambulance themselves, the security-gards.
Since they were the ones, caring for the injured woman.
So they could have explained about the patients situation.
Instead they shouted to the reception, about this.
So it was a bit bureucratic, it seemed to me.
One shouldn’t do things bureaucraticly, when someone are injured, I think.
It looked to me like it could have been serious, since the woman laid there, looking like she was dead.
And a yellow jacket was put on top of her, by a security-guard, so that it almost covered her nose, I think, it covered about half her face, I think.
Something like this.
(This was done at the same time, that I went out of the building, passing the injured
woman, on a few meters distance, walking out).I wasn’t allowed to have the camera on, and I thought it would have been a bit respectless, taking a pic, so I didn’t take a pic.
It could be that I’m wrong, and that everything went fine, but it seemed a bit bureucratic, to me.
So that’s how this was.
(And there was also a big crowd outside, of asian or african-looking people, (or where they could have been from), which I think seemed a bit strange.
Since they were so many.
But it could be that all of them knew the woman then.
What do I know).
-
Nå driver jeg å tenker på damer her, siden jeg noen ganger har kjeda meg litt på jobb, i Oslo osv., og kanskje flørta litt med noen av kollegene på jobben, hvis jeg har kjeda meg.
Men sånne damer jeg liker, det er sånne damer, som jeg husker fra Berger og Svelvik osv.
Sånn som Annika, Christell, Anne Uglum, Lene Andersen, Line Nilsen.
Hva het hun som gikk på Gjerde da.
Monica Nebell.
(Nå skriver jeg bare de peneste damene her, så jeg skjønner at jeg er innbilsk).
For dette her var damer som så veldig fine ut, og som var lette å prate med osv. og.
Sånn at dem var hyggelig og prøvde å oppføre seg bra og sånn.
Men i Oslo så fant jeg nesten ingen sånne damer.
Alle var så utrivelige mot meg, syntes jeg.
Uten at jeg skjønner hvorfor.
Men da jeg jobba på Rimi Bjørndal, den første perioden, fra 1996 til 1998, som assisterende butikksjef.
Da traff jeg mange damer jeg likte, på jobben.
Spesielt de utenlandske var veldig høflige og hyggelige og naturlige osv.
Men de andre damene i Oslo, de var ofte ganske kunstige og litt kalde, kan man kanskje si, syntes jeg, ofte.
Men aller helst så ville jeg hatt en sånn dame som de jeg nevnte fra Berger, eller fra de som jobba på Arvato, her i Liverpool, mange av de var også veldig fine, og minte meg nesten om jentene på Berger da.
Mens i Oslo, så var det sjelden at noen av de damene minte meg om sånne damer jeg likte på Berger.
Så sånn var det.
Bare noe jeg kom på, siden jeg tar med om alt mulig på bloggen uansett.
Så sånn er det.
Med vennlig hilsen
Erik Ribsskog
PS.
Jeg synes også at det er veldig nedverdigende, at jeg må forklare om tankene mine osv., i et forsøk, på å få rettighetene mine.
Er ikke Norge og Storbritannia sekulære land?
Er det fordi jeg er i EU og EU er en ‘katolsk klubb’, som jeg har sett det blir kalt, i the Times, tror jeg det var.
Og norske myndigheter gir faen, eller tørr ikke gjøre noe?
Hva er det som forgår, lurer jeg.
























