 |
Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com> |
Problemer med at mine rettigheter ikke blir respektert, av myndighetene, i Norge og Storbritannia.
|
Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com> |
Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 4:14 AM | |||||||||||
|
To: solvit-norway@nhd.dep.no | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
-
Google Mail – Problemer med at mine rettigheter ikke blir respektert, av myndighetene, i Norge og Storbritannia.
-
Google Mail – To the leader of Amnesty International Secretariat/Fwd: Complaint about the Norwegian Amnesty.
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
To the leader of Amnesty International Secretariat/Fwd: Complaint about the Norwegian Amnesty.
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 4:09 AM
To:
amnestyis@amnesty.org
Hi,I can't see that I've recieved an answer to this e-mail yet, so I'm sending it again.Yours sincerely,Erik Ribsskog———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 6:09 PMSubject: To the leader of Amnesty International Secretariat/Fwd: Complaint about the Norwegian Amnesty.
To: amnestyis@amnesty.orgHi,I would like to escalate a complaint please.It's regarding that the Norwegian Amnesty, refuse to help, people like me, who aren't getting helpby the Government, after they have overheard that they are being followed by 'the mafia'.Mr. Egenes, the General Secretary, at Amnesty in Norway, is using the excuse,'that the mafia don't operate this way'.How can Amnesty know how the mafia operate, and use this as an excuse not to help, withthe problem that the Government refuse to give help?Are Amnesty a branch of 'the mafia', since Amnesty know how the mafia operate?How can Amnesty know the mafia agenda?I don't think Amnesty should refere to mafia agenda, if they document what this agenda is about,unless you change your name to Mafia International, then I guess it would have been alright.Is it possible to please get an explanation, about how Amnesty can know this in detail, abouthow 'the mafia' operate?Where have Amnesty found this knowledge?Yours sincerely,Erik Ribsskog———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>Date: Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 10:00 AM
Subject: Re: Complaint about the Norwegian Amnesty.
To: "MByler@amnesty.org" <MByler@amnesty.org>Hi,if I felt it was impolite, to legitimise mafia?I think your organisation is a joke!Yours sincerely,Erik RibsskogOn 7/7/08, MByler@amnesty.org <MByler@amnesty.org> wrote:
Dear Mr. Ribsskog,
I am sorry to hear that you have not had a positive experience with Amnesty International in relation to your concerns.
I need to affirm, however, that the response that was given to you by the Director of AI Norway is correct, and that there is nothing that AI can do to support you in this instance. I am sorry that you felt this was impolite.
Best wishes,
Marjory M. Byler
Senior Director, International Mobilization
Amnesty International———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Jun 18, 2008 1:38 PM
Subject: Complaint about the Norwegian Amnesty.Hi,
I called your offices today, and explained that I had been having some problems with theNorwegian Amnesty, and if it was possible for me to send an e-mail to you explaining about
this, and then I was given your e-mail address.
The problems, are regarding that I was in contact with the General Secretary, for the NorwegianAmnesty, Mr. Jegenes, earlier today.
It was a bit of problem with the communiction in this phone-call.
So I thought I'd try to write you an explanation, or complaint, about this.
I found that Mr. Jegenes, was a bit impolite, I think I have to say, since he interupted me, whenI started explaining why I had contacted him and Amnesty, and about the problems with the earlier
contact, which I had escalated to the General Secretary.
Then, after he had interupted me, and said quite a few things, then he didn't want to let me finishmy explanation, that I had prepared, before the call.
He just hang up.
I thought this was a bit inpolite.
Further, in the call, when he interupted me, he said that their representative, was right in decliningto help me, since Amnesty couldn't investigate organised crime, like he said.
But, I wanted them, to help me with the Government.The Government, aren't answering my correspondence, and also the Sivilombudsman in Norway,
which Amnesty UK, adviced me to contact, is also, like the Goverment, playing games with me,
I think one have to say.This is what I wanted Amnesty to help with, to get the Government to treat me, in accordance to
my rights, and not play games with me.
But the General Secretary, said that Amnesty would have had to investigate organised crime,
to help me.This is not right, they could just have looked at the correspondance, between me and the
Government, and then they could have seen that the Government are playing games with me.
Since I think this is the real problem, that leads to what I'd say is torture and inhumane
treatment from the Government, that they are playing games with me, and my life, and thatthey have no respect for my rights.
And this leads to the torture, like I think I have to call it, and inhumanity, in my situation.I think I have to hold the Government in Norway, since I am a Norwegian citizen, responsible
for this, since they haven't got the right, to keep things in soceity, like how the situation is
with 'mafia', like I've heard I've been followed by, secret.
And they are also not answering my corresponedence etc, with I'd say means that they areplaying games with me.
Further, Mr. Jegenes, also said, when he interupted me, that 'mafia/organised criminals
wouldn't just single out and individual for following', when he asked me, why I was beingfollowed, and I answered that I couldn't say exactly why.
These things, like criminal organisations/mafias agenda, is not something that is open in
society, and for him, to demand, that I needed to know this, I think is unreasonable.
Mr. Jegenes, is infact, legitimising mafia, in society, by saying, that their agenda, is
logical and reasonable.Mafia, is not a legitimate part of society, you can't find anything in eg. the Norwegian
constitution, that says that mafia, is legit.
I think it seems like Mr. Jegenes, is trying to legitimise mafia, and mafia/orginised criminal
organisations agenda in society, by claiming, that they are acting reasonable and logical.
I object strongly to this legitimisation of mafia/organised crime, by Mr. Jegenes.
Further, Mr. Jegenes, also said, that he thought, that the Norwegian Government, thought
that, what I had overheard, that I was followed by 'the mafia', and that I was being used asa 'target-guy', by the Government, must have been something I had imagined.
So Mr. Jegenes, is saying what he thinks is more right, than what I think.
He isn't taking what I'm saing in good faith, and neighter is the Government.
There is no declared sivil war, in Norway, at the moment, so there is no reason, for why,
Mr. Jegenes (and the Norwegian Goverment), shouldn't take what is being said from a
fellow country-man, in good faith.
So this I would like to complain about, I think it's inpolite of Mr. Jegenes, to treat a fellow
country-man, in this way.
This is what I wanted to contact you and explain about.I hope that you have the time to have a look at this!
I'll also add a link, to my blog, where I've written a short summary, of the phone-call with
the General Secretary today, and also posted the notes from the call, and the notes that
I had written, to prepare myself, before I called, but which the General Secretay, wouldn'tlet me finish read/explain about.
(Although this blog-post is in Norwegian, but I add the link anyway, just for to explain that
I got a bit upset, and posted the notes etc. on my blog, at once after the call, since I thoughI was being treated a bit inpolite.).
I hope this is alright!
Yours sincerely,Erik Ribsskog
PS.
Here is the link to mentioned post, on my blog:
http://johncons-mirror.
blogspot.com/2008/06/kort- referat-fra-telefonsamtale- med.html Working to protect human rights worldwide
DISCLAIMER
Internet communications are not secure and therefore Amnesty International Ltd does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message. If you are not the intended recipient you must not disclose or rely on the information in this e-mail. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Amnesty International Ltd unless specifically stated. Electronic communications including email might be monitored by Amnesty International Ltd. for operational or business reasons.
This message has been scanned for viruses by Postini.
www.postini.com
-
Google Mail – Telefonsamtale, forrige måned.
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Telefonsamtale, forrige måned.
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 4:03 AM
To:
Per Edgar Kokkvold <kokkvold@online.no>
Hei,jeg prøver å sende denne klagen til deg, siden han kollegaen din ikke svarer.
Med vennlig hilsenErik Ribsskog———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: 2008/9/8Subject: Telefonsamtale, forrige måned.
To: Kjell Nyhuus <kjell.nyhuus@presse.no>Hei,jeg viser til telefonsamtale, i forrige måned, hvor jeg etterlyste svar på klagen min, på trakassering og sensur,fra VGD, Veggavisen, Debattcentralen og Dagbladet.Jeg viste til de aktuelle punktene, i Vær Varsom-plakaten, og etterlyste også en egen Vær Varsom-plakat,for debattforum.Siden det finnes en Vær Varsom-plakat, for vanlige avisartikler.Og også en Vær Varsom-plakat, for reklamer, mener jeg det var.Men nå er det jo år 2008, så jeg lurte på om det ikke var på tide med en egen Vær Varsom-plakat, fordebattfoum, drevet av nettavisene også.Bare et forslag, siden jeg ikke tror at de plakatene som man har nå, passer helt å bruke for problemer,som med trakassering og sensur, på debattforum.I allefall ikke, etter at jeg hørte du sa, over telefon, da jeg ringte den nevnte telefonsamtalen, at min klagelå langt nede i bunken, og at du bare hadde tenkt å foreta en forenklet behandling.Og det kan man jo tenke seg hva betyr, at du bare ville hive det i søpla, f.eks.Men, da nevnte jo jeg det, at Solskjær, han hadde sagt, at PFU, bare var noe tull uansett, eller noe.At man kunne bare like gjerne droppe PFU, de hadde ingen troverdighet, og heller ta det i et siviltsøksmål.Noe sånn var det vel han sa.Men du sa at det var feil, det var agenten til Solskjær, en som Solbakken, som hadde sagt, at å klagetil PFU, var som å pisse i motvind.Det er mulig.I hvertfall, så virker det ikke helt enkelt.Fordi, du sa, da jeg ringte, for 3-4 uker siden, at du skulle meg noe skriftlig, angående klagen på denevnte avisene, som jeg sendte dere.Men jeg har ikke fått noe svar av deg.Så jeg tror Solskjær og Solbakken, har rett i det her, at PFU, det er like greit å droppe å kontakte,for de har ikke noen troverdighet uansett.Det kan i hvertfall virke som at de kan ha rett, hvis man sammenligner hva dere sier, med hva dere gjør.Med vennlig hilsenErik Ribsskog
-
Google Mail – To the Minister of Justice/Fwd: Our ref: TO08/2153
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
To the Minister of Justice/Fwd: Our ref: TO08/2153
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 5:54 PM
To:
general.queries@justice.gsi.gov.uk
Hi,I can't see that I've recieved an answer to this e-mail yet, so I'm sending it again.Yours sincerely,Erik Ribsskog———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 1:47 PMSubject: To the Minister of Justice/Fwd: Our ref: TO08/2153
To: general.queries@justice.gsi.gov.uk Hi,I've tried to escalate a complaint, but it doesn't seem like your representative is answering, to hiscorrespondence.And I also thought that the original complaint, wasn't answered that well, by another of yourrepresentatives.So it seems to me, that there are a lot of problems in the Ministry, so I thought it would bebest, to send it to the top of the Ministry, so that you could have the chance to have a lookat these problems, and to get these problems sorted, so that I maybe could get a secondopinion, from the right person in your Ministry, to the original complaint.Hope this is alright!Yours sincerely,Erik Ribsskog———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>Date: Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 2:42 PM
Subject: Fwd: Our ref: TO08/2153
To: jan.farenden@justice.gsi.gov.uk Hi,I can't see that I've recieved an answer to this e-mail yet, so I'm sending it again.Yours sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>Date: Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 9:31 AM
Subject: Fwd: Our ref: TO08/2153
To: jan.farenden@justice.gsi.gov.uk Hi,I called the Ministry of Justice today, and I got your e-mail address, from the clerk there.The reason that I'm sending you this e-mail, is that I was wondering, who it is, that oneshould contact, if one are having problems with the IPCC.Since they are not answering my e-mails, and I've already been in contact, with thecomplaints-manager there, so I think I've escalated it, as far as it's possible toescalate, at the IPCC.So I was wondering, if it isn't the Ministry of Justice, that one should contact, if theIPCC, are having problems in the way, that they aren't answering e-mails etc.Thanks in advance for any help regarding this!Yours sincerely,Erik Ribsskog———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Jun 30, 2008 7:23 PMSubject: Re: Our ref: TO08/2153To: "Holmes, Ryan" <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk >Hi,thank you very much for your answer!I think that the IPCC, probably recieves founding from the Government.And, I think, that if the IPCC, don't answer their e-mails etc, then this is a matter, for the Ministry,who are administratively in charge of the IPCC.Which I think must be the Ministry of Justice.I don't think the Ministry of Justice, can't pretend that they aren't in charge of the Police, likeyou are trying now.So, I write this, mostly, to put it on my blog, and then I'll think further, on how to go forward with this.Yours sincerely,Erik Ribsskog
On 6/30/08, Holmes, Ryan <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk > wrote:
Dear Mr Ribsskog
Thank you for your email reply of 23 June.
While I am sorry to read of your ongoing concerns, I am afraid there is little useful information I can add to the previous correspondence that you have received from this Department.
As previously explained, if you choose to further your concerns regarding your complaint with the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC), you must address the matter to the IPCC directly. Similarly, the Ministry of Justice is unable to comment on or give advice on how to escalate your case with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) or the American Embassy. I can only confirm that the points you have raised have been thoroughly considered and that the Department has been as helpful as possible in answering your concerns.
I am sorry that I am unable to be of more help, but I hope you can appreciate for the reasons given above that the Department is unable to intervene in your case. Hence, any further correspondence sent that addresses the same points will be placed on file and not responded to.
Ryan Holmes
Legal Services Regulation and Redress Division
—–Original Message—–
From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 23 June 2008 14:20To: Holmes, Ryan
Subject: Re: Our ref: TO08/2153Hi,I've already been in contact with the Complaints Manager at the IPCC, but this hasn't resovled the problems.I suspect could be some corruption involved there, because something is obviouslly wrong there in my opinion.Also I wondering a bit on how to escalate the case I've been in contact with the FBI, or the American Embassy,about.Also, I've been in contact with the Norwegian equivalent, of the IPCC, that's Spesialenheten, regarding another,but linked, matter.And they sort under the Norwegian Ministry of Justice.So, I think that the IPCC are sorting under the British Ministy of Justice(?)If not, who should they then be sorting under?Sorry if I'm asking stupid questions.Yours sincerely,Erik RibsskogOn 6/23/08, Holmes, Ryan <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk > wrote:
Dear Mr Ribsskog
Thank you for your email reply of 19 June.
The Ministry of Justice is unable to submit a complaint on your behalf to the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC). Additionally, a complaint against the IPCC cannot be directed to the Ministry of Justice for review as this does not fall within the remit of this Department. If you wish to make a complaint against the IPCC you must do this by addressing your concerns to the IPCC directly. The information provided below outlines how to do this.
If you have a complaint or query about a casework decision, the IPCC will do their best to clearly explain the reason for their decisions and answer any concerns you have. Please note however that IPCC casework decisions are final and they will not necessarily be able to change the outcome. For further information or advice on your rights you can contact a Citizens Advice Bureau, solicitor or your local MP.
If you have a complaint about a member of staff at the IPCC, in the first instance you can contact the person concerned and the matter may be resolved there and then. As mentioned in my previous email, Casework Manager Sarah Brown is one of a number of IPCC staff that has conducted an investigation into your file and she can be contacted on 0207 166 3934 should you wish to discuss the details of your complaint further. However, since you mention that Miss Brown has not contacted you in the past, you may wish to raise any issues of concern through a line manager, or write to the Internal Complaints Manager. Alternatively, you can download a complaint form via the link
http://www.ipcc.gov.uk/index/contact-us/complaints_ipcc.htm and make your complaint against the IPCC using the contact details below.
Internal Complaints Manager
Independent Police Complaints Commission
90 High Holborn
London
WC1V 6BH
Fax: 0207 404 0695
Email:
internal.complaints.unit@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk .
I do hope that this information is of some use to you.
Ryan Holmes
Legal Services Regulation and Redress Division
—–Original Message—–
From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 19 June 2008 20:35
To: Holmes, Ryan
Subject: Re: Our ref: TO08/2153
Hi,thank you very much for your e-mail, and the advice!I wanted to complain about the IPCC, since the whole case is a mess, and they don't reply to my e-mails,and they don't call me, you mention Brown, she has been supposed to call me, regarding the problemswith the missing answers on the e-mails, but she haven't called.I think that the IPCC must have some serious problems, with handeling the complaints I sent them,which I view as one case really.So I was wondering, how I could submit this complaint, on the IPCC, to the Ministry of Justice.If you think that you could please submit this complaint for me.Also, I've contacted the FBI, in the American Embassy, in London.And I asked them, on how should go forward, regarding reporting a crime in the US, that someone,has set up a hate-blog against me there.The FBI/The American Embassy Legal Advice, tells me to contact my local police-station, about this.But I've lost a bit of confidence, with the Merseyside Police, due to the things mentioned in thecomplaints, sent to the IPCC, and more.And then I thought, that I could contact the IPCC about this then, since I didn't think I could contactthe local Police about this.But now there has been so much problems, with the IPCC, so that I've lost a bit of confidence, inthe IPCC, as well.So then I have to contact the Ministry of Justice about this, since I don't think that eighter theMerseyside Police or the IPCC, have showed themselves, to be worthy, of much confidence,unfortunatly.So I'm mentioning this now.Hope this is alright!Yours sincerely,Erik RibsskogOn 6/19/08, Holmes, Ryan <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk > wrote:
Dear Mr Ribsskog
Thank you for your email reply of 5 June. I am also in receipt of your email dated 13 June.
As explained in my previous reply, the Law Society is the regulatory body for solicitors in England and Wales and will keep a comprehensive list of solicitors practising in your local area. Their website promotes a searchable database to help you find a solicitor which allows you to search by firm name, area of law and/or post code. To alleviate your concerns about contacting the Law Society due to previous personal experiences, I should point out that this list is a resource to assist the public locate suitable legal representation and promote solicitors across England and Wales. You can access the facility via the following link:
http://www.lawsociety.org.uk/choosingandusing/ .findasolicitor.law
Alternatively, you could also look through a local directory, such as the Yellow Pages, which might help identify a suitable firm. As suggested in my previous reply, you may wish to contact the Law Centres Federation on 0207 428 4401 who can provide contact details for your local Law Centre. Also, you may find it helpful to access the Community Legal Services Direct website for information on providers of legal advice at
www.clsdirect.org.uk. These are all alternative options available to you that do not involve the assistance of the Law Society.
With regard to the complaint you have submitted to the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC), I have contacted the IPCC to investigate the status of your complaint. Senior lawyers at the IPCC inform me that without your expressed consent, I am unable to obtain any information that relates to your complaint. I was informed however that Casework Manager Sarah Brown is one of a number of IPCC staff that has conducted an investigation into your file and she can be contacted on 0207 166 3934 should you wish to discuss the details of your complaint further.
I do hope that this information is of some use to you.
Ryan Holmes
Legal Services Regulation and Redress Division
—–Original Message—–
From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 05 June 2008 01:51To: Holmes, Ryan
Subject: Re: Our ref: TO08/2153
Hi,thank you very much for your e-mail!I have been thinking about contacting the Law Society, regarding getting a list, like you say,for law firms, who take on law-cases on a 'pro bono' service basis.But, like I might have forgotten to explain, the Law Society, are already involved in this,I have complained about them to the Legal Services Ombudsman, who I have been contactingyou about.So I've maybe lost a bit of confidence, in the Law Society, since I think they gave a bit of wronginformation, and some errors, that I thought were a bit strange, so they are really involved in thisfrom before.So then I was wondering about, if it would be right to involve the Law Society again, since theyare involved from before.Maybe there is someone else one could contact about getting the name of companies like this?Sorry if I'm asking a lot of questions.I've also sent a complaint, on the Merseyside Police, to the IPCC.But the IPCC, aren't dealing with the complaint at all, it seems, so I was wondering who I shouldcontact then, if I wanted to compain about the IPCC not dealing with the complaint on the Police?Sorry again that I'm asking so many questions!Thanks in advance for the reply!Yours sincerely,Erik RibsskogOn 4/25/08, Holmes, Ryan <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk > wrote:
Dear Mr Ribsskog
Thank you for your email reply of 7 April, in which you request further advice on ways to proceed forward with your complaint against the Legal Services Ombudsman (LSO). To assist you with your concerns, I shall set out the avenues of legal assistance available to you that acknowledge your specific financial concerns.
Firstly, while I understand you have already been in contact with the Citizen's Advice Bureau (CAB), you may also wish to consider contacting your local Law Centre. Contact details for your local Law Centre can be found via the Law Centres Federation on 0207 428 4401, or by accessing their website www.lawcentres.org.uk. You may also find it helpful to access the Community Legal Services Direct website for information on providers of legal advice at www.clsdirect.org.uk. Alternatively, you may choose to contact Community Legal Advice for free confidential help regarding your legal queries on 0845 345 4345.
Secondly, it may be worth investigating the possibility of a Conditional Fee Agreement (CFA). This allows a solicitor to accept a case on a 'no won, no fee' basis, under which they receive a fee from you only if the case is won. It is worth pointing that the solicitor's standard fees can be increased by up to 100% to reflect the degree of risk to the solicitor in taking the case on (the 'success fee'). However, should you lose your case, you may still be liable to pay the successful party's costs, as well as expert witness fees and other disbursements. There are insurance schemes that, for a premium, provide cover for these items. As part of the implementation of the Access to Justice Act 1999, we have made it possible for the successful side to recover their lawyer's success fee and insurance premium form the loser. Effectively, this has made the operation of conditional fees fairer and more attractive to clients.
Thirdly, some solicitors may be prepared to take on your case on a pro bono agreement (i.e. provide you with a free service). You can contact the Law Society who can provide you with a list of solicitors that may provide pro bono services. The Law Society is the regulatory body for solicitors in England and Wales and you can write to them at the following address:
The Law Society
113 Chancery Lane
London
WC2A 1SX
Tel: 0870 606 2555.
Alternatively, you can access the Law Society's website at www.solicitors-online.com.
I do hope that you find this information useful.
Yours sincerely
Ryan Holmes
Legal Services Regulation and Redress Division
This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.
Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail.
This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.
This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.
This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.
Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail.
This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.
This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.
This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.
Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail.
This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.
This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.
This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.
Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail.
This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.
-
Skrevet
av Erik 17.09.2008 kl. 13:23Hvorfor
ikke innføre ny tidsregning etter valget neste år:
"Etter Stoltenberg".Nytt
innlegg
Svar
på innlegg
Varsle2
anbefalinger
Skrevet
av What do we want? More lies &
infotainment bullshit, PLEASE!!
17.09.2008 kl. 13:34Ja
han er jo jøde han også, så!Nytt
innlegg
Svar
på innlegg
Varslehttp://www.dagbladet.no/nyheter/2008/09/16/547060.html#comments_container
-
På begynnelsen av 90-tallet, så jobba jeg på OBS Triaden, i Lørenskog, i et par år.
Da hadde jeg to kamerater, som het Øystein og Glenn, som hadde gått på skole sammen, i Lillestrøm, eller noe sånt.
Øystein var også tremenningen min, for mora hans, var kusina til fattern.
Så dem hadde et sommerhus, etter foreldra hennes, eller noe, nederst ved fjorden, helt nederst i Havnehagen, fordi ‘teskjekjærringa’.
Dem kallte det Sand.
Men Sand, for meg, det var litt lenger bort mot Svelvik.
Så jeg ville sagt, at det var på Bergeråsen.
Siden det var like på nedsida, av husene, som lå på Bergeråsen.
Så det var litt rart, synes jeg, at de kallte det Sand.
Men de kallte Oslo S., for ‘S-en’ og, eller i hvertfall tremenningen min.
Så jeg synes de var litt artige, for de, eller spesiellt Øystein da, brukte så mange rare ord og utrykk osv., fra Lørenskog osv., som ikke var så kjent på Bergeråsen.
Og i helgene, på Bergeråsen, så hang han og jeg og Kjetil Holshagen, ofte oppe i leiligheten min, i Leirfaret.
Og da så vi på de nyeste Hollywood action-filmene, og spilte de nyeste C64-spillene, og spiste masse junkfood, Pizza Grandiosa, og potetgull og Cola osv.
Dette var veldig kult, synes jeg, i hvertfall da jeg gikk på ungdomsskolen osv.
En gang, da jeg gikk i 2. klasse på videregående, så tok Øystein og slukka en røyk, i hånda mi.
Så da synes jeg ikke det var så artig.
Det var vel i 1987, kan jeg tenke meg.
Og jeg har arr enda.
Såvidt.
21 år sida.
Men da fikk jeg jo skikkelig sår osv.
Så jeg ble så sinna, så jeg heiv ut Øystein og Kjetil og søstra mi, fra leiligheten i Leirfaret, og snakka nesten ikke med dem, på et halvt år.
Og det var litt ergelig, for vi hadde egentlig en bra tone, på den tida, synes jeg.
Men etter den sigarett-stumpinga, i hånda mi, fra Øystein, så var det ikke like bra lengre.
Så det var litt dumt.
Så jeg lot han få en pause, på et halvt år, etter det her, før jeg prata med han igjen.
Det er mulig det ikke var for lang pause.
Det er mulig.
Men men.
Men ihvertfall.
Sånn rundt 1990 og 91, så hang jeg en del sammen med Øystein og Glenn, og spilte biljard og flipper osv., etter jobben, på OBS.
Vi pleide å henge i en biljardhall, på Skårer, som ble eiet av familien til Bengt Rune, fra Rasta, som vi ble kjent med, siden vi hang der, ganske tilfeldig vel.
Men vi pleide å henge på bowlinga, på Metro senteret.
Men så åpna den biljardhallen, så da hang vi der og.
Senere så hang jeg en del med Glenn, på bowlinga på Strømmen Storsenter.
Og vi pleide å være hos meg eller Øystein, å spille poker og black jack, og se på kino, som Øystein hadde på rommet, noe projektor, som han kjøpte billig fra konferansesenteret, på hotellet på Triaden, da dem gikk konkurs, sånn rundt 1990.
Så Øystein var ganske før sin tid, når det gjaldt hjemmekino osv.
Vi pleide også å kjøre til Strømmen å kjøpe pizza.
Eller vi dro på Robsrudjordet grill, og der jobba kusina til Øystein.
Jeg husker ikke hva hu heter.
Øystein var adoptert fra Korea, men kusina hans, som også var naboen, i Markus Thranes Vei, hadde lyst hår, og var ikke adoptert.
Hun jobba på cruise-båt en gang, og likte ikke det, men kom hjem, fordi arbeidsforholdene var så dårlige, sa hu.
Anita, tror jeg kanskje hu het.
Noe sånt.
En gang, så skulle hu vaske klær for meg, sommeren 1990, eller noe, etter at jeg Øystein hadde vært i England.
Da hadde jeg ikke noe sted å bo den sommeren.
For jeg sa opp leiligheten på Abilsø, etter juni måned.
Så den sommeren, 1990, så var jeg i Brighton, hos Øystein på Hanaborg, hos bestemuttern på Sand i Svelvik, hos bestemuttern i Stavern, og jeg tror også, hos onkelen min, i Son.
Før jeg flytta til halvbroren min og dem, høsten 1990 da, og leide et rom hos dem, på Furuset.
Så sparte jeg husleia, hos de folka på Abildsø.
Men hvor tinga mine var i mellomtida, det skal jeg ikke si.
Men jeg solgte vannsenga mi, til Øystein.
Men de andre tinga, husker jeg ikke hvor jeg gjorde av, før jeg flytta.
Men jeg stua dem kanskje inn hos broren min og dem, før ferien.
Noe sånt.
Men men.
En dag, i 1991 eller 1992, eller noe.
Så kjørte jeg og Øystein og Glenn, forbi sentralsykehuset i Akershus.
Det ligger vel i Lørenskog, blir det vel.
Hvis jeg husker riktig.
Jeg hadde ikke lappen, for jeg studerte på datahøyskole.
Så jeg hadde ikke hatt råd til lappen og bil.
Men Glenn hadde vært i en mopedulykke, på 80-tallet, og fikk mye erstatning, fordi han skada beinet, i et kryss, på Skjetten.
Det var noe med vikeplikt, eller noe vel.
Noe sånt.
Så fikk han masse penger.
Så starta han og Øystein spilleautomat-firma.
Og det var jo veldig kult, på den tida.
Med masse Street-fighter spill osv.
Jeg hadde jo studert noen økonomifag osv., på handel og kontor, og datahøyskole.
Så egentlig var det meg og Øystein, som skulle starte automatfirma.
Men det ble ikke noe av.
Men de sa jeg kunne kjøpe aksjer.
Men dem visste at jeg ikke hadde så mye penger, siden jeg studerte, så det var mest kødd.
Men det firma gikk etterhvert nedenom og hjem da.
Så kanskje de hadde tjent på, å hatt en blåruss med på laget.
Det er mulig.
Men sånn er det.
Men tilbake til SIA da.
Vi kjørte forbi der, og da sa dem, at dem hadde måttet spikre igjen vinduene der.
Fordi det var så mange folk som hoppa ut, fra de øverste etasjene i sykehusbygget der.
Det var vel 15 etasjer høyt, eller noe sånt.
Så de måtte spikre igjen vinduene, eller noe, var det vel de sa.
Siden det var så mange som heiv seg ut av vinduene.
Så spurte jeg hvorfor de heiv seg ut av vinduene.
Da svarte de ikke.
Men jeg vet ikke hvor smart det egentlig er å være på sånne sykehus.
Jeg vet ikke hvem som egentlig har kontrollen der.
Det virker egentlig litt for meg, som at undergrunnen har det meste av kontrollen i Norge.
Så å havne på sånn sykehus, og bli tullet med av noe undergrunn.
Det høres ikke så fristende ut.
Så det var kanskje derfor de måtte spikre igjen vinduene.
Siden en del pasienter ble plaget av noe undergrunn.
Hva vet jeg.
Med vennlig hilsen
Erik Ribsskog
-
Google Mail – Oppdatering/Fwd: VS: Ligningsattest.
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Oppdatering/Fwd: VS: Ligningsattest.
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 8:27 PM
To:
Helstad Merethe <merethe.helstad@fmoa.no>
Hei,jeg viser til tidligere korrespondanse, og telefoner, i forbindelse med søknad om Fri Rettshjelp.Nå viser det seg, at familien min, eller noen andre, nok har foretatt noe trygdesvindel, i mitt navn,mens jeg har vært i England.Så nå hoper det seg opp her, med ting som foregår.Så det er kanskje pga. dette, at navnet mitt blir tullet med i Norge, at jeg ikke får noe hjelpfra noen myndigheter, og problemene hoper seg opp.Så nå har jeg ikke råd til å betale for lagerboden min, i Oslo lengre, så nå sliter jeg litt her,må jeg innrømme.Så jeg kunne trengt litt hjelp nå, og ikke bare sånne litt dårlige begrunnede avslag, og litt manglendeforståelse, som jeg synes dere har vist.Med vennlig hilsenErik Ribsskog———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: 2008/9/17Subject: Re: VS: Ligningsattest.
To: "Eieland, Inga Marie" <inga.eieland@skatteetaten.no>Hei,jeg har jobbet i Liverpool, i England, siden august 2005, og har skattet til England.Jeg har bare vært i London, noen ganger, og ikke vært i Norge.Jeg er skrevet ut av psykiatrien i Vestfold, det var bare onkelen min, som jeg prøvde åberolige, han trodde det hadde 'klikka' for meg.Jeg skal sende med en kopi av journalen, hvor man kan se at jeg er skrevet ut.Så her må det ha vært noe trygdesvindel, fra familien min i Norge.For jeg har ikke levert noen selvangivelse, siden 2003.Den for 2004, leverte søstra mi for meg, for hun var så flink med sånn papirarbeid, sa hun.Så hva som har skjedd med ligningene, for 2005 – 2007, det vet ikke jeg, men de har ihvertfall ikke jeg godkjent.Fordi jeg har skattet av all intekt til England, og har ikke hatt så mye tid her, til å kontakteligningsmyndighetene i Norge, før nå i det siste.Men som jeg nevnte, da jeg ringte Skatt Sør, for noen uker siden, så regnet jeg med, at detholdt å betale skatt i England, jeg regnet ikke med, at man måtte betale skatt i to land.Men da kan ikke jeg forstå det på noen annen måte, enn at det burde undersøkes, om detkan være trygdesvindel, eller noe, som er grunnen til at noen har levert selvangivelser i mittnavn, i Norge.For jeg har betalt skatt til England.Jeg skal se om jeg finner noe lønnsoppgave, for den aktuelle perioden.Med vennlig hilsenErik Ribsskog2008/9/17 Eieland, Inga Marie <inga.eieland@skatteetaten.no>
Hei !
Beklager at det har tatt litt lang tid før jeg fant ut av dette, måtte nemlig ha tak i noen på arkivet.
Nå har jeg tatt ut utskrift av likningen din, og det står kr 111.190 i lønn. I følge innlevert selvangivelse, så sier de på arkivet at du har skrevet på at dette er lønn fra psykiatrien i Vestfold. Dette har vi ikke fått lønns- og trekkoppgave på, men har lagt dine egne innberetninger til grunn.
Jeg sender deg i dag utskrift av likningen og håper at dette er nok informasjon.
Med hilsen
Inga Marie Eieland
Konsulent, VeiledningSkatt sør
GrimstadBesøksadresse: Televeien 1, 4879 Grimstad
Postadresse: Postboks 2412, 3104 Tønsberg
Telefon: 37 25 74 60
Telefax: 33 74 12 00Sentralbord: 800 80 000
Fra: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sendt: 11. september 2008 05:42
Til: Skatt sør – fellespost
Emne: Ligningsattest.Hei,
jeg viser til telefonsamtale, i begynnelsen av måneden, hvor jeg ringte om jeg kunne få
tilsendt en kopi av ligningsattesten min, fra 2006, siden jeg har skattet til Storbritannia,
det året, og lurer litt på hva inntektene, som er ført opp meg, for dette året, stammer fra.
Håper dette er i orden!
Med vennlig hilsen
Erik RibsskogFødt:
Adresse:
Flat 35 Leather Lane
Liverpool
Merseyside
GB-L2 2AE
Storbritannia
3 attachments scan0015.jpg
356Kscan0109.JPG
82KV.gif
283K
-
Jeg tror de som har tatt trygdesvindel på meg, mens jeg har vært i England.
Det tror jeg er onkel Martin, søstra mi Pia, tante Ellen, og han legen i Helgeroa, muligens.
Og hvem vet.
Jo, naboen til Martin, Thor, han er en kriminell, som dyrker marijuana osv., på hytta si, i Kvelde der.
Og kameraten hans, Trond, som var dørvakt, på Fritzøe Brygge.
Jeg mistenker at de kan være innvolvert.
Om kusina mi Rahel, og broren min Axel er innvolvert, det veit jeg ikke.
Jeg kan jo ikke si det her sikkert, men noe rart er det nok.
Og hun dama, eller ex-dama til Martin, Grethe Ingebrigtsen, som nå bor i Østfold.
Jeg vet ikke hvilken rolle hun har i det her.
Vi får se.
De vil jo ikke engang sende meg papirene fra jobb og skole, som ligger i kofferten min, på gården til Martin.
Og ikke klærna mine, eller noe.
Så sånn er det.
Med vennlig hilsen
Erik Ribsskog
-
Nå ringte jeg tante Ellen, i Stavern, men hun var ikke hjemme.
Så ringte jeg bestemor Ingeborg, i Nevlunghavn, og da svarte tante Ellen.
Det var litt rart.
Men men.
Tante Ellen, trodde ikke at noen kunne ha levert selvangivelser i mitt navn.
Og ble litt forrvirret av det her, at jeg nevnte både England og Norge.
Det forstod hun ikke helt.
Hun trodde ikke at noen kunne ha levert selvangivelser i mitt navn i Norge, siden folk såvidt ikke gadd å levere sine egne selvangivelser.
Det er greit, nå er jo jeg i utlandet, så har jeg egentlig nok å stri med her, om jeg ikke skal få selvangivelsene mine tullet med i Norge også.
Men jeg spurte hvorfor hun svarte telefonen til bestemor.
Det var fordi hun satt nærmest.
Så fikk jeg etterhvert snakke med bestemor.
Og hun hadde hatt maleriutstilling, i det gamle biblioteket, i Nevlunghavn, og solgt masse malerier.
Jeg sa jeg hadde funnet uniformen, til morfaren hennes, generalen Anders Gjedde Nyholm, på internett.
Og det trodde hun ikke noe på.
Så jeg måtte si at jeg skulle prøve å få printet ut det, og sende det i posten.
Vi får se.
Det er ikke tull, jeg skal finne linken.
Med vennlig hilsen
Erik Ribsskog
PS.
Her er linken til det debattforumet:
http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?f=52&t=112310&st=0&sk=t&sd=a&start=15
-
Jeg skrev jo om det igår, at en i klassen min, fra tredje klasse, og helt til andre klasse på videregående, på handel og kontor, Linda Moen.
Hun gikk jeg altså i klasse med, i ni år.
Det er mulig hun gikk i parallellklassen, første året på videregående.
I såfall var det åtte år, som jeg gikk i samme klasse som henne.
Men i løpet av de årene, så prata jeg aldri ordentlig med henne, hun bare gliste stygt, hver gang det var noe.
Hun var litt ufordragelig, vil jeg si.
Så hun ble jeg aldri på godfot med, eller hva man skal kalle det.
Så det var litt merkelig for meg, hver gang hun dukket opp, og ble kjørt av faren sin, for å hente sagflis til kaninen sin, i siloen, som stod mellom Strømm Trevare, firmaet til fattern, og huset til bestemora mi, hvor jeg spiste middag hver dag etter skolen.
Etter middag, så pleide jeg å slappe av, og lese avisene.
Aftenposten, Drammens Tidende, Svelvik-Nytt.
Og også Donald og Fantomet og sånn, avhengig av hvor gammel jeg var, jeg spiste middag der i flere år.
Og også masse annet lesestoff osv.
Hvis ikke jeg skulle sende noe brev eller noe, fra kontoret der da.
Eller ringe noen om noe.
Jeg fikk lov å gjøre som jeg ville der.
Se på TV, men det var bare NRK, så etter middagen, så var det bare prøvebilde, stort sett.
Så sånn var det.
Før ettermiddagsnytt begynte, klokken 17.55.
Så sånn var det.
Men faren til Linda, Leif Moen.
Han var trener på fotballlaget, på Berger IL, det første året.
Før Skjellsbekk og faren til Anders i klassen over, tok over.
Røkås het vel dem.
De bodde i huset, som jeg og fattern og muttern og søstra mi, bodde i.
I Toppen 4.
Før muttern, ifølge fattern, sa at det bodde bare arbeiderfolk på Bergeråsen, og dro med meg og søstra mi, til Larvik, i 1973.
Eller hvordan det kan ha vært.
I 1979, så var jeg i hvertfall tilbake på Bergeråsen, nå i Hellinga 7B, og vi hadde vel han Leif Moen som trener, rundt 1980, eller 1981, eller noe.
Og da var også Linda med, sammen med Lene Andersen, og spillte fotball, en sesong.
Men det ble vel mest bare tull, tror jeg.
Selv om jeg husker et lag fra Oslo.
I noe cup.
Manglerud Star.
Smågutt-laget, eller noe, på 80-tallet.
De spilte vi mot i en cup, på Berger.
Og da hadde de en jente på laget.
Så var det noen som hadde kikka inn i garderoben dems etter kampen.
Og da sa dem, at hun jenta dusja sammen med gutta.
Men det gjorde ikke Linda Moen og Lene Andersen.
Så frigjorte var vi ikke på Berger.
Så sånn var det.
De var vel bare med på noen treninger tror jeg, og ikke noen kamper, hvis jeg husker riktig.
Men men.
Men selv om jeg gikk veldig dårlig overens med hun Linda Moen, på skolen.
Så spurte jeg sikkert fattern, om det var nødvendig at hu kom der og henta sagflis.
Ja, dem hadde pleid å gjort det sånn da, at folk fikk hente sagflis gratis osv.
Og han Leif Moen, eller Leiv Moen, han var jo tremenningen til fattern.
Hvis ikke det var mora til Linda Moen som var det.
Linda Moen var i hvertfall firemenningen min, sa dem.
Men det tror jeg ikke hun Linda Moen visste.
Og farmora mi, hun var sånn, at hu var mye på kjøkkenet osv.
Og når det kom en bil, så fløy hu til vinduet.
Og da sa hu sånn som, at nå er hu dattra til Moen her, for å hente sagflis til kanin sin igjen.
Sånne ting.
Og jeg ville jo ikke lage noe spetakkel, av det her uvennskapet, eller hva man skal kalle det, med Linda Moen.
Så da satt jeg bare å leste avisa osv., når hu var der.
Det var jo folk på verkstedet der, og i huset, hele tida, så det var ikke så spesiellt at hu dukka opp.
Men jeg lot hu bare stå i siloen der i fred da, jeg så kanskje på hu, i vinduet en gang, mens hun holdt på å grave i flisa der.
Men jeg ville liksom ikke begynne å krangle med henne der.
For selv om vi var uvenner på skolen, så var jo faren kjent med faren min, så da kunne ikke jeg lage noe spetakkel da, tenkte jeg.
Så da lot jeg henne være i fred, selv om jeg ikke likte hu.
Men hvis fattern ikke hadde kjent foreldra hennes, da hadde jeg nok gått ut, og spurt hva hun dreiv med, siden hun dreiv å rappa flis i siloen til verkstedet til fattern.
Men faren hennes var med, så da kunne jeg ikke gjøre det.
Så sånn var det.
Med vennlig hilsen
Erik Ribsskog