johncons
  • Nå ringte jeg å pratet med Thor Gjermund Eriksen, i A-Pressen.

    Han var på ferie, men han svarte likevel, jeg ble satt over fra A-Pressens sentralbord.

    Han mente, at dette var en sak, som han ikke kunne gjøre noe med.

    Det var en klage på Stavrum, i Nettavisen, at han ikke hadde svar på e-post osv.

    Han skulle ta det med Stavrum sa han, at jeg ikke fikk svar.

    Jeg forklarte, at det saken gikk på, var trakassering. (På Veggavisen).

    Dette svarte jo ikke Stavrum på, klagene på trakassering.

    Så han Eriksen, mente, at dette var redaksjonelt da.

    Det mener jeg er tøys. (Jeg mener at trakassering ikke har noe med journalistikk å gjøre).

    Men han kunne ikke gjøre noe med det her, mente han.

    Så spurte jeg hvem Stavrums overordnede var, og det var han Thor Gjermund Eriksen, mente han.

    Så jeg lurte på om det var Pressens Faglige Utvalg, som jeg måtte ta det med, denne trakasseringen.

    Og det sa han, at det fikk jeg gjøre, hvis jeg mente det var riktig.

    Jeg sa at jeg skulle tenke mer på det her, hvordan jeg skulle gå frem, om jeg skulle ta det med pressens faglige utvalg, eller ikke.

    Så beklagde jeg at jeg forstyrret i ferie osv.

    Det er jo ikke så kult, når man blir forstyrret i ferie, det skjønner man.

    Men jeg får tenke gjennom hva jeg skal gjøre da.

    Vi får se.







  • Google Mail – Complaint







    Google Mail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    Complaint





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 11:11 AM





    To:

    Sarah Thompson <Sarah.Thompson@legalservices.gov.uk>



    Hi,

     

    that's right, I did not recieve legal aid, since Morecrofts, said that they didn't participate, in the legal aid

    programme.

    (They said this about a month after the initial meeting, like explained in the complaint).

     

    However, the Law Society, if I remember right, told me, that if I wanted to complain, about unprofessional

    conduct, from law-firms, in connection with the Duty Solicitor programme, then I should contact the LSC,

    I was told.

     

    So that was why I was contacting your offices, earlier this year, I think it was.

     

    So the complaint wasn't really in regards to the Legal Aid Programme, it was to do with law-firms, and 

    unproffesional conduct etc., from them (Morecrofts and EAD), in connection with the Duty Solicitor Programme.

    Yours sincerely,

     


    Erik Ribsskog

     


    On 7/7/08, Sarah Thompson <Sarah.Thompson@legalservices.gov.uk> wrote:

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    Mrs Dillon forwarded your complaint to me as I am the Account Manager
    for Morecrofts. I have investigated your complaint and find that you did

    not received Legal Aid and did not become a client of Morecrofts.
    Therefore, I am unable to take your complaint any further.

    Kind regards

    Sarah Thompson

    Account Manager

    >>> "Erik Ribsskog" <eribsskog@gmail.com> 02/07/2008 20:04 >>>

    Hi,

    there has been a lot going on regarding this case.

    I was wondering, is this e-mail to do with the e-mail I sent to Fiona
    Dillon
    at the LSC,
    earlier this week?

    Thanks in advance for the reply!

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On 7/2/08, Sarah Thompson <Sarah.Thompson@legalservices.gov.uk> wrote:
    >
    > Dear Mr Ribsskog

    >
    > I have investigated your complaint and found that you did not
    receive
    > advice funded by the Legal Services Commission. Therefore, I am
    unable
    > to to investigate the matter further as it is not a Legal Services

    > Commission matter. It also seems from the correspondence that this
    > matter is also outside the Law Society's jurisdiction. Therefore,  I
    > cannot see how you can progress this complaint further.
    >

    > Kind regards
    >
    > Sarah Thompson
    >
    > Account Manager
    >
    >
    >
    ************************************************************************************
    > Disclaimer
    >

    > This e-mail (and any attachment(s)) is private and intended solely
    for the
    > use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Its
    unauthorised
    > use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not

    the
    > intended recipient please destroy all copies and inform the sender by
    return
    > e-mail.
    >
    > Internet e-mail is not a secure medium, as messages can be
    intercepted and
    > read by someone else. Please bear this in mind when deciding whether

    to send
    > information by e-mail. Postal addresses for the Legal Services
    Commission
    > are available from
    > http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/aboutus/our_regional_network.asp

    >
    > The Legal Services Commission reserves the right to monitor, record
    and
    > retain any incoming and outgoing e-mails for security reasons and
    for
    > monitoring internal compliance with the Legal Services Commission

    policy on
    > staff use. E-mail monitoring and/or blocking software may be used and
    e-mail
    > content may be read. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not
    broken
    > when writing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. No contracts

    can be
    > entered into on our behalf by e-mail.
    >
    > Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do
    not
    > necessarily represent those of the Legal Services Commission.
    >

    > The Legal Services Commission checks all e-mails and attachments for
    known
    > viruses, however, you are advised that you open any attachments at
    your own
    > risk.
    >
    >
    ************************************************************************************

    >
    >




  • Charity conman Peter Lyon gets banned from running companies

    By Andrew Penman on Jul 3, 08 10:55 AM in Charity

    The charity conman we’ve branded repulsive has been banned from acting as a company director for 11 years.


    Peter Lyon ran Barrington House Publishing Corp, which persuaded businesses into advertising on wallplanners by claiming that money raised would help children’s charities.

    It raked in £3.5million but just £100,000 – less than three per cent – went to good causes.

    Lyon, 45, who recently tried to sell his huge detached house in Halsall, Lancs, repeated the scam at Hamilton Forbes Ltd and Price Chamberlain Ltd.

    All three were put into compulsory liquidation by the High Court.

    Besides personally pocketing £600,000 the worm also acted as a director while a bankrupt.

    The woman who sat on his right hand, 39-year-old Lorraine Wells, of Liverpool, has been banned from the boardroom for eight years.

    (2) comments so far add yours here

    Share:

    Older/Newer

    « Elaine Douglas gets company ban for Galaxy Lifestyles scam | We save money for Shopper Discounts victims »

    2 Comments

    Erik Ribbskog said:

    Mr Lyon is pictured there leaving the Halsall offices of CHESTNUT HOUSE PUBLISHING.

    Chestnut House is a publishing company that publish Charity Wall Planners and sell advertising upon said planners. Just like Barrington House and Hamilton Forbes did.

    Chestnut House is run by Lisa Colford (former employee of Mr Lyons at Barrington House and
    Hamilton Forbes).

    Several other former employees and ‘friends’ of My Lyon also work at CHESTNUT HOUSE

    Mr Lyon lived/lives in Halsall

    Im not making any assumption as I dont want to incur the wrath of ‘The Law’ (though as a lady once told me – ‘its not libel if its true’). But these coincidences are just piling up arent they?

    Hello Mr P and Mr S – a fine job you are being. Feel free to visit Ormskirk a little town in the middle of ‘Knowhere’ and say hi 🙂

    July 3, 2008 6:04 PM

    Her in Doors said:

    Peter Lyon does look like he’s got the weight of the world on his shoulders, doesn’t he? HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!

    July 3, 2008 6:30 PM

    Leave a comment

    Top of Form

    Name

    Email Address

    URL

    Remember personal info?

    Comments

    Captcha:


    Type the characters you see in the picture above.

    Bottom of Form

    When I was working, at Bertelsmann Arvato Services Ltd’s Microsoft Scandinavian Product Activation, in 2005 and 2006, they spellt my name, Erik Ribbskog.

    (There there were a lot of problems, with illigal managment methods, and organised harassment, and more, by the way).

    When I searchen on Google now, I found this article, and that someone had been using my name, the way Arvato spellt it.

    So I was just wondering what this is about, since I don’t really think anyone else living in Britain, or anywhere else, have the same name as me.

    So I thought this was a bit strange maybe.

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    PS.

    Here is a link where it is explained more about the problems at Arvato:

    https://johncons-blogg.net/search/label/Arvato-case

    http://blogs.mirror.co.uk/investigations/2008/07/charity-conman-peter-lyon-gets.html







  • Google Mail – Complaint about the Norwegian Amnesty.







    Google Mail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    Complaint about the Norwegian Amnesty.





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 10:00 AM





    To:

    "MByler@amnesty.org" <MByler@amnesty.org>



    Hi,

     

    if I felt it was impolite, to legitimise mafia?

     

    I think your organisation is a joke!

     

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

     


    On 7/7/08, MByler@amnesty.org <MByler@amnesty.org> wrote:

    Dear Mr. Ribsskog,

    I am sorry to hear that you have not had a positive experience with Amnesty International in relation to your concerns.  

    I need to affirm, however, that the response that was given to you  by the Director of AI Norway is correct, and that there is nothing that AI can do to support you in this instance.  I am sorry that you felt this was impolite.

    Best wishes,

    Marjory M. Byler
    Senior Director, International Mobilization
    Amnesty International

    ———- Forwarded message ———-

    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Date: Jun 18, 2008 1:38 PM
    Subject: Complaint about the Norwegian Amnesty.
    To:
    amnestyis@amnesty.org

    Hi,
     
    I called your offices today, and explained that I had been having some problems with the
    Norwegian Amnesty, and if it was possible for me to send an e-mail to you explaining about
    this, and then I was given your e-mail address.

     
    The problems, are regarding that I was in contact with the General Secretary, for the Norwegian
    Amnesty, Mr. Jegenes, earlier today.
     
    It was a bit of problem with the communiction in this phone-call.

     
    So I thought I'd try to write you an explanation, or complaint, about this.
     
    I found that Mr. Jegenes, was a bit impolite, I think I have to say, since he interupted me, when
    I started explaining why I had contacted him and Amnesty, and about the problems with the earlier

    contact, which I had escalated to the General Secretary.
     
    Then, after he had interupted me, and said quite a few things, then he didn't want to let me finish
    my explanation, that I had prepared, before the call.

     
    He just hang up.
     
    I thought this was a bit inpolite.
     
    Further, in the call, when he interupted me, he said that their representative, was right in declining
    to help me, since Amnesty couldn't investigate organised crime, like he said.

     
    But, I wanted them, to help me with the Government.

    The Government, aren't answering my correspondence, and also the Sivilombudsman in Norway,
    which Amnesty UK, adviced me to contact, is also, like the Goverment, playing games with me,

    I think one have to say.

    This is what I wanted Amnesty to help with, to get the Government to treat me, in accordance to
    my rights, and not play games with me.

    But the General Secretary, said that Amnesty would have had to investigate organised crime,

    to help me.

    This is not right, they could just have looked at the correspondance, between me and the
    Government, and then they could have seen that the Government are playing games with me.
     
    Since I think this is the real problem, that leads to what I'd say is torture and inhumane

    treatment from the Government, that they are playing games with me, and my life, and that
    they have no respect for my rights.
     
    And this leads to the torture, like I think I have to call it, and inhumanity, in my situation.

    I think I have to hold the Government in Norway, since I am a Norwegian citizen, responsible
    for this, since they haven't got the right, to keep things in soceity, like how the situation is
    with 'mafia', like I've heard I've been followed by, secret.

     
    And they are also not answering my corresponedence etc, with I'd say means that they are
    playing games with me.

    Further, Mr. Jegenes, also said, when he interupted me, that 'mafia/organised criminals

    wouldn't just single out and individual for following', when he asked me, why I was being
    followed, and I answered that I couldn't say exactly why.
     
    These things, like criminal organisations/mafias agenda, is not something that is open in

    society, and for him, to demand, that I needed to know this, I think is unreasonable.
     
    Mr. Jegenes, is infact, legitimising mafia, in society, by saying, that their agenda, is
    logical and reasonable.

    Mafia, is not a legitimate part of society, you can't find anything in eg. the Norwegian

    constitution, that says that mafia, is legit.

    I think it seems like Mr. Jegenes, is trying to legitimise mafia, and mafia/orginised criminal
    organisations agenda in society, by claiming, that they are acting reasonable and logical.

     
    I object strongly to this legitimisation of mafia/organised crime, by Mr. Jegenes.
     
    Further, Mr. Jegenes, also said, that he thought, that the Norwegian Government, thought
    that, what I had overheard, that I was followed by 'the mafia', and that I was being used as

    a 'target-guy', by the Government, must have been something I had imagined.
     
    So Mr. Jegenes, is saying what he thinks is more right, than what I think.
     
    He isn't taking what I'm saing in good faith, and neighter is the Government.

     
    There is no declared sivil war, in Norway, at the moment, so there is no reason, for why,
    Mr. Jegenes (and the Norwegian Goverment), shouldn't take what is being said from a
    fellow country-man, in good faith.

     
    So this I would like to complain about, I think it's inpolite of Mr. Jegenes, to treat a fellow
    country-man, in this way.
     
    This is what I wanted to contact you and explain about.

    I hope that you have the time to have a look at this!

     
    I'll also add a link, to my blog, where I've written a short summary, of the phone-call with
    the General Secretary today, and also posted the notes from the call, and the notes that
    I had written, to prepare myself, before I called, but which the General Secretay, wouldn't

    let me finish read/explain about.
     
    (Although this blog-post is in Norwegian, but I add the link anyway, just for to explain that
    I got a bit upset, and posted the notes etc. on my blog, at once after the call, since I though

    I was being treated a bit inpolite.).
     
    I hope this is alright!
     
    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog
     
    PS.
     
    Here is the link to mentioned post, on my blog:
     

    http://johncons-mirror.blogspot.com/2008/06/kort-referat-fra-telefonsamtale-med.html

     

    Working to protect human rights worldwide
    
    DISCLAIMER
    Internet communications are not secure and therefore Amnesty International Ltd does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message. If you are not the intended recipient you must not disclose or rely on the information in this e-mail. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Amnesty International Ltd unless specifically stated. Electronic communications including email might be monitored by Amnesty International Ltd. for operational or business reasons.
    This message has been scanned for viruses by Postini.
    www.postini.com













  • Google Mail – Comlaint







    Google Mail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    Comlaint





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 9:50 AM





    To:

    "SCT@amnesty.org.uk" <sct@amnesty.org.uk>



    Hi,

     

    I called your offices today, regarding, that I haven't recieved an answer to the

    e-mails ,(regarding problems with the Goverment and human rights), I sent your

    representative Liliann Okuyama, in April.

    Your receptionist, Hillary, said that I should send the e-mail again, but since I

    have already sent the mentioned e-mail twice, then I asked if I could possibly

    get the name and contact-details, for Lilliann Okuyamas line-manager.

     

    But your receptionist, refused, to give me the name of the manager.

    And I thing this is a bit strange, for organisations, to not let people complain,

    on representatives.

    So I though I'd try to send this e-mail, and complain about Okuyama not answering

    the e-mails, and the receptionist, not letting me speak with her manager.

    And that maybe someone could have a look at my e-mail.

    Hope this is alright!

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog







  • Da jeg begynte å studere igjen, i 2002, så var det i samråd med fastlegen min.

    Jeg var veldig overarbeidet, etter mange års nesten slavearbeid, på luselønn, må man vel nesten si, i Rimi, så jeg, ville gjerne ha en ny karriære da, og bli fri fra Rimi åket, må jeg vel nesten kalle det.

    Så da tror jeg han legen synes det var en bra ide, at jeg begynte å studere igjen osv.

    Søstra mi, hadde fortalt meg, at hun hadde noen venninner, som hadde fått ny utdannelse, på atføring osv., av noe lege da.

    Men selv om jeg var veldig sliten og overarbeidet, fra Rimi, så klarte jeg ikke å få meg til å tigge legen om noe sånt.

    Men jeg lagde en plan da, mens jeg var sykmeldt, at jeg kunne begynne å studere igjen, fra høsten.

    Og få datautdannelsen min i orden.

    Jeg hadde jo mange godkjente fag fra datahøyskole fra før, fra begynnelsen av 90-tallet, så da kunne jeg, roe ned litt, og også ha litt fritid osv., og komme meg igjen fra denne slavedriften, fra Rimi, vil jeg kalle det.

    Og det husker jeg, at legen var enig i, at det hørtes fornuftig ut osv.

    Så da ble det sånn.

    Men jeg jobbet noen måneder på våren, på Rimi Langhus, før jeg sluttet.

    Og om sommeren, så jobbet jeg på Rimi Bjørndal, når Irene hadde ferie.

    Og da dro han ambulerende der, til Trondheim, så da var jeg alene om å lede Rimi Bjørndal, noen uker, sommeren 2002, mens Irene hadde ferie da.

    Så begynte jeg å studere.

    Men sånn som jeg har skjønt det nå, så har politiet, eller noe sånt, torpedert studie-planene mine, og brukt meg som noe ‘target-guy’, eller ‘drone’, mot noe mafia, eller hvem vet hva, og har ødelagt studie-planene mine.

    For jeg ville da gått ut fra datahøyskole, eller HiO da, sommeren 2005, med en bachelor informatikk.

    Og da var arbeidsmarkedet veldig bra for folk med slik utdannelse.

    Og da ville jeg nok ha fått en veldig bra jobb.

    Men istedet så har politiet, eller hvem det er, bare tulla med meg, og risikert livet mitt, eller prøvd å drepe meg, eller hva de har.

    Jeg mener at hvis de skal tulle sånn med folk, så må det være frivillig og avtalt i såfall.

    Man kan ikke bare ta en person, mot den personens vilje, og tulle rundt med den, og ødelegge livet, og bruke som ‘target guy’ og ‘drone’, og det som er.

    Det er fascistisk, og usivilisert og inhumant, mener jeg.

    Så om politiet har tatt myteri, og nå er en gjeng med fascister, som ingen har kontroll på.

    Hva vet jeg.

    Det er mulig.

    Jeg ville i hvertfall ikke sett helt bort fra det.

    Med vennlig hilsen

    Erik Ribsskog