johncons
  • Jeg har jo skrevet om, at jeg ble behandlet som dritt, av distriktsjef Neteland, da jeg jobbet som butikksjef, på Rimi Kalbakken, i år 2000/01.

    Hun satt meg ikke opp i lønn, enda jeg gikk over til en dobbelt så stor butikk.

    Hun hadde ikke engang noe møte med meg, før jeg begynte der.

    Og hun detaljstyrte meg, jeg fikk ikke lov å bruke teipen i hylla, jeg måtte bruke teipen fra binders/Tybring Gjedde, enda den var i dispenser, så den kunne man ikke ha i lomma f.eks, for å teipe opp plakater, som man gikk forbi.

    Så det var ikke høyt under taket, som folk sier.

    Og hun hørte på han assistenten min, Kjetil Prestegården, eller Prestegarden, eller noe sånt.

    Så jeg hadde egentlig ikke noe jeg skulle sagt, for Anne Neteland, hun hørte bare på Kjetil Prestegarden, for hun kjente han fra før, som hun sa.

    Men hun kjente ikke meg.

    Så jeg ble etterhvert mer som en vanlig ansatt der.

    Men det var jeg som hadde ansvaret for resultatene.

    Så sånn var det.

    Så det funka så dårlig der, så jeg gikk etterhvert med på, å begynne som butikksjef, på Rimi Langhus, i distriktet til Anne Kathrine Skodvin, i stedet.

    Nå tenkte jeg på det her Illuminati-greiene.

    På et personalmøte, var det vel, på Rimi Kalbakken.

    Så ble det tatt opp dette, at assistenten, Kjetil Prestegarden, han hadde en vane, å sitte inne på kontoret, mens hun blonde jenta, ca. 20 år, kassamedarbeider Cecilie.

    Slank, pen.

    Jeg tror hun muligens kan ha hatt anoreksia, for hun var så glad når hu skulle til McDonalds en gang.

    Det var liksom en stor begivenhet, husker jeg.

    Men hun var ikke så værst.

    Jeg husker vi var på Stena Saga, en tur som Kjetil hadde satt igang vel.

    Han og han ambulerende vel.

    Så virka det som om alle gangsterne i Oslo, var med på båtturen.

    Så kjøpte jeg en øl da.

    Så stod Cecilie der og bestilte.

    Så var det en bølle, må man vel si.

    Som chatta opp Cecilie, og spurte henne hvem jeg var.

    Så sa hun at jeg var sjefen hennes.

    Vi hadde vel prata sammen litt, mens vi venta på å få service i baren på danskebåten.

    Så spurte han karen, i en truende tone mot meg, om hvordan jeg var som sjef, som om jeg hadde gjort noe galt osv., som at han hadde tenkt å angripe meg, enda jeg hadde ikke gjort noe i det hele tatt.

    Så han var nok en sånn gatebølle, vil jeg si.

    Så sa Cecilie, at Erik er snill, eller grei, eller noe.

    Så hun hjalp meg ut av den situasjonen.

    Jeg ble ikke så kjent med henne, men hun var i hvertfall grei da.

    Men da de andre jentene, tok opp det, med at Kjetil pleide å sitte i mørke, inne på kontoret, på Rimi Kalbakken, når Cecilie jobba.

    Hun satt alltid i kassa nærmest kontoret.

    Så hvis lyset var av, så så man henne veldig godt da.

    En gang, så gikk jeg inn på kontoret, og da satt Kjetil der, i mørke, og så på Cecilie.

    Jeg var mest opptatt av butikkdrift, og jeg hadde ikke tid å sitte på kontoret, og se på Cecilie.

    Det hadde jeg ikke turt, eller villet heller, for det hadde bare blitt problemer, og det synes jeg virka veldig useriøst.

    Jeg synes ikke man bare skal sitte på kontoret og glane på hun pene kassadama, sånn som han Kjetil gjorde.

    Men hun Cecilie, sa på det møte, at hun var ‘blond’, så hun likte det, det gjorde ikke henne noe, om Kjetil satt der i mørke, og glante på henne.

    Men nå, fikk jeg noe flashback, til den her episoden.

    Det møte.

    Og lyset var alltid av på kontoret.

    Jeg skrudde det alltid på.

    Jeg tok Kjetil på fersken en gang, at han satt å så på Cecilie.

    Og da spurte jeg hvorfor lyset var av.

    Og da svarte ikke Kjetil.

    Han ble vel rød i trynet, eller i hvertfall flau og forlegen, og svar skyldig.

    Så skrudde jeg på lyset da.

    Men når jeg fikk flashback nå, så skjønner jeg ikke noe annet, enn at han må ha hatt noe rituale, å sitte inne på kontoret der i mørke, og da antagelig ta en ‘stille Anders’, mens han så på hun pene blonde kassadama Cecilie da.

    Dette her var vel etter at Kjetil kom hjem fra ferien i Israel, som han dro på med en kamerat plutselig, høsten 2000, vil jeg tippe.

    Hun Anne Neteland, reagerte veldig da, da jeg fortalte, at Kjetil dro på ferie til Israel.

    Men hun ville ikke forklare meg, hvorfor hun reagerte så sterkt på det.

    Hun ble litt stum.

    Men både med den ronkinga på kontoret, til han Kjetil Prestegarden.

    Og det at Prestegarden dro til Israel.

    Og det at hun Neteland, ikke ville forklare hvorfor hun reagerte så mye på det.

    Og det at hun Cecilie, sa at hun var blond, så hun likte å bli kikka på sånn, fra det mørke kontoret.

    Og lagde et poeng av ‘jeg er blond’, så da var det helt greit.

    Dette er nok noe Illuminti-greier, og at det er krig mot blonde.

    Og at de lyshårede, er ‘ham’, folkeslaget som var slaver i gamle testamentet, eller Talmud, eller hvor det var.

    I jødenes skrifter da.

    Ham de var dømt til å være slaver og horer og sånn da, mener jeg det var.

    Og nordmenn, er nok en av ‘the lost tribes of Israel’.

    En av de nordlige stammene.

    Vi hørte jo at Odin og de, er basert på virkelige høvdinger, som vandret fra Svartehavs-området, til Skandinavia.

    Og Svartehavs-området, det er nok dit som de ‘lost tribes of Israel dro’.

    Så at vi har en slik jødisk verdenkonspirasjon, som det har blitt skrevet litt om, eller i hvertfall såvidt nevn om, i avisene, fra tid til annen.

    Og at dette går ut på, å kontrollere de blonde, som er ‘ham’ da, det slavefolket, fra bibelen, eller Talmud.

    Jeg tror det er dette, som den ronkinga til Kjetil Prestegarden, og den stumme reaksjonen til Anne Neteland, på Kjetils Israel-tur, og den reservasjonsløse aksepteringen fra hun kassadama Cecilie, at hun var blond, så da hadde ikke hun noe å si mot, at Kjetil satt i mørke på kontoret, og ronka mens han så på henne.

    Sånn som jeg skjønner det nå.

    Og det var nok derfor jeg ble behandla så dårlig der, når jeg faktisk ville lede butikken, og ikke bare jobbe meg inn i koma, som en slave, som Kjetil presset på for at Anne skulle beordre meg til å gjøre, må jeg vel si.

    Så jeg synes mer og mer peker i den retningen, at det er en krig mot blonde, fra jødene, fordi de nordiske er ‘ham’, fra Talmud da.

    Så det er nok derfor jeg ikke får rettighetene mine, fra noen myndigheter, hverken i Norge eller Storbritannia.

    Fordi dette jødiske verdenskonspirasjons-greiene, har kommet så langt, at det har grodd inn i politiet og myndighetene, og at de nok legger hindringer i veien, for at folk, som er ‘ham’, eller ‘goy’, eller hva man er, ikke skal få kontroll.

    Sånn virker det i hvertfall for meg, så da skriver jeg om det her.

    Så kanskje folk som eventuellt leser det her, kan ha det i bakhodet i hvertfall, så kan dem kanskje se om det er mer som stemmer, med det jeg skriver her.

    Vi får se.

    Med vennlig hilsen

    Erik Ribsskog







  • Google Mail – To the Minister of Justice/Fwd: Our ref: TO08/2153







    Google Mail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    To the Minister of Justice/Fwd: Our ref: TO08/2153





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 1:47 PM





    To:

    general.queries@justice.gsi.gov.uk



    Hi,

     

    I've tried to escalate a complaint, but it doesn't seem like your representative is answering, to his

    correspondence.

     

    And I also thought that the original complaint, wasn't answered that well, by another of your

    representatives.

    So it seems to me, that there are a lot of problems in the Ministry, so I thought it would be

    best, to send it to the top of the Ministry, so that you could have the chance to have a look

    at these problems, and to get these problems sorted, so that I maybe could get a second

    opinion, from the right person in your Ministry, to the original complaint.

    Hope this is alright!

     

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 2:42 PM

    Subject: Fwd: Our ref: TO08/2153
    To: jan.farenden@justice.gsi.gov.uk

    Hi,

     

    I can't see that I've recieved an answer to this e-mail yet, so I'm sending it again.

     

    Yours sincerely,

     


    Erik Ribsskog


    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Date: Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 9:31 AM
    Subject: Fwd: Our ref: TO08/2153
    To: jan.farenden@justice.gsi.gov.uk

    Hi,

     

    I called the Ministry of Justice today, and I got your e-mail address, from the clerk there.

     

    The reason that I'm sending you this e-mail, is that I was wondering, who it is, that one

    should contact, if one are having problems with the IPCC.

     

    Since they are not answering my e-mails, and I've already been in contact, with the

    complaints-manager there, so I think I've escalated it, as far as it's possible to

    escalate, at the IPCC.

    So I was wondering, if it isn't the Ministry of Justice, that one should contact, if the

    IPCC, are having problems in the way, that they aren't answering e-mails etc.

     

    Thanks in advance for any help regarding this!

     

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-

    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: Jun 30, 2008 7:23 PM

    Subject: Re: Our ref: TO08/2153

    To: "Holmes, Ryan" <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk>

     

    Hi,

     

    thank you very much for your answer!

     

    I think that the IPCC, probably recieves founding from the Government.

    And, I think, that if the IPCC, don't answer their e-mails etc, then this is a matter, for the Ministry,

    who are administratively in charge of the IPCC.

     

    Which I think must be the Ministry of Justice.

     

    I don't think the Ministry of Justice, can't pretend that they aren't in charge of the Police, like

    you are trying now.

    So, I write this, mostly, to put it on my blog, and then I'll think further, on how to go forward with this.

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

     


    On 6/30/08, Holmes, Ryan <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    Thank you for your email reply of 23 June.

    While I am sorry to read of your ongoing concerns, I am afraid there is little useful information I can add to the previous correspondence that you have received from this Department.

    As previously explained, if you choose to further your concerns regarding your complaint with the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC), you must address the matter to the IPCC directly. Similarly, the Ministry of Justice is unable to comment on or give advice on how to escalate your case with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) or the American Embassy. I can only confirm that the points you have raised have been thoroughly considered and that the Department has been as helpful as possible in answering your concerns.

    I am sorry that I am unable to be of more help, but I hope you can appreciate for the reasons given above that the Department is unable to intervene in your case. Hence, any further correspondence sent that addresses the same points will be placed on file and not responded to.

    Yours sincerely,

    Ryan Holmes

    Legal Services Regulation and Redress Division

    —–Original Message—–
    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
    Sent: 23 June 2008 14:20

    To: Holmes, Ryan
    Subject: Re: Our ref: TO08/2153

    Hi,

     

    I've already been in contact with the Complaints Manager at the IPCC, but this hasn't resovled the problems.

    I suspect could be some corruption involved there, because something is obviouslly wrong there in my opinion.

     

    Also I wondering a bit on how to escalate the case I've been in contact with the FBI, or the American Embassy,

    about.

     

    Also, I've been in contact with the Norwegian equivalent, of the IPCC, that's Spesialenheten, regarding another,

    but linked, matter.

     

    And they sort under the Norwegian Ministry of Justice.

    So, I think that the IPCC are sorting under the British Ministy of Justice(?)

     

    If not, who should they then be sorting under?

     

    Sorry if I'm asking stupid questions.

     

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

     

    On 6/23/08, Holmes, Ryan <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:


    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    Thank you for your email reply of 19 June.

    The Ministry of Justice is unable to submit a complaint on your behalf to the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC). Additionally, a complaint against the IPCC cannot be directed to the Ministry of Justice for review as this does not fall within the remit of this Department. If you wish to make a complaint against the IPCC you must do this by addressing your concerns to the IPCC directly. The information provided below outlines how to do this.

    If you have a complaint or query about a casework decision, the IPCC will do their best to clearly explain the reason for their decisions and answer any concerns you have. Please note however that IPCC casework decisions are final and they will not necessarily be able to change the outcome. For further information or advice on your rights you can contact a Citizens Advice Bureau, solicitor or your local MP.

    If you have a complaint about a member of staff at the IPCC, in the first instance you can contact the person concerned and the matter may be resolved there and then. As mentioned in my previous email, Casework Manager Sarah Brown is one of a number of IPCC staff that has conducted an investigation into your file and she can be contacted on 0207 166 3934 should you wish to discuss the details of your complaint further. However, since you mention that Miss Brown has not contacted you in the past, you may wish to raise any issues of concern through a line manager, or write to the Internal Complaints Manager. Alternatively, you can download a complaint form via the link

    http://www.ipcc.gov.uk/index/contact-us/complaints_ipcc.htm and make your complaint against the IPCC using the contact details below.

    Internal Complaints Manager

    Independent Police Complaints Commission

    90 High Holborn

    London

    WC1V 6BH

    Fax: 0207 404 0695

    Email:

    internal.complaints.unit@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk.

    I do hope that this information is of some use to you.

    Yours sincerely,

    Ryan Holmes

    Legal Services Regulation and Redress Division

     

    —–Original Message—–
    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 19 June 2008 20:35
    To: Holmes, Ryan
    Subject: Re: Our ref: TO08/2153


    Hi,

     

    thank you very much for your e-mail, and the advice!

     

    I wanted to complain about the IPCC, since the whole case is a mess, and they don't reply to my e-mails,

    and they don't call me, you mention Brown, she has been supposed to call me, regarding the problems

    with the missing answers on the e-mails, but she haven't called.

    I think that the IPCC must have some serious problems, with handeling the complaints I sent them,

    which I view as one case really.

    So I was wondering, how I could submit this complaint, on the IPCC, to the Ministry of Justice.

    If you think that you could please submit this complaint for me.

     

    Also, I've contacted the FBI, in the American Embassy, in London.

     

    And I asked them, on how should go forward, regarding reporting a crime in the US, that someone,

    has set up a hate-blog against me there.

     

    The FBI/The American Embassy Legal Advice, tells me to contact my local police-station, about this.

    But I've lost a bit of confidence, with the Merseyside Police, due to the things mentioned in the

    complaints, sent to the IPCC, and more.

    And then I thought, that I could contact the IPCC about this then, since I didn't think I could contact

    the local Police about this.

     

    But now there has been so much problems, with the IPCC, so that I've lost a bit of confidence, in

    the IPCC, as well.

     

    So then I have to contact the Ministry of Justice about this, since I don't think that eighter the

    Merseyside Police or the IPCC, have showed themselves, to be worthy, of much confidence,

    unfortunatly.

    So I'm mentioning this now.

     

    Hope this is alright!

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

     

    On 6/19/08, Holmes, Ryan <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:


    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    Thank you for your email reply of 5 June. I am also in receipt of your email dated 13 June.

    As explained in my previous reply, the Law Society is the regulatory body for solicitors in England and Wales and will keep a comprehensive list of solicitors practising in your local area. Their website promotes a searchable database to help you find a solicitor which allows you to search by firm name, area of law and/or post code. To alleviate your concerns about contacting the Law Society due to previous personal experiences, I should point out that this list is a resource to assist the public locate suitable legal representation and promote solicitors across England and Wales. You can access the facility via the following link:

    http://www.lawsociety.org.uk/choosingandusing/findasolicitor.law.

    Alternatively, you could also look through a local directory, such as the Yellow Pages, which might help identify a suitable firm. As suggested in my previous reply, you may wish to contact the Law Centres Federation on 0207 428 4401 who can provide contact details for your local Law Centre. Also, you may find it helpful to access the Community Legal Services Direct website for information on providers of legal advice at

    www.clsdirect.org.uk. These are all alternative options available to you that do not involve the assistance of the Law Society.

    With regard to the complaint you have submitted to the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC), I have contacted the IPCC to investigate the status of your complaint. Senior lawyers at the IPCC inform me that without your expressed consent, I am unable to obtain any information that relates to your complaint. I was informed however that Casework Manager Sarah Brown is one of a number of IPCC staff that has conducted an investigation into your file and she can be contacted on 0207 166 3934 should you wish to discuss the details of your complaint further.

    I do hope that this information is of some use to you.


    Yours sincerely,

    Ryan Holmes

    Legal Services Regulation and Redress Division


    —–Original Message—–
    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
    Sent: 05 June 2008 01:51

    To: Holmes, Ryan
    Subject: Re: Our ref: TO08/2153



    Hi,

     

    thank you very much for your e-mail!

     

    I have been thinking about contacting the Law Society, regarding getting a list, like you say,

    for law firms, who take on law-cases on a 'pro bono' service basis.

    But, like I might have forgotten to explain, the Law Society, are already involved in this,

    I have complained about them to the Legal Services Ombudsman, who I have been contacting

    you about.

    So I've maybe lost a bit of confidence, in the Law Society, since I think they gave a bit of wrong

    information, and some errors, that I thought were a bit strange, so they are really involved in this

    from before.

    So then I was wondering about, if it would be right to involve the Law Society again, since they

    are involved from before.

    Maybe there is someone else one could contact about getting the name of companies like this?

    Sorry if I'm asking a lot of questions.

    I've also sent a complaint, on the Merseyside Police, to the IPCC.

    But the IPCC, aren't dealing with the complaint at all, it seems, so I was wondering who I should

    contact then, if I wanted to compain about the IPCC not dealing with the complaint on the Police?

     

    Sorry again that I'm asking so many questions!

    Thanks in advance for the reply!

     

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

     

    On 4/25/08, Holmes, Ryan <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    Thank you for your email reply of 7 April, in which you request further advice on ways to proceed forward with your complaint against the Legal Services Ombudsman (LSO).  To assist you with your concerns, I shall set out the avenues of legal assistance available to you that acknowledge your specific financial concerns.

    Firstly, while I understand you have already been in contact with the Citizen's Advice Bureau (CAB), you may also wish to consider contacting your local Law Centre.  Contact details for your local Law Centre can be found via the Law Centres Federation on 0207 428 4401, or by accessing their website www.lawcentres.org.uk. You may also find it helpful to access the Community Legal Services Direct website for information on providers of legal advice at www.clsdirect.org.uk.  Alternatively, you may choose to contact Community Legal Advice for free confidential help regarding your legal queries on 0845 345 4345.

    Secondly, it may be worth investigating the possibility of a Conditional Fee Agreement (CFA).  This allows a solicitor to accept a case on a 'no won, no fee' basis, under which they receive a fee from you only if the case is won.  It is worth pointing that the solicitor's standard fees can be increased by up to 100% to reflect the degree of risk to the solicitor in taking the case on (the 'success fee').  However, should you lose your case, you may still be liable to pay the successful party's costs, as well as expert witness fees and other disbursements.  There are insurance schemes that, for a premium, provide cover for these items.  As part of the implementation of the Access to Justice Act 1999, we have made it possible for the successful side to recover their lawyer's success fee and insurance premium form the loser. Effectively, this has made the operation of conditional fees fairer and more attractive to clients.

    Thirdly, some solicitors may be prepared to take on your case on a pro bono agreement (i.e. provide you with a free service).  You can contact the Law Society who can provide you with a list of solicitors that may provide pro bono services.  The Law Society is the regulatory body for solicitors in England and Wales and you can write to them at the following address:

    The Law Society

    113 Chancery Lane

    London

    WC2A 1SX

    Tel: 0870 606 2555.

    Alternatively, you can access the Law Society's website at www.solicitors-online.com.

    I do hope that you find this information useful.

    Yours sincerely

    Ryan Holmes

    Legal Services Regulation and Redress Division

    This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

    Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail.

    This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

    The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.

    Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.

    This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk.

    Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.


    This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

    Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail.

    This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

    The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.

    Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.

    This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk.

    Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.


    This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

    Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail.

    This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

    The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.

    Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.

    This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk.

    Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.

    This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

    Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail.

    This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

    The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.

    Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.







  • PS.

    Dem sang den three lions sangen, på slutten, og da forrandra dem på teksten, og sang noe om at Beckham aldri scorte, eller noe sånt noe.

'Bokhylla' 70-tallet 80-tallet 90-tallet Anmeldelse Arne Mogan Olsen Berger Bergeråsen Brev Christell Humblen Dagbladet.no Datatilsynet Drammen E-post Facebook Google Haldis Humblen Hm Identitetstyveri Ingeborg Ribsskog irc Jobbsøking i England Johannes Ribsskog johncons-blogg Karen Ribsskog Klage Larvik Liverpool Magne Winnem Mobilbilder Musikk Nettmobbing Online trakassering Oppdatering Oslo Pia Ribsskog Politiet Rimi Slektsforskning StatCounter Svelvik Twitter Wikipedia YouTube Ågot Mogan Olsen