-
Google Mail – Konto i Svelvik Sparebank.
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Konto i Svelvik Sparebank.
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 10:49 AM
To:
04800@dnbnor.no
Hei,jeg ringte kundeservice hos DNB Nor, i dag, angående en konto, som jeg hadde tidligere, i Svelvik Sparebank.Nå har jo Svelvik Sparebank, skiftet navn, til Sparebanken Nor, og nå DNB Nor, men jeg tenkte, at jeg kunnejo forsøke, å se om det var mulig å finne ut av hva som har skjedd.Det som skjedde, var at foreldrene mine skilte seg, på 70-tallet.Så skiftet moren min, etternavn, på meg, til Ribsskog.Så var vi på ferie hos faren min og dem, litt senere på 70-tallet.Og da tok faren min meg med i banken, og sa at jeg skulle si, at navnet mitt, var Erik Mogan Olsen.Så, på begynnelsen av 90-tallet, så fikk jeg et brev, fra Svelvikbanken, om at jeg skulle kontakte de, angåendeden kontoen.Så dro jeg dit, det var vel sommeren 1991, hvis jeg husker riktig.Da mener jeg pratet med en dame der, med mørkt hår, det er mulig hun het Røkås, eller noe, men det skaljeg ikke si helt sikkert.Men da beholdt hun bare brevet, og jeg fikk ikke noe beskjed om hva som skjedde med kontoen, enda jeg menerdet var noen penger på den kontoen.Så, nå bor jeg i utlandet, og nå har jeg tenkt litt tilbake, på ting som skjedde på 70, 80 og 90-tallet, og da begyntejeg å tenke på denne episoden igjen, siden jeg synes den var litt underlig.Så da tenkte jeg, at jeg kunne jo prøve å ringe Svelvikbanken, men det var jo ikke noe direkte-nummer dit, påwebsidene deres, så jeg pratet med en dame på kundeservice, som sa at jeg kunne jo sende en reklamasjon,til f.eks. denne e-post adressen.Så det er derfor jeg sender denne e-posten nå, for jeg lurte på hva som foregikk, i forbindelse, med at jeg ikke fikknoe beskjed om hva som skjedde med den kontoen, og pengene som var på den.Jeg vet jeg ikke ligger så bra ann, når det gjelder saldoen, på den vanlige kontoen min hos dere, så det er vel ikkemest på grunn av pengene, som jeg skriver denne e-posten, for det må vel balanseres, fra den andre kontoenuansett.Men jeg var litt nysgjerrig angående hva som egentlig har foregått da.Så jeg håper det er mulig å finne ut mer om dette.På forhånd takk for hjelp i såfall!Med vennlig hilsenErik Ribsskog
-
Google Mail – Angående klage på Torry Pedersen i VG, mm.
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Angående klage på Torry Pedersen i VG, mm.
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:46 AM
To:
schibsted@schibsted.no
Hei,jeg kan ikke se at jeg har mottatt noe svar på denne e-posten ennå, så derfor prøver jeg å sende den igjen.Håper dette er i orden!
Med vennlig hilsenErik Ribsskog———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Jun 10, 2008 1:33 PMSubject: Angående klage på Torry Pedersen i VG, mm.
To: schibsted@schibsted.noHei,tidligere i år, så ringte jeg VG, for å høre hvordan jeg skulle gå frem, med å sende en klage,på VG Nett osv.Så fikk jeg beskjed om å sende et brev til administrerende direktør i Verdens Gang.Det gjorde jeg, her i februar måned.Så har jeg ikke klart å få noe svar på dette brevet.Så så jeg gjennom notatene mine nå, og da begynte jeg å lure litt på hva dette, med detmanglende svaret, kunne komme av.Så tenkte jeg, at jeg kunne jo ringe VG, og høre hva e-post adressen til administrerendedirektør var, så kunne jeg eventuelt prøve å sende en e-post, for å høre hva som har skjeddmed det nevnte brevet.Så ble jeg satt over til VG redaksjonen, og da forteller de meg, at nå har Torry Pedersenblitt administrerende direktør for hele VG, og ikke bare VG Nett.Og jeg husker jo det, selv om det er noen måneder siden jeg sendte klagen, at jeg ringtePedersen, da han jobbet i VG Nett, og da presanterte han seg ikke engang, da han svartepå mobilen, så at han har blitt administrerende direktør, det syntes jeg hørtes litt rart ut.Men jeg søkte på nettet for sikkerhets skyld, og da så jeg jo det, på Wikipedia, at dette stemte.Men jeg tenkte, at siden denne klagen, er på blant annet Torry Pedersen, så er det vel litt feil,hvis klagen skal behandles av Torry Pedersen.Da blir det vel som at samme person sitter på begge sidene av bordet, omtrent som underforhandlingene om delelinjene i Barentshavet når Treholt og Evensen, eller hva han het, varmed.Så jeg lurte på om dere har noe forslag, til hvem jeg burde kontakte da, for å eventuelt fånoe fremgang på denne floken?Jeg kopierer inn en kopi av brevet her, og jeg kan også sende vedleggene på nytt, når jegvet hvilken person det er, som er riktig person for å kikke på klagen osv.Håper dette er i orden, og på forhånd takk for hjelp!Med vennlig hilsenErik RibsskogPS.Her følger en kopi av det nevnte brevet, fra februar:Erik Ribsskog
Flat 3
5 Leather Lane
Liverpool 4. februar 2008
L2 2AE
Storbritannia
Verdens Gang A/S
Administrerende Direktør
Akersgata 55
N-0180 Oslo
Norway
KLAGE
Jeg har hatt noen problemer med trakassering, sletting av tråder, sperring av brukerkonto, og
manglende svar/dårlig kundebehandling, fra VGD og VG Multimedia.
Det er snakk om følgende problemer:
1. En tråd jeg startet på VGD, 'Kjeller', ble slettet midt på natten, i 2-3 tiden, natt til søndag 15.
september i fjor.
For det første, så var det ingen åpenbar grunn for slettingen, og for det andre, så synes jeg
det var merkverdig at VGD skulle slette en tråd, midt på natten, natt til søndag, når mer eller
mindre hele Oslo eller Norge, er ute på puben, eller gjør hva som helst annet enn
rutinearbeid.
F.eks., så vet jeg at BBC's debattforum, har steng hele helgen, fra fredag kveld til mandagmorgen, så jeg synes det var litt bemerkelsesverdig, at VGD er i full sving med å slette tråder
kl. 2-3 om natten, natt til søndag, midt i helgen.
Og jeg har også overhørt, i 2003, at jeg er forfulgt av mafiaen, og i år, så har jeg overhørt at
jeg (mot min vilje og viten), har blitt brukt som 'target guy', av politiet.
Så jeg mistenker at politiet kan ha vært blandet inn i denne slettingen, som en type
overtramp/maktmisbruk, for å prøve å skjule at de har brukt meg som 'target guy', og også
dekke over andre ting de har gjort galt, så derfor synes jeg dette burde undersøkes formelt.
2. Noen dager etterpå, så innrømmer moderator at slettingen var feil, likevel ville de ikke
gjennopprette tråden.
Jeg ringte å pratet med Torry Pedersen om dette, 23. januar i år, men han bare vifta det unna,
og svarte at, 'det var vel ingenting som var tapt for evigheten'.
Som man vel kan si om det meste, og som jeg synes vitner om en uproffesjonell holding både
ovenfor folks meninger og yttringer og også om dårlig kundebehandlig.
3. Jeg hadde noe problemer med personangrep rettet mot meg, på VGD, og jeg skrev, som
jeg husker var vanlig fra da jeg hang på Engelsk Fotball forumet mye, for noen år tilbake,
'Klage sendt', på forumet, etter at jeg hadde rapportert personangrepet.
Men da får jeg selv advarsel, fra VGD, for å ha skrevet 'klage sendt'.
Jeg er ganske sikker på at det er, mer eller mindre, vanlig praksis, på VGD, å skrive 'klage sendt'.
Så jeg mener dette kan tyde på trakassering, mot meg, fra VGD moderatorenes side.
For jeg mistenker at VGD moderatorene ikke sender advarsel til alle som skriver 'klage sendt'.Men jeg mistenker at de ville bli kvitt meg fra forumet, og bare fant på en grunn for å gi meg
advarsel.
Jeg søkte på hvor mange som hadde skrevet 'klage sendt', før meg, og da hadde 20 stykker
skrevet 'klage sendt', de siste fire dagene.
At jeg skal få advarsel, for noe som, mer eller mindre, alle gjør, det er det ingen tvil om, for
meg, om at må sies å være trakassering mot meg, fra VGD.
Så dette synes jeg er alvorlig, og det kan tyde på at VGD har en agenda her.Jeg mistenker at VGD samarbeider med politiet, eller andre, for å dekke over ting som har skjedd,
i forbindelse med organisert kriminell aktivitet, og/eller maktmisbruk fra myndighetenes sin side.
4. Mod tillot at en tråd jeg skrev på forumet, 'Klage sendt', skeiet ut fra tema, og var vel selv med
på å ødelegge den tråden.
Det virket som om Mod ikke ønsket en debatt om tema, og med vilja ødela diskusjonen, og dethar jeg vanskelig for å se at kan kalles noe annet enn trakassering.
5. Mod. svarte ikke på mitt innlegg 2605, det virket som om de spekulerte, på en eller annen
måte, fordi de svarte, når jeg startet en ny tråd.
Så at de med vilje unngikk å svare, av en eller annen anledning.
Nå skriver jeg dette fra notater, så jeg husker ikke helt nøyaktig sammenhengen, men det burdekomme fram ved å se på mitt innlegg 2605, jeg mener å huske at det virker veldig rart, som om
VGD drev å overvåkte det jeg skrev, og spekulerte i å ikke svare, før jeg opprettet en ny tråd.
Nå er jo dette noen måneder siden, men det er hvertfall slik jeg husker det, fra notatene.6. 23. november i fjor, så sendte jeg en e-post til torry.pedersen@vg.no, med en purring,
angående manglende svar, på klagene ovenfor, om trakassering på VGD.
Men jeg mottok ikke noe svar på denne e-posten.
7. 14. desember i gjor, så la jeg igjen en beskjed på Torry Pedersens mobilsvar, om han kunne
ringe meg tilbake, i forbindelse med denne klagen.
Men jeg hørte ikke noe tilbake i forbindelse med dette.
8. 23. januar, så prøvde jeg å ringe Pedersen igjen, og da fikk jeg prate med han, på mobil,
tror jeg det var.
Men han presanterte seg ikke, når han tok telefonen.
9. Og når det gjaldt klagene, 1-5, listet ovenfor, så nektet han å svare på mer enn de to første,
så jeg fikk ikke forklart ordentlig dette, angående det jeg opplevde som trakassering fra VGD.
Pedersen nektet å svare på mer enn de to første spørsmålene, og henviste bare til at 'VG
utøver sitt redaktøransvar etter det de finner formålstjenlig'.
Og sa han, at han, 'hadde svart på det han trengte å svare på', og avsluttet samtalen.
Det synes jeg var litt dårlig kundeservice, fordi jeg fikk jo ikke da forklart ordentlig hva klagen
gikk ut på, for eksempel dette med trakasseringen fra VGD, under punkt 3. osv.
For jeg synes at det ikke er riktig at man skal bli trakassert på debattforum.
Såvidt meg bekjent, så er slike ting, som trakassering, også ulovlig ifølge norsk lov.
Og at man ikke lar den som ringer, få lov å fullføre samtalen, og heller ikke presanterer seg, nårman svarer på telefonen, det synes jeg nok, er nokså uhøflig ovenfor VG Multimedia sine kunder.
Og som nevnt ovenfor, så mistenker jeg at politiet har noen form for aksjon pågående, for å
skjule feil de har gjort, iom. at de bl.a. har brukt meg som 'target guy', mot mafiaen, uten
min tilatelse/viten.
Så det virker som om politiet bruker ulovlige metoder, for å dekke over feil de har gjort.
Og jeg mistenker, som skrevet ovenfor, at politet, eller andre utenfor VGD, kan ha vært
involvert i sletting av debattråder, midt på natten, natt til søndag, som nevnt i pkt. 1.
Og muligens også i forbindelse med de andre nevnte tilfellene av trakassering.
Nå er vel disse punktene alvorlige nok i seg selv, men på bakgrunn av situasjonen, medat jeg har overhørt at jeg er forfulgt av mafian, og også har overhørt at jeg har blitt brukt
som 'target guy', av noe norsk eller utenlandsk etterettning eller politi da, jeg regner med
det må være norsk, britisk eller amerikansk politi eller etterettning.
Så jeg håper Verdens Gang har muligeten til å behandle denne klagen på en ansvarlig
måte, og håper at dere har muligheten til å undersøke denne klagen formelt.
Jeg sender ved en kopi av e-poster sendt VGD i forbindelse med de overnevnte klagene,
og jeg sender også med en kopi av en e-post, sendt Human Rights Watch, med en
mer detaljert forklaring på noen av problemene nevnt ovenfor, i forbindelse med organiserte
kriminelle nettverk og politi/myndigheter, etc.
Håper dette er i orden, og på forhånd mange takk for hjelp!
Mvh.
Erik Ribsskog
-
Google Mail – Spørsmål i forbindelse med klage.
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Spørsmål i forbindelse med klage.
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:41 AM
To:
kokkvold@online.no
Hei,jeg kan ikke se at jeg har mottatt noe svar på denne e-posten ennå, så jeg prøver å sende den igjen.Håper dette er i orden!
Med vennlig hilsenErik Ribsskog———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Apr 18, 2008 2:58 PMSubject: Spørsmål i forbindelse med klage.
To: kokkvold@online.noHei,jeg har et spørsmål i forbindelse med en klage jeg sendte til en medarbeider hos dere som heter Kjell Nyhus,i forrige uke.Jeg har klagen i en blogg-post forresten, det er på denne linken:Så får jeg en e-post tilbake fra medarbeideren deres.Så sier han, at han kontaktet denne nettavisen, (Koordinatoren).Så har ansvarlig redaktør der sagt, at de ikke er en avis/nettavis, men bare tilrettelegger informasjon fra skoleverket.Mens på nettsiden deres, så står det, at de er en nettavis.De kan vel ikke bare skrive på websiden deres, at de er en nettavis, og så påstå til dere, at de bare tilrettelegger informasjonfra skoleverket?Så lenge de har en online publikasjon, og en ansvarlig redaktør, så er de jo en nettavis.Så jeg lurer på hvorfor PFU kommer med skrøner, som man vel må kalle det.Så jeg vet ikke hvorfor dere driver med sånt, så håper jeg dere får stramma opp han medarbeideren deres litt, for sånn tull,det hører vel ikke noen steder hjemme.Så jeg håper at jeg kan få noen svar på de spørsmålene i denne e-posten, og at dere slutter med det tullet deres.Med vennlig hilsenErik Ribsskog
-
Google Mail – Our ref: TO08/2153
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Our ref: TO08/2153
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:35 AM
To:
Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk
Hi,I can't see that I've received an answer to this e-mail yet, that's why I'm sending it again.By the way, I've also been in contact with the IPCC again, and it seems like the situation there isa bit complicated/problematic, with the complaints and correspondence etc.
I was told earlier this week, that I would hear back from the IPCC, but I haven't heard back fromthem yet.But I thought I should update you about this, since I've already mentioned this, in the e-mail I'msending again now.Hope this is alright!Yours sincerely,Erik Ribsskog
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Jun 5, 2008 1:50 AMSubject: Re: Our ref: TO08/2153
To: "Holmes, Ryan" <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk>Hi,thank you very much for your e-mail!I have been thinking about contacting the Law Society, regarding getting a list, like you say,for law firms, who take on law-cases on a 'pro bono' service basis.But, like I might have forgotten to explain, the Law Society, are already involved in this,I have complained about them to the Legal Services Ombudsman, who I have been contactingyou about.So I've maybe lost a bit of confidence, in the Law Society, since I think they gave a bit of wronginformation, and some errors, that I thought were a bit strange, so they are really involved in thisfrom before.So then I was wondering about, if it would be right to involve the Law Society again, since theyare involved from before.Maybe there is someone else one could contact about getting the name of companies like this?Sorry if I'm asking a lot of questions.I've also sent a complaint, on the Merseyside Police, to the IPCC.But the IPCC, aren't dealing with the complaint at all, it seems, so I was wondering who I shouldcontact then, if I wanted to compain about the IPCC not dealing with the complaint on the Police?Sorry again that I'm asking so many questions!Thanks in advance for the reply!Yours sincerely,Erik Ribsskog
On 4/25/08, Holmes, Ryan <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:
Dear Mr Ribsskog
Thank you for your email reply of 7 April, in which you request further advice on ways to proceed forward with your complaint against the Legal Services Ombudsman (LSO). To assist you with your concerns, I shall set out the avenues of legal assistance available to you that acknowledge your specific financial concerns.
Firstly, while I understand you have already been in contact with the Citizen's Advice Bureau (CAB), you may also wish to consider contacting your local Law Centre. Contact details for your local Law Centre can be found via the Law Centres Federation on 0207 428 4401, or by accessing their website www.lawcentres.org.uk. You may also find it helpful to access the Community Legal Services Direct website for information on providers of legal advice at www.clsdirect.org.uk. Alternatively, you may choose to contact Community Legal Advice for free confidential help regarding your legal queries on 0845 345 4345.
Secondly, it may be worth investigating the possibility of a Conditional Fee Agreement (CFA). This allows a solicitor to accept a case on a 'no won, no fee' basis, under which they receive a fee from you only if the case is won. It is worth pointing that the solicitor's standard fees can be increased by up to 100% to reflect the degree of risk to the solicitor in taking the case on (the 'success fee'). However, should you lose your case, you may still be liable to pay the successful party's costs, as well as expert witness fees and other disbursements. There are insurance schemes that, for a premium, provide cover for these items. As part of the implementation of the Access to Justice Act 1999, we have made it possible for the successful side to recover their lawyer's success fee and insurance premium form the loser. Effectively, this has made the operation of conditional fees fairer and more attractive to clients.
Thirdly, some solicitors may be prepared to take on your case on a pro bono agreement (i.e. provide you with a free service). You can contact the Law Society who can provide you with a list of solicitors that may provide pro bono services. The Law Society is the regulatory body for solicitors in England and Wales and you can write to them at the following address:
The Law Society
113 Chancery Lane
London
WC2A 1SX
Tel: 0870 606 2555.
Alternatively, you can access the Law Society's website at www.solicitors-online.com.
I do hope that you find this information useful.
Yours sincerely
Ryan Holmes
Legal Services Regulation and Redress Division
This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.
Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail.
This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.
-
Google Mail – Your complaint about Liverpool Central CAB
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Your complaint about Liverpool Central CAB
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:26 AM
To:
Sue.Thomas@citizensadvice.org.uk
Hi,I can't see that I've recieved an answer to this e-mail yet, that's why I'm sending it again.Hope this is alright!Yours sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: May 12, 2008 5:12 PMSubject: Re: Your complaint about Liverpool Central CAB
To: "Thomas, Sue" <Sue.Thomas@citizensadvice.org.uk >Hi,thanks very much for your e-mail.I was wondering about the street theater operation, that was going on, at the CAB, in April of last year,and was included in the complaint.(With the gay-looking CAB-representative helding the meeting in the dark etc.).I wonder what happened with this issus, noone seems to have commented on this, or is my knowledge ofthe English language that is failing me, English only being my second language?Thanks in advance for the reply!Yours sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
On 5/12/08, Thomas, Sue <Sue.Thomas@citizensadvice.org.uk > wrote:
When the Independent Adjudicator sent you her reivew (on 24th April), she said that Citizens Advice would consider the report and then write to you. I am sorry that my reply is a little late but I was away from the office last week and so have only been able to finish my letter to you today.
<<Ribsskog-Liverpool Central.doc>>
Sue Thomas
Head of Advice Policy & Standards
Tel: 020 7833 7034 Mob: 07970 990425P please consider the environment – do you really need to print this email?
The Citizens Advice service helps people resolve their legal, money and other problems by providing information and advice, and by influencing policymakers. Citizens Advice is an operating name of The National Association of Citizens Advice Bureaux.
-
Information and Advice www.adviceguide.org.uk
-
For information about our campaigns, to volunteer or support us www.citizensadvice.org.uk
NOTICE: this e-mail originates from Citizens Advice, an operating name of The National Association of Citizens Advice Bureaux (Charity Registration Number 279057, VAT number 726 0202 76, Company limited by guarantee, Registered Number 1436945 England, Registered office Myddelton House, 115-123 Pentonville Road, London N1 9LZ). It contains proprietary information, some or all of which may be legally privileged. It is for the intended recipient only. If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, please notify the author by replying to this e-mail. If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or reply to this e-mail (other than for the reason stated above).
This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for Content Security threats, including computer viruses.
-
-
Google Mail – complaint against Liverpool City Council our ref 08 000 279
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
complaint against Liverpool City Council our ref 08 000 279
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:18 AM
To:
st3york@lgo.org.uk
Hi,I can't see that I have recieved an answer to this e-mail yet, so that's why I'm sending it again.
Hope this is alright!Yours sincerely,Erik Ribsskog———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: May 21, 2008 8:03 AMSubject: Re: complaint against Liverpool City Council our ref 08 000 279
To: st3 york <st3york@lgo.org.uk>Hi,I'm refering to our phone-call, on Monday, where I explained that I would have a closer look at the compaint, andcall you back the next day. (Tuesday, yesterday).Unfortunaltly, I was a bit busy yesterday, but I have thought a bit more about this now, so I'm sending you thise-mail.Like I explained in the phone-call, my main complaint, against the gym, was that the (female) washing-staff,where washing the mens chaning-room, within the opening hours, on several (at least two) occations.I also explained, that I had been working-out in other council/university-run gyms, in Oslo and Sunderland,but that I hadn't seen this before, that the female washing-staff was washing the mens changing room,within the opening hours.I've been thinking a bit more about how to explain this, and I think one must probably say, that this, thatthe washing-women wash the mens changing-room within the opening hours of the gym, must be saidto be indicent(?)And this gym is not like a private gym, but it's a council run gym, open to all members of the public, andrun by the tax-payers money.The council, explained that they had changed the 'washing-regime', after recieving my complaint, but afterI've been thinking more about this, I think it's a bit strange anyway.Since, I think that the staff at the gym should have stopped the washing-women, acting like this, I rememberthat there was plenty of staff there, the last time this happend, they were just standing in the reception-area,without doing any work-tasks, maybe 10 or 15 minutes before the gym closed, looking at me, more or less,smiling, when I left the gym, the last time this happend.So, I think that staff must have been aware of this.
So, I think that there must have been something going on at the gym, since the staff didn't react, when thewashing women did this.So I don't think it's enough by the Council, to say they've changed the washing regime, since I think theremust be problems with the staff as well, since they didn't reflect or react at this procedure.I think both the washing-staff, and the gym-staff and management, should have understood, by themselves,that it's maybe a bit indecent, to let the washing-women wash the mens changing-room during the openinghours of the gym, while the changing-room is being used.So I think that there must be something going on there, since noone reflected on this.So, I think that maybe the situation at the gym, should be looked a more into, by the Ombudsman, sinceI think that there must have been something strange going on there.I haven't had the time to look at the complaint that much, and this was from last year, so I don't rememberthe details that well, but I remember that I was thinking, that there were a lot of strange things going on atthe gym.So I'm forwarding you the complaint I sent the gym, so maybe you could have a look at this, and see whatyou think yourselves, of the other complaints than the main complaint mentioned in this e-mail, if you don'tthink the things going on at the gym, weren't a bit strange.So then I'll trust your judgement on the other complaints, since I am a bit after shedule with work etc. here.Hope this is alright!Yours sincerely,Erik Ribsskog
On 5/14/08, st3 york <st3york@lgo.org.uk> wrote:
Dear Mr Ribskkog
I refer to your complaint against Liverpool City Council. I tried calling you today and last Wednesday but have been unsuccessful. I would like to have a chat with you about your complaint. Please would you telephone me today or on Monday, Tuesday or Wednesday next week (19-21 May) sometime between 9.15am and 4.30pm so that I can make progress on your complaint. If I am not available when you call, please leave a message giving details of the best time to get back to you.
Yours sincerely
Julie Murray
Investigator
Commission for Local Administration in England
Tel: 01904 380220
Website: www.lgo.org.uk
NOTICE – This message contains information intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you have received this message in error please advise us at once and do not make any use of the information.
-
Google Mail – Update/Fwd: To Mrs. Wilton, Corporate Services Manager, Complaint.
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Update/Fwd: To Mrs. Wilton, Corporate Services Manager, Complaint.
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:13 AM
To:
Fiona Dillon <Fiona.Dillon@legalservices.gov.uk>
Hi,I can't see that I've heard anything more from you, regarding this, so I was just wonderingif it would be possible, to please get an update, regarding what's going on, surrounding this.
Hope this is alright!Yours sincerely,Erik RibsskogOn 2/26/08, Fiona Dillon <Fiona.Dillon@legalservices.gov.uk > wrote:
Mr Ribsskog,
I have contacted both firms in order for them to give an explanation
of themselves and will cony=tact you as soon as I receive a reply.Yours sincerely,
Fiona Dillon.
Mrs Fiona Dillon
CDS Administrator
Legal Services Commission0151-242-5268 or ext 5268
0151-242-5396 Fax>>> "Erik Ribsskog" <eribsskog@gmail.com> 22/02/2008 15:51 >>>
Hi,
I'm refering to my earlier e-mail today, and I'm also sending you this
update, an e-mail I sent the
LGO today, that describes more, about the complaint-process, regarding
the
complaints onMorecrofts and EAD, that I sent you today, and how these complaints
were
dealt with by
the Law Society, and the LGO.Hope this is alright!
Yours sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Feb 22, 2008 3:43 PM
Subject: To Mrs. Wilton, Corporate Services Manager, Complaint.
To: lso@olso.gsi.gov.ukCc: general.queries@justice.gsi
.gov.uk Hi,
I called the LGO today, on 0161 839 7262, and I got confirmed, like
Mr.
Gavin
Brown, Operations Manager, is explaining in the letter from 14/2, thatthe
LGO, haven't got an appeal-possibility, included in the
complaint-process.So I've decided that I'm going to follow the Operations Managers
advice, and
contact the Ministry of Justice, regarding the problems that Iorginially
wanted to appeal about.This is going to take me a bit of time, since I need to go through the
details
of both comlaints. (Ref. 39651 and ref. 40080), and I'm in a busy
periode at
work, so this is propably going to take me at least a couple of weeks.Anyway, from what I'm suspecting, when I'm using my judgement,
regarding
how many problems I think it was with the Law Society, regarding the
complaints on the Morecrofts and EAD law-firms.Due to that I think these problems, with the Law Society were many and
serious,
and due to that I can't see the seriousnes of the problems being
mirrored at
all,
in the LGO reports, due to this, I decieded to call your offices today,
to
check
if it really is so, that you haven't got a possibility to appealincluded
in your
complaint-process.Since I found out, that there is no such possibility to appeal, then I
asked
your
representative, who answered the phone, if one have the possibilty to
complainabout the LGO representatives.
Since I suspect, that there could be maybe some form of corruption
involved,
and that this is the reason, that I couldn't see that the Law Society
problems
where mirrored in the LGO reports.If it so, that there is some type of corruption, that is causing this,
that
I can't
see the problems mirrored in the reports, then I think this is serious,
and
that
it should contact the person at LGO responsible for handlingcomplaints
about LGO representatives, regarding this.So this is why I'm sending this e-mail, so that you get the chance to
have
a look at this, and get a chance to sort the problems that I suspectcould
exist in some form, causing this, the to me obvious misproportions
between how I think the Law Society acted, and how the Law Society are
being described in your report.So I hope very much that you have the chance to have a look at this!
Please just tell me if there is anything more I should inform about!
I'm also sending a copy of this e-mail, to the Ministry of Justice,
since
I'm going
to contact them later, regarding these problems, so I thought it wouldbe
right
to be informing them about the problems, as early as possible.Hope this is alright, and that you have a chance to have a look at
this!Yours sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
******************************
****************************** ************************ Disclaimer
This e-mail (and any attachment(s)) is private and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.
Internet e-mail is not a secure medium, as messages can be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear this in mind when deciding whether to send information by e-mail. Postal addresses for the Legal Services Commission are available from http://www.legalservices.gov
.uk/aboutus/our_regional _network.asp The Legal Services Commission reserves the right to monitor, record and retain any incoming and outgoing e-mails for security reasons and for monitoring internal compliance with the Legal Services Commission policy on staff use. E-mail monitoring and/or blocking software may be used and e-mail content may be read. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when writing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. No contracts can be entered into on our behalf by e-mail.
Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the Legal Services Commission.
The Legal Services Commission checks all e-mails and attachments for known viruses, however, you are advised that you open any attachments at your own risk.
******************************
****************************** ************************
-
Google Mail – Update/Fwd: To Mrs. Wilton, Corporate Services Manager, Complaint.
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Update/Fwd: To Mrs. Wilton, Corporate Services Manager, Complaint.
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:13 AM
To:
Fiona Dillon <Fiona.Dillon@legalservices.gov.uk>
Hi,I can't see that I've heard anything more from you, regarding this, so I was just wonderingif it would be possible, to please get an update, regarding what's going on, surrounding this.
Hope this is alright!Yours sincerely,Erik RibsskogOn 2/26/08, Fiona Dillon <Fiona.Dillon@legalservices.gov.uk > wrote:
Mr Ribsskog,
I have contacted both firms in order for them to give an explanation
of themselves and will cony=tact you as soon as I receive a reply.Yours sincerely,
Fiona Dillon.
Mrs Fiona Dillon
CDS Administrator
Legal Services Commission0151-242-5268 or ext 5268
0151-242-5396 Fax>>> "Erik Ribsskog" <eribsskog@gmail.com> 22/02/2008 15:51 >>>
Hi,
I'm refering to my earlier e-mail today, and I'm also sending you this
update, an e-mail I sent the
LGO today, that describes more, about the complaint-process, regarding
the
complaints onMorecrofts and EAD, that I sent you today, and how these complaints
were
dealt with by
the Law Society, and the LGO.Hope this is alright!
Yours sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Feb 22, 2008 3:43 PM
Subject: To Mrs. Wilton, Corporate Services Manager, Complaint.
To: lso@olso.gsi.gov.ukCc: general.queries@justice.gsi
.gov.uk Hi,
I called the LGO today, on 0161 839 7262, and I got confirmed, like
Mr.
Gavin
Brown, Operations Manager, is explaining in the letter from 14/2, thatthe
LGO, haven't got an appeal-possibility, included in the
complaint-process.So I've decided that I'm going to follow the Operations Managers
advice, and
contact the Ministry of Justice, regarding the problems that Iorginially
wanted to appeal about.This is going to take me a bit of time, since I need to go through the
details
of both comlaints. (Ref. 39651 and ref. 40080), and I'm in a busy
periode at
work, so this is propably going to take me at least a couple of weeks.Anyway, from what I'm suspecting, when I'm using my judgement,
regarding
how many problems I think it was with the Law Society, regarding the
complaints on the Morecrofts and EAD law-firms.Due to that I think these problems, with the Law Society were many and
serious,
and due to that I can't see the seriousnes of the problems being
mirrored at
all,
in the LGO reports, due to this, I decieded to call your offices today,
to
check
if it really is so, that you haven't got a possibility to appealincluded
in your
complaint-process.Since I found out, that there is no such possibility to appeal, then I
asked
your
representative, who answered the phone, if one have the possibilty to
complainabout the LGO representatives.
Since I suspect, that there could be maybe some form of corruption
involved,
and that this is the reason, that I couldn't see that the Law Society
problems
where mirrored in the LGO reports.If it so, that there is some type of corruption, that is causing this,
that
I can't
see the problems mirrored in the reports, then I think this is serious,
and
that
it should contact the person at LGO responsible for handlingcomplaints
about LGO representatives, regarding this.So this is why I'm sending this e-mail, so that you get the chance to
have
a look at this, and get a chance to sort the problems that I suspectcould
exist in some form, causing this, the to me obvious misproportions
between how I think the Law Society acted, and how the Law Society are
being described in your report.So I hope very much that you have the chance to have a look at this!
Please just tell me if there is anything more I should inform about!
I'm also sending a copy of this e-mail, to the Ministry of Justice,
since
I'm going
to contact them later, regarding these problems, so I thought it wouldbe
right
to be informing them about the problems, as early as possible.Hope this is alright, and that you have a chance to have a look at
this!Yours sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
******************************
****************************** ************************ Disclaimer
This e-mail (and any attachment(s)) is private and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.
Internet e-mail is not a secure medium, as messages can be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear this in mind when deciding whether to send information by e-mail. Postal addresses for the Legal Services Commission are available from http://www.legalservices.gov
.uk/aboutus/our_regional _network.asp The Legal Services Commission reserves the right to monitor, record and retain any incoming and outgoing e-mails for security reasons and for monitoring internal compliance with the Legal Services Commission policy on staff use. E-mail monitoring and/or blocking software may be used and e-mail content may be read. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when writing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. No contracts can be entered into on our behalf by e-mail.
Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the Legal Services Commission.
The Legal Services Commission checks all e-mails and attachments for known viruses, however, you are advised that you open any attachments at your own risk.
******************************
****************************** ************************
-
Google Mail – Til Sivilombudsmann Arne Fliflet. Ref. 2007/2263
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Til Sivilombudsmann Arne Fliflet. Ref. 2007/2263
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:04 AM
To:
"arkiv@sivilombudsmannen.no" <arkiv@sivilombudsmannen.no>
Hei,beklager hvis jeg sender mange e-poster, men jeg lurte på om det var mulig å få en ny saksbehandler, hos dere,siden jeg synes at han saksbehandleren jeg har nå, gjør seg litt vanskelig.Jeg vet ikke hva årsaken til dette er, men jeg synes at det er greit å ha en saksbehandler som man er på talefotmed, hadde jeg nær sagt, så jeg håper dette er i orden.Håper dette er i orden.Med vennlig hilsenErik Ribsskog