johncons
  • Filmselskapet Paradox, som jeg ikke vet så mye om, men det kan jeg jo prøve å søke på.

    Her var det mer om de:

    About Paradox

    Paradox is an independent producer of commercials and feature films. In 1998 the company was established by a group of people with numerous years of experience in the industry.

    Since the start-up, we have produced over 200 commercials and 10 feature films. Paradox wishes to be a central contender within Scandinavian film production through competence, new thinking, and a conscious investment in young talent.

    Paradox is a company in which continuity and format exchange is regarded as the most important building blocks. Through this, we can utilize internal and external resources, maintain focus and develop competence among the co-workers in the company

    http://www.paradox.no/about_paradox

    Jeg klarte ikke å finne noe skummelt om de.

    I hvertfall ikke før jeg kikket på hvem de hadde produsert reklamefilmer for, som de skriver i den linken, så har de laget over 200 tv-reklamer.

    Så så jeg at de hadde lagd reklame for DNB Nor, og den banken, Svelvik-banken, som han banksjefen, Berg, som fattern sa var med i ‘Svelvik-mafiaen’, den banken heter jo DNB Nor nå, så jeg klarte å finne en link der og.

    Så var det poenget da.

    Dette selskapet, Paradox, de insisterer på å kalle Ramslies bok for ‘Knullegutt’, enda forfatteren og forlaget ikke ønsker dette, skriver NRK.no:

    http://www.nrk.no/nyheter/distrikt/ostfold/1.5657930

    Så man må vel si at filmselskapet har lurt Ramslie.

    Hvor morsomt er det å være forfatter, også lager noen en film, til og med, av en av bøkene man har skrevet, også kaller dem filmen et sånt navn.

    Er det mange av familie og venner som vil ringe og be om gratisbilletter til en film med en sånt navn da?

    Så må man vel si da, at filmselskapet, eller produksjonsselskapet, driver å tuller litt.

    Jeg tror ikke de får oppdraget å filme de andre bøkene han har skrevet ved senere anledning, hvis jeg skulle gjette.

    Før, da jeg jobba på Rimi, som assistent og butikksjef, i en årerekke, i Oslo, så husker jeg, at dette ofte en hektisk jobb, å være leder i Rimi.

    Man måtte ha mye selvbeherskelse, for å takle alle henvendelsene fra sjefer, medarbeidere, kunder og selgere.

    Det kunne være mye rart som dukket opp fra noen av dem, uten at jeg skal gå i detalj nå.

    Men det mest stressende, var vel at det skjedde såpass mye hele tida, med 500 kunder innom butikken hver dag, så kunne det ofte bli litt mye strabaser.

    Men men.

    Og de her sjefene i Rimi, var jo så autoritære og steile, mange av dem, og kombinert med alt maset fra kunder og medarbeidere osv., så ble det ofte sånn, at man måtte liksom koble av fra alt maset, når man kom hjem.

    Og da var man ofte utkjørt, for i tillegg til maset, så var det også mye som skulle gjøres i butikken.

    Det var varer som skulle spres, bestillinger som skulle tas, varer som skulle stables, tipping, retur i kassa.

    Det var noe hele tida.

    Så da var det sånn, at det var ikke alltid man hadde lyst til å gå ut på byen f.eks., og ta en halvliter f.eks., eller gå på kino, eller hva som helst, etter jobben.

    Jeg ble ofte veldig sulten, særlig da jeg jobba alle seinvaktene på Rimi Bjørndal, var det ofte veldig mye å gjøre, også da jeg jobba som butikksjef de neste åra, husker jeg at jeg spiste mye, da jeg kom hjem fra jobb.

    Jeg pleide å kjøpe en stor kebab, som jeg pleide å ringe fra bilen og bestille, på kebabsjappa, på hjørnet, ved krysset Waldemar Thranes gate/Uelandsgate der.

    Det var en pakistaner som dreiv den kebab-sjappa.

    Men der virka det alltid reint og ordentlig, og kebaben var ganske billig og med mye mat.

    Jeg hadde ikke så god råd, selv om jeg var butikksjef en del år, for det var ofte innbrudd i bilen der jeg bodde, på St. Hanshaugen, og jeg hadde jobba mange år med lav lønn, som assistent i Rimi, så når jeg fikk en brukbar lønn, så kjøpte jeg ting jeg trengte som nye klær, kjøleskap, etc, etc.

    Så jeg hadde ikke så god råd, selv om jeg jobba som butikksjef.

    Og jeg brukte masse penger på mat, for jeg så stressa og overarbeida, så jeg kjøpte bare ferdigmat.

    Og bilen slukte jo penger.

    Men men.

    Så pleide jeg å spise en stor pizza, etter kebaben, og så noe snacks eller godteri osv.

    Og da var jeg ikke i form til å gjøre noe spesielt annet, enn å sitte hjemme å chatte på irc osv.

    Jeg pleide å henge på #quiz-show, og en kanalen jeg og noen kjente opprettet, som het #blablabla, hvor vi pleide å bare chatte da, blant annet Glenn, som er kamerat til tremenningen min Øystein, og som hadde automatfirma sammen med han, og som også bodde på Skansen Terrasse, på Ungbo der, når jeg og søstra mi bodde der.

    Men, hva var det jeg skulle skrive der.

    Jo, det var rimelig hektiske år det her, med all stresset på jobben, og chattinga på irc osv om kvelden.

    Og jeg lærte meg også en del mer data som jeg ikke kunne, jeg har jo studert informasjonsbehandling, men jeg lærte meg også å bygge pc-er og sånn selv da, i de her åra, og mye om internett, vi pleide å dele filmer og musikk osv., vi så Lord of the Rings lenge før den kom på kino osv.

    Og jeg var helt hekta på mp3, når det formatet kom i 97, var det vel, selv om det tok 20 minutter å laste ned en sang.

    Monkeywrench tror jeg den første sangen jeg lasta ned var.

    Og hva het den gruppa da.

    Foo Fighters ja, det var vel fra en weblink eller noe, da mp3, var nytt format i 97 eller noe da.

    Det var artig, husker jeg, å koble pc-en til stereoanlegget, og bruke pc-en som cd-spiller omtrent.

    Så kjøpte jeg cd-brenner i 98, og fikk til å koble tv-en til pc-en og.

    Så det gikk ann å se south park episoder osv., på tv-en.

    Det var artig.

    Og jeg har jo alltid fulgt med på nyheter, så jeg leste alltid nettavisene osv da.

    Og internett, var jo dyrt på den tida, så å være online 3-4 timer hver dag, på dial-up, det ble fort penger.

    Så jeg hadde ikke så bra råd da jeg bodde i Oslo heller.

    Men men.

    Jeg ble med en kamerat, som heter Magne Winnem, til BI, i 96, var det vel, i datasalen der, det var vel ved Schaus plass der.

    Og da skjønte jeg, at det gikk ann å chatte, på internett.

    Så da kjøpte jeg meg pc, og fikk internett osv. da.

    For det gikk ann å chatte med folk over hele verden.

    Først fant jeg ikke noen norske chatte-steder, det var kanskje ikke så mange i 96.

    Men jeg fant noen amerikanske, som jeg prøvde å chatte på, selv om jeg følte meg litt utafor der, for dette var jo mange år seinere, enn jeg hadde vært i England om sommerne, og det var bare amerikanere der omtrent, husker jeg, så jeg var ikke helt på bølgelengde.

    Men så skjønte jeg at det var noe som het irc da, og da søkte jeg på alle kanalene, og fant #quiz-show da, og det var artig, det var/er en norsk quizze-kanal, så da ble det til at jeg hang mye der om kveldene, etter jobben, for jeg var sliten etter jobben, og hadde egentlig ikke noen gode venner, må man vel nesten si.

    Da jeg var snørris, og bodde aleine, på Bergeråsen, så fortalte en kamerat av meg, som het Tom Ivar, som gikk i klassen min, at det var noe som het kontakttelefon, som man kunne ringe for hele helga for en krone.

    Det var før de økte prisene igjen.

    Så da pleide jeg å ringe mye dit, siden jeg ikke var så populær på Bergeråsen, og ble mye mobba på skolen osv.

    Men det kontakttelefon greiene, det slutta vel å være så populært, etter at telenor/televerket, økte ringeprisene på kveldene og i helgene, så utover 90-tallet, så dabba vel det av.

    Men da jeg skjønte det, da jeg satt i datasalen på BI, i 96, at det gikk ann å chatte på internett, og at det var omtrent på samme måte som kontakttelefonen hadde vært.

    Da bestemte jeg meg for, at det her var noe jeg måtte skaffe meg, for man må vel nesten si at jeg savnet rimelig mye, noen nye kjente å prate med osv.

    Med en gang jeg skjønte det, at man kunne snakke med folk rundt i hele verden, på internett, da var det bare at jeg skjønte at det her var noe jeg hadde sanvnet, og gjerne ønsket å ha, siden jeg egentlig ikke var så særlig på bølgelengde med venner og familie og jobbkolleger osv., hvis jeg skal være helt ærlig.

    Så da tok det ikke så mange ukene før jeg hadde fått raska sammen noen penger, og investert i ny pc og modem osv.

    Men livet mitt var ganske hektisk med spesiellt jobb, men etterhvert, så fikk jo en del folk jeg kjente internett, dem også, og man ble jo kjent med nye folk og, så da ble det ganske mye chatting, og lasting av mp3er og filmer osv.

    Jeg har jo alltid vært interessert i musikk og få tak i de nye filmene, når det var VHS osv., så det at man kunne laste ned filmer og musikk, det var nesten som på 80-tallet, når man kunne kopiere musikk og video-kassetter, så det var ganske artig husker jeg.

    Så pleide jeg å brenne cd-er for kolleger på jobben osv.

    Det ble bare sånn, at jeg spurte en om det var noe musikk dem så etter, så måtte jeg nesten spørre de andre og, så jeg brukte vel en tid på å brenne cd-er for folk jeg kjente og.

    Men men.

    Men for å slappe av fra alt det her da, så var det ikke alltid så lett å få sove om kvelden osv.

    Jeg var vel for stressa fra all jobbinga osv.

    Så da pleide jeg å lese bøker da, for å roe ned helt, og klare å sovne.

    Så da pleide jeg å lese norske bøker osv., kanskje en ny bok hver måned, eller annenhver måned, eller noe.

    Og da har jeg også lest et par bøker av Ramslie.

    Og det var en som het Mikrokaos, som jeg mener var ganske artig.

    Selv om jeg som sagt, var ganske stressa på den tida, så ikke spørr meg for mye om handligen osv.

    Men jeg synes egentlig at det har dukket opp mange dyktige norske forfattere de siste årene, som man vel kanskje kan si er i klasse med folk som Lars Saabye Christensen, eller Agnar Mykle f.eks., for å ta noen som ikke er helt nye.

    Men de er vel kanskje ikke helt på høyde med Knut Hamsun, f.eks., han synes vel jeg er i en særstilling.

    Men i klasse med Axel Jensen, eller hva han het, og Ingvar Ambjørnsen kanskje.

    Jeg synes egentlig det er mange dyktige norske forfattere.

    Jeg bor i England nå, og hvis jeg går på WH Smith, så er det ikke sånn at jeg akkurat finner masse bøker jeg har lyst til å lese.

    Men det er kanskje fordi jeg er vant til å lese på norsk.

    Dem har jo noen mindre bokhandlere her og, så kanskje jeg skulle kikke der.

    Selv om kanskje typisk 90-talls forfattere, eller hva man skal kalle dem, som Erlend Loe og Ari Behn, kanskje er litt oppskrytt(?)

    Det er mulig.

    Men den Mikrokaos, den tror jeg kanskje kunne egnet seg til å lage film av.

    Jeg tror den hadde vært like morsom, minst, som den tatt av kvinnen osv., selv om den vel hadde en artig stil, men kanskje ikke hadde like mye innhold, men det var kanskje typisk for 90-tallet.

    Men nå er ikke jeg noe ekspert på bøker egentlig da.

    Men det blir spennende å se hva navnet til slutt blir på den her filmen da.

    Vi får se.

  • Anbefalt av 0

    SIer vel litt om det norske samfunnet. 23.05.08 15:23

    (Svar til: Artikkel)

    cons

    Ikke registrert

    Dette forslaget om blogg-lønn, sier vel sitt om det norske samfunnet.

    Jeg husker jeg var på Unge Høyre møte, i Høires Hus, i Oslo, i 1990, var det vel.

    Da lærte vi hva konservatisme betydde.

    Det var, at forrandringer i samfunnet, og ellers, skulle gå gradvis, sånn at man ikke tapte kontrollen f.eks.

    Dvs. at hvis man burde ikke forrandre på mer enn en ting av gangen.

    F.eks. ikke som ved revolusjonen, når alt blir forrandret på en gang, det var motsetningen av konservatisme da, for da, ved revolusjon, så var det lett å miste kontrollen, og folk følte seg fremmedgjort osv.

    Vi lærte også, andre ting, i grunnfilosofien til Høyre, og det var, at man (staten) skulle ikke hjelpe alle som hadde to bein, for da ble det ikke noe igjen til de som bare har et bein.

    Så at folk som skriver blogg, venter seg å få hjelp av staten, det sier vel sitt, om at det ikke er Høyre-politikk som har blitt fulgt i Norge, for da hadde vel folk skjønt, at dem med to bein, ikke ville få noe blogg-lønn, så da hadde de vel ikke giddi og søkt.

    Men, nei, det er nok en annen type politikk som har blitt ført i Norge, og hva man skal kalle den, det vet ikke jeg, men Siste Sovjetstat politikk kanskje?

    At noen er likere enn andre?

    De som er likere enn andre i dette tilfelle, det er vel de som bestemmer hvem som skal få kunstnerlønn, eller ikke.

    Det var vel begrunnelsen som bloggerne brukte, at kunstere fikk kunstnerlønn, derfor kunne bloggere få blogg-lønn.

    Og det er vel egentlig et logisk resonement.

    At hvorfor skal alle mulige moderne kunstnere, få kunstnerlønn, av staten, når ikke bloggere får blogg-lønn av staten.

    Og så svarer staten, eller Giske, var det kanskje, at kun de som har produsert kunst av høy kvalitet de siste år, får kunstnerlønn.

    Men, hva som er bra kunst, er jo subjektivt.

    Hvem er det som skal dømme om kunstnerne får lønn eller ikke?

    Dette er vel noen i eliten da, grisene fra Orwells Animal Farm.

    Et system som skriker av maktmisbruk, bare man tenker på det på avstand.

    Hvorfor skal noen bestemme hvem som skal få lønn av staten på subjektivt grunnlag?

    Det lukter av korrupsjon og Sovjetstat-tankegang, spørr du meg.

    Her er det ting som kan utnyttes, man kan forestille seg scenarier, hvor faktige kunstnere, må gi gjenytelser, til disse fra eliten, som bestemmer om noe er bra, eller ikke.

    Man kan tenke seg at ting som trynefaktor osv., spiller en rolle.

    Det er sikkert mange som sier, at eliten, nei de er kjempefine, de gjør ikke sånn tullball.

    Ja, det er greit det, det gjør sikkert ikke de fleste.

    Men her er det et system, som kan ytnyttes, og er sårbart for slik utnytting, og som det ikke er lett å gå tilbake og sjekke om folk har blitt behandet urettferdig i, fordi det går på synsing.

    Jeg har f.eks. studert markedsføring, på videregående, og da lærte vi, at alle mål, skulle være målbare.

    Om det var i en time på handel og kontor vi lærte dette, det er mulig.

    Så i forretningslivet, så driver man ikke å tuller med synsing.

    Der skal alt være målbart.

    Og det er vel at alt skal være gjennomsiktig.

    At man kan vise til, at her har ting foregått på en ordentlig og redelig måte osv.

    Men hos Staten, så er det ikke gjennomsiktig, når de har sånne subjektive regler, for hvem som skal få kunsterlønn, eller ikke.

    Jeg synes ikke det er noe grunn, til at ting skal være mindre gjennomsiktige, hos Staten, enn hos næringslivet.

    Dette for å lette revisjon, unngå korrupsjon osv.

    Så dette systemet, med kunstnerlønn, det er system, som er sårbart for korrupsjon, så jeg synes det er en dårlig løsning.

    Fordi, vi som skattebetalere, har rett til, å vite, at pengene våre, blir brukt på en fornuftig måte.

    Og, å la en gjeng, mer eller mindre, selverklærte eksperter, eller elitister, synse seg frem til, hvordan de synes pengene vi har jobbet for, skal brukes, det synes ikke jeg er riktig.

    Så dette synes jeg er en dårlig løsning fra staten.

    Eller den siste Sovjetstaten, er vel nærmere sannheten, når de driver med sånn her humbug.

    Så takk for forsøket til Staten, og bedre lykke neste gang.

    Med vennlig hilsen

    Erik Ribsskog


    http://debatt.aftenposten.no/item.php?GroupID=14&ThreadID=236269&page=1#item3648024

  • Fattern ringte i går, og da prøvde jeg å forklare han hva det var som foregikk, om hvorfor jeg skreiv på blogg osv.

    Jeg forklarte om han trudaduren, eller musikeren, i Eiker, som hadde blitt plaget av offentlig forvaltning, som samarbeidet bak scenen, til de klarte å knuse han.

    Her er linken til en bok om dette:

    https://secure.kolofon.no/searchdetails.aspx?docid=78&pid=1826

    Og jeg sa, at jeg synes det virka som, at myndighetene, i Staten, samarbeider på samme måten, bak scenen, som en mafia, bare på et høyere plan da.

    Så sa fattern, at han kjente igjen det jeg forklarte om han karen i Eiker.

    For sånn hadde det vært i Svelvik og, sa han.

    På slutten av 80-tallet, så husker jeg at fattern kjøpte et gammelt hus i Sandsveien, på Sand, i Svelvik.

    Det er en vei som går ned fra riksveien mellom Svelvik og Sande, og ned til Drammensfjorden, og til Sand gård da, de som opprinnelig eide hele Sand, og som dyrker jordbær, hvor jeg jobba en sommer, eller var det to, med å plukke jordbær.

    Så jeg spiste ikke jordbær på mange år etter det, husker jeg, for man bli litt lei.

    Men vi fikk kr. 2.50 pr kurv vi plukka, mener jeg å huske.

    Og hvis vi fant brennesle, så tror jeg vi fikk 5 kroner pr. brennesle.

    Noe sånt.

    Det siste var bare i åkern da, men samme det.

    Fattern kjøpte et hus der, rundt 1988 kanskje.

    Fattern han kan masse forskjellig, han har bygd hus, blant annet et svært hus for onkelen min i Son.

    Han har bygd masse båter, blant annet en havseiler på 30-40 fot vel, som måtte støpes i sement osv.

    Han har drevet snekkerfirma, og startet opp produksjon av vannsenger, på 80-tallet, og solgte mye av dem, og importerte vannsengmadrasser fra USA osv.

    Nå har visst Jensen Møbler kjøpt opp jordet, som lå like ved snekkerverkstedet, og det gamle huset til besteforeldra mine, så nå er det visst ikke så trivelig å bo der lengre.

    Men samme det.

    Jensen Møbler hadde visst gode kontakter i Svelvik kommune osv., så det var visst ikke få folk han hadde overkjørt gjennom åra.

    Og fattern sa, at det var en sånn gjeng i Svelvik og, som hadde knust noe sånt som ti folk opp igjennom åra.

    Ledet av banksjef Berg, i Svelvikbanken, visstnok.

    Mens fattern dreiv å bygde nye hus i Sandsveien, så hadde visst banksjef Berg & Co., i Svelvik-banken, nå heter den vel Dnb NOR, men den har hatt flere andre navn opp i gjennom tidene også.

    Svelvik Sparebank, eller sparebanken NOR, het vel banken på den tida.

    Så hadde Banksjefen, Berg, & Co., sperra kontoene til fattern, mens han dreiv å bygde.

    Så han fikk vel ikke kjøpt materialer osv. da.

    Til å bygge ferdig de siste husa.

    Så da gikk vel prosjektet med underskudd, og fattern gikk konkurs da.

    Og det husker jeg allerede fra den tida, at fattern kalte dem for Svelvik-mafian.

    Så det kan virke som at det noe lignende i de forskjellige stedene rundt omkring, som var beskrevet i den boka, av Freddy Kristoffersen, mafiaen i Eiker.

    For det var visst et titall personer, som hadde blitt knust av denne banksjefen Berg, i Svelvik.

    Fattern sa også, at datra hans, var venninne, med stesøstra mi, eller datra til dama til fattern, Christell, og også med søstra mi.

    Jeg husker mange av venninnne til Christell og Pia, men at det var noen av dem som het Berg, det skal jeg ikke påstå at jeg husker.

    Men dem hadde visst vært mye sammen med hu dattra til banksjefen, ettersom jeg skjønte, uten at jeg skal påstå at jeg veit hvem det var.

    Noe som jeg syns var litt rart, at jeg ikke visste det, hvis dem var mye sammen.

    Men nå bodde jo jeg i et hus for meg selv på Bergeråsen da, så det var vel ikke alt søstra mi og Christell gjorde, som jeg fikk med meg nei.

    Jeg hadde egentlig ikke noe sjangs til å ha kontroll på dem.

    Jeg hadde nok med meg sjæl, for jeg ble mobba ganske mye på skolen, når jeg gikk på ungdomsskolen, så jeg trodde at jeg gjorde dem en tjeneste, hvis jeg holdt meg unna dem, på ungdomsskolen osv., så kanskje ikke folk skjønte at vi var i slekt, for da ville kanskje dem bli mobba og.

    Og jeg var litt flau over at jeg ble så mye mobba, så jeg ville ikke at Christell og Pia, skulle se at jeg ble mobba hele tida, så jeg holdt meg unna dem, det året jeg gikk i 9. klasse, og dem gikk i 7. klasse, på Svelvik Ungdomsskole.

    Så det var vel bare et år vi gikk på samme skole, og da ble jeg mobba hele tida, som sagt.

    Og, vi bodde jo ikke i samme hus heller, så det var litt begrensa hvor mye jeg kunne følge med på dem.

    Jeg tenkte at Christell hadde jo to storebrødre, Jan og Viggo, selv om dem flytta vekk etterhvert.

    Pluss at hu hadde fattern da.

    Og søstra mi, ville jo ikke bo i samme huset som meg, hu ville bo i Havnehagen, med Christell og Haldis og fattern.

    Så da regna jeg med at fattern passa på hu da.

    Og Jan også da, som vel ble nesten som broren hennes da, siden dem bodde i samme huset der, de første åra da.

    Pluss at Haldis passa vel på dem.

    Så jeg så ikke på det som min jobb, å passe på dem, husker jeg.

    Jeg husker når fattern traff Haldis, så slutta han plutselig å bo i Hellinga, der hvor jeg bodde da.

    Så jeg var bare ni år, så jeg var ikke vant til å bo aleine.

    Så noen uker etter, så tok fattern med meg ned til Haldis, og der var det to jenter, Nina og Christell, som var et og to år yngre enn meg.

    Så jeg så vel ikke på Christell som søstra mi.

    Jeg så vel på hu og Nina osv., som noen jenter jeg kjente der, omtrent.

    I hvertfall i starten.

    Jeg hadde jo masse familie på stedet, som besteforeldre, og onkel og tante og fetter og kusine osv.

    Så det var liksom den ordentlige familien min.

    Og søstra mi, hu var jo hos moren min i Larvik da.

    Larvik, synes jeg var såpass fredelig, så jeg trodde egentlig ikke at noen turte å gjøre noe mot søstra mi.

    Jeg tenkte ikke på sånne ting, i det hele tatt.

    Og da søstra mi valgte å bo nede i Havnehagen, når hu flytta til Bergeråsen, i 82, eller når det var.

    Så tenkte jeg, at da ville hu jo, at fattern skulle passe på hu, og ikke ha så mye med meg å gjøre.

    Så jeg ble litt såra da, siden jeg ikke likte å bo aleine, da jeg var sånn ni, ti, elleve år osv.

    Så jeg tenkte ikke på det sånn, at jeg måtte passe på, og følge med på dem.

    Siden dem hadde Jan og Viggo og fattern osv.

    Og Christell likte ikke meg så bra heller, husker jeg, så hu tålte omtrent ikke meg, i hvertfall ikke alltid, husker jeg.

    Så de siste åra jeg bodde på Bergeråsen, så hadde jeg ikke alltid like mye kontakt med dem.

    Så jeg veit vel ikke hvem alle venninnene dems fra Svelvik var, osv.

    Men kan han Berg, ha vært med i noe frimurere, eller noe sånn.

    Jeg tror dem hadde Lions og Rotary, i Svelvik.

    Kanskje dem har noen fler og.

    Og så har dem sitti der, og styrt hvem dem skulle knuse osv?

    Bergeråsen ble forresten solgt fra Jebsen, som eide Berger Gård, til Svelvik kommune, for dem ville ha flere innbyggere i Svelvik, av en eller annen grunn.

    For en halv million, rundt 1970 da antagelig.

    Jebsen solgte også Blindvann, innsjøen som drikkevannet til Svelvik kommer fra, til kommunen.

    Så den elva som går fra Kafe-dammen, til Drammensfjorden, den var det sikkert en god del mer liv i før da, når den ble brukt til å drive maskinene på Berger-fabrikkene.

    Nå går vel mye til drikkevann, så da blir det sikkert ikke like mye vann igjen i elva, men det er vel ingen som bruker vannkraft fra den elva lenger nå, så det spiller vel kanskje ikke så stor rolle.

    Men det virka ikke som at fattern synes det var så god ide, å bygge byggefelt på Bergeråsen.

    Det blei vel mye mer folk med en gang da.

    Men kommunen ville kanskje ha mer skatteinntekter da.

    Det er mulig.

    Men det hadde kanskje vært artig, å visst mer om hvordan disse lokale ‘mafiaene’, er bygd opp.

    Om dem følger et visst mønster, og at det er sånn, at det er en mafia på hvert sted?

    Og at det bare er untaksvis, at dette kommer ut, sånn som det skjedde i Eiker?

    Så hvis noen har noe mer kunnskaper om dette, så hadde det vel vært artig, om dem hadde skrevet en kommentar om dette.

    Noe annet jeg har tenkt på i det siste, er at det virker som at jeg har havnet borti Illuminati, her på Arvato, i Liverpool.

    Jeg overhørte noen sa, like etter jeg sluttet der, at ‘they only want the girls/women’.

    Om dette var politiet som kommenterte Illuminati-agendaen da.

    Og, at de har alle de pene damene.

    Men ingen av de, vil at det skal bli kjent, at de må jobbe for dem, på den og den måten.

    Så derfor, er det ingen som vil at dette skal bli kjent.

    Var det derfor Merseyside-politiet, kalte meg ‘Miss’, tro.

    Fordi de damene som dette med, ikke vi at dette skal bli kjent, så det blir holdt skjult?

    Eller var det bare for å kødde.

    Man kan i hvertfall se det brevet, i denne linken:

    http://nb.xiandos.info/Politiet_i_England

    Jeg har i hvertfall lest, at alle har plikt å stå opp for sine sivile rettigheter.

    At det er de vanlige folkas plikt, hvis man blir tullet med, av myndighetene.

    Jeg skjønner jo det, at hvis nordiske jenter, har blitt tulla med, av noe Illuminati, eller noe, i Liverpool, så vil de ikke at dette skal bli kjent.

    Men jeg synes jo ikke det er riktig, at vanlige folk skal bli tulla med hele tida da.

    Det kommer jo bare til å fortsette og fortsette, hvis ingen forklarer hva som foregår.

    Kanskje damene synes dette er artig?

    De bare synes ikke det er så artig, hvis det blir kjent?

    Hva vet jeg.

    Men jeg får bare forholde meg til det som jeg har lest, om rettigheter osv.

    At det er enhvers plikt å stå opp for sine sivile rettigheter, overfor maktmisbruk fra myndighetene osv.

    Så får de heller kalle meg ‘Miss’, hva nå grunnen er for det.

    Ikke at jeg aksepterer det, jeg har rapportert om dette videre til IPCC osv., men de gjør ingenting.

    Så hva som foregår, det kan man lure på.

    Men jeg lurer på, om Illuminati, kan være beskyttet av politiet.

    Eller hvordan dette foregår.

    Eller om det er noen andre enn Illuminati.

    Noe tull var det i hvertfall på den Microsoft aktiveringa.

    Så vi får se hva som skjer.

    Med vennlig hilsen

    Erik Ribsskog

  • Ny NFF-logo på landslagsdraktene. (In Norwegian).












    NFF har designet seg ny logo, og vil kline den på landslagsdraktene, istedet for det norske flagget.

    De sier at nesten ingen land har flagg på fotballdraktene.

    Jeg kunne ha skjønt det, hvis denne ormen dems, var et symbol, som NFF, hadde hatt, siden de ble grunnlagt, eller deromkring.

    Men de kan vel ikke bare bytte ut flagget, med et nymotens påfunn, som ikke har noe historie eller tradisjon i det hele tatt.

    Og hva med skrifttypen?

    Hvorfor er det liten n, med de resterende bokstavene store?

    Skulle de ikke vært stor N, og resten små bokstaver?

    Hvordan skal man tolke dette?

    Er det noe galt i Norge?

    Siden de skriver det nORGE?

    Midtgardsormen, er forresten sønn av Loke, hvis jeg husker riktig, og søsken til Fenrisulven og Hel, som var den som voktet dødsriket, hvis jeg husker riktig.

    Så her har vi med symboler som er linket med underverdenen å gjøre.

    Så det synes jeg var litt snodig, med alt det andre som det virker som foregår i verden for tiden.

    For eksempel så får ikke jeg noe hjelp, rettighetene mine er null verdt, selv om jeg kontakter alt som heter etater i Norge og Storbritannia, så er det ingen som forteller hva som foregår, i forbindelse med dette:

    https://johncons-blogg.net/search/label/Lack%20of%20openness%20from%20the%20Government.

    Skal jeg se om jeg finner noe om midtgardsormen også:

    Midgardsormen (norrønt Miðgarðsormr) i den norrøne mytologien er den enorme ormen som omkranser menneskenes verden (Midgard).

    Midgardsormen er avlet av Loke og Angerboda, og er bror til Fenrisulven og Hel. Den het opprinnelig Jormundgand, men æsene kastet ham ut i havet som omkranser verden, fordi de ville ha mer kontroll over monstrene. Der har den ligget og spist seg større og større, og ble etterhvert så stor at den biter seg selv i halen. Dermed fikk den navnet Midgardsormen, fordi den omslutter hele Midgard.

    Under Ragnarok kommer Midgardsormen opp på land, og bukter seg over åker og eng. Da skal Tor kjempe mot den, og drepe den. Tor får selv sitt banesår i denne tvekampen, og dør.

    http://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Midgardsormen”>http://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Midgardsormen”>http://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Midgardsormen

    Midgardsormen er kanskje ikke så kjent nå for tiden, men da jeg var snørris, så lærte jeg at den var så svær, at den kunne slynge seg rundt hele jorden og bite seg i halen, så det er tydelig at det er Midgardsormen, som vi har med å gjøre her.

    På engelsk, så blir Midgardsormen, blant annet kallt ‘the World Serpent’:

    Jörmungandr [‘jœrmuŋgandr], alternately referred to as the Midgard Serpent or World Serpent, is a sea serpent of the Norse mythology, the middle child of the giantess Angrboða and the god Loki.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J%C3%B6rmungandr

    Midgardsormen, husker jeg, var også med i filmen ‘Erik the Viking’, som jeg så på Eldorado, var det vel, like etter at jeg flyttet til Oslo, i 1989.

    Der var Vikingene ute og seilte til England, eller noe, og da var det storm, om natten, så så de noe, som de trodde var månen.

    Som lyste opp på himmelen.

    Men så var det øyet til Midgardsormen.

    Selv om de kaller den, ‘Dragon of the North Sea’, her da, på engelsk Wikipedia, så det var litt rart, men den må vel ha vært inspirert av midgardsormen i hvertfall:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erik_the_Viking

    Her ser vi altså at britene lager filmer som heter ‘Erik the Viking’, osv., og alikevel, så tror, eller ‘tror’, Merseyside-politiet, at Erik er et jentenavn, (de skriver _Miss_ Erik Ribsskog):

    http://nb.xiandos.info/Politiet_i_England

  • Lena fra Døden på Oslo S

    [rediger] Om politikk
    Fy fader, jeg hater politikerforakt!
    Jeg stemmer Venstre, for Venstre er jo de små og mellomstore bedriftenes parti, og jeg, Lena, er en liten eller mellomstor bedrift avhengig av hvor mange liggeturer jeg får.
    Frihet under ansvar? For et jævla dustete opplegg.

    [rediger] Om jøder
    Skjønner du ikke at jødene styrer Norge? Faen ta dem, jævla sionister ass!
    Hvis bare jødene setter alle klutene til, de jævla jødeklutene sine, fy faen
    Hvorfor tror du Haakon Magnus har så krum nese? Hvorfor tror du Jens Stoltenberg egentlig heter Jens Schtoltzenbürg? Hvorfor tror du at stortingspresident Jørgen Kosmo, hvis du bare bytter om på bokstavene, så får du jøden Kosmo? Bytta ut r og g med en d der hvis du er interessert i å høre på.

    [rediger] Diverse
    Fy faen du er så jævla frekk! Men du treffer spikern på hodet.
    Hodet ditt vokser opp og ned og mikrofonen ser ut som et snyteskaft, din gris! Nå tror jeg vi må runde av dette intervjuet fort som faen Bård.
    Hadet bra du og, trehoda troll med børstemark ut av nesa!
    Jeg digger deg! Jeg hater deg… Jeg er likegyldig til deg.
    Jeg skulle ønske folk ville ha meg for den jeg er, ikke bare for det jeg har mellom beina… Vet du hva jeg har mellom beina? En piercing det har gått verk i!
    Hadet på badet din gamle sjokolade! Merkelig uttrykk egentlig… Ser deg i kveld gamle karamell!

    http://no.wikiquote.org/wiki/Tazte_priv

  • Lena fra Døden på Oslo S., kommenterer om omgangstonen i det moderne Norge. (In Norwegian).














    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GoWCTRL7EGI

    Her hører vi Lena fra Døden på Oslo S., forteller om omgangstonen i Norge:

    Faen så uhøflige folk har blitt.

    Det er slutt på høflige fraser.

    Alle skal si akkurat hva de mener.

    Samfunnet har blitt uformelt, joda.

    Men samtidig har vi ikke mistet noe på veien?

    Faen, er det rart folk setter seg overdoser når høflighetsfrasene har blitt toatelt fraværende?

    Fy faen!

    Politikerne hva gjør de?

    Nå sier jo folk at jeg må huske å ta medisinene mine osv., men jeg lurer på om ikke Eia, vet et par ting, om hva som foregår, og synes det er artig, å vitse om dette, som en slags meta-humor, i programmene sine på radio og TV?

    F.eks, så prater han jo om Jahve, i forbindelse med noe nattverd her, som vel går på det greiene, som Dagbladet skrev om, med Bohemian Groove, og Illuminati osv.:

    https://johncons-blogg.net/2008/05/problemer-med-menneskeofring-og-misbruk.html

    Og en del andre ting han prater om, jeg lurer på om han er ‘in the know’, angående noen New World Order agendaer som foregår i Norge osv., og liker å vitse med det, som en slags meta-humor, jeg har også synes det kan virke sånn med Jarle i Åpen Post osv., også.

    Men nå sier jo folk på Dagbladets kommentarfunksjon, at jeg må huske å ta medisinene mine, så da tar jeg sikkert feil da.

    Men da er vi tilbake til omgangstonen, og den synes jeg er mye bedre i England, enn i Norge, så sånn sett, så trives jeg mye bedre i England, enn f.eks. i Oslo.

    Det er bare sånn jeg oppfatter det privat.

    Men det betyr jo ikke at det er sånn, andre kan jo mene at det er motsatt, at omganstonen er mye høfligere og bedre i Oslo.

    Det er mulig.

    Men dette her er jo min blogg, så da får jeg skrive hva jeg mener her da.

    Så får man håpe at det er i orden!

    Med vennlig hilsen

    Erik Ribsskog

    PS.

    Når Eia mobber Elg, mobber han egentlig Tufte Johansen da, lurer jeg på.

  • Bra!

    Hvor ble innlegget av?

    Skrevet av Ratatoskr 20.05.2008 kl. 14:09

    Argh! Hvor ble Cons’ innlegg av?? Kom igjen Dagbladet, det var morsomt!

    Jeg som hadde så mange kommentarer klare….

    Nytt innlegg Svar på innlegg Varsle

    2

    anbefalinger

    Bra!

    RE: Hvor ble innlegget av?

    Skrevet av cons 20.05.2008 kl. 14:20

    Dem fikk telefon fra Stoltenberg og Kolberg.

    Jeg har det på blogg da:

    https://johncons-blogg.net/2008/05/ser-norske-myndigheter-ogs-ubter-in.html

    Nytt innlegg Svar på innlegg Varsle

    0

    anbefalinger

    Bra!

    RE: Hvor ble innlegget av?

    Skrevet av fredrik 21.05.2008 kl. 10:42

    Ojojojojoj, håper at du tar medisinen din

    Nytt innlegg Svar på innlegg Varsle

    0

    anbefalinger

    Bra!

    RE: Hvor ble innlegget av?

    Skrevet av cons 21.05.2008 kl. 10:57

    Det er alltid hyggelig å debattere med sine landsmenn.

    Jeg har merket det, etter at jeg flyttet til England, at det er så høflig tone i Norge.

    Med vennlig hilsen

    Erik Ribsskog

    Nytt innlegg Svar på innlegg Varsle

    http://www.dagbladet.no/nyheter/2008/05/20/535742.html?commentId=1973658#comments_container

  • Did Merseyside Police fail to help fireball murder victim Monika Szmecht?

    Did police fail the fireball murder victim Monika Szmecht?
    May 10 2008 by Michelle Fiddler, Liverpool Echo

    AN INVESTIGATION was underway today to see if a Polish waitress stabbed and torched by her abusive boyfriend was given enough police protection.

    Monika Szmecht was imprisoned in a van and then driven to a remote country lane, where she was doused in petrol and set alight last June.

    Ex-soldier Anthony Clarke was jailed for life after being convicted of her murder last week.

    The Independent Police Complaints Commission is now investigating the way Merseyside Police dealt with domestic violence allegations prior to her horrific death.

    Officers from Merseyside police were in contact with Ms Szmecht and she expressed concern about Clarke’s behaviour in the days leading up to her murder.

    During Clarke’s trial, Liverpool crown court heard the 27-year-old lashed out at his ex-lover days before her death after discovering texts from another man.

    He also threatened to burn down her house – forcing her to secretly move.

    Weeks before she died, Ms Szmecht told police she had been assaulted by Clarke.

    She ended up with bruises and a fractured bone in her hand and was due to make a statement against him.

    Clarke claimed in his defence he met up with Miss Szmecht on the day she died in order to hand over £1,000 in return for her not making the statement.

    During the trial, his sister Shareen Clarke told the jury she, in fact, attacked the Polish waitress.

    On the day of her death, Clarke bundled Ms Szmecht, who at the time was living in Wellesbourne Place, Norris Green, into his van, where he kept her imprisoned for four hours.

    He then took her to an isolated country lane in Rainford and stabbed her six times.

    When she struggled to her feet Clarke, a divorced dad-of-three, doused her in petrol and set her alight.

    Merseyside police referred concerns regarding the way they dealt with Ms Szmecht and handled her allegations of domestic violence at the hands of Clarke to the IPCC on December 11 last year.

    IPCC Commissioner for the North West Mike Franklin decided an independent investigation was needed.

    The watchdog could not launch the investigation until criminal proceedings against Clarke were completed.

    Mr Franklin said: “This was a horrifically brutal murder and my condolences go out to Ms Szmecht’s family and friends.

    “It is known that Merseyside police had been in contact with Ms Szmecht and she had raised concerns about Mr Clarke’s behaviour towards her in the days leading up to her murder.

    “Our investigation will examine whether officers observed the correct policies and procedures and whether Ms Szmecht was afforded sufficient protection.”

    A Merseyside police spokesman said: “We can confirm the force has looked into the police response to issues of domestic violence in the case of Monika Szmecht.

    “The matter was voluntarily referred to the IPCC and we support their decision to carry out an independent enquiry.”

    michellefiddler@liverpoolecho.co.uk0151 472 2529

    http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/liverpool-news/local-news/2008/05/10/did-police-fail-the-fireball-murder-victim-monika-szmecht-100252-20889166/







  • Google Mail – complaint against Liverpool City Council our ref 08 000 279







    Google Mail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    complaint against Liverpool City Council our ref 08 000 279





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Wed, May 21, 2008 at 8:03 AM





    To:

    st3 york <st3york@lgo.org.uk>



    Hi,

     

    I'm refering to our phone-call, on Monday, where I explained that I would have a closer look at the compaint, and

    call you back the next day. (Tuesday, yesterday).

     

    Unfortunaltly, I was a bit busy yesterday, but I have thought a bit more about this now, so I'm sending you this

    e-mail.

     

    Like I explained in the phone-call, my main complaint, against the gym, was that the (female) washing-staff,

    where washing the mens chaning-room, within the opening hours, on several (at least two) occations.

     

    I also explained, that I had been working-out in other council/university-run gyms, in Oslo and Sunderland,

    but that I hadn't seen this before, that the female washing-staff was washing the mens changing room,

    within the opening hours.

     

    I've been thinking a bit more about how to explain this, and I think one must probably say, that this, that

    the washing-women wash the mens changing-room within the opening hours of the gym, must be said

    to be indicent(?)

     

    And this gym is not like a private gym, but it's a council run gym, open to all members of the public, and

    run by the tax-payers money.

     

    The council, explained that they had changed the 'washing-regime', after recieving my complaint, but after

    I've been thinking more about this, I think it's a bit strange anyway.

    Since, I think that the staff at the gym should have stopped the washing-women, acting like this, I remember

    that there was plenty of staff there, the last time this happend, they were just standing in the reception-area,

    without doing any work-tasks, maybe 10 or 15 minutes before the gym closed, looking at me, more or less,

    smiling, when I left the gym, the last time this happend.

    So, I think that staff must have been aware of this.

     

    So, I think that there must have been something going on at the gym, since the staff didn't react, when the

    washing women did this.

    So I don't think it's enough by the Council, to say they've changed the washing regime, since I think there

    must be problems with the staff as well, since they didn't reflect or react at this procedure.

     

    I think both the washing-staff, and the gym-staff and management, should have understood, by themselves,

    that it's maybe a bit indecent, to let the washing-women wash the mens changing-room during the opening

    hours of the gym, while the changing-room is being used.

     

    So I think that there must be something going on there, since noone reflected on this.

     

    So, I think that maybe the situation at the gym, should be looked a more into, by the Ombudsman, since

    I think that there must have been something strange going on there.

    I haven't had the time to look at the complaint that much, and this was from last year, so I don't remember

    the details that well, but I remember that I was thinking, that there were a lot of strange things going on at

    the gym.

    So I'm forwarding you the complaint I sent the gym, so maybe you could have a look at this, and see what

    you think yourselves, of the other complaints than the main complaint mentioned in this e-mail, if you don't

    think the things going on at the gym, weren't a bit strange.

    So then I'll trust your judgement on the other complaints, since I am a bit after shedule with work etc. here.

    Hope this is alright!

     

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog


     

     

    On 5/14/08, st3 york <st3york@lgo.org.uk> wrote:

    Dear Mr Ribskkog

     

    I refer to your complaint against Liverpool City Council. I tried calling you today and last Wednesday but have been unsuccessful.  I would like to have a chat with you about your complaint. Please would you telephone me today or on Monday, Tuesday or Wednesday next week (19-21 May) sometime between 9.15am and 4.30pm so that I can make progress on your complaint.  If I am not available when you call, please leave a message giving details of the best time to get back to you.

     

    Yours sincerely

     

    Julie Murray

    Investigator

    Commission for Local Administration in England

    Tel: 01904 380220

    Website: www.lgo.org.uk

    NOTICE – This message contains information intended only for the use of the addressee named above.  If you have received this message in error please advise us at once and do not make any use of the information.

     












    Google Mail – Complaint







    Google Mail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    Complaint





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 5:06 AM





    To:

    Richard.Little@liverpool.gov.uk


    Cc:

    "Lennon, Linda" <linda.lennon@liverpool.gov.uk>, "Southern, Lesley" <Lesley.Southern@liverpool.gov.uk>



    Hi,

     

    I'm refering to phone-call last week (4/7). I know I said I'd send this e-mail no

    later than Wednesday, but I didn't get to start on it untill late on Wednesday,

    so it's probably going to be Thursday untill I get to actually send the e-mail,

    so sorry about that!

     

     

    Problems with washing women/girls in the mens changing-room during opening hours:

     

    The first thing I wondered about, was regarding the problems described in

    the e-mail I sent to Linda Lennon on 8/6, about the washing girl/women in

    the mens changing-room.

     

    I'll copy the text from that e-mail into this e-mail, since I have some questions

    regarding that episode:

     

    to




    linda.lennon@liverpool.gov.uk

     

    date

    Jun 8, 2007 10:58 PM

     

    subject

    Fwd: Statement

     

    mailed-by

    gmail.com

     


    Hi,

     

    I just got back from the gym, it closed at 9 pm.

     

    I just had to eat a bit and relax a bit after the work-out, or else I would have sent the

    email at once.

     

    Because what I'm wondering about with the gym, is:

     

    Is it really right that there should be female washing-staf in the mens wardrobe

    at 8.45 pm, when the gym closes at 9pm?

     

    This happened again today, and it has also happened once before.

    I used to workout a bit when I lived in Oslo and Sunderland as well, but they never

    used to start washing the wardrobe until after the closing hours.

     

    So I think that since the gym is run by the Council, I think that they shouldn't

    have the washing-routines that includes female staff starting to wash in the

    mens wardrobe as early as 8.45 pm.

     

    I think they should wait until after closing-hours to wash the mens wardrobe,

    and that if they have to wash, then they could maybe instead wash the machines

    in the gym or something else before the gym is closed.

     

    When I went into the mens wardrobe at 8.45 pm then there was a female washing

    staff washing there, about 40 years maybe with dark hair.

     

    I think she was talking with a colleague in there, it was probably the other washing-

    woman.

    I was working out on the tread-mill by the reception untill a bit before 8.45 pm, and

    then I saw the washing-staff walking around in the reception-area at around 8.40 pm.

     

    And one of the washing-staff looked quite young, maybe 16-17 years.

    I think it must have been her that the washing-woman with dark hair spoke with in

    the mens wardrobe at 8.45.

     

    I don't think there should be that young female washing staff in the mens wardrobe

    at 8.45, when the gym closes at 9.00pm.

     

    It has happened once earlier as well that there were female washing staff in the

    mens wardrobe at around 8.45, and I just think that this isnt right.

     

    I think that both the staff in the gym and the washing staff should understand by

    themselves that the female washing staff shouldnt start to wash in the mens

    wardrobe untill after the closing hours at 9 pm, so thats why I havent complained

    about this to the staff in the gym or the washing staff.

    I think that it should be unecessary for me to tell this to them, I think they should

    have understood this by themselves.

     

    And Im not really sure whos in charge there in the evenings eighter.

     

    There has also been other incidents at the gym that I have thought to complain

    about, but I havent untill now.

    But with the washing-staff in the mens wardrobe again today at 8.45 pm, was

    a bit like the final drop, so since Im not really sure whos in charge there in the

    evening I thought that I could send you an email about this.

    And also since one of the washing women was so young, it makes me a bit

    worried about whats going on in the gym, when they put a washing woman/

    girl that looked like she was maybe 16 or 17 in the mens wardrobe at 8.45pm,

    so therefore I thought I should really just write the email now, because that this

    is a bit unacceptable for a gym thats run by the Council.

     

    I know its a bit late to send emails at this hour, but it thought that since I think

    that this way of organising the washing-routines in the gym is a bit unaceptable,

    I thought that if I sent the email about this right after I got back from the gym,

    then there would be less possibilites that eg. someone could say that I must have

    mistaken the time etc,  since now its just a quite short time since I left the gym,

    so I reckoned that its best to send it right away, while I still have the details at

    mind so to speak. 

     

    So I hope that this is alright!

     

    Sorry that I send the email this late.

     

    Regards,


     

    Erik Ribsskog


    – Show quoted text –


     

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <

    eribsskog@gmail.com
    >
    Date: Jun 8, 2007 3:45 PM
    Subject: Statement
    To: linda.lennon@liverpool.gov.uk

     

    Hi,

     

    I refer to the phone-call earlier today, and send the statement from

    the bank about the duplicate payment with the direct-debit.

     

    Pleare just contact me if there is anything else I should have remembered.

     

    Hope that this is alright!

     

    Regards,


     

    Erik Ribsskog


     

    So my questions regarding this is:

     

    1. How come that there are washing women/girls in the mens changing-room at 8.45 pm,

    when the gym closes at 9 pm?

     

    2. Is the gym going to change its washing-routine, so that the washing women/girls dont

    start to wash the mens changing-room untill after the gym is closed. (Because like I explained

    in the e-mail to Linda Lennon, this with the washing women in the mens changing-room has

    also happened earlier at the Millenium gym, but I've never seen it in other gyms).

     

     

    Problems with direct-debit processing errors/duplicate payments:

     

    Also, I have been in contact with Lesley Southern, about some problems regarding processing

    errors/duplicate direct debits from the gym.

     

    I explained to him that I would also bring up some the issues regarding this with you, so I think

    its alright if I also copy the contents of that e-mail:

     

     

     

    from



    Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com> 

     

     hide details

     Jul 10 (2 days ago) 

     

    to



    "Southern, Lesley" <Lesley.Southern@liverpool.gov.uk>

     

     

    date

     

    Jul 10, 2007 6:18 PM

     

     

    subject

     

    Re: Earlier e-mails

     

     

    mailed-by

     

     


    Hi,

     

    thank you very much for your answer.

     

    I think it was very fine that you had the time to answer me, and I also think that it was very

    fine that you have taken off my arrears due to the amount of time/inconvinience I have had

    due to this.

     

    But since there were still some things I was wondering about, I thought I could try to send

    you an enquiery about this, to try to maybe found out about this.

     

    I've written an explanation below, as comments on your e-mail, since I thought it was easier

    to explain/answer this way.

     

    To summarize my questions:

     

    1. Shouldn't the gym have asked me first if they wanted to withdraw an extra payment (that they

    had no mandate for) from my account in June?

     

    2. How come that there were still two payment-requests from the gym waiting to be withdrawn

    from my account on 27/6, when firstly, the gym only have a mandate to withdraw one monthly

    payment from my account. Secondly, I had agreed with the staff at the gym, that I would pay the

    arrears when I recieved the swith-bonus from the bank. And thirdly, I had sent Linda Lennon,

    Administration Manager at the Council an e-mail about this problem on 8/6, with a copy of the

    statement from the bank, showing that there was a problem with the gym charging me duplicate

    payments from my account for the month of June?

     

    3. How come that the gym still wanted to withdraw a (duplicate) payment from my account for the

    month of July, when the gym was closed for refurbishment for six weeks from 25/6?

     

    I'm also going to contact the Duty Officer at the gym regarding why the gyms members weren't

    informed about the six weeks closure of the gym and more. So it might be that I'll also ask him

    about some of the same questions. (Like about why the gym still wanted to charge me even

    if they were going to be closed etc.)

     

    I hope you have the time to answer me about this questions, since I thought some of these things

    were a bit strange, so it would be nice to be informed about this.

    So I hope that you bear over with me if I'm asking many questions!

     

    Thank you very much in advance!

     

    Yours sincerely,

     

    Erik Ribsskog


     

     

     

     

     

    On 7/3/07, Southern, Lesley <Lesley.Southern@liverpool.gov.uk

    > wrote:

    Erik

     

    Your enquiry regarding your direct debit payments has been passed onto myself for further investigation.

     

    Unfortunately we cannot refund a payment to a member that has outstanding arrears, this is for audit purposes as we are required to provide details of all miscellaneous payments made to our members.

     

    The action we have taken to date is to take your 1 month overpayment as your cancellation fee (which is normally 2 months) and we have taken your arrears off your membership record for the inconvenience caused as a result of the error.


    – Regarding the overpayment, it wasn't actually an overpayment, because when the bank saw that it had been a

    process error/duplicate payment from the gym, then they transferred the duplicate payment back as a

    'interbranch payment' on 6/6.

     

    (Secondly, I think that I shouldn't recieve a cancellation fee, when the gym suddently closes for 6 weeks

    for refurbishment. I think that then the gym should have first sent its members a letter about this, put

    up a poster at the gym about this, and also not charged its members for the month that they are closed,

    but I have to contact the Duty Officer at the gym about something else, so I'll bring this up with him.)

     

     

    I have checked the Direct Debit report and it seems that the overpayment dates back to a missed January payment which has been allocated to your account on 30

    th May.  I will need to speak to our Direct Debit team to determine why a payment for January has been included in June's Direct Debit report.

    I've been speaking with the staff (including the Manager) at the gym several times about the arrears, and we agreed that I would

    pay the arrears later, when I recieved some money I was expecting (a switch-bonus from the bank).

     

    This was agreed with Craig at the gym, when we set up the direct-debit agreement in May.

     

    I spoke with Craig about this on 1/6 as well, since I hadn't recieved the switch-bonus yet, and then I was informed

    that the arrear was £70.50, and we agreed that I would pay this when I recieved the money from the bank.


     

    So my point is, that they should have told me first if they wanted to withdraw an extra payment from my account

    on 1/6, so that I could have planned this in advance.

     

    Also, this (RBS) bank account was set up in May, so I don't really understand how a missed direct-debit

    payment to my old (Barclays) account in Januray, could suddently appear on my RBS-account in June?

     

    It seems a bit strange to me that this could happen, when I also had agreed several times with the staff

    at the gym (in the month of March and then monthly), that I would pay the running bills, and that I'd pay the

    arrears when I recieved the switch-bonus from RBS.

     

    Also I had been told by the staff at the gym, that there was no hurry at all with the arrears, as long as I

    paid the running bills.

     

    – Also the bank told me when I called them in the beginning of June, that the gym wasn't allowed to

    withdraw more than one payment a month from my account, since they only had one mandate.

     

    – Also, when I called the gym on 26/6, to ask if they were open on 26/6, (since they were closed for

    no apparent reason on 25/6), then I was told that the gym was closed for refurbishment for six weeks.

     

    I then thought that it wasn't right that the gym should charge me for the month of July, when they were

    closed. (I also thought they should have informed the members about the six weeks closure). So due

    to this, I called my bank (the RBS customer-support line) on 27/6 to cancel the direct-debit.

    I was then told that there were still two direct-debits from the gym on my account, both with the same,

    reference-number (LIFE 800 1561).

     

    – So I was wondering, how come that there were still two payment-requests from the gym waiting to

    be withdrawn on my account on 27/6, when firstly, the gym only have a mandate to withdraw one

    monthly payment from my account. Secondly, I had agreed with the staff at the gym, that I would

    pay the arrears when I recieved the swith-bonus from the bank, and thirdly, I had sent Linda Lennon,

    Administration Manager at the Council an e-mail about this problem on 8/6, with a copy of the

    statement from the bank, showing that there was a problem with the gym charging me duplicate

    payments from my account?


     

     

     

    Your account has now been set to expired and no payment was requested in July.

     


    Well, there were actually two payments requested in July (see above

    So my questions regarding this is:

     

    3. Shouldn't the gym have asked me first if they wanted to withdraw an extra payment (that they

    had no mandate for) from my account in June?

     

    4. How come that there were still two payment-requests from the gym waiting to be withdrawn

    from my account on 27/6, when firstly, the gym only have a mandate to withdraw one monthly

    payment from my account. Secondly, I had agreed with the staff at the gym, that I would pay the

    arrears when I recieved the swith-bonus from the bank. And thirdly, I had sent Linda Lennon,

    Administration Manager at the Council an e-mail about this problem on 8/6, with a copy of the

    statement from the bank, showing that there was a problem with the gym charging me duplicate

    payments from my account for the month of June?

     

     

    Problems around the closure of the gym for six weeks from 25/6 due to refurbishment:

     

    5. How come that the gym still wanted to withdraw a (duplicate) payment from my account for the

    month of July, when the gym was closed for refurbishment for six weeks from 25/6?

     

    6. How come that there were no letters sent to the members of the gym regarding the closure

    of the gym for six weeks from 25/6 due to refurbishment?

     

    7. How come that there were no poster in the gym informing the users of the gym that the gym

    would be closed for six weeks from 25/6 due to refurbishment?

     

    8. How come that there was only a makeshift sign on the entrance-door to the millenium-

    building saying 'gym closed', and nothing more when I went there to work out on the

    evening on 25/6. (Shouldn't it have been a proper sign, with information about why the

    gym was closed, how long the gym was closed for, and not just some makeshift

    sign written with an ink-marker)?

     

    9. How come that there were no information about the fact that the gym was closed, when

    I went on the lifestyles website:

     

     

    on 26/6 (When the gym had been closed since 25/5)?

     

    (I can see that it says that the gym is closed there now, but on 26/6, there was no information

    about the gym being closed at all. I went there to see if it said anything on the website on 26/6,

    since the gym was closed for no obvious reason on 25/6, but it didn't say anything about the gym

    being closed on the website, so I noted down the phone-number to the gym, and called the gym,

    and they told me that the gym was closed for six weeks due to refurbishment.)

     

    10. How come that members of the gym were charged for the whole month of June, when the gym

    was closed for refurbishment from 25/6? (Shouldn't the six days from 25/6 to 30/6 have been

    deducted from the charge?).

     

     

    Other problems at the gym:

     

    Like I wrote in my e-mail to Linda Lennon on 8/6, there had also been other, earlier incidents at

    the gym which I had thought to complain about.

     

    But like I also wrote, it wasn't always easy to know who it was that was in charge there after the

    manager had gone home, and him I only spoke with once, since I most often worked out in the

    evening.

     

    And that the incident with the washing girls/women in the mens changing room again within the

    opening hours was the last drop, so to speak.

     

    And then it was easier for me to complain, because then I had her e-mail address from before,

    since I had sent her a copy of the statement from the bank, to document the problems with

    the duplicate direct debit/processing error from the gym.

     

    So then it was easier for me to complain.

     

    I'm going to try explain a bit more about the earlier incidents:

     

    Problems with locker:

     

    On 26/4, it says in my note-book, I was at the gym.

     

    I work with office-work, so I try to work out quite often, and I usually use different lockers at the

    gym, depending on which locker of the lockers that are free etc.

     

    And when one work out 3-5 days a week for some time, and you have a different locker each time,

    then it could be that one forgets exactly which locker one uses this particular time.

     

    And, since only about half of the key-rings with the keys for the lockers had tag-numbers on them,

    this could be a bit confusing.

     

    So when I was finished with the work-out, and I went to the area of the changing-room where my

    locker was, then the locker wouldn't open.

     

    Like I wrote, I use different lockers each time, depending on which lockers that are free, where in

    the changing-room it is less crowded etc.

     

    So it isn't that easy to be exactly sure if it is that particular locker, especially since the key-ring

    to the locker (like about half of the other key-rings, i noticed later), lacked a number-tag on it,

    to specify which locker it belonged to.

     

    I usually dont keep things like my wallet etc. in the locker, since its a big gym, always many

    people there, and I would get a lot of inconvienience if something happened to my wallet etc.,

    so I didn't keep the most 'valuble' things in the locker.

     

    I use to keep my note-book with my wallet, so I had my note-book still on me, and I thought it

    was a bit embarresing going to the reception explaining that I coultn't find my locker, so I decided

    to be 100% sure before I did that.

    So, I just wrote down the numbers of all the lockers in my note-book, and then I checked each

    and every locker, and crossed the number for that locker in my note-book.

    I made sure to check each lock thoroughly.

     

    So, when I had checked each lock in the changing-room, and the key didn't fit in any of them,

    then I went to the reception to explain.

     

    It was still quite embarresing, but at least now I had the note-book to show that I had tryed all

    of the locks.

     

    There were about 5 or 6 people sitting in the reception, and the woman in charge, told Neil to

    help me with this.

     

    I explained to Neil that maybe the smartest thing for me would be to return at closing-time,

    when all the other users of the gym had gone home, then it would only be one locker left

    to check.

     

    I was holding my note-book still, so I wrote down that Neil started acting a bit like a sergeant

    in the army, knocking his fist into the side of the enterance to the changing-room and screaming

    /comanding: 'come here'.

     

    I thought this behaviour was a bit peculiar, but I went after him into the changing-room, and then

    he starting to ask if I had been having a few beers. (Since I couldnt remember the number for

    the locker).

     

    I asked him what his name was, and wrote it down.

     

    Then I showed him that I had tryed all the lockers, and that noone worked, and that there wasnt

    any number-tag on the key-chain for the locker.

     

    He asked me which locker I thought it was, and I told him that I thought it was the number 156

    one. (It says in my note-book).

     

    So he asked me to give him the key, so that he could try the number 156 locker and the

    surrounding lockers.

     

    But he couldnt manage to open any of them, so he went to find the master-key.

     

    This took a bit of time, but he returned and then opened the locker with the new key.

     

    It was locker 156, and I showed him in my note-book that I had already tryed to open

    locker 156 with the key, because I had crossed out that number in the note-book.

     

    Neil said that 'the locks often get stuck.', I can see from my note-book.

     

    I found a new locker (since I didnt have the key any longer to the 156 one), and Neil

    reminded me to remember the key-number.

     

    I told him that I thought that there should be key-tags on the key-rings for the lockers.

     

    Also, the next time I went to the gym, the woman in charge reminded me that I should

    remember the key-number, and then I told the woman in charge that I thought that

    there should be key-tags on the key-rings. (But there still wasnt done anything

    with this problem, and about half of the key-rings were still missing a key-tag

    for the remainder of the time I was working out at the gym).

     

    So my questions regarding this is:

     

    11. How come there are so much problems with the locks getting stuck in the lockers?

    I mean, surely the gym bought new lockers when they opened? And its the Millennium

    building gym, so the building and the gym can't be that old? (Did someone buy used

    lockers for the gym when it opened)?

     

    12. How come the gym doesn't use oil in the locks for the lockers, if it, like Neil said,

    is a problem with the 'locks often get stuck'?

     

    13: And why didn't the gym put key-tags on the lockers, when about half of the key-

    tags were missing, and I had spoken about this problem with both Neil and the woman

    who was in charge there on the day this incident ocured, I think it was on 26/4?

     

     

    Problems with the washing of the machines:

     

    When I wrote the e-mail about the problem with the washing women/girls in the

    mens changing-room in the opening hours, then it came to mind that maybe

    the washing-should should rather wash the machines, and then wait untill

    the gym has closed, before they washed the changing-rooms.

     

    The reason I thought about this, is because I remembered an incident from when

    I was working out, I think it must have been in April or May.

    Then I was working out at the thread-mill, and this was I seem to remember hours

    before closing-time.

     

    There were a couple of washing-ladys there, even if it was still a few hours until

    closing-time.

     

    They were just walking around a bit, seemingly not certain on the routine.

     

    But then one of the washing ladies started to wash the stepping-machine in front

    of me. But what I thought was a bit strange, was that she only washed the tip of

    one of the handles of the stepping machine, and then nothing else. This she did

    twice with a few minuttes inbetween.

     

    Other than that, I couldn't see that eighter she or her collegue washed any of the

    other machines. (They looked a bit lost there, walking around with their buckets

    while the gym was still quite crowded, since it was hours till closing-time.)

     

    My question regarding this is:

    14: Shouldn't the washing-staff put up a sign near the machines when they wash

    them during the time of which the gym is open? Couldn't people get hurt if

    they work out on machines that are slippery from being washed? I seem to

    remember from other places I've been working etc., that yellow plastic signs

    are being put on the floor etc., saying that one have to be careful since its

    newly washed, so shouldn't the washing staff in the gym also do this when

    they clean the machines within the opening hours?

     

     

    Problems with staff:

     

    Like I've written, there have been some incedents before that I have wondered

    if I should complain about, but I'm not always sure whos in charge there, so

    this makes it a bit more tricky to complain, and I've also had the problem

    with the arrears on my membership, and the manager let me work out

    there and pay the arrears later, so there was a threshold before I would

    complain.

     

    But I wrote down in my note-book a couple of things I reacted on anyway.

     

    I was wondering a bit what was going on there, e.g. on 24/5 Craig and

    a blond girl sits in the reception.

     

    Only Craig logs in the members, even if there is a long queue. The girl

    is only watching. (I think maybe she is his girlfriend, since I noticed

    them sitting very close once when I wanted to log in).

     

    So I was wondering, if there is a long queue, surely both of them could

    log in the users of the gym, so that they wouldn't have to wait in a line,

    like if some of the customers are there to sign up for a membership,

    then still everyone have to wait in one line, even if there are more

    staff at work.

    So then I was wondering what is the girl doing there, if she cant log in

    the customers, and is only sitting watching.

     

    And I think she had been working there a while then, so I dont think

    she was on training.

     

    So this seemed a bit strange to me, so I thought I could mention it

    while Im writing this e-mail anyway.

     

    Also, I remember, that one Friday I was working out there, then they

    annonced the closing of the gym like this:

     

    'The gym will be closing in 60 minutes', 'The gym will be closing in

    45 minutes', 'The gym will be closing in 30 minutes', 'The gym will

    be closing in 15 minutes'.

    I think it was the same girl, but it seemed like it was Craig that told

    her to say it.

     

    Normally they only say 'The gym will be closing in 20 minuttes', or

    something like this, so I thought I could mention this as well, even

    if its maybe not so important what they say on the calling-system

    in the Friday evenings? Anyway, I thought I could mention it while

    I was writing the e-mail anyway.

     

    My question to this is:

     

    15. How come the staff only sits watching while the customers are

    standing in line?

     

    16. Shouldn't the staff have name-tags, where it said name and title,

    so that it would be easier for the users of the gym to know who to

    speak with regarding different problems. (So that they know who

    are in charge)?

     

    (For instance, on the day when there were washing girls/women in

    the mens changing room, and they must have been there from

    around 8.40 pm. or earlier, because I went in there on 8.45 pm,

    and then they were well into their routine it looked like, before I

    turned and went home.

     

    On that day (8/6), the staff that were working around closing-time,

    was Neil, a young girl that wears high-healed shoes and blouse,

    and a man around 40 years maybe that I think could maybe is the

    girls father, because I saw him standing very close to the girl once.

     

    I thought maybe the girl was in a kind of responsible position there,

    since she wear office-clothes, but the guy in his forthies I reckon

    also could be in charge there, since hes the oldest etc., and also

    Neil I reckoned could have been in charge, since he has access

    to the master-keys etc.

     

    So its a bit embarrasing asking about whos in charge, because

    you wouldn't want to offend anyone, with asking whos in charge,

    and then its actually that person who is in charge.

     

    I don't say that it is impossible for the customers of the gym to

    find out whose in charge, but I thought that it could maybe add

    to the general level of customer-service at the gym if the staff

    was wearing name-tags.

     

    I wrote down a note of who that was working that day, so that

    I would know later, since I wrote the e-mail that day with the

    complaint about the washing-staff in the chaning-room, so I

    thought I'd write it down, in case it became an issue.)

     

    17. Should they really anounce that the gym is closing in 60 minutes,

    and that the gym is closing in 45 minutes etc.?

     

     

     

    Problems with direct-debit agreement on 13/12/06:

     

    While I was looking for some notes before I started writing this

    e-mail now, I found a letter from the gym from 8/12/06.

     

    I'll just write what it says:

     

    'Dear Mr. Ribsskog,

     

    RE: Lifestyles Membership No: LDD121346

     

    As a valued Lifestyles member, I was surprised to find that your monthly

    Lifestyles subscription of £23.50 due earlier this month has not been paid.

     

    You may be aware of this already and have made payment at the

    Lifestyles centre, if so, please accept my apologies.

     

    If you have not paid these arrears, I would ask that you pay them at your

    earliest convienience by contacting your nearest Lifestyles Centre. Your

    membership account can be updated at any of the centres and you can

    pay either by cash, cheque, credit or debit card.

     

    Please contact Liverpool Direct on 0151 233 3007 for the number of your

    nearest Lifestye centre.

     

    I regret that until any arrears have been paid, standard admission

    charges will apply and you will lose the benefits of your membership.

     

    Yours feithfully

     

    Steve Kneale

     

    Business Development Manager'.

     

     

     

    (I write quite fast, so I thought I could just write it down, so that it would be

    easier to understand what I meant.)

     

    There were some problems regarding me switching from a Barclays Cashcard

    account to a Barclays Current-account at around the end of November/beginning

    of December 2006.

     

    The problem was that my pay from work was switched to the new current-account,

    whereas the direct-debits remained connected to the old account.

     

    I was in a busy period with work etc., so I didnt think about this problem before I

    got a letter from the bank about it.

    So I went to the bank, and transfered all my direct-debits from my old Barlays

    cashcard account, and to my new Barclays current/visa account.

    The clerk in the bank did this for me, it was a quite routine operation it seemed

    to me.

     

    Exept for the Lifestyles direct-debit for some reason.

    This direct-debit had been canceled right away, in a way so that the clerk in the

    bank couldnt transfer it to the new account.

     

    And when I went to the gym on 13/12, I had to pay the charge for Decemeber at

    the gym, and it wasn't possible for me to just switch the existing direct-debit

    agreement from my old Barlays Cashcard account to my new Barclays Current

    account, but I had to fill out a new form all over again to set up the new

    direct debit agreement on my new account.

     

    I accept that it was my fault with forgetting to transfer the direct-debit to the

    new account (It was some comunication-problem at work, with me informing

    work that I had got a new bank-account, but with work not giving me any

    feedback on that they had changed my account information in the payment

    system).

     

    But because of the later problem with the direct debits now in June, I thought

    I could ask a couple of questions regarding this as well, while I'm at it, so to

    speak.

     

    18: How come that the gym canceled my direct-debit between 1/12 and 8/12,

    and sent me a letter on 8/12, where it said that I had to go to the gym and

    pay in cash, when I had never had any payment problems with the gym before 

    this, and all the other direct-debits were possible to switch (for the clerk at

    the bank to my new account), except the gyms direct-debit? Shouldn't the

    gym have tryed to collect the payment from my account again 7-14 days

    later, like the clerk in the bank told me that the other companies did?

     

    19: Why did I have to write my signature on, and fill out a new form all over

    again on 13/12, for a new direct-debit. Didn't the gym have all my information

    from before, have one got to fill out and sign a new form just because one

    gets a new account-number, when one are still using the same bank?

     

    (The signature of the women I spoke with on the gym on 13/12/06, looks

    like it says Probert as a last name by the way, in case that makes it

    any easier to find out about this.

     

    I remember I thought it was strange that I had to fill out the form all over

    again, just because of the problem of the one payment due to the

    problems with changing the direct-debits and my pay from work to

    the new account, in a coordinated way.

     

    Because it didn't seem to be a similiar problem with the other companies

    that also had direct-debits on my account, so therefore I remember that

    I thought that this was a bit strange.

    And now, due to the other problems with the direct-debits again, now in

    June, I thought I'd just ask about the earlier problems, since they came

    to mind now.

     

    also this:

     

    How come I got a letter sent 8 days after the missed payment in December,

    where as later, in January, February and March (with the new direct-debit set

    up on 13/12), I didn't get a letter at all.

     

    It went on for two or three months, it must have been, before someone reminded

    me that there were arrears on my membership.

     

    I was quite busy in this time-periode, even if I was unemployed, so I didn't

    have so much money then, so I should maybe have spoken with the staff about

    this myself, but I much problems with paying my rent etc., and I was glad to

    have the oppertunity to work-out, since it was a bit stressing not having a

    job, and it helped to work-out to relax from the stress.

     

    And also, the staff gave different information to me regarding the arrears. The

    girl wearing office-wear, and who worked on 8/6, for instance, told me on

    one occation that it wasn't a hurry paying the arrears at all. (As long as I

    paid the running bills, which I did).

     

    And other members of staff, Craig for instance, told me that I had to pay the

    arrears before a certain date, (I spoke with the manager and got an extension,

    and later I agreed with Craig that I would pay the arrears when I got first the

    loan I was promised from the bank, and later the switch-bonus I was promised

    from the bank.)

     

    So the questions regarding this:

     

    20: How come in December I get a letter for not paying after 8 days, where as

    in the new year, it goes in the region of two or three months without recieving

    a letter or reminder from the staff, even if I worked out several times a week?

     

    21: How come one member of the staff (the girl with the office-wear who worked

    on 8/6), says that there is no hurry with the arrears, where as another member

    of staff (Craig), says that I have to pay before this and this date? How is this

    really supposed to be, according to the rules?

     

    (I appriciate very much that I was allowed to work out at the gym even if I had

    arrears, so it's not because I am ungrateful that I ask about these things. It's

    just that due to the other problems, with the washing-women/girls in the changing

    room, and the problems with the continuing processing errors and duplicate

    payments with the direct debits.

     

    And also due to the problems surrounding the unanounced closure of the gym

    for six weeks due to refurbishment.

     

    Due to these problems, I thought it would be best to mention all the other

    problems while I was at it. Even if some of these problems aren't maybe

    that serious in themselves, I anyway thought that they were worth bringing

    up, because, I think, thay add to a general picture of things at the gym

    being a bit out of hand, so due to this I'm a bit concerned about whats

    really going on at the gym, and then I thought it would be best to mentioned

    all the things that came to mind, because these things, even if it isn't clear

    to me here and now that there for certain is a problem conected with them,

    it could be a problem, so I thought it would be the most responsible thing

    to do, to also add the latter part of the problems, the ones that are mentioned

    under the title 'other problems'.

     

    So even if it was the first five or ten questions that made me go to the step

    of complaining. Even so, I hope you have the oppertunity to answer me about

    the last part of the questions as well.

     

    Sorry again that this e-mail got a bit delayed. I know I said I'd send it no latter

    than Wednesday, but I reckon that as long as I send it before the office hours

    on Thursday, then it hopefully should be ok.

     

    I'll also forward this e-mail to Linda Lennon and Lesley Southern, since I've been

    copying the e-mails I've sent to them earlier, in this e-mail now. 

     

    Hope that this is alright, and that you bear over with me if some of the last questions

    wasn't as well stated as they should have been, due to time problems etc.

     

    Hope that this is alright!

     

    Yours sincerely,

     

    Erik Ribsskog

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     







'Bokhylla' 70-tallet 80-tallet 90-tallet Anmeldelse Arne Mogan Olsen Berger Bergeråsen Brev Christell Humblen Dagbladet.no Datatilsynet Drammen E-post Facebook Google Haldis Humblen Hm Identitetstyveri Ingeborg Ribsskog irc Jobbsøking i England Johannes Ribsskog johncons-blogg Karen Ribsskog Klage Larvik Liverpool Magne Winnem Mobilbilder Musikk Nettmobbing Online trakassering Oppdatering Oslo Pia Ribsskog Politiet Rimi Slektsforskning StatCounter Svelvik Twitter Wikipedia YouTube Ågot Mogan Olsen