![]() |
Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com> |
Comlaint/Fwd: Ref 540460/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Phone-call just now
|
Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com> |
Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 1:31 PM | |
|
To: CustomerServiceDirector@scottishpower.co.uk | ||
| ||
![]() |
Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com> |
Comlaint/Fwd: Ref 540460/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Phone-call just now
|
Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com> |
Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 1:31 PM | |
|
To: CustomerServiceDirector@scottishpower.co.uk | ||
| ||
![]() |
Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com> |
Message from EnSO – Case 540460, Ribsskog
|
The Ombudsman <enquiries@energy-ombudsman.org.uk> |
Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 1:10 PM | |||||
|
To: "eribsskog@gmail.com" <eribsskog@gmail.com> | ||||||
| ||||||
PS.
Her er e-brevet som fulgte med:
![]() |
Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com> |
Re: Complaint/Fwd: Reminder/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Complaint <<#22175-33652#>>
|
Liverpool Direct <Liverpool.Direct@liverpool.gov.uk> |
Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 12:17 PM | |
|
To: eribsskog@gmail.com | ||
| ||
https://johncons-blogg.net/2009/11/jeg-sendte-en-e-post-til-stine-mogan.html
PS.
Jeg har nemlig mørk blondt hår, husker jeg, fra da jeg fikk mitt første pass, rundt 1980.
Da spurte jeg min far, Arne Mogan Olsen, hvilken hårfarge jeg hadde, og han sa at jeg hadde mørk blondt hår.
På en kanskje litt ‘misbilligende’ måte.
Så måtte jeg fylle ut det i passøknaden selv.
At jeg hadde blå øyne, det visste jeg vel fra før.
Men familien min, (ihvertfall faren mins familie), de liker nok ikke blonde, og tuller med de, og snakker om de bak ryggen på de, og bruker de som slaver, og behandler de dårlig da.
Noe sånt.
Så jeg får ingen hjelp av de, nå som jeg har overhørt at jeg er forfulgt av noe ‘mafian’.
Faren min har latt meg bo alene, fra jeg var ni år, så jeg kan ikke stole på min fars familie, rett og slett.
Jeg vet ikke hvor jeg har de, eller noenting.
Så sånn er det.
Mvh.
Erik Ribsskog
PS 2.
Dette er Norges Grunnlov, av 1814:
Denne har norske myndigheter ingen som helst respekt for.
De bare hersjer rundt med både meg og rettighetene mine, og nekter f.eks. å gi meg adokat, og de nekter også å fortelle meg hvem den her ‘mafian’ er, som jeg har overhørt at jeg er forfulgt av.
Så her er det bare sånn at Norge er et søple-land, mener jeg.
Så sånn er nok det.
Vi får se hva som skjer.
PS.
Dette nettstedet anbefaler å ha en innetemperatur på 19-22 grader:
Alt tatt i betraktning anbefales en innetemperatur på 19-22° C, men noe lavere ved høy fysisk aktivitet.
http://www.aktivhms.no/Skoler/Kompetanseheving/Innetemperatur_Helse.htm
PS 2.
Nå har det vært ganske kaldt, også her i Liverpool, (selv om jeg har lest at det er enda mye kaldere i Norge, ja), så jeg har måttet bruke to varmovner av gangen nå, for å få det såpass varmt i stua her.
Så jeg gruer meg litt til strømregninga.
Men jeg får spare til sommeren da.
Vi får se.
Her er mer om dette:
PS 4.
Jeg tror at en av de her pakkene, er en sånn strømmåler-gadget, som jeg har bestilt fra E-ON.
Da kan man se hvor mye strøm man bruker, i pund og pence.
Det blir artig.
Kanskje jeg skal prøve å få kommet meg på posthuset i morgen, før kl. 18, og få hentet disse pakkene.
Vi får se.
Her er mer om dette:
PS 5.
Jeg må også trene, merker jeg.
Jeg trente to ganger, på en uke, før jul, og da merka jeg, at jeg begynte å få kontroll, på mageflesket.
Men nå, så har jeg ikke trent siden julaften, (når faktisk gymet var åpent, siden britene feirer mest på første juledag osv.), så nå merker jeg at jeg begynner å bli for tjukk igjen.
Så nå er det sånn at magan liksom er så tjukk, så det blir ukomfertablet liksom, jeg merker at magan er for tjukk da, til at det er komfortabelt.
Så nå har jeg skikkelig lyst til å begynne å trene igjen, merker jeg.
Også for å få opp kondisen, som jeg har nesten begynt å få kontroll på nå.
Hvis det går for lang tid, mellom hver gang jeg trener, så merker jeg det, at jeg kondisen begynner å nærme seg et farlig lavt nivå.
Nok helt sikkert fordi jeg sitter for mye hjemme og skriver på blogg.
Så jeg får se om jeg klarer å ta meg noe sånt som en dag i morgen, hvor bloggskriving ikke er førsteprioritet.
Men jeg får se om jeg får kjøpt meg noen fler gensere osv., og nye innesko/tøfler, for det er ganske kaldt, om morgenen, for jeg har ikke full varme på om natta.
Så jeg får prøve å ta en sånn trene og ærend-dag i morgen, tenker jeg.
Det hadde vært digg etter jula.
Vi får se.
Mvh.
Erik Ribsskog
Thoughts on Blog Comments, Moderation, and the Conversation
by Scott Allen – June 16, 2008
Filed Under Blogging
Every blogger at some point has to wrestle with his or her own philosophy on blog comments and moderation. Each blog has different goals and a unique target audience so there is no “one size fits all” answer. The particular solutions will have to be different for each blog. I think about blog comments a lot. More so since developing WP-SpamFree, because now I’m always thinking about how to help improve the quality of blog conversations – that’s really what the comments are – part of the conversation. I’ll share some thoughts that may affect your particular strategy for handling blog comments.
The Conversation
First off, I’ll explain my view on blog comments as part of a conversation. The blog author writes a post and starts the conversation, which is continued through the comments. I think real-life conversational etiquette comes into play, or at least it should. When people have conversations outside the Matrix (Internet), there is nothing wrong with disagreeing or trying to persuade others to our point of view, as long as it’s done in a civil manner (not rude, not yelling, etc.) I feel the same way about blogs. I don’t mind if you disagree with me or have a different point of view (in fact that’s great!), but being rude, off-topic or self-promotional lowers the quality of the conversation, and let’s face it, who wants to have a conversation with someone who does that? We go elsewhere. What I find incredible is that people sometimes act very differently on blogs than they do in real life. In real life they would be courteous, even if they are disagreeing with others, but somehow online – where words are just words and there are no faces – it seems ok to drop some of these civilities. What happened here?
There a few irksome things that we see in a lot of blog comments. One is trolling. We all dislike trolls – people who visit a blog or forum with the sole intent of stirring up trouble, or flaming. Disagreement is fine, but there is nothing constructive about trolling and flaming. Another is when people read a blog post and take one line out of context and then start harping on something that clearly wasn’t the author’s intent. To that I say: “Read the entire post before you comment!” A third, is blatant self-promotion. We’re all guilty of a little shameless self-promotion from time to time, but seriously, let’s keep it to a minimum. The fourth, is a variation of #3: Dropping an extra link in the comments. The whole purpose for allowing blog commenters to place links in comments is to add to the conversation. If you really feel a link helps the conversation, add it. But people shouldn’t just throw a link to their site in because they can. Everyone already gets a link to your site just by commenting – is it necessary to make the comment spammy by adding another? You can probably come up with a few more that bother you too.
Comment Moderation
Personally I believe bloggers should always moderate comments. There are many who would disagree with me on this, and that’s fine. Their points are valid. Some feel moderation slightly discourages commenters, and I understand this position, as I don’t want to stifle the freedom of the commenters. However, in my opinion the costs of not moderating outweigh the benefits. Here are my reasons:
As a blog owner you are responsible for the content of your site – all of the content.
If it’s on your domain, you own it – the good, the bad, and the ugly. Yes, this means legally and in all other kinds of ways. If someone posts a comment on your site, they aren’t responsible for it any longer – YOU are. If it defames someone else, you are liable and could be sued. That may be an uncommon example, but it’s not extreme. If your blog is part of a business site, the stakes are even higher, because you need to protect your brand. This doesn’t mean you need to delete comments by anyone disagrees with you or has a negative comment – in fact this can lead to product improvements and development ideas – but it does mean you should be wise and use discretion.
Stop the trolls before they start.
Moderating comments gives you a chance to make sure that trolls don’t find a home on your blog.
It helps your blog stay on track for your target audience, and prevents anarchy.
You may think comment moderation might discourage commenters, but in my opinion it actually makes your blog a more hospitable place for your target audience (when done right). Are you aware of your target audience? If not, you should be – especially if your blog is on business site.
It protects your SEO efforts.
Unmoderated comments give an opportunity for spammers to link to bad neighborhoods from your site. You also don’t want to reward spammers – if they can get their links off in your blog, they’ll come back, with friends.
It improves the quality of the conversation.
If someone is just filling up space with something that has NOTHING to do with the topic of the post, or other comments, it’s just lowering the quality of your site and diluting it’s message. Eliminating these off-topic comments will keep the high-quality commenters coming back.
Editorial Integrity
That being said, it’s important for you to exercise editorial integrity, or your blog just turns into one big propaganda piece. (Again, just my thoughts here – you’re obviously free to do as you like.) If you edit a comment, don’t do more that fix grammar or typos, or strip a link. Also, don’t just delete a comment because it disagrees with you. Learning to respond with class to dissenting comments is a skill that every blogger should develop. However, if a comment is excessively rude or uncivil, by all means, delete it. People should learn to have discussions with respect for each other, so my tolerance level is pretty low in that area.
The Other Side of The Coin
There are two sides to this coin. We also need to become better commenters. Some quick questions we should ask ourselves before we hit submit:
Have I read the entire post and fully processed it before commenting?
Answering NO = FAIL.
Will this comment add something to the conversation?
Answering NO = FAIL.
Am I trolling?
Answering YES = FAIL.
Am I taking one line out of context and missing the author’s intended point?
Answering YES = FAIL.
Am I being self-promotional?
Answering YES = FAIL.
Am I only commenting to get a link or traffic?
Answering YES = FAIL.
Am I commenting primarily for any self-serving purpose?
Answering YES = FAIL.
If our comment fails any of these questions, then we should rewrite it with something that adds to the conversation and isn’t self-serving.
The thing I’ve found is that by simply participating in conversations without selfish motives, you make friends who want to link to you and promote you without you ever asking them to.
http://www.hybrid6.com/webgeek/2008/06/thoughts-on-blog-comments-moderation-and-the-conversation.php
PS.
Her kan man lese, at jeg må tenke på det, at hva er mitt mål med bloggen?
Og mitt mål med bloggen, det er ihvertfall ikke at det skal være det eneste i livet mitt, og at jeg skal sitte hjemme 24 timer i døgnet, som en slags plikt, og svare på alle slags mulige spørsmål som alle i Norge eller verden lurer på.
Nei, det var ikke akkurat det som var mitt mål med bloggen.
Mitt mål var vel å få mine rettigheter, og å finne ut hva som er galt i Norge.
Så jeg håper at folk er enige med meg i, at det er en forskjell på de to tingene.
Selv om det kan være hyggelig å ha diskusjoner innimellom, så må jeg liksom ha litt kontroll og, synes jeg, sånn at ikke hele livet mitt til slutt går ut på å sitte og diskutere til alle døgnets tider, som en plikt, 365 dager i året.
Så det håper jeg at folk forstår.
Det kan være gøy å diskutere, men da skal det være av lyst, mener jeg, og ikke som at man er som en slave som må sitte å diskutere, hele tiden, som en plikt eller slavejobb.
Hvis man skal diskutere, så bør man vel ha overskudd og lyst til det, hvis ikke så kan det vel slite en ut og, vil jeg tippe på.
Så det her med målet med bloggen, det håper jeg at folk har forståelse for.
Det får man håpe på.
Vi får se hva som skjer.
Vi får se.
Mvh.
Erik Ribsskog
![]() |
Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com> |
Klage/Fwd: (SaksId:120828) Kontigent
|
Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com> |
Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 3:04 AM | |
|
To: eli.therkildsen@nito.no | ||
| ||
![]() |
Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com> |
Re: [Ticket#2010010610016951] Complaint about the Norwegian Wikipedia/Fwd: Klage: Dette her er bare trakassering av meg. Med hils […]
|
Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com> |
Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 4:20 PM | |
|
To: Wikipedia Info Team <info-no@wikipedia.org> | ||
| ||
![]() |
Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com> |
Re: [Ticket#2010010610016951] Complaint about the Norwegian Wikipedia/Fwd: Klage: Dette her er bare trakassering av meg. Med hils […]
|
Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com> |
Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 4:01 PM | |
|
To: Wikipedia Info Team <info-no@wikipedia.org> | ||
| ||
'Bokhylla' 70-tallet 80-tallet 90-tallet Anmeldelse Arne Mogan Olsen Berger Bergeråsen Brev Christell Humblen Dagbladet.no Datatilsynet Drammen E-post Facebook Google Haldis Humblen Hm Identitetstyveri Ingeborg Ribsskog irc Jobbsøking i England Johannes Ribsskog johncons-blogg Karen Ribsskog Klage Larvik Liverpool Magne Winnem Mobilbilder Musikk Nettmobbing Online trakassering Oppdatering Oslo Pia Ribsskog Politiet Rimi Slektsforskning StatCounter Svelvik Twitter Wikipedia YouTube Ågot Mogan Olsen