PS.
Her er den samme sangen, hvor Cohen synger selv:
-
PS.
Bailey Tzuke, er hun som har den sangen, som diskoteket i Eberle St., spiller hele tida.
Og jeg har sett noe YouTube-video med henne, hvor de sa at hun hadde jobba i en ‘fish-shop’, siden den forrige singelen.
Det hørtes litt rart ut, for meg.
Den gjengen, i Brighton, hvor jeg pleide å være på språkreise, om sommerne, på 80-tallet, virka litt spesielle.
Så jeg husker jeg lurte på om hun var under kontroll.
Mora hennes synger også på noen av sangene.
Men jeg har ikke hørt om disse, mor og datter Tzuke, fra før, selv om jeg pleide å være ganske ofte i Brighton, i sommerferiene.
Det var ettersom jeg hørte den sangen, gjennom veggen her, fra diskoteket, G-bar, i Eberle St., at jeg prøvde å finne ut hvem det var som sang.
Så sånn er det.
Med vennlig hilsen
Erik Ribsskog
PS 2.
Her er den sangen jeg tenkte på igjen:
PS 3.
Og her er originalen også forresten, med Alanis Morissette:
-
PS.
I det andre klippet der, så har jeg litt problemer med magan, på Bumper.
Og det er sted jeg har vært en del ganger, i det siste, siden det er gratis inngang, og de spiller alternativ rock der, som jeg har pleid å høre en del på, for jeg ble så lei av sånn mainstream-musikk, på 80-tallet.
Så sånn var det.
Men nå, på fredag, så har de begynt med noe der, som jeg har sett, på noen steder i Livepool og Newcastle.
I Livepool, så er det på Zoo, Suede og altså Bumper da.
Og det er at det står noen, oftest afrikanere, på herredoen, og selger after-shave osv.
Og det har jeg ikke sett at dem har hatt på Bumper, før på fredag.
Jeg lurer på om det kan være et kjennemerke på at det er noe illuminati-greier, eller noe.
Hvem vet.
Med vennlig hilsen
Erik Ribsskog
-
http://www.dagbladet.no/2009/06/28/nyheter/helse/innenriks/kreft/sykdom/6939717/
PS.
Det er vel ille nok i seg selv, at myndighetene i Norge, tuller med en kreftsyk person.
Men, jeg synes at det som er enda verre, er hvorfor de gjør dette.
Det har vel lenge vært sånn i Norge, at folka i Norge og myndighetene, de kriger liksom mot hverandre litt.
Mens sånn som her i England, så er myndighetene og folk kanskje oftere på samme side.
Hva vet jeg.
Men grunnen til at jeg tror at myndighetene tuller med han karen, som heter Olsgård, som er et veldig norsk navn da.
Det er at myndighetene i Norge, de har en krig mot de norske.
Myndighetene i Norge, de er ikke norske, de er sionister, eller ‘jøder’ da.
Sånn som jeg mistenker at det er.
Og de har krig mot blonde.
Så hvis du er en ikke-jøde, en såkalt ‘goy’, som jeg sikkert er for sionistene/’jødene’, og som nok også da Olsgård er.
Da har man ikke lov til å ta saker til retten osv.
Det har jeg overhørt bak ryggen min, her i England, at jeg ‘is not supposed to deal with things like that’.
(Arbeidssaken min mot Arvato).
Antagelig sagt av noe sivilt britisk politi, eller etterettning, som dreiv å tulla med meg, og prøvde å fucke meg opp, for å kunne manipulere meg da, med såkalt ‘streat theather’, ‘mind control’ og ‘group stalking’.
Så sånn er det.
Så norske/nordiske/blonde/’ikke-jøder’, de har nok ingen rettigheter i vår nye verdensordnings-samfunn, som er Bilderberger-styrt, med New World Order og det hele.
Nei, hvis man bli betegnet som å være en såkalt ‘goy’, så blir man bare trenert mot, og trakassert, hvis man prøver å få sine rettigheter.
Det ser man med min arbeidssak mot Bertelsmann/Microsoft, mine anmeldelser til politiet i Norge, og alt det andre, som jeg har skrevet om på bloggen.
Hvis man er norsk, som jeg er, og som vel antagelig han Olsgård er, så blir man motarbeidet av myndighetene i sitt eget land, som har en krig mot de norske, i deres eget land.
Så det er nok sannheten om det norske samfunnet idag, og dette foregår overalt omtrent i verden, at sionistene/’jødene’, har kontrollen da, og tuller med ‘goy’.
De har nok kontrollen over etterettning, aviser, Nato vil jeg tippe osv., osv.
Så dette er nok den ubehagelige sannheten, om vår nye verdensordnings-hverdag.
Er du norsk, så får du ikke rettighetene dine, men blir bare tullet med av myndighetene.
Så sånn er nok det.
Med vennlig hilsen
Erik Ribsskog
-
Google Mail – Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:17 AM
To:
"Cox, Rosemary" <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>
Hi,I don't think it's any use with me repeating myself.I don't think you should handle my complaint.The reason is, that if you are to overworked, you get to tired.And in dealing with complaints like these, one obviously needs ones judgement, to be likeit should be.If one are out of balance, like I think you could be, then I don't think this is good for how thecomplaint is being dealt with.So please do as I ask Mrs .Cox, and tell your manager what I said, that I want someone elseto deal with my complaint, due to that I think that you must be overworked.Haven't you seen how fine the weather is today, you should have a day off in the fine weather,I think.Sincerely,Erik Ribsskog
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Cox, Rosemary <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk > wrote:
Dear Mr Ribsskog
Thank you for your e-mails
As previously advised I am not going to debate with
you the working hours of this office.
I have written to you today to advise the steps we
are taking with your complaint. If the firm fail to resolve the situation for
you, your complaint will be passed onto our adjudication area for further
consideration of the concerns you have raised.
I should add that we do not
tolerate rude or insulting language at this
office, and would expect any further communication to be sent in a more
acceptable manner.
Kind Regards
Rose Cox
team manager
From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]Sent: 28 June 2009 10:43
To: Cox,
Rosemary
Subject: Re: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier
e-mailHi,
of course you can work on Sundays if you want.But business e-mails should just be sent within the
business-hours.Or else, what's going to happen, is obvious.Someone are going to come drunk home from town, and answer the
business-e-mails when they are drunk, which is what has happened today, with our
correspondence.If this is something, you didn't know from before, then I think this
Financial Ombudsman-stuff is just a load of crap really.Try to use the head that God gave you when you were born!Sincerely,Erik RibsskogOn Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Cox, Rosemary <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk >
wrote:Dear Mr
RibsskogThank you
for your e-mailI must admit to being surprised and confused with the content of
the e-mail.We are an extremely busy department and we often work at the weekends,
this is obviously of help to consumers as we are able to deal with
their complaints in a more timely manner. I would suggest that
It is entirely up to each individual business to determine which hours
their staff will work and I do not intend debating this with
you.By working this weekend I have been able to deal with your complaint,
which as you can appreciate is of a benefit to
you.Perhaps you can clarify the spelling mistakes you are referring
to?Kind
RegardsRose
Coxteam
manager
From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]Sent: 28 June 2009 10:20
Subject: Re: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier
e-mailHi again,
don't you think it's strange for an institutions like yours to send
e-mails on Sunday mornings then?Shouldn't e-mails be sent within normal business hours then you
think?This is what it says on Wikipedia:In
the United
States and United
Kingdom, the hours between 9 am and 5 pm are typically considered to be standard business
hours
Sincerely,
Erik
RibsskogOn Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Cox, Rosemary <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk >
wrote:Dear Mr
RibsskogThank
you for your e-mailThat's no problem, however I should point out that we are
not a government department, we are a independent complaints
body.I
will be in touch with your again in the next few
daysKind
RegardsRose
Coxteam
manager
From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]Sent: 28 June 2009
08:02
To: Cox, Rosemary
Subject: Re: Complaint against
RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mailHi,
ok that's very fine, I'm just home from town you see.I thought it was a bit strange, since noone in Government in
Norway, work on Sundays.Sorry about this, I forget sometimes that I'm not in Norway any
longer.Sorry about this!Yours sincerely,Erik RibsskogOn Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 7:54 AM, Cox, Rosemary <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk >
wrote:Dear
Mr RibsskogThank
you for your e-mailI can assure you this is not a joke, I am
currently in the office working
today.I presume that you would like us to deal
with your complaint, so am responding to your e-mails
todayKind
RegardsRose
Coxteam
manager
From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]Sent: 28 June 2009 07:36
To: Cox,
Rosemary
Subject: Re: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier
e-mailHi,
why do send the e-mails early on a Sunday morning, by the way.Is this some kind of joke?Sincerely,Erik RibsskogOn Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Cox, Rosemary
<Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk >
wrote:Dear
Mr RibsskogThank you for your e-mailsI will contact you again once I
have considered the
information.Kind
RegardsRose
Coxteam
manager
From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]Sent: 27 June 2009 14:59
To: Cox,
Rosemary
Subject: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier
e-mailHi,
thank you for you e-mail, that I recieved today.I'll contact your collegue back, regarding the
Barclays-complaint.I sent the complaint on RBS Dale St., to Yvonne Williams at RBS,
but shealso harassed me, like this, she writes 'Dear Ms Ribsskog', even if
my nameis Erik, and in Britain, you have a movie called 'Erik the Viking',
and Eric isalso a quite usual name, in English-speaking countries.So I think Yvonne Williams, the complaint-investigator, also
bullied me.I think this must have been a deliberate mistake.This ended with the complaint being partly resolved, in the way
that RBS,gave me the bonus of £100, for moving my account to them, from
Barclays,(who I also had problems with, that I'll exlain about to your
collegue, like Imentioned earlier).I'll also find the actual complaint against RBS Dale St. now,
and forward itto you.What I meant with the complaint-form, was that it didn't look
anything at alllike the ones you've sent me now.Maybe the complaint-form I was sent, was to do with other
financial institutions,than banks?Like share-fonds etc?Have you also got other complaint-forms, other than to banks,
perhaps someonesent me the wrong form intentionally?Just a thought I had.But anyway, thank you very much for your e-mail, and I'll also
find the actualRBS Dale St. complaint, and e-mail it to you now.Yours sincerely,Erik Ribsskog———- Forwarded message ———-
From:
Williams, Yvonne (CRU) <Yvonne.Williams@rbs.co.uk>
Date: Tue, Jun
26, 2007 at 4:30 PM
Subject: RE: Earlier e-mail
To: Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>Dear
Ms RibsskogCould you please arrange another copy of your email to be sent to
me for my investigationRegardsYvonne Williams
From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 19 June 2007 14:04
To: Williams, Yvonne
(CRU)
Subject: Earlier e-mail*** WARNING : This message originates from
the Internet ***
Hi,I'm refering to the e-mail I sent you on 5/6.I was just wondering if you have recieved this e-mail, because
I cant seethat I have recieved any answer to it yet.Please just contact me if you want me to send you the e-mail
again.Yours sincerely,Erik RibsskogThe Royal Bank of
Scotland plc, Registered in Scotland No. 90312. Registered Office: 36 St
Andrew Square, Edinburgh EH2 2YBAuthorised and regulated by the
Financial Services Authority.This e-mail message is confidential
and for use by the addressee only. If the message is received by anyone
other than the addressee, please return the message to the sender by
replying to it and then delete the message from your computer. Internet
e-mails are not necessarily secure. The Royal Bank of Scotland plc does
not accept responsibility for changes made to this message after it was
sent.Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the
transmission of viruses, it is the responsibility of the recipient to
ensure that the onward transmission, opening or use of this message and
any attachments will not adversely affect its systems or data. No
responsibility is accepted by The Royal Bank of Scotland plc in this
regard and the recipient should carry out such virus and other checks as
it considers
appropriate.
This e-mail and any attachments are
confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the
intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this
e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended
recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to
it.
This e-mail and any attachments have been
checked by virus detection software before transmission. You should
carry out your own virus checks on the contents of this communication.
We accept no liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by
software viruses or by interception or interruption of this mail.
Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has
no contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated
in it. The statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of
the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Financial
Ombudsman Service Ltd.This email has originated from the Financial
Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR,
United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No.
3725015. Registered office as above.
This e-mail and any attachments are
confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the
intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this
e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended
recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to
it.
This e-mail and any attachments have been
checked by virus detection software before transmission. You should carry
out your own virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept
no liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by software
viruses or by interception or interruption of this mail.Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no
contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in
it. The statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the
author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman
Service Ltd.This email has originated from the Financial
Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR,
United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No.
3725015. Registered office as above.
This e-mail and any attachments are
confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the
intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this
e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended
recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to
it.
This e-mail and any attachments have been checked
by virus detection software before transmission. You should carry out your
own virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept no
liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or
by interception or interruption of this mail.Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no
contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it.
The statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service
Ltd.This email has originated from the Financial
Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR,
United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No.
3725015. Registered office as above.
This e-mail and any attachments are
confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the
intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this
e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended
recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to
it.
This e-mail and any attachments have been checked
by virus detection software before transmission. You should carry out your own
virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept no liability for
any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or by interception
or interruption of this mail.Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no
contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it.
The statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service
Ltd.This email has originated from the Financial
Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR,
United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No.
3725015. Registered office as above.
This e-mail and any attachments are confidential
and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient,
please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail and any attachment
from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you must not copy,
disclose or take any action in reliance to it.This e-mail and any attachments have been checked by
virus detection software before transmission. You should carry out your own
virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept no liability for
any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or by interception or
interruption of this mail.Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no
contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it. The
statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author and do
not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd.
This email has originated from the Financial
Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR, United
Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No. 3725015.
Registered office as above.
-
Google Mail – Update/Fwd: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Update/Fwd: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 10:56 AM
To:
Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk
Hi,I also think you are to overworked, since you are working every Sunday.So I think you should ask your manager, to give my complaint, to someone else,so that you can get some well deserved rest, before you warrior on, with thecomplaints.Hope this is alright!Yours sincerely,Erik Ribsskog———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>Date: Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 10:43 AM
Subject: Re: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail
To: "Cox, Rosemary" <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk >Hi,
of course you can work on Sundays if you want.But business e-mails should just be sent within the business-hours.Or else, what's going to happen, is obvious.Someone are going to come drunk home from town, and answer the business-e-mails when they are drunk, which is what has happened today, with our correspondence.
If this is something, you didn't know from before, then I think this Financial Ombudsman-stuff is just a load of crap really.Try to use the head that God gave you when you were born!Sincerely,Erik RibsskogOn Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Cox, Rosemary <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk > wrote:Dear Mr
RibsskogThank you
for your e-mailI
must admit to being surprised and confused with the content of the
e-mail.We are an
extremely busy department and we often work at the weekends, this is obviously
of help to consumers as we are able to deal with their complaints in a
more timely manner. I would suggest that
It is entirely up
to each individual business to determine which hours their staff will work and I
do not intend debating this with you.By working this
weekend I have been able to deal with your complaint, which as you can
appreciate is of a benefit to you.Perhaps you can
clarify the spelling mistakes you are referring
to?Kind
RegardsRose
Coxteam manager
From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]Sent: 28 June 2009 10:20
Subject: Re: Complaint against
RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mailHi again,
don't you think it's strange for an institutions like yours to send e-mails
on Sunday mornings then?Shouldn't e-mails be sent within normal business hours then you
think?This is what it says on Wikipedia:In the United
States and United Kingdom, the hours
between 9 am and 5 pm are typically
considered to be standard business hours
Sincerely,
Erik
RibsskogOn Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Cox, Rosemary <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk >
wrote:Dear Mr
RibsskogThank you
for your e-mailThat's no problem, however I should point out that we are
not a government department, we are a independent complaints
body.I
will be in touch with your again in the next few
daysKind
RegardsRose
Coxteam
manager
From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]Sent: 28 June 2009 08:02
To: Cox, Rosemary
Subject: Re: Complaint
against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mailHi,
ok that's very fine, I'm just home from town you see.I thought it was a bit strange, since noone in Government in Norway,
work on Sundays.Sorry about this, I forget sometimes that I'm not in Norway any
longer.Sorry about this!Yours sincerely,Erik RibsskogOn Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 7:54 AM, Cox, Rosemary <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk >
wrote:Dear Mr
RibsskogThank
you for your e-mailI can assure you this is not a joke, I am currently
in the office working today.I presume that you would like us to deal
with your complaint, so am responding to your e-mails
todayKind
RegardsRose
Coxteam
manager
From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]Sent: 28 June 2009
07:36
To: Cox, Rosemary
Subject: Re: Complaint against
RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mailHi,
why do send the e-mails early on a Sunday morning, by the way.Is this some kind of joke?Sincerely,Erik RibsskogOn Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Cox, Rosemary <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk >
wrote:Dear
Mr RibsskogThank
you for your e-mailsI will contact you again once I have
considered the information.Kind
RegardsRose
Coxteam
manager
From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]Sent: 27 June 2009 14:59
To: Cox,
Rosemary
Subject: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier
e-mailHi,
thank you for you e-mail, that I recieved today.I'll contact your collegue back, regarding the
Barclays-complaint.I sent the complaint on RBS Dale St., to Yvonne Williams at RBS, but
shealso harassed me, like this, she writes 'Dear Ms Ribsskog', even if
my nameis Erik, and in Britain, you have a movie called 'Erik the Viking',
and Eric isalso a quite usual name, in English-speaking countries.So I think Yvonne Williams, the complaint-investigator, also
bullied me.I think this must have been a deliberate mistake.This ended with the complaint being partly resolved, in the way that
RBS,gave me the bonus of £100, for moving my account to them, from
Barclays,(who I also had problems with, that I'll exlain about to your
collegue, like Imentioned earlier).I'll also find the actual complaint against RBS Dale St. now, and
forward itto you.What I meant with the complaint-form, was that it didn't look
anything at alllike the ones you've sent me now.Maybe the complaint-form I was sent, was to do with other
financial institutions,than banks?Like share-fonds etc?Have you also got other complaint-forms, other than to banks, perhaps
someonesent me the wrong form intentionally?Just a thought I had.But anyway, thank you very much for your e-mail, and I'll also
find the actualRBS Dale St. complaint, and e-mail it to you now.Yours sincerely,Erik Ribsskog———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Williams, Yvonne (CRU) <Yvonne.Williams@rbs.co.uk>Date: Tue, Jun
26, 2007 at 4:30 PM
Subject: RE: Earlier e-mail
To: Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>Dear
Ms RibsskogCould
you please arrange another copy of your email to be sent to me for my
investigationRegardsYvonne
Williams
From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 19 June 2007 14:04
To: Williams, Yvonne
(CRU)
Subject: Earlier e-mail*** WARNING : This message originates from
the Internet ***
Hi,I'm refering to the e-mail I sent you on 5/6.I was just wondering if you have recieved this e-mail, because I
cant seethat I have recieved any answer to it yet.Please just contact me if you want me to send you the e-mail
again.Yours sincerely,Erik RibsskogThe Royal Bank of
Scotland plc, Registered in Scotland No. 90312. Registered Office: 36 St
Andrew Square, Edinburgh EH2 2YBAuthorised and regulated by the
Financial Services Authority.This e-mail message is confidential
and for use by the addressee only. If the message is received by anyone
other than the addressee, please return the message to the sender by
replying to it and then delete the message from your computer. Internet
e-mails are not necessarily secure. The Royal Bank of Scotland plc does
not accept responsibility for changes made to this message after it was
sent.Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the
transmission of viruses, it is the responsibility of the recipient to
ensure that the onward transmission, opening or use of this message and
any attachments will not adversely affect its systems or data. No
responsibility is accepted by The Royal Bank of Scotland plc in this
regard and the recipient should carry out such virus and other checks as
it considers
appropriate.
This e-mail and any attachments are
confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the
intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this
e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended
recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to
it.
This e-mail and any attachments have been
checked by virus detection software before transmission. You should carry
out your own virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept
no liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by software
viruses or by interception or interruption of this mail.Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no
contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in
it. The statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the
author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman
Service Ltd.This email has originated from the Financial
Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR,
United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No.
3725015. Registered office as above.
This e-mail and any attachments are
confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the
intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this
e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended
recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to
it.
This e-mail and any attachments have been checked
by virus detection software before transmission. You should carry out your
own virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept no
liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or
by interception or interruption of this mail.Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no
contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it.
The statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service
Ltd.This email has originated from the Financial
Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR,
United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No.
3725015. Registered office as above.
This e-mail and any attachments are
confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the
intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this
e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended
recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to
it.
This e-mail and any attachments have been checked
by virus detection software before transmission. You should carry out your own
virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept no liability for
any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or by interception
or interruption of this mail.Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no
contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it.
The statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service
Ltd.This email has originated from the Financial
Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR,
United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No.
3725015. Registered office as above.
This e-mail and any attachments are confidential
and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient,
please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail and any attachment
from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you must not copy,
disclose or take any action in reliance to it.This e-mail and any attachments have been checked by
virus detection software before transmission. You should carry out your own
virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept no liability for
any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or by interception or
interruption of this mail.Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no
contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it. The
statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author and do
not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd.
This email has originated from the Financial
Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR, United
Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No. 3725015.
Registered office as above.