Erik Ribsskog
Case# 37667434: Impersonation – ErikOinkerRibss
Erik Ribsskog     Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 7:28 PM
To: Twitter Support
Hi,

thank you for your e-mail!

I wonder if it could be, a misunderstanding, to do, with this decision.

(Because I think this is clearly an impersonation-case).

So I was wondering, if you could please escalate this case, to a superior/line-manager there, (for å second opinion).

Thanks in advance for any help!

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Twitter Support wrote:

    @JohnconsWeb.

    Hello,

    We’ve investigated the reported account and have determined that it is not in violation of Twitter’s impersonation policy.

    In order for an account to be in violation of the policy, it must portray another person or business in a misleading or deceptive manner. Read the full policy here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/18366

    Thank you for your report, and please note that any documents you may have uploaded will be deleted.

    Twitter Support
    Reference #ref:00DA0000000K0A8.500G00000120TQz:ref
    Help
    Twitter, Inc. 1355 Market Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94103

Erik Ribsskog
Case# 37667693: Impersonation – GronnPaaData
Erik Ribsskog     Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 7:17 PM
To: Twitter Support
Hi,

thank you for your e-mail!

I wonder if it could be, a misunderstanding, to do, with this decision.

(Because I think this is clearly an impersonation-case).

So I was wondering, if you could please escalate this case, to a superior/line-manager there, (for å second opinion).

Thanks in advance for any help!

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 6:18 PM, Twitter Support wrote:

    @JohnconsWeb.

    Hello,

    We’ve investigated the reported account and have determined that it is not in violation of Twitter’s impersonation policy.

    In order for an account to be in violation of the policy, it must portray another person or business in a misleading or deceptive manner. Read the full policy here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/18366

    Thank you for your report, and please note that any documents you may have uploaded will be deleted.

    Twitter Support
    Reference #ref:00DA0000000K0A8.500G00000120TlJ:ref
    Help
    Twitter, Inc. 1355 Market Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94103

Erik Ribsskog
Case# 37667483: Impersonation – sjefstulling
Erik Ribsskog     Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 7:04 PM
To: Twitter Support
Hi,

thank you for your e-mail!

I wonder if it could be, a misunderstanding, to do, with this decision.

(Because I think this is clearly an impersonation-case).

So I was wondering, if you could please escalate this case, to a superior/line-manager there, (for å second opinion).

Thanks in advance for any help!

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Twitter Support wrote:

    @JohnconsWeb.

    Hello,

    We’ve investigated the reported account and have determined that it is not in violation of Twitter’s impersonation policy.

    In order for an account to be in violation of the policy, it must portray another person or business in a misleading or deceptive manner. Read the full policy here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/18366

    Thank you for your report, and please note that any documents you may have uploaded will be deleted.

    Twitter Support
    Reference #ref:00DA0000000K0A8.500G00000120TUw:ref
    Help
    Twitter, Inc. 1355 Market Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94103

Erik Ribsskog
Case# 37667529: Impersonation – JodenRibsskog
Erik Ribsskog     Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 6:25 PM
To: Twitter Support
Hi,

thank you for your e-mail!

I wonder if it could be, a misunderstanding, to do, with this decision.

(Because I think this is clearly an impersonation-case).

So I was wondering, if you could please escalate this case, to a superior/line-manager there, (for å second opinion).

Thanks in advance for any help!

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 6:20 PM, Twitter Support wrote:

    @JohnconsWeb.
    Hello,

    We’ve investigated the reported account and have determined that it is not in violation of Twitter’s impersonation policy.

    In order for an account to be in violation of the policy, it must portray another person or business in a misleading or deceptive manner. Read the full policy here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/18366

    Thank you for your report, and please note that any documents you may have uploaded will be deleted.

    Twitter Support
    Reference #ref:00DA0000000K0A8.500G00000120TYP:ref
    Help
    Twitter, Inc. 1355 Market Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94103

Erik Ribsskog
Case# 37667579: Impersonation – BaronErikR
Erik Ribsskog     Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 5:57 PM
To: Twitter Support
Hi,

thank you for your e-mail!

I wonder if it could be, a misunderstanding, to do, with this decision.

(Because I think this is clearly an impersonation-case).

So I was wondering, if you could please escalate this case, to a superior/line-manager there, (for å second opinion).

Thanks in advance for any help!

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 6:20 PM, Twitter Support wrote:

    @JohnconsWeb.
    Hello,

    We’ve investigated the reported account and have determined that it is not in violation of Twitter’s impersonation policy.

    In order for an account to be in violation of the policy, it must portray another person or business in a misleading or deceptive manner. Read the full policy here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/18366

    Thank you for your report, and please note that any documents you may have uploaded will be deleted.

    Twitter Support
    Reference #ref:00DA0000000K0A8.500G00000120TcW:ref
    Help
    Twitter, Inc. 1355 Market Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94103

Erik Ribsskog
Case# 37667633: Impersonation – erikribs
Erik Ribsskog     Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 5:46 PM
To: Twitter Support
Hi,

thank you for your e-mail!

I wonder if it could be, a misunderstanding, to do, with this decision.

(Because I think this is clearly an impersonation-case).

So I was wondering, if you could please escalate this case, to a superior/line-manager there, (for å second opinion).

Thanks in advance for any help!

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 6:20 PM, Twitter Support wrote:

    @JohnconsWeb.
    Hello,

    We’ve investigated the reported account and have determined that it is not in violation of Twitter’s impersonation policy.

    In order for an account to be in violation of the policy, it must portray another person or business in a misleading or deceptive manner. Read the full policy here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/18366

    Thank you for your report, and please note that any documents you may have uploaded will be deleted.

    Twitter Support
    Reference #ref:00DA0000000K0A8.500G00000120Tgi:ref
    Help
    Twitter, Inc. 1355 Market Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94103

Erik Ribsskog
Case# 37667382: Impersonation – minitissemann
Erik Ribsskog     Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 5:35 PM
To: Twitter Support
Hi,

thank you for your e-mail!

I wonder if it could be, a misunderstanding, to do, with this decision.

(Because I think this is clearly an impersonation-case).

So I was wondering, if you could please escalate this case, to a superior/line-manager there, (for å second opinion).

Thanks in advance for any help!

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 6:25 PM, Twitter Support wrote:

    @JohnconsWeb.

    Hello,

    We’ve investigated the reported account and have determined that it is not in violation of Twitter’s impersonation policy.

    In order for an account to be in violation of the policy, it must portray another person or business in a misleading or deceptive manner. Read the full policy here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/18366

    Thank you for your report, and please note that any documents you may have uploaded will be deleted.

    Twitter Support
    Reference #ref:00DA0000000K0A8.500G00000120TN2:ref
    Help
    Twitter, Inc. 1355 Market Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94103