johncons
  • Du og Rita Omvik har ingen forbindelser på Facebook
    Product Manager for Skintech As
    Bosted: Maura, Norway
    • Samtale startet tirsdag
    • Erik Ribsskog
      13.09.2016 19:55
      Erik Ribsskog

      Hei,
      jeg søkte på nettet, og fant ut, at du vant Frøken Norge, i 1993.
      Jeg var ferdig med førstegangstjenesten, (i Elverum), det året.
      Og min yngre søster Pia flytta inn hos meg, på den tida.
      (For hu var hjemløs, etter at bofelleskapet hennes, ble oppløst).
      Og når det nærmet seg jul.
      Så sa Pia, at jeg var invitert, til min far og hans nye kone/samboer Haldis.
      Og der skulle det også være, ei dame, som kom på fjerdeplass, (eller noe sånt), i frøken Norge.
      Men da julaften kom, og jeg dro, til Bergeråsen.
      Så var ikke hu frøken Norge-dama der.
      Min fars stedatter Christell, (som bare gikk i joggedress, på julaften), sa at hennes eldre halvbror Jan, hadde tulla, med hu frøken Norge-dama.
      Og at det var grunnen, til at hu ikke dukka opp der.
      Og Jans mor Haldis klagde da på, at Jans damer, alltid var så unge.
      Men hvilken frøken Norge-finalist, (fra 1993), kan dette ha vært, egentlig?
      For jeg har nå drevet, med slektsforskning, i mange år.
      Og jeg kan forstå, hvem dette, kan ha vært.
      Kan det ha vært sånn, at disse folka, (må jeg kalle dem), bare har tulla med meg?
      Beklager hvis det ikke var greit, å sende melding.
      På forhånd takk for eventuelt svar!
      Mvh.
      Erik Ribsskog
    • I dag
    • 19:29Rita Omvik har godtatt forespørselen din.
    • Rita Omvik
      19:32
      Rita Omvik

      Hei Erik, jeg kan dessverre ikke hjelpe deg, men hvis du ønsker å komme til bunns i det her så kan du prøve å kontakte Geir Hamnes. Han har sikkert oversikt over alle finalistene i et eller annet arkiv. Lykke til👍hilsen Rita😉
    • I dag
    • Erik Ribsskog
      00:32
      Erik Ribsskog

      Hei,
      takk for svar!
      Ja, det er litt sånn, at hvis man blir lovet, at man skal få møte, en av finalistene, fra Frøken Norge.
      Og så får man ikke møte dem likevel.
      Så blir man litt skuffa, liksom.
      Så det var artig å få svar.
      Jeg får se om jeg finner han misse-generalen på Facebook, eller noe sånt.
      (Jeg var ikke sikker på, om det var han, som hadde frøken Norge også).
      Igjen mange takk for svar!
      Mvh.
      Erik Ribsskog
  • Erik Ribsskog
    Case# 37668212: Impersonation – RibsskogErik
    Erik Ribsskog     Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 11:59 PM
    To: Twitter Support
    Hi,

    thank you for your e-mail!

    I wonder if it could be, a misunderstanding, to do, with this decision.

    (Because I think this is clearly an impersonation-case).

    So I was wondering, if you could please escalate this case, to a superior/line-manager there, (for å second opinion).

    Thanks in advance for any help!

    Best regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Twitter Support wrote:

        @JohnconsWeb.

        Hello,

        We’ve investigated the reported account and have determined that it is not in violation of Twitter’s impersonation policy.

        In order for an account to be in violation of the policy, it must portray another person or business in a misleading or deceptive manner. Read the full policy here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/18366

        Thank you for your report, and please note that any documents you may have uploaded will be deleted.

        Twitter Support
        Reference #ref:00DA0000000K0A8.500G00000120URK:ref
        Help
        Twitter, Inc. 1355 Market Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94103

  • Erik Ribsskog
    Case# 37668249: Impersonation – MrErikRibsskog
    Erik Ribsskog     Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 11:54 PM
    To: Twitter Support
    Hi,

    thank you for your e-mail!

    I wonder if it could be, a misunderstanding, to do, with this decision.

    (Because I think this is clearly an impersonation-case).

    So I was wondering, if you could please escalate this case, to a superior/line-manager there, (for å second opinion).

    Thanks in advance for any help!

    Best regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Twitter Support wrote:

        @JohnconsWeb.

        Hello,

        We’ve investigated the reported account and have determined that it is not in violation of Twitter’s impersonation policy.

        In order for an account to be in violation of the policy, it must portray another person or business in a misleading or deceptive manner. Read the full policy here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/18366

        Thank you for your report, and please note that any documents you may have uploaded will be deleted.

        Twitter Support
        Reference #ref:00DA0000000K0A8.500G00000120UUE:ref
        Help
        Twitter, Inc. 1355 Market Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94103

  • Erik Ribsskog
    Case# 37668296: Impersonation – GaleRibsskog
    Erik Ribsskog     Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 11:50 PM
    To: Twitter Support
    Hi,

    thank you for your e-mail!

    I wonder if it could be, a misunderstanding, to do, with this decision.

    (Because I think this is clearly an impersonation-case).

    So I was wondering, if you could please escalate this case, to a superior/line-manager there, (for å second opinion).

    Thanks in advance for any help!

    Best regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Twitter Support wrote:

        @JohnconsWeb.

        Hello,

        We’ve investigated the reported account and have determined that it is not in violation of Twitter’s impersonation policy.

        In order for an account to be in violation of the policy, it must portray another person or business in a misleading or deceptive manner. Read the full policy here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/18366

        Thank you for your report, and please note that any documents you may have uploaded will be deleted.

        Twitter Support
        Reference #ref:00DA0000000K0A8.500G00000120UY1:ref
        Help
        Twitter, Inc. 1355 Market Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94103

  • Erik Ribsskog
    Case# 37667831: Impersonation – ErikGayman
    Erik Ribsskog     Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 11:46 PM
    To: Twitter Support
    Hi,

    thank you for your e-mail!

    I wonder if it could be, a misunderstanding, to do, with this decision.

    (Because I think this is clearly an impersonation-case).

    So I was wondering, if you could please escalate this case, to a superior/line-manager there, (for å second opinion).

    Thanks in advance for any help!

    Best regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 4:58 PM, Twitter Support wrote:

        @JohnconsWeb.

        Hello,

        We’ve investigated the reported account and have determined that it is not in violation of Twitter’s impersonation policy.

        In order for an account to be in violation of the policy, it must portray another person or business in a misleading or deceptive manner. Read the full policy here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/18366

        Thank you for your report, and please note that any documents you may have uploaded will be deleted.

        Twitter Support
        Reference #ref:00DA0000000K0A8.500G00000120TwR:ref
        Help
        Twitter, Inc. 1355 Market Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94103

  • Erik Ribsskog
    Case# 37667872: Impersonation – E_Ribsskog
    Erik Ribsskog     Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 11:42 PM
    To: Twitter Support
    Hi,

    thank you for your e-mail!

    I wonder if it could be, a misunderstanding, to do, with this decision.

    (Because I think this is clearly an impersonation-case).

    So I was wondering, if you could please escalate this case, to a superior/line-manager there, (for å second opinion).

    Thanks in advance for any help!

    Best regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 5:02 PM, Twitter Support wrote:

        @JohnconsWeb.

        Hello,

        We’ve investigated the reported account and have determined that it is not in violation of Twitter’s impersonation policy.

        In order for an account to be in violation of the policy, it must portray another person or business in a misleading or deceptive manner. Read the full policy here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/18366

        Thank you for your report, and please note that any documents you may have uploaded will be deleted.

        Twitter Support
        Reference #ref:00DA0000000K0A8.500G00000120Tzk:ref
        Help
        Twitter, Inc. 1355 Market Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94103

  • Erik Ribsskog
    Case# 37667916: Impersonation – TheOinker
    Erik Ribsskog     Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 11:36 PM
    To: Twitter Support
    Hi,

    thank you for your e-mail!

    I wonder if it could be, a misunderstanding, to do, with this decision.

    (Because I think this is clearly an impersonation-case).

    So I was wondering, if you could please escalate this case, to a superior/line-manager there, (for å second opinion).

    Thanks in advance for any help!

    Best regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Twitter Support wrote:

        @JohnconsWeb.

        Hello,

        We’ve investigated the reported account and have determined that it is not in violation of Twitter’s impersonation policy.

        In order for an account to be in violation of the policy, it must portray another person or business in a misleading or deceptive manner. Read the full policy here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/18366

        Thank you for your report, and please note that any documents you may have uploaded will be deleted.

        Twitter Support
        Reference #ref:00DA0000000K0A8.500G00000120U3S:ref
        Help
        Twitter, Inc. 1355 Market Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94103

  • Erik Ribsskog
    Case# 37667954: Impersonation – johncons_
    Erik Ribsskog     Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 8:26 PM
    To: Twitter Support
    Hi,

    thank you for your e-mail!

    I wonder if it could be, a misunderstanding, to do, with this decision.

    (Because I think this is clearly an impersonation-case).

    So I was wondering, if you could please escalate this case, to a superior/line-manager there, (for å second opinion).

    Thanks in advance for any help!

    Best regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 5:15 PM, Twitter Support wrote:

        @JohnconsWeb.

        Hello,

        We’ve investigated the reported account and have determined that it is not in violation of Twitter’s impersonation policy.

        In order for an account to be in violation of the policy, it must portray another person or business in a misleading or deceptive manner. Read the full policy here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/18366

        Thank you for your report, and please note that any documents you may have uploaded will be deleted.

        Twitter Support
        Reference #ref:00DA0000000K0A8.500G00000120U6W:ref
        Help
        Twitter, Inc. 1355 Market Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94103

  • Erik Ribsskog
    Case# 37668005: Impersonation – ErikRibsskog1
    Erik Ribsskog     Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 8:22 PM
    To: Twitter Support
    Hi,

    thank you for your e-mail!

    I wonder if it could be, a misunderstanding, to do, with this decision.

    (Because I think this is clearly an impersonation-case).

    So I was wondering, if you could please escalate this case, to a superior/line-manager there, (for å second opinion).

    Thanks in advance for any help!

    Best regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 5:36 PM, Twitter Support wrote:

        @JohnconsWeb.

        Hello,

        We’ve investigated the reported account and have determined that it is not in violation of Twitter’s impersonation policy.

        In order for an account to be in violation of the policy, it must portray another person or business in a misleading or deceptive manner. Read the full policy here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/18366

        Thank you for your report, and please note that any documents you may have uploaded will be deleted.

        Twitter Support
        Reference #ref:00DA0000000K0A8.500G00000120UAY:ref
        Help
        Twitter, Inc. 1355 Market Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94103

  • Erik Ribsskog
    Case# 37668064: Impersonation – MsErikRibsskog
    Erik Ribsskog     Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 8:18 PM
    To: Twitter Support
    Hi,

    thank you for your e-mail!

    I wonder if it could be, a misunderstanding, to do, with this decision.

    (Because I think this is clearly an impersonation-case).

    So I was wondering, if you could please escalate this case, to a superior/line-manager there, (for å second opinion).

    Thanks in advance for any help!

    Best regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 5:37 PM, Twitter Support wrote:

        @JohnconsWeb.

        Hello,

        We’ve investigated the reported account and have determined that it is not in violation of Twitter’s impersonation policy.

        In order for an account to be in violation of the policy, it must portray another person or business in a misleading or deceptive manner. Read the full policy here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/18366

        Thank you for your report, and please note that any documents you may have uploaded will be deleted.

        Twitter Support
        Reference #ref:00DA0000000K0A8.500G00000120UFT:ref
        Help
        Twitter, Inc. 1355 Market Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94103

'Bokhylla' 70-tallet 80-tallet 90-tallet Anmeldelse Arne Mogan Olsen Berger Bergeråsen Brev Christell Humblen Danmark Datatilsynet Drammen E-post Facebook Google Haldis Humblen Hm Identitetstyveri Ingeborg Ribsskog irc Jobbsøking i England Johannes Ribsskog johncons-blogg Karen Ribsskog Klage Larvik Liverpool Magne Winnem Mobilbilder Musikk Nettmobbing Online trakassering Oppdatering Oslo Pia Ribsskog Politiet Rimi Slektsforskning StatCounter Svelvik Twitter Wikipedia YouTube Ågot Mogan Olsen