- Samtale startet tirsdag
-
Erik RibsskogHei,
jeg søkte på nettet, og fant ut, at du vant Frøken Norge, i 1993.
Jeg var ferdig med førstegangstjenesten, (i Elverum), det året.
Og min yngre søster Pia flytta inn hos meg, på den tida.
(For hu var hjemløs, etter at bofelleskapet hennes, ble oppløst).
Og når det nærmet seg jul.
Så sa Pia, at jeg var invitert, til min far og hans nye kone/samboer Haldis.
Og der skulle det også være, ei dame, som kom på fjerdeplass, (eller noe sånt), i frøken Norge.
Men da julaften kom, og jeg dro, til Bergeråsen.
Så var ikke hu frøken Norge-dama der.
Min fars stedatter Christell, (som bare gikk i joggedress, på julaften), sa at hennes eldre halvbror Jan, hadde tulla, med hu frøken Norge-dama.
Og at det var grunnen, til at hu ikke dukka opp der.
Og Jans mor Haldis klagde da på, at Jans damer, alltid var så unge.
Men hvilken frøken Norge-finalist, (fra 1993), kan dette ha vært, egentlig?
For jeg har nå drevet, med slektsforskning, i mange år.
Og jeg kan forstå, hvem dette, kan ha vært.
Kan det ha vært sånn, at disse folka, (må jeg kalle dem), bare har tulla med meg?
Beklager hvis det ikke var greit, å sende melding.
På forhånd takk for eventuelt svar!
Mvh.
Erik Ribsskog - I dag
-
19:29Rita Omvik har godtatt forespørselen din. -
Rita OmvikHei Erik, jeg kan dessverre ikke hjelpe deg, men hvis du ønsker å komme til bunns i det her så kan du prøve å kontakte Geir Hamnes. Han har sikkert oversikt over alle finalistene i et eller annet arkiv. Lykke til
👍hilsen Rita
😉 - I dag
-
00:32Erik RibsskogHei,
takk for svar!
Ja, det er litt sånn, at hvis man blir lovet, at man skal få møte, en av finalistene, fra Frøken Norge.
Og så får man ikke møte dem likevel.
Så blir man litt skuffa, liksom.
Så det var artig å få svar.
Jeg får se om jeg finner han misse-generalen på Facebook, eller noe sånt.
(Jeg var ikke sikker på, om det var han, som hadde frøken Norge også).
Igjen mange takk for svar!
Mvh.
Erik Ribsskog
-
Du og Rita Omvik har ingen forbindelser på FacebookProduct Manager for Skintech AsBosted: Maura, Norway
-
Erik Ribsskog
Case# 37668212: Impersonation – RibsskogErik
Erik RibsskogThu, Sep 15, 2016 at 11:59 PM
To: Twitter Support
Hi,thank you for your e-mail!
I wonder if it could be, a misunderstanding, to do, with this decision.
(Because I think this is clearly an impersonation-case).
So I was wondering, if you could please escalate this case, to a superior/line-manager there, (for å second opinion).
Thanks in advance for any help!
Best regards,
Erik Ribsskog
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Twitter Support
wrote: @JohnconsWeb.
Hello,
We’ve investigated the reported account and have determined that it is not in violation of Twitter’s impersonation policy.
In order for an account to be in violation of the policy, it must portray another person or business in a misleading or deceptive manner. Read the full policy here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/18366
Thank you for your report, and please note that any documents you may have uploaded will be deleted.
Twitter Support
Reference #ref:00DA0000000K0A8.500G00000120URK:ref
Help
Twitter, Inc. 1355 Market Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94103 -
Erik Ribsskog
Case# 37668249: Impersonation – MrErikRibsskog
Erik RibsskogThu, Sep 15, 2016 at 11:54 PM
To: Twitter Support
Hi,thank you for your e-mail!
I wonder if it could be, a misunderstanding, to do, with this decision.
(Because I think this is clearly an impersonation-case).
So I was wondering, if you could please escalate this case, to a superior/line-manager there, (for å second opinion).
Thanks in advance for any help!
Best regards,
Erik Ribsskog
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Twitter Support
wrote: @JohnconsWeb.
Hello,
We’ve investigated the reported account and have determined that it is not in violation of Twitter’s impersonation policy.
In order for an account to be in violation of the policy, it must portray another person or business in a misleading or deceptive manner. Read the full policy here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/18366
Thank you for your report, and please note that any documents you may have uploaded will be deleted.
Twitter Support
Reference #ref:00DA0000000K0A8.500G00000120UUE:ref
Help
Twitter, Inc. 1355 Market Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94103 -
Erik Ribsskog
Case# 37668296: Impersonation – GaleRibsskog
Erik RibsskogThu, Sep 15, 2016 at 11:50 PM
To: Twitter Support
Hi,thank you for your e-mail!
I wonder if it could be, a misunderstanding, to do, with this decision.
(Because I think this is clearly an impersonation-case).
So I was wondering, if you could please escalate this case, to a superior/line-manager there, (for å second opinion).
Thanks in advance for any help!
Best regards,
Erik Ribsskog
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Twitter Support
wrote: @JohnconsWeb.
Hello,
We’ve investigated the reported account and have determined that it is not in violation of Twitter’s impersonation policy.
In order for an account to be in violation of the policy, it must portray another person or business in a misleading or deceptive manner. Read the full policy here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/18366
Thank you for your report, and please note that any documents you may have uploaded will be deleted.
Twitter Support
Reference #ref:00DA0000000K0A8.500G00000120UY1:ref
Help
Twitter, Inc. 1355 Market Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94103 -
Erik Ribsskog
Case# 37667831: Impersonation – ErikGayman
Erik RibsskogThu, Sep 15, 2016 at 11:46 PM
To: Twitter Support
Hi,thank you for your e-mail!
I wonder if it could be, a misunderstanding, to do, with this decision.
(Because I think this is clearly an impersonation-case).
So I was wondering, if you could please escalate this case, to a superior/line-manager there, (for å second opinion).
Thanks in advance for any help!
Best regards,
Erik Ribsskog
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 4:58 PM, Twitter Support
wrote: @JohnconsWeb.
Hello,
We’ve investigated the reported account and have determined that it is not in violation of Twitter’s impersonation policy.
In order for an account to be in violation of the policy, it must portray another person or business in a misleading or deceptive manner. Read the full policy here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/18366
Thank you for your report, and please note that any documents you may have uploaded will be deleted.
Twitter Support
Reference #ref:00DA0000000K0A8.500G00000120TwR:ref
Help
Twitter, Inc. 1355 Market Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94103 -
Erik Ribsskog
Case# 37667872: Impersonation – E_Ribsskog
Erik RibsskogThu, Sep 15, 2016 at 11:42 PM
To: Twitter Support
Hi,thank you for your e-mail!
I wonder if it could be, a misunderstanding, to do, with this decision.
(Because I think this is clearly an impersonation-case).
So I was wondering, if you could please escalate this case, to a superior/line-manager there, (for å second opinion).
Thanks in advance for any help!
Best regards,
Erik Ribsskog
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 5:02 PM, Twitter Support
wrote: @JohnconsWeb.
Hello,
We’ve investigated the reported account and have determined that it is not in violation of Twitter’s impersonation policy.
In order for an account to be in violation of the policy, it must portray another person or business in a misleading or deceptive manner. Read the full policy here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/18366
Thank you for your report, and please note that any documents you may have uploaded will be deleted.
Twitter Support
Reference #ref:00DA0000000K0A8.500G00000120Tzk:ref
Help
Twitter, Inc. 1355 Market Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94103 -
Erik Ribsskog
Case# 37667916: Impersonation – TheOinker
Erik RibsskogThu, Sep 15, 2016 at 11:36 PM
To: Twitter Support
Hi,thank you for your e-mail!
I wonder if it could be, a misunderstanding, to do, with this decision.
(Because I think this is clearly an impersonation-case).
So I was wondering, if you could please escalate this case, to a superior/line-manager there, (for å second opinion).
Thanks in advance for any help!
Best regards,
Erik Ribsskog
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Twitter Support
wrote: @JohnconsWeb.
Hello,
We’ve investigated the reported account and have determined that it is not in violation of Twitter’s impersonation policy.
In order for an account to be in violation of the policy, it must portray another person or business in a misleading or deceptive manner. Read the full policy here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/18366
Thank you for your report, and please note that any documents you may have uploaded will be deleted.
Twitter Support
Reference #ref:00DA0000000K0A8.500G00000120U3S:ref
Help
Twitter, Inc. 1355 Market Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94103 -
Erik Ribsskog
Case# 37667954: Impersonation – johncons_
Erik RibsskogThu, Sep 15, 2016 at 8:26 PM
To: Twitter Support
Hi,thank you for your e-mail!
I wonder if it could be, a misunderstanding, to do, with this decision.
(Because I think this is clearly an impersonation-case).
So I was wondering, if you could please escalate this case, to a superior/line-manager there, (for å second opinion).
Thanks in advance for any help!
Best regards,
Erik Ribsskog
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 5:15 PM, Twitter Support
wrote: @JohnconsWeb.
Hello,
We’ve investigated the reported account and have determined that it is not in violation of Twitter’s impersonation policy.
In order for an account to be in violation of the policy, it must portray another person or business in a misleading or deceptive manner. Read the full policy here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/18366
Thank you for your report, and please note that any documents you may have uploaded will be deleted.
Twitter Support
Reference #ref:00DA0000000K0A8.500G00000120U6W:ref
Help
Twitter, Inc. 1355 Market Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94103 -
Erik Ribsskog
Case# 37668005: Impersonation – ErikRibsskog1
Erik RibsskogThu, Sep 15, 2016 at 8:22 PM
To: Twitter Support
Hi,thank you for your e-mail!
I wonder if it could be, a misunderstanding, to do, with this decision.
(Because I think this is clearly an impersonation-case).
So I was wondering, if you could please escalate this case, to a superior/line-manager there, (for å second opinion).
Thanks in advance for any help!
Best regards,
Erik Ribsskog
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 5:36 PM, Twitter Support
wrote: @JohnconsWeb.
Hello,
We’ve investigated the reported account and have determined that it is not in violation of Twitter’s impersonation policy.
In order for an account to be in violation of the policy, it must portray another person or business in a misleading or deceptive manner. Read the full policy here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/18366
Thank you for your report, and please note that any documents you may have uploaded will be deleted.
Twitter Support
Reference #ref:00DA0000000K0A8.500G00000120UAY:ref
Help
Twitter, Inc. 1355 Market Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94103 -
Erik Ribsskog
Case# 37668064: Impersonation – MsErikRibsskog
Erik RibsskogThu, Sep 15, 2016 at 8:18 PM
To: Twitter Support
Hi,thank you for your e-mail!
I wonder if it could be, a misunderstanding, to do, with this decision.
(Because I think this is clearly an impersonation-case).
So I was wondering, if you could please escalate this case, to a superior/line-manager there, (for å second opinion).
Thanks in advance for any help!
Best regards,
Erik Ribsskog
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 5:37 PM, Twitter Support
wrote: @JohnconsWeb.
Hello,
We’ve investigated the reported account and have determined that it is not in violation of Twitter’s impersonation policy.
In order for an account to be in violation of the policy, it must portray another person or business in a misleading or deceptive manner. Read the full policy here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/18366
Thank you for your report, and please note that any documents you may have uploaded will be deleted.
Twitter Support
Reference #ref:00DA0000000K0A8.500G00000120UFT:ref
Help
Twitter, Inc. 1355 Market Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94103
