Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

---

Update/Fwd: Your letter from 27/11/Fwd: complaint – [Not Protectively Marked] – [Not Protectively Marked]

---

Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>


Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 5:20 PM



To:
professional.standards.department.psd@merseyside.pnn.police.uk
Cc:
“emb.london” <emb.london@mfa.no>, !enquiries <enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk>, post <post@spesialenheten.no>, fampo@hotmail.com, efta-lux@ec.europa.eu, “mail.gva” <mail.gva@efta.int>, mail.bxl@efta.int, “hv-02.kontakt” <hv-02.kontakt@mil.no>, Politikk Høyre <politikk@hoyre.no>, anne-kathrine.skodvin@ica.no, post@slottet.no, amnestyis <amnestyis@amnesty.org>, “EUteam@amnesty.org” <EUteam@amnesty.org>, “inquiries2@un.org” <inquiries2@un.org>, steve.rotheram.mp@parliament.uk

Hi, I also thought about something else now. The constable (3174 Taylor it says in your letter).

He said when I went to report the crime-cases at the police-station. That the police didn’t have time to investigate ‘dodgy’ phone-calls and e-mails.

But perhaps you should stop standing in the city centre so much, on Saturday night, to look at the pretty girls. It’s like the whole town is a war-area.
Something like this. Like the party-goers were doing some type of terror or crime. You could save a lot of money if you stopped surveiling every person going to the night-club, like they perhaps also do in China. And then you could use those money on investigating murder-cases and impersonation-crime, etc. Just a suggestion. Erik Ribsskog

From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 11:27 AM
Subject: Your letter from 27/11/Fwd: complaint – [Not Protectively Marked] – [Not Protectively Marked]
To: professional.standards.department.psd@merseyside.pnn.police.uk
Cc: efta-lux@ec.europa.eu, eftacourt@eftacourt.int, “emb.london” <emb.london@mfa.no>, post <post@spesialenheten.no>, !enquiries <enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk>
I tell you in the forwarded e-mail, (from ten days ago), that I’m going to contact the IPCC, (which I’ve done, I sent them a letter on Wednesday from the post-office in Bootle). And still you send me this unwanted letter. That’s harassment, I’d say.
(One from the Police.
It’s like one could think that the police-helicoptre in Glasgow hit that pub on purpose I think. Please let the IPCC do their job now and stop harassing me with your ‘ridiculus’ stuff, (if I might call it that, because that’s what it seems to, to me). Erik Ribsskog
Dere må ikke si til meg igjen at dere ikke har noe med IPCC å gjøre. For dere er ment å tjene borgerne, (siden dere er del av statsforvaltningen), så dere kan se på det fra det perspektivet, (for en gangs skyld).

Date: Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:25 AM
Subject: Re: complaint – [Not Protectively Marked] – [Not Protectively Marked]
To: Cottam Jenni <Jennifer.Cottam@merseyside.police.uk>
Erik Ribsskog

Sent: 20 November 2013 10:17
To: Cottam Jenni
Subject: Re: complaint – [Not Protectively Marked]



can’t we keep this in writing, I was wondering. I think that’s better, because then we get to keep a copy of what has been said, in the e-mail-programme. I also think it’s a bit descending that you just write ‘Thank you’ as a salutation.

(And not ‘Yours sincerely’). And you complain that I don’t have a facility for automatic phone-call-answering. This is a new phone-number I have, since I got 70 ‘dodgy’ phone-calls, some days ago, on my old mobile-number. Also, it says ‘Unknown’ when you call me. Or else I would have called back. The phone you used for calling me seems to not have a phone-number. Could I please escalate this, to your line-manager, please. Best regards, Erik Ribsskog























============================================================
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender as soon
as possible. This footnote confirms that all reasonable steps have been taken to
ensure that this email message has been swept for the presence of
computer viruses. The views expressed in this communication may not necessarily be the
views of Merseyside Police. All communications, including telephone calls and electronic messages to
and from Merseyside Police may be subject to monitoring and recording.
============================================================

============================================================

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender as soon
as possible. This footnote confirms that all reasonable steps have been taken to
ensure that this email message has been swept for the presence of
computer viruses. The views expressed in this communication may not necessarily be the
views of Merseyside Police. All communications, including telephone calls and electronic messages to
and from Merseyside Police may be subject to monitoring and recording.
============================================================

merseyside politiet.jpg 96K