-
https://soundcloud.com/andrea-lea-ingebrigtsen
PS.
Her er mer om dette:
http://johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/2012/11/andrea-er-visst-i-england-na.html
PS 3.
Enda mer om dette:
http://www.distance-calculator.co.uk/distances-for-bournemouth-to-hove.htm
-
Gmail – eribsskog@gmail.com – CWJobs.co.uk – Applicant details for Head of Technology – VAC-760455M 
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
eribsskog@gmail.com – CWJobs.co.uk – Applicant details for Head of Technology – VAC-760455M
cwjobs@cwjobsmail.co.uk<cwjobs@cwjobsmail.co.uk>
Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 2:26 PMReply-To:
eribsskog@gmail.comTo:
steven.clark@northpointrecruitment.comCc:
eribsskog@gmail.com
NEW APPLICATION CONFIRMATION SIGN IN ADVERTISE NOW BUY JOB PACKS IT MARKET INDEX The following candidate has applied online for the position: Head of Technology.
Candidate email address: eribsskog@gmail.com.
Candidate’s comments:
Hi,
I read about this job, on the CW Jobs website.
I have management-experience, from working for many years as a Shop Manager, in one of Norways biggest companies, (Rimi, owned by ICA and Ahold).
I’ve also studied at five academies, at the highest level. This is mostly IT, Information Management and Computing from University of Sunderland and Norwegian academies, (Norwegian College of Information Technology and Oslo University College). And I have a degree in IT, from Oslo University College.
I’m unemployed at the moment so I could start right away.
I attach my CV and hope to hear back from you.
Yours sincerely,
Erik RibsskogI confirm that I am eligible to live and work in the UK
If the candidate has supplied a CV it will be attached to this email.
Please provide your feedback to eribsskog@gmail.com.
Thank you for advertising on CWJobs.
Totaljobs Group
Holden House, 57 Rathbone Place, London W1T 1JU
Registered in England & Wales under company number 04269861
eribsskog_251220120226.doc
33K -
Noname 301
Noname 302
Noname 303
Noname 304
Noname 305
Noname 306
Noname 307
Noname 308
Noname 309
Noname 310
Noname 311
Noname 312
Noname 313
Noname 314
Noname 315
Noname 316
Noname 317
Noname 318
Noname 319
Noname 320
Noname 321
Noname 322
Noname 323
Noname 324
Noname 325
Noname 326
Noname 327
Noname 328
Noname 329
Noname 330
Noname 331
Noname 332
Noname 333
Noname 334
Noname 335
Noname 336
Noname 337
Noname 338
Noname 339
Noname 340
Noname 341
Noname 342
Noname 343
Noname 344
Noname 345
Noname 346
Noname 347
Noname 348
Noname 349
Noname 350PS.
Linkene ovenfor blir åpnet i et eget vindu.
PS 2.
Nå har jo jeg blitt omtalt, av Thomas Seltzer, på Tweet4Tweet.
Og på den tiden, så visste jeg ikke hvem Thomas Seltzer var.
(For Turboneger har aldri vært min musikksmak, for å si det sånn).
Så jeg har måtte lese om Thomas Seltzer, på Wikipedia, (for å prøve å skjønne hvem han var), og så der at han hadde studert psykologi, blant annet.
(I februar-mars cirka, i år, var vel dette).
Og nå nylig, så sjekket jeg Wiki-siden til Thomas Seltzer, igjen.
Og da var dette om at han hadde studert psykologi fjernet, (så jeg).
Og jeg sjekket da historien, til den Wiki-siden.
Og så da, at den første siden, (om Thomas Seltzer), var skrevet uten at det ble brukt stor forbokstav, på begynnelsen av setningene, osv.
Og så har andre Wikipedianere fikset på denne siden seinere, da.
Men etter å ha lest ‘Philip Gabrielsen e-postene’, så tror jeg ikke at Thomas Seltzer ville ha fått en Wiki-side så tidlig, hvis det hadde vært som i ‘våre dager’.
For jeg synes at det virker som, (fra disse e-postene), at nye Wikipedianere, nå bli overvåket og snakket ‘dritt’ om, bak ryggen deres, på dette lukkede forumet, da.
(Som Philip Gabrielsen nå har gjort offenlig, (ihvertfall til en viss grad), må man vel si.
Ved å sende disse e-postene til meg, som jo er bannet, fra Wikipedia).
Og sånn var det vel ikke, i gamle dager.
(Sånn som jeg har forstått det, ihvertfall).
For i gamle dager, så hadde man vel ikke engang administratorer, på Wikipedia.
(Hvis jeg har skjønt det riktig).
Men etterhvert, så har man vel fått mer og mer byråkrati der, da.
Så det er vel som at Wikipedia er et samfunn, (nesten som et land eller en landsby), som forandrer seg hele tida da, (må man vel si).
Så jeg tror at folk bør holde et lite øye, med Wikipedia.
For å se hvordan Wikipedia forandrer seg, da.
For nettstedet Wikipedia, det brukes jo av folk over hele verden, som et leksikon.
(Jeg vil tippe at Wikipedia nå ganske sikkert må være verdens mest brukte leksikon).
Så Wikipedia får vel snart omtrent monopol, på sannheten.
Og så sitter det noen sånne ‘sannhets-sjefer’ og trekker i tråder, på lukkede fora, da.
Da er det om å gjøre å følge med, på hva disse ‘diktatorene’ driver med, (vil jeg si).
Hva motiverer folk til å bruke all sin fritid, på å jobbe gratis, med å overvåke andre, på Wikipedia?
Er det Stasi eller Komosol, (i nye, vestlige utgaver, som Norulv Øvrebotten vel har skrevet om), som disse egentlig jobber for?
Hvem vet.
Mvh.
Erik Ribsskog
PS 3.
Her er mer om dette:
http://no.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thomas_Seltzer&oldid=403582
-
Noname 251
Noname 252
Noname 253
Noname 254
Noname 255
Noname 256
Noname 257
Noname 258
Noname 259
Noname 260
Noname 261
Noname 262
Noname 263
Noname 264
Noname 265
Noname 266
Noname 267
Noname 268
Noname 269
Noname 270
Noname 271
Noname 272
Noname 273
Noname 274
Noname 275
Noname 276
Noname 277
Noname 278
Noname 279
Noname 280
Noname 281
Noname 282
Noname 283
Noname 284
Noname 285
Noname 286
Noname 287
Noname 288
Noname 289
Noname 290
Noname 291
Noname 292
Noname 293
Noname 294
Noname 295
Noname 296
Noname 297
Noname 298
Noname 299
Noname 300PS.
Linkene ovenfor åpnes i et eget vindu.
PS 2.
Etter å ha lest ‘dagens bolke’ med ‘Philip Gabrielsen e-poster’, så må jeg vel si det, at det som var mest spesielt.
Det var de e-postene, om giftmorderen Terje Wiik, som driver og endrer på Wikipedia-artikkelen, om sitt eget mord.
Det der kunne man vel nesten ha laget en film om.
En thriller-film kanskje, (som det vel heter).
Hvem vet.
Bare noe jeg tenkte på.
Mvh.
Erik Ribsskog
PS 3.
Man kan også se det.
At Wikipedianerne, (som de vel blir kalt).
De skriver det, at å referere til en blogg.
Det blir som noe annet, enn å referere til for eksempel en bok eller en avis.
Siden at en bloggpost kan endres, da.
Jeg studerte jo ved University of Sunderland, studieåret 2004/05.
(Selv om jeg måtte avbryte studiene der, før tiden.
Noe som jeg skal skrive mer om, i Min Bok 6, hadde jeg tenkt meg).
Og der, så hadde jeg et fag, som het ‘Final Year Project’.
(Jeg gikk det siste året, på en Bachelor i Computing, ved Faculty of Applied Sciences.
Så dette var ganske ‘heavy-e’ greier, da).
Og der, så lærte vi, (i begynnelsen av faget), om ‘research’ og ‘referencing’, da.
(Eller rettere sagt, jeg lærte det.
For dette var vel bare som en oppsummering, for de britiske studentene der, tror jeg.
For de hadde vel antagelig lært om dette, iløpet av de to første studieårene.
(Hvis jeg skulle tippe, ihvertfall).
Mens man på HiO IU, ikke lærte noe om hverken forskning eller referering, vel.
Sånn som jeg husker det, ihvertfall).
Og når det gjaldt referanser.
Så skulle de være ‘Oxford’, (mener jeg at de sa).
(Noe sånt).
Og i dette faget, (som var ledet av en professor, (eller noe), ved navn Peter White vel), så var de også skeptiske til å referere til noe som var på nettet, (husker jeg).
Men de utelukket vel ikke helt å gjøre det.
Ihvertfall så var det sånn, at i det referanse-systemet, som vi lærte å bruke.
(Som vel het Oxford.
Etter universitetet, må det vel være.
Hvis jeg ikke husker helt feil, da).
Så ble det forklart om, hvordan man skulle referere, til noe som var på nettet, da.
Og det viktige da, (husker jeg), det var at når man linket til en nettside, så måtte man ta med hvilken dato, (og vel muligens også hvilket klokkeslett), som man hadde lest denne nettsiden, da.
Og da ble det liksom som en gyldig referanse, da.
(Hvis jeg husker det riktig, ihvertfall).
Og det er vel også mulig, at andre lands Wiki-er, vet mer om hvordan dette er riktig å gjøre, (for å si det sånn).
Så norske Wikipedianere, de burde kanskje komme seg litt mer ut av ‘andedammen’ sin.
(Tenker jeg nå, etter å ha lest dagens e-poster).
Og kanskje prate med Wikipedianere, fra andre land, om hvordan dem gjør ditt og datt der, da.
(Tenkte jeg ihvertfall nå, etter å ha lest gjennom de her e-postene).
Så sånn er det.
Bare noe jeg tenkte på.
Men men.
PS 4.
Her er mer om Oxford Referencing Style:
http://www.deakin.edu.au/current-students/study-support/study-skills/handouts/oxford-docnote.php
-
Gmail – Recovery CD/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Recovery CD/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
Erik Ribsskog<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 12:59 PMTo:
rekruttering@acer.no———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer-daemon@googlemail.com>
Date: Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 12:56 PM
Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
To: eribsskog@gmail.comDelivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
Technical details of permanent failure:
Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 550 550 5.1.1 <euro_mail@acer-euro.com>: Recipient address rejected: User unknown (state 13).—– Original message —–
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content- type;
bh=eFlXhygmWjY0BWRhWrZFlVnedmru7v tLfRsDUQzQCow=;
b=li8u8fF/6Fv8QLlKzChKS82aGwnxDHWrjZDzUH 1KCgfBqYbVLeio3oh3poDRTU2/Tx
GAkL09YtAotIQeSfgIXBAbbwNJiXkV lgWcUpkq3VixlZ20xEtrAp4YaCdhmp wFwYCSE7
QpI9adTIBLscLev4nA1xNdPHU+BkZLeDf9ftXQCFSSKhN99Mmj8PMLx+ 6odmB+pbCuBj
/cIpR1FFdiZMCNGfFMBlbXEU0Tdf2lc 3cKDWcgwFpHB3lVAZG/jI/ nsCU4uO3QRuEAgb
xRaQMv42p+ownDR0jcKVK2XypExRJ04LkLKwKAPz N4lsZltUlMaw8EZSvliMzCFia1rJ
64Iw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.58.243.166 with SMTP id wz6mr33815667vec.28.1356353775711;
Mon, 24 Dec 2012 04:56:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.220.147.134 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 04:56:15 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 12:56:15 +0000
Message-ID: <CAGtfns5ReZG8fYe5q8ARKpGkNzfzr5wyTBMC9XitZSvDBvwgyA@mail. gmail.com>
Subject: Recovery CD
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
To: euro_mail@acer-euro.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b86f4b2fdb4cf04d198b8da Hi,
I recently bought a refurbished Acer Extensa E261, here in Liverpool.
It didn’t come with a media.
When I worked at Microsoft Scandinavian Product Activation, in 2005 and
2006, (for Arvato in the Cunard Building), then we learned that if
customers didn’t have the media, they should contact the manufacturer.I wonder if you can send me a recovery CD, for Windows XP Professional,
(no service pack).(There is a product key for this OS, on a sticker, on the box, so I have a
valid licence, but no media).Yours sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
-
Gmail – Your reference: 1105539
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Your reference: 1105539
Erik Ribsskog<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 5:01 AMTo:
Customer Relations <CustomerRelations@stepchange.org>Hi,
I must admit that I’ve only read the first line of your e-mail now.You bring my feelings into this.This I react on.
Then I think you are not a serious business-person.
I therefore would have wanted to please get this escalated to your line-manager.
Erik RIbsskogOn Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Customer Relations <CustomerRelations@stepchange.org> wrote: Dear Mr RibsskogClient reference: 1105539Complaint reference: 1076/1105539Further to my previous email which acknowledged your concerns about our recent name change. You’ve told us that you feel our newname is patronising and demoralising. I’m sure you’ll appreciate it isn’t our intention to upset any of our clients.
Changing our name from Consumer Credit Counselling Service (CCCS) was a bold step for us. Although we help thousandsof people every day with their debt problems, and we’re already the UK’s largest single provider of Debt Management Plans, millions of people still need our help. Becoming StepChange Debt Charity is part of our plan to be more visible and to help even more
people.You’ve told us you dislike our new name but we believe it will help raise awareness of our services and provide aclear message about who we are and what we do. It will help people recognise the free services we offer and hopefully we’ll become the organisation that people turn to first when looking for debt help.
We’re not here to judge people who contact us. We aim to give them the help and advicethey need to take control of their financial situation no matter how they got in to difficulty.
You’ve also raised concern that we’re funded by creditors which has caused you to havedoubts about how independent we are. Unlike fee-charging debt management companies, we are funded by creditors. Their charitable contributions enable us to provide genuinely free advice and support to those who need it. Our advice is always based on what is
best for an individual not what is most
profitable for us. Creditors do not influence our advice or the debt solutions we discuss with individuals who need ourhelp.
I hope my explanation helps you understand why we’ve changed our name and that I’ve restored your confidence in ourservice. I’m sorry you dislike our new name but we hope you’ll continue to use our free service to guide you through your financial difficulties.
Details of the charity’s formal complaints procedure were sent to you in our initial email. If you aren’t satisfied with this response,you may refer your complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service who’ll complete an impartial review of your concerns. You’ll need to do this within six months of the date of this email. Information relating to their service can be found using the following
link http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/consumer/ complaints.htm. Kind regardsChristina EcclesClient Liaison Officer——————————
—————————— ——————This message may contain confidential information and is intended for the addressee only.
If you have received this information in error, please return it to us and delete it from
your computer.
Although StepChange Debt Charity operates anti-virus programmes, it does not accept
responsibility for any damage whatsoever that is caused by viruses being passed.
As emails are not a secure method of communication, StepChange Debt Charity does not
accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message.
Foundation for Credit Counselling, trading as StepChange Debt Charity,
Wade House, Merrion Centre, Leeds LS2 8NG. Company No. 2757055, Charity No. 1016630. -
Gmail – #6942770 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – MegaHomofil”
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
#6942770 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – MegaHomofil”
Erik Ribsskog<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 4:56 AMTo:
Twitter Support <support+id6942770@twitter.zendesk.com>Hi,
I think this must be a clear case of breaking Twitter rules.
I would have wanted a second opinion about this.
Could you please escalate to your line-manager?
Erik Ribsskog
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 12:08 PM, SetantaRoss <notifications-support@twitter.zendesk.com> wrote: ##- Please type your reply above this line -##
SetantaRoss, Dec 21 04:08 am (PST): Hello,
While we understand your frustration, the reported behavior is not in violation of the Twitter Rules (http://twitter.com/rules).
Here are some quick tips to help you with your situation:• Do not respond to the user. We have found that responding to someone who is intentionally attempting to aggravate you or others encourages them to continue their behavior.
• Block the user. You can block the user using the blocking feature described here: https://support.twitter.com/entries/117063
• Learn more about how to deal with abusive users: https://support.twitter.com/articles/15794
• Learn how to flag inappropriate media here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/20069937 As a policy, we do not mediate content and we do not intervene in disputes between users. This means that users are allowed to post potentially inflammatory content, provided that they do not violate the Twitter Rules.
If someone feels personally threatened, or if you believe the content you are reporting is prohibited in your local jurisdiction, please contact your local authorities with the information you provided to us. You can point local law enforcement to our Law Enforcement Guidelines here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/41949.
Please let us know if you believe the behavior has escalated or otherwise violates our rules.
Thanks,
SetantaRoss
Twitter Trust & Safety
johncons, Dec 20 04:07 pm (PST): How can we help?: Offensive content
Reported user: @MegaHomofil
Offensive Tweet: https://twitter.com/MegaHomofil/status/ 280491555998031872
Text of Tweet: @johncons Du trenger ikke skamme deg. Neste gang finner jeg nok penisen din. Jeg tar med meg forstørrelsesglass, så ordner det seg nok. 😀
Tweet time: Dec 17 2012 01:56:12 via web
What are you reporting?: This user keeps sending me @replies and I don’t want to receive them.
Blocked user(s): Yes
How long ago did this begin?: Few days ago
How many times has this happened?: Only once, (but this is a new account which seems dedicated to attacking me).
I’ve sent you between fifty and one hundred similar reports lately.
This seems organised.
Further description of problem: The person calls himself ‘megahomofil’, which means mega-gay.
The tweet means something like: ‘You don’t need to be ashamed. I think I’ll find your penis the next time. I’ll bring a magnifing-glas, then it will be alright :D’.
As a heterosexual man, I find this tweet very offensive, inpolite and harassing.
So I wanted to please report about this.
Your full name: Erik Ribsskog
I understand that Twitter may provide third parties, such as the affected user, with a copy of this report.
Twitter username: @johncons
Email address: eribsskog@gmail.comMessage-Id:KRTQXDC0_
50d4513875741_ 499c1c6fa7430334cd_sprut
