johncons

  • Gmail – #6864437 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – MobbedByMafia”

    Gmail


    Erik Ribsskog
    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    #6864437 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – MobbedByMafia”



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 2:56 PM

    To:
    Twitter Support <support+id6864437@twitter.zendesk.com>

    Hi,
    I want this escalated for a second opinion please.
    This is part of a large attack it seems, and Twitter have taken the around fifty complaints I’ve sent you earlier more seriously, I think.

    This is like you aren’t taking your job seriously, I think.

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 1:15 PM, SamuelFisher <notifications-support@twitter.zendesk.com> wrote:

    ##- Please type your reply above this line -##

    Twitter



    SamuelFisher, Dec 13 05:15 am (PST): Hello,
    While we understand your frustration, the reported behavior is not in violation of the Twitter Rules (http://twitter.com/rules).
    We have found overwhelmingly that responding to users who are intentionally attempting to aggravate you encourages that user to continue their behavior. We recommend you don’t reply, retweet, comment on their behavior, or instigate them. If you’d prefer not to see content from that person, you can block the user using the blocking feature described here: https://support.twitter.com/entries/117063
    As a policy, we do not mediate content and we do not intervene in disputes between users. This means that users are allowed to post potentially inflammatory content, provided that they do not violate the Twitter Rules.
    If you believe the content or behavior you are reporting is prohibited in your local jurisdiction, please contact your local authorities so they can accurately assess the content or behavior for possible violations of local law. If Twitter is contacted directly by law enforcement, we can work with them and provide assistance for their investigation as well as guidance around possible approaches. You can point local law enforcement to our Law Enforcement Guidelines here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/41949.
    If you’re concerned for your physical safety, please contact your local authorities for further assistance. Please let us know if you believe the behavior has escalated or otherwise violates our rules.
    Thanks,
    SamuelFisher
    Twitter Trust & Safety

    Additional information:
    • Dealing with abusive users: https://support.twitter.com/articles/15794
    • Blocking other users: https://support.twitter.com/entries/117063
    • Making your profile protected: https://support.twitter.com/entries/14016



    johncons, Dec 12 06:54 pm (PST): How can we help?: Offensive content
    Reported user: @MobbedByMafia
    Offensive Tweet: https://twitter.com/MobbedByMafia/status/278892176509902848
    Text of Tweet: @jeblad Du må kalle @johncons for Baronesse Adeler. Alt annet er ‘breach of honour-crime’
    Tweet time: Dec 12 2012 16:00:51 via web
    What are you reporting?: This user keeps sending me @replies and I don’t want to receive them.
    Blocked user(s): Yes
    How long ago did this begin?: 24 hours ago
    How many times has this happened?: Only once, (but this is a new account which seems dedicated to attacking me).
    I’ve sent you arround fifty similar reports lately.
    This seems organised.
    Further description of problem: The person writes to another person, that he has to call me ‘Baronesse Adeler’.
    I’m a heterosexual man, and don’t like to be called baronesse.
    This I think is very offensive, inpolite and harassing.
    The person have also used a lot of effort, to manipulate pictures, (which I own the copyrights for), from my blog, (http://johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/)/Flickr-account.
    Your full name: Erik Ribsskog
    I understand that Twitter may provide third parties, such as the affected user, with a copy of this report.
    Twitter username: @johncons
    Email address: eribsskog@gmail.com

    Message-Id:PSGRY4E0_50c9d4e4dfa29_6f07194527c31867b3_sprut


  • Gmail – #6863797 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – johncons_mage”

    Gmail


    Erik Ribsskog
    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    #6863797 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – johncons_mage”



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 2:51 PM

    To:
    Twitter Support <support+id6863797@twitter.zendesk.com>

    Hi,

    I want this escalated for a second opinion please.

    This is part of a large attack it seems, and Twitter have taken the around fifty complaints I’ve sent you earlier more seriously, I think.


    This is like you aren’t taking your job seriously, I think.


    Erik Ribsskog

    On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 1:14 PM, SamuelFisher <notifications-support@twitter.zendesk.com> wrote:

    ##- Please type your reply above this line -##

    Twitter



    SamuelFisher, Dec 13 05:14 am (PST): Hello,
    While we understand your frustration, the reported behavior is not in violation of the Twitter Rules (http://twitter.com/rules).
    We have found overwhelmingly that responding to users who are intentionally attempting to aggravate you encourages that user to continue their behavior. We recommend you don’t reply, retweet, comment on their behavior, or instigate them. If you’d prefer not to see content from that person, you can block the user using the blocking feature described here: https://support.twitter.com/entries/117063
    As a policy, we do not mediate content and we do not intervene in disputes between users. This means that users are allowed to post potentially inflammatory content, provided that they do not violate the Twitter Rules.
    If you believe the content or behavior you are reporting is prohibited in your local jurisdiction, please contact your local authorities so they can accurately assess the content or behavior for possible violations of local law. If Twitter is contacted directly by law enforcement, we can work with them and provide assistance for their investigation as well as guidance around possible approaches. You can point local law enforcement to our Law Enforcement Guidelines here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/41949.
    If you’re concerned for your physical safety, please contact your local authorities for further assistance. Please let us know if you believe the behavior has escalated or otherwise violates our rules.
    Thanks,
    SamuelFisher
    Twitter Trust & Safety

    Additional information:
    • Dealing with abusive users: https://support.twitter.com/articles/15794
    • Blocking other users: https://support.twitter.com/entries/117063
    • Making your profile protected: https://support.twitter.com/entries/14016



    johncons, Dec 12 04:54 pm (PST): How can we help?: Offensive content
    Reported user: @johncons_mage
    Offensive Tweet: https://twitter.com/johncons_mage/status/277936004097257473
    Text of Tweet: Jeg er latterlig stor. Større enn størst. For å underdrive litt. Men @johncons sine mannlige elskere digger meg visstnok. Så sånn er det.
    Tweet time: Dec 10 2012 00:41:21 via web
    What are you reporting?: This user keeps sending me @replies and I don’t want to receive them.
    Blocked user(s): Yes
    How long ago did this begin?: Few days ago
    How many times has this happened?: Only once, (but this is a new account which seems dedicated to attacking me).
    I’ve sent you around 50 similar reports in the last couple of weeks.
    This seems organised.
    Further description of problem: The person with this account, calles himselves ‘johncons-mage’, which means johncons-belly.
    johncons is my nick, on the internet, I have this blog, (johncons-blogg): http://johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/
    The person says that my belly is redicously big and something with male lovers.
    And I’m very heterosexual and think this is very offending and inpolite, so I wanted to compain about this.
    Your full name: Erik Ribsskog
    I understand that Twitter may provide third parties, such as the affected user, with a copy of this report.
    Twitter username: @johncons
    Email address: eribsskog@gmail.com

    Message-Id:Y8VB40A2_50c9d4a998bd7_2bf018dba70313852e_sprut


  • Gmail – Remittance Advice – ERIK RIBSSKOG. Payment# 4473509

    Gmail


    Erik Ribsskog
    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    Remittance Advice – ERIK RIBSSKOG. Payment# 4473509



    Amazon Accounts Payable

    <noreply@amazon.com>


    Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 9:26 AM

    Reply-To:
    noreply@amazon.com

    To:
    ~WF_ADHOC-13096090 <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    *****************PLEASE DO NOT RESPOND TO THIS EMAIL*****************
    The following payment has been made by Amazon EU Sarl.
    This payment has been processed by Direct Deposit. Please allow 5 business days following the payment date to receive the funds.
    The amounts on this page are shown in the currency in which the royalty was earned.

    Within five business days following the payment date you can view the details of this payment in the Payment History Report section at https://www.createspace.com/reports.

    Payment made to: ERIK RIBSSKOG.
    Our Supplier No.: 13061495
    Supplier site name: MOD:DE:1139481
    Paid to bank: Hidden for security
    Paid to account: Hidden for security
    Payment number: 4473509
    Payment date: 14-DEC-12
    Payment currency: EUR
    Payment amount: 13.07


    Invoice Number

    Invoice Date

    Invoice Description Discount Taken

    Amount Paid 4914577 22-SEP-12 Member ID: 1139481, Member Name: Erik Ribsskog, Se 9.21 5470794 28-NOV-12 Member ID: 1139481, Member Name: Erik Ribsskog, No 3.86
  • På Rimi Langhus, så foregikk vel mesteparten av skravlinga, nede på spiserommet.

    Så det skjedde vel ikke like mye der, (i 2003), som på Rimi Bjørndal.

    Men en episode jeg husker.

    Det var at to nyansatte ungdommer, som jobba, på Rimi Langhus, da jeg begynte der igjen, som låseansvarlig, våren 2003.

    Det var Stian Augestad og Fredrik Karlsen.

    Og jeg mener å huske at jeg overhørte det, at de her to kara, prata seg imellom, (mens de la opp frysevarer, eller noe sånt vel), om at det var dumt, at jeg, som var en så god butikkleder, (eller noe lignende), skulle jobbe med data.

    (Siden jeg hadde forklart dem, da de spurte, at jeg studerte ved ingeniørhøyskolen, da).

    For de her to kara, de mente vel at jeg så flink med mennesker da, (eller noe lignende), hvis jeg skjønte det riktig.

    (Noe sånt).

    Selv om det vel også er mulig å jobbe som leder, selv om man har utdannelse, innen data.

    Jeg hadde jo mål å få meg en jobb, som IT-leder, og tjene mellom en halv million og en million, i året, liksom.

    Men det var ikke sånn at de her to kara, prata _med_ meg, om det her.

    Det var istedet sånn at de prata _om_ meg, da.

    Bak min rygg, må man vel si.

    Så jeg fikk ikke forklart dem ordentlig, om hvordan jeg selv så for meg det her, da.

    Så sånn var det.

    Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

    Men men.

    På Rimi Bjørndal, så ville butikksjef Johan der, at jeg skulle slutte å jobbe der, på torsdagene.

    (Og bare jobbe der på lørdagene).

    Av en eller annen grunn.

    (Etter sommerferien 2003 en gang, vel).

    I begynnelsen så gikk jeg ikke med på det her, for jeg syntes det var greit å få en del i lønn, da.

    Men han Johan, han forlangte så mye, av medarbeiderne.

    Så det ble slitsomt å jobbe der, to vakter i uka, da.

    For jeg måtte jo liksom fokusere på studiene mine også.

    (Som liksom var hovedprioriteten min, på den her tida, da.

    For det var jo snakk om heltidsstudier, liksom).

    Så jeg gikk etterhvert med på å bare jobbe på Rimi Bjørndal, på lørdagene, (fra klokka 14 vel, til cirka klokka 19), da.

    Så sånn var det.

    Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

    Men men.

    Lars Boye, fra Rimi sin sikkerhetsavdeling.

    (Som jeg også har skrevet om, fra ‘Rimi Kalbakken-tida’.

    Tidligere i den her boken).

    Han begynte etterhvert istedet å jobbe som distriktsjef, i et distrikt i Oslo Vest, (var det vel).

    Og Lars Boye, han bodde vel på Bjørndal, (ettersom jeg skjønte det, ihvertfall).

    Og han kom en gang, (i år 2003, må det vel ha vært), innom Rimi Bjørndal, en lørdag ettermiddag, som jeg jobba som låseansvarlig, da.

    For å handle, (eller noe sånt), må det vel ha vært.

    Ihvertfall så huket Lars Boye tak i meg, (husker jeg).

    Og ville at jeg skulle gjøre ditt og datt, inne på flaskerommet, da.

    Men da viste jeg Lars Boye en lapp, (husker jeg), som butikksjef Johan hadde skrevet til meg, dagen før, (eller noe sånt), da.

    Om ting som skulle gjøres, i butikken, da.

    Og så forklarte jeg Lars Boye det, at jeg hadde mer enn nok å gjøre, fra før, da.

    (For Rimi Bjørndal er en veldig travel butikk, da.

    Spesielt på ettermiddagene, på lørdagene.

    Selv om jeg for ikke så lenge siden, mener å ha sett det, på Google Maps, at de nå i tillegg også har fått seg en Rema-butikk, oppe på Bjørndal der.

    Men på den her tida, så var Rimi Bjørndal den eneste kjede-matbutikken, på Bjørndal, da).

    Så jeg sa til Lars Boye det, at han måtte ta det her ordreveien, da.

    (Altså med butikksjef Johan, da.

    Hvis Lars Boye var hans distriktsjef, da.

    Det husker jeg ikke helt nøyaktig nå, for å være ærlig).

    Og det mener jeg at jeg hadde rett til å si, da.

    For jeg kunne jo ikke ha to direkte overordnede, på den samme vakta, liksom.

    For det mener jeg at bare hadde blitt tull og tøys, (for på si det sånn).

    Så sånn var det.

    Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

    Men.men.

    Det var også sånn, på Rimi Bjørndal, (husker jeg), at det var vanskelig å se hvem som var muslimer der, (må man vel si).

    Og med det, så mener jeg det, at Fredrick og Toro.

    De fikk butikksjef Johan til å bestille en type frossenpizza, som ikke var i Rimi Bjørndal sitt sortiment.

    Nemlig Mia Pizza med kylling.

    Denne var frossenpizzaen, den var vel i ICA sitt supermarked-sortiment, så Hakon sitt grossistlager på Skårer, (som Rimi Bjørndal fikk varer fra), de førte dette pizzaslaget, da.

    Men dette slaget frossenpizza, det gikk jo ikke inn i kassa, da.

    (Ihvertfall så stod det vel ikke noen ordentlig label, for denne varen, på pizzadisken, til Rimi Bjørndal).

    Men Fredrick og Toro, de spiste tydeligvis bare halal-mat, (eller noe sånt), da.

    Så de fikk lov til å ha sin egen frossenpizza, i frysedisken, til Rimi Bjørndal, da.

    (Sånn som jeg husker det, ihvertfall).

    Selv om vel denne pizzaen ikke gikk inn i kassa.

    Men nå satt vel ikke jeg noe særlig i kassa, på den tida, som jeg jobba, som låseansvarlig, på Rimi Bjørndal.

    (Nemlig fra sommeren 2002 til desember 2003).

    Så hva de gjorde i kassa, når noen ville kjøpe denne Mia Pizza med kylling.

    Det veit jeg ikke.

    Men sånn som jeg husker det, så ble ikke disse pizzaene priset, da.

    (Selv om de vel ikke gikk inn i kassa).

    Så man må vel si at Fredrick og Toro, de var så vanskelige, at de skaffet plunder for Rimi Bjørndal, da.

    Siden de var så kresne i matveien, da.

    Sånn at Rimi Bjørndal måtte føre varer, som ikke gikk inn i kassa, da.

    Så sånn var det.

    Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

    Men men.

    Det var også noe lignende, som skjedde, da jeg kom tilbake fra sykmelding, som butikksjef, på Rimi Langhus, våren 2002, (husker jeg).

    Assistent Sølvi Berget der, hu hadde da, (mens jeg hadde vært sykmeldt), begynt å selge lomper og lefser, (som stod i to sjokkselgere, av papp), fra Skoga Brød.

    (Hennes tidligere arbeidsgiver, da).

    Disse lompene og lefsene, de gikk jo ikke inn i kassene, på Rimi Langhus.

    For de var jo ikke i Rimi sitt sortiment.

    Og jeg prøvde å si fra, til distriktsjef Anne-Katrine Skodvin, om at assistent Sølvi Berget, hadde tatt inn disse varene, som ikke gikk inn i kassa, da.

    (Og som vel var fra en leverandør, som Rimi ikke hadde noe kontakt med offisielt, vel).

    Men distriktsjef Anne-Katrine Skodvin, hu bare lo det bort, da.

    (Må man vel si).

    Hun svarte ihvertfall ikke noe ordentlig, (sånn som jeg husker det), da jeg gjorde et poeng av det, at det stod noen varer, (like utafor kontoret, var det vel, at disse to pappdisplayene stod), som Rimi-butikker egentlig ikke skulle selge, da.

    Og det var litt dårlig, av distriktsjef Anne-Katrine Skodvin, (syntes jeg).

    For varer som ikke er i sortimentet.

    De skaper adskillig krøll, i kassa, da.

    Siden de ikke går inn der.

    Og siden butikker flest hadde skannere, i kassa, på den her tida.

    Så var det nesten ingen, i Rimi, som visste hvordan man skulle bruke en prismaskin, da.

    Så varer som ikke gikk inn i kassa, de ble det vel ganske ofte gjettekonkurranse om, når det gjaldt å finne den riktige prisen, når de kom fram, til kassa, da.

    Og jeg hadde jo selv jobbet som heltidskasserer, på OBS Triaden, fra høsten 1990.

    Så jeg visste hvor mye heft det ble, av sånne varer, som ikke gikk inn i kassa, da.

    Samtidig, så kan også kasserere få sparken, (hvis jeg ikke tar helt feil), for å slå inn feil pris, i kassa, da.

    Så sett fra en kasserers synspunkt.

    (Et synspunkt som jeg ganske lett klarte å se, som butikksjef, (må jeg vel si).

    Siden jeg jo hadde jobba som kasserer, (på Matland/OBS Triaden), cirka 10-12 år tidligere).

    Så var varer som ikke gikk inn i kassa, en fæl uting, da.

    (For å si det sånn).

    Men dette var visst ikke distriktsjef Anne-Katrine Skodvin enig i, da.

    Og hva assistent Sølvi Berget tenkte på, det veit jeg ikke.

    Men hennes dømmekraft, den hadde jeg vel ikke så høye tanker om, fra før heller, (tror jeg).

    Så hu gadd jeg vel ikke å prate med, om det her, engang.

    (Sånn som jeg husker det, ihvertfall).

    For hu hadde jeg vel nesten gitt opp, tror jeg.

    (For å si det sånn).

    Siden hu var så skjør, da.

    (Som jeg har skrevet om, tidligere i den her boken).

    Så sånn var det.

    Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

    Men men.

    Det var fortsatt mye mer som hendte, den tida, som jeg bodde, på St. Hanshaugen.

    Og dette tenkte jeg at jeg skulle prøve å få skrevet mer om, i de neste kapitlene, av Min Bok 5.

    Så vi får se om jeg klarer å få til det.

    Vi får se.


  • Gmail – #6864437 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – MobbedByMafia”

    Gmail


    Erik Ribsskog
    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    #6864437 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – MobbedByMafia”



    Twitter Support

    <notifications-support@twitter.zendesk.com>


    Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 2:54 AM

    Reply-To:
    Twitter Support <support+id6864437@twitter.zendesk.com>

    To:
    johncons <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    ##- Please type your reply above this line -##

    Twitter

    Hello,
    We’ve received your report and will be taking a look at the issue you reported.
    What happens next?
    The Twitter Trust & Safety team will review your report and take action if the user is violating the Twitter Rules (https://twitter.com/rules). We may follow up with you if we need additional information.
    Keep in mind, Twitter is a platform that provides a global communication service which encompasses a variety of users with different voices, ideas, and perspectives. As a policy, Twitter does not mediate content or intervene in disputes between users.
    Please keep in mind that filing multiple reports will not resolve your issue faster. Rest assured, we are working as quickly as possible, but our ability to respond may be delayed due to a high number of tickets. We thank you for your patience.
    What else can I do?
    We recommend that you block users who you believe are being abusive towards you. Blocking the user prevents them from doing the following:
    adding your Twitter account to their lists;
    having their @replies or mentions show in your mentions tab (although these Tweets may still appear in search);
    following you; and
    seeing your profile picture on their profile page or in their timeline.
    You can read more about how to block other users on the following page: https://support.twitter.com/articles/117063
    You can also find more resources for dealing with abusive behavior at our Help Center:
    https://support.twitter.com/articles/15794
    Contact Law Enforcement
    If something has gone beyond the point of a personal conflict and has escalated to the point of believable violent threats, whether it be online or offline, please contact your local law enforcement so they can accurately assess the validity of the issue.
    If contacted by law enforcement directly, we can work with them and provide the necessary information for their investigation of your issue.
    You can point local law enforcement to our Law Enforcement Guidelines (https://support.twitter.com/articles/41949).
    Thanks,
    Twitter Trust & Safety
    ————————————————-
    Your ticket number: #6864437

    Message-Id:PSGRY4E0_50c943794ce90_28191316a7c5647ab_sprut


  • Gmail – #6864391 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – MsErikRibsskog”

    Gmail


    Erik Ribsskog
    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    #6864391 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – MsErikRibsskog”



    Twitter Support

    <notifications-support@twitter.zendesk.com>


    Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 2:45 AM

    Reply-To:
    Twitter Support <support+id6864391@twitter.zendesk.com>

    To:
    johncons <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    ##- Please type your reply above this line -##

    Twitter

    Hello,
    We’ve received your report and will be taking a look at the issue you reported.
    What happens next?
    The Twitter Trust & Safety team will review your report and take action if the user is violating the Twitter Rules (https://twitter.com/rules). We may follow up with you if we need additional information.
    Keep in mind, Twitter is a platform that provides a global communication service which encompasses a variety of users with different voices, ideas, and perspectives. As a policy, Twitter does not mediate content or intervene in disputes between users.
    Please keep in mind that filing multiple reports will not resolve your issue faster. Rest assured, we are working as quickly as possible, but our ability to respond may be delayed due to a high number of tickets. We thank you for your patience.
    What else can I do?
    We recommend that you block users who you believe are being abusive towards you. Blocking the user prevents them from doing the following:
    adding your Twitter account to their lists;
    having their @replies or mentions show in your mentions tab (although these Tweets may still appear in search);
    following you; and
    seeing your profile picture on their profile page or in their timeline.
    You can read more about how to block other users on the following page: https://support.twitter.com/articles/117063
    You can also find more resources for dealing with abusive behavior at our Help Center:
    https://support.twitter.com/articles/15794
    Contact Law Enforcement
    If something has gone beyond the point of a personal conflict and has escalated to the point of believable violent threats, whether it be online or offline, please contact your local law enforcement so they can accurately assess the validity of the issue.
    If contacted by law enforcement directly, we can work with them and provide the necessary information for their investigation of your issue.
    You can point local law enforcement to our Law Enforcement Guidelines (https://support.twitter.com/articles/41949).
    Thanks,
    Twitter Trust & Safety
    ————————————————-
    Your ticket number: #6864391

    Message-Id:VP1WFYQ2_50c94146d195a_6f07194527c5635b3_sprut

'Bokhylla' 70-tallet 80-tallet 90-tallet Anmeldelse Arne Mogan Olsen Berger Bergeråsen Brev Christell Humblen Dagbladet.no Datatilsynet Drammen E-post Facebook Google Haldis Humblen Hm Identitetstyveri Ingeborg Ribsskog irc Jobbsøking i England Johannes Ribsskog johncons-blogg Karen Ribsskog Klage Larvik Liverpool Magne Winnem Mobilbilder Musikk Nettmobbing Online trakassering Oppdatering Oslo Pia Ribsskog Politiet Rimi Slektsforskning StatCounter Svelvik Twitter Wikipedia YouTube Ågot Mogan Olsen