-
Gmail – Report of crime
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Report of crime
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 1:56 PM
To:
Matrix.disruption.team@merseyside.police.uk
Hi,someone are writing I'm insane, on a newspaper message board.I wanted to report this as breach of honour-crime.Regards,Erik Ribsskog
dagbladet trakassering.JPG
105K
PS.
Her er vedlegget:
-
Gmail – Update/Fwd: Complaint/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Complaint/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Fail ure)
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Update/Fwd: Complaint/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Complaint/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Fail ure)
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 12:15 PM
To:
"Liverpool County, Enquiries" <enquiries@liverpool.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk>
Cc:
adminappeals@tribunals.gsi.gov.uk, Janet.Dunbar@hmcourts-service.gsi.gov.uk
And Mr. Walker Liverpool County Court.I can hear you are a mobster on the way you talk, with your accent.Probabaly just a scam all this.The County Court have scamed me before on e-mails.I send this to the Crowns Court now.If I see your bailiff here I'm going to fucking kill him.To you hear me you bloody scamers.Erik Ribsskog———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 12:08 PMSubject: Fwd: Update/Fwd: Complaint/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Complaint/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Fail ure)
Cc: Janet.Dunbar@hmcourts-service.
To: adminappeals@tribunals.gsi.gov.uk gsi.gov.uk Are you going to reply or do you want me to start a riot myself?
Emma Ranaweera, what kind of name is that?
Are you Al Quaida?Erik RibsskogPS.Here is more about this:
Dear Sir/Madam,Thank you for your email, for which I acknowledge receipt. The contents have been noted and you will be contacted in due course where appropriate.
Yours faithfully,
Emma Ranaweera
Tribunal Manager.
ADDRESS:
Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
5th Floor,
Chichester Rents,
81 Chancery Lane,
London.
WC2A 1DD.Tel: 020 7911 7085
Fax: 020 7911 7093Email: adminappeals@tribunals.gsi.
gov.uk
Website: www.administrativeappeals. tribunals.gov.uk ———- Forwarded message ———-From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 10:20 AM
Subject: Update/Fwd: Complaint/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Complaint/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Fail ure)
To: adminappeals@tribunals.gsi.gov.uk
Cc: "Liverpool County, Enquiries" <enquiries@liverpool.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk >Hi,
now I got called, by the bailiff, Mr. Campbell, from Liverpool County Court.Apparently you haven't contacted them about this case, because they still want to go on with the hearing today.I think we should take one thing at a time.Could you please tell the court to take one thing at a time.Why wasn't I informed about the first hearing?Best regards,
Erik Ribsskog
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>Date: Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 11:07 AM
Subject: Complaint/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Complaint/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Fail ure)
To: adminappeals@tribunals.gsi.gov.uk Hi,
this judge is just lecturing me.I've gone to business-school, and I think this is inpolite, this isn't a matter of life and death, I think the judge should be civilised and polite, and follow the normal practise, that is to reply in the same way that one get the correspondence.I think it's strange that he calls, maybe he wants to hide something, I think then.He says this is urgent, but they forget to find out why I wasn't informed about the first hearing.I think we should find out about that, before this process goes on, and that's why I send about this to the Administrative Appeals.Please investigate this, and please inform the Liverpool County Court about this, as I don't want any bailiff on my door.Hope this is alright!Yours sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Liverpool County, Enquiries <enquiries@liverpool.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk >Date: Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 10:40 AM
Subject: RE: Update/Fwd: Complaint/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Fail ure)
To: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>Mr Ribsskog,
Please note communication can be by
telephone, letter and email. On this occasion it was by telephone as it is an
urgent matter.As I was saying on the phone there is a
hearing tomorrow, this will definitely be going ahead and you are required to
attend. If you don't attend an order will be made in your absence.Your email dated 5th August 2011 stated
you did not receive hearing notice, this is why we have re listed the matter.
Therefore hearing tomorrow still stands.Any further emails received will not be
replied to and placed on file for hearing 9th August 2011 at 10:00am.Reagrds,
Lee Walker
Lee Walker
Enforcements Section
Liverpool County Court
0151 296 2472
Cc:
enquiries@liverpool.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk Subject: Update/Fwd: Complaint/Fwd:
Delivery Status Notification (Failure)Hi,
now Mr. Walker, from
Liverpool County Court, rang me on the phone, to reply to this e-mail.I think if I send an e-mail then I should get a reply by e-mail.
I think there's definetly something wrong in this process.
Just as an update.
Regards,
Erik Ribsskog
———- Forwarded
message ———-From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 11:10 PM
Subject: Complaint/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
To: enquiries@liverpool.
countycourt.gsi.gov.uk Cc: "adminappeals@tribunals.gsi.
gov.uk "
<adminappeals@tribunals.gsi.gov.uk >Hi,
I try to send this
complaint, (mentioned in the forwarded e-mail), again, to another e-mail
address, (adminappeals@tribunals.gsi.gov.uk ).Regards,
Erik Ribsskog
———- Forwarded
message ———-From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer-daemon@googlemail.com>
Date: Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 11:03 PM
Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
Technical details of permanent failure:
Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient
domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information
about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was:
550 550 #5.1.0 Address rejected cust.ser.cs@gtnet.gov.uk (state 14).—– Original message —–
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.213.8.135 with SMTP id h7mr319333ebh.108.
1312581782550; Fri, 05 Aug 2011 15:03:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.213.28.137 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Aug 2011 15:03:02 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 23:03:02 +0100
Message-ID: <CAGtfns5NbMY7JnwuJMvZ+OESKw=b
xaGCFmPeEv_AB+KPdvaVjA@mail. >gmail.com Subject: Complaint/Fwd:
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
To: adminappeals@tribunals.
gsi.gov.uk
<adminappeals@tribunals.gsi.gov.uk >Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=
0015174c4518e3397e04a9c9423d Hi,
I send this e-mail, as a complaint, to the Court Service Secretariat for
Crown, High, County Courts, regarding that I wasn't informed about the
hearing, on 1/8.
I think this should be dealt with first, before there is a new hearing.
Hope this is alright!
Yours sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Liverpool County, Enquiries <
enquiries@liverpool.
countycourt.gsi.gov.uk >Date: Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 4:26 PM
Subject:
To: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
**
Thank you for your previous emails.
Please note that as you did not attend the hearing on 1st August 2011, your
application was dismissed and the warrant of eviction is to proceed. However
as a further application was lodged in your email, we have now listed it
again on 9th August 2011 at 10:00am. It is in your own interest to attend
this hearing as if you do not the order may be the same and warrant for
eviction will proceed on this day.
I have placed your appellants notice on file, however there is no order to
appeal and this is why we have listed your application.
Please do not email any further documents and bring them to the hearing as I
cannot guarantee these will be placed on file and referred to a Judge before
the hearing and therefore it will be quicker to bring them to the hearing.
Regards,
Lee Walker
Lee Walker
Enforcements Section
Liverpool County Court
0151 296 2472
This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of
the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying
is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all
copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.
Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message
could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in
mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message
by e-mail.
This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure
Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in
partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case
of problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk.Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of
the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying
is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all
copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.
Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message
could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in
mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message
by e-mail.
This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be
read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not
broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.
-
Gmail – Update/Fwd: Complaint/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Complaint/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Fail ure)
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Update/Fwd: Complaint/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Complaint/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Fail ure)
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 12:08 PM
To:
adminappeals@tribunals.gsi.gov.uk
Cc:
Janet.Dunbar@hmcourts-service.gsi.gov.uk
Are you going to reply or do you want me to start a riot myself?Emma Ranaweera, what kind of name is that?
Are you Al Quaida?Erik RibsskogPS.Here is more about this:
Dear Sir/Madam,Thank you for your email, for which I acknowledge receipt. The contents have been noted and you will be contacted in due course where appropriate.
Yours faithfully,
Emma Ranaweera
Tribunal Manager.
ADDRESS:
Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
5th Floor,
Chichester Rents,
81 Chancery Lane,
London.
WC2A 1DD.Tel: 020 7911 7085
Fax: 020 7911 7093Email: adminappeals@tribunals.gsi.
gov.uk
Website: www.administrativeappeals. tribunals.gov.uk font face=”monospace”>
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 10:20 AM
Subject: Update/Fwd: Complaint/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Complaint/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Fail ure)
To: adminappeals@tribunals.gsi.gov.uk
Cc: "Liverpool County, Enquiries" <enquiries@liverpool.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk >Hi,
now I got called, by the bailiff, Mr. Campbell, from Liverpool County Court.Apparently you haven't contacted them about this case, because they still want to go on with the hearing today.I think we should take one thing at a time.Could you please tell the court to take one thing at a time.Why wasn't I informed about the first hearing?Best regards,
Erik Ribsskog
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>Date: Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 11:07 AM
Subject: Complaint/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Complaint/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Fail ure)
To: adminappeals@tribunals.gsi.gov.uk Hi,
this judge is just lecturing me.I've gone to business-school, and I think this is inpolite, this isn't a matter of life and death, I think the judge should be civilised and polite, and follow the normal practise, that is to reply in the same way that one get the correspondence.I think it's strange that he calls, maybe he wants to hide something, I think then.He says this is urgent, but they forget to find out why I wasn't informed about the first hearing.I think we should find out about that, before this process goes on, and that's why I send about this to the Administrative Appeals.Please investigate this, and please inform the Liverpool County Court about this, as I don't want any bailiff on my door.Hope this is alright!Yours sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Liverpool County, Enquiries <enquiries@liverpool.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk >Date: Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 10:40 AM
Subject: RE: Update/Fwd: Complaint/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Fail ure)
To: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>Mr Ribsskog,
Please note communication can be by
telephone, letter and email. On this occasion it was by telephone as it is an
urgent matter.As I was saying on the phone there is a
hearing tomorrow, this will definitely be going ahead and you are required to
attend. If you don't attend an order will be made in your absence.Your email dated 5th August 2011 stated
you did not receive hearing notice, this is why we have re listed the matter.
Therefore hearing tomorrow still stands.Any further emails received will not be
replied to and placed on file for hearing 9th August 2011 at 10:00am.Reagrds,
Lee Walker
Lee Walker
Enforcements Section
Liverpool County Court
0151 296 2472
Cc:
enquiries@liverpool.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk Subject: Update/Fwd: Complaint/Fwd:
Delivery Status Notification (Failure)Hi,
now Mr. Walker, from
Liverpool County Court, rang me on the phone, to reply to this e-mail.I think if I send an e-mail then I should get a reply by e-mail.
I think there's definetly something wrong in this process.
Just as an update.
Regards,
Erik Ribsskog
———- Forwarded
message ———-From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 11:10 PM
Subject: Complaint/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
To: enquiries@liverpool.
countycourt.gsi.gov.uk Cc: "adminappeals@tribunals.gsi.
gov.uk "
<adminappeals@tribunals.gsi.gov.uk >Hi,
I try to send this
complaint, (mentioned in the forwarded e-mail), again, to another e-mail
address, (adminappeals@tribunals.gsi.gov.uk ).Regards,
Erik Ribsskog
———- Forwarded
message ———-From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer-daemon@googlemail.com>
Date: Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 11:03 PM
Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
Technical details of permanent failure:
Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient
domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information
about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was:
550 550 #5.1.0 Address rejected cust.ser.cs@gtnet.gov.uk (state 14).—– Original message —–
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.213.8.135 with SMTP id h7mr319333ebh.108.
1312581782550; Fri, 05 Aug 2011 15:03:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.213.28.137 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Aug 2011 15:03:02 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 23:03:02 +0100
Message-ID: <CAGtfns5NbMY7JnwuJMvZ+OESKw=b
xaGCFmPeEv_AB+KPdvaVjA@mail. >gmail.com Subject: Complaint/Fwd:
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
To: adminappeals@tribunals.
gsi.gov.uk
<adminappeals@tribunals.gsi.gov.uk >Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=
0015174c4518e3397e04a9c9423d Hi,
I send this e-mail, as a complaint, to the Court Service Secretariat for
Crown, High, County Courts, regarding that I wasn't informed about the
hearing, on 1/8.
I think this should be dealt with first, before there is a new hearing.
Hope this is alright!
Yours sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Liverpool County, Enquiries <
enquiries@liverpool.
countycourt.gsi.gov.uk >Date: Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 4:26 PM
Subject:
To: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
**
Thank you for your previous emails.
Please note that as you did not attend the hearing on 1st August 2011, your
application was dismissed and the warrant of eviction is to proceed. However
as a further application was lodged in your email, we have now listed it
again on 9th August 2011 at 10:00am. It is in your own interest to attend
this hearing as if you do not the order may be the same and warrant for
eviction will proceed on this day.
I have placed your appellants notice on file, however there is no order to
appeal and this is why we have listed your application.
Please do not email any further documents and bring them to the hearing as I
cannot guarantee these will be placed on file and referred to a Judge before
the hearing and therefore it will be quicker to bring them to the hearing.
Regards,
Lee Walker
Lee Walker
Enforcements Section
Liverpool County Court
0151 296 2472
This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of
the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying
is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all
copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.
Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message
could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in
mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message
by e-mail.
This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure
Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in
partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case
of problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk.Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of
the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying
is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all
copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.
Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message
could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in
mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message
by e-mail.
This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be
read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not
broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.
-
Gmail – Update/Fwd: Complaint/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Complaint/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Fail ure)
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Update/Fwd: Complaint/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Complaint/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Fail ure)
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 11:35 AM
To:
"Liverpool County, Enquiries" <enquiries@liverpool.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk>
Cc:
adminappeals@tribunals.gsi.gov.uk
Hi,this isn't exactly right.The new hearing was set up for today, before I informed about that I hadn't been informed about the first hearing.Well this is sh*t because I have complained to the Admin Appeals.Stop being idiots.Erik RibsskogOn Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Liverpool County, Enquiries <enquiries@liverpool.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk > wrote:Mr Ribsskog,
Notification of the hearing for the 1st August 2011 was sent to you. As you stated you did not receive this the matter
was re-listed for today. You did not attend the hearing today and the Judge has
struck out your application. The bailiff has re-listed the eviction date to 17th August 2011 when
you will be evicted.The order and eviction date will be sent.
Regards,
Lee Walker
Lee Walker
Enforcements Section
Liverpool County Court
0151 296 2472
—–Original
Message—–From: Erik Ribsskog
[mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]Sent: 09
August 2011 10:21Cc: Liverpool
County, EnquiriesSubject: Update/Fwd:
Complaint/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Complaint/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Fail
ure)Hi,
now I got called, by the
bailiff, Mr. Campbell, from Liverpool County Court.Apparently you haven't contacted them about this case, because they still want
to go on with the hearing today.I think we should take one thing at a time.
Could you please tell the court to take one thing at a time.
Why wasn't I informed about the first hearing?
Best regards,
Erik Ribsskog
———- Forwarded
message ———-From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 11:07 AM
Subject: Complaint/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Complaint/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification
(Fail ure)To: adminappeals@tribunals.gsi.
gov.uk Hi,
this judge is just
lecturing me.I've gone to
business-school, and I think this is inpolite, this isn't a matter of life and
death, I think the judge should be civilised and polite, and follow the normal
practise, that is to reply in the same way that one get the correspondence.I think it's strange that he calls, maybe he wants to hide something, I think
then.He says this is urgent,
but they forget to find out why I wasn't informed about the first hearing.I think we should find out about that, before this process goes on, and that's
why I send about this to the Administrative Appeals.Please investigate this, and please inform the Liverpool County Court about
this, as I don't want any bailiff on my door.Hope this is alright!
Yours sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
———-
Forwarded message ———-From: Liverpool County, Enquiries <enquiries@liverpool.
countycourt.gsi.gov.uk >Date: Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 10:40 AM
Subject: RE: Update/Fwd: Complaint/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Fail ure)
To: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Mr
Ribsskog,Please
note communication can be by telephone, letter and email. On this occasion it
was by telephone as it is an urgent matter.As I was
saying on the phone there is a hearing tomorrow, this will definitely be going
ahead and you are required to attend. If you don't attend an order will be made
in your absence.Your
email dated 5th August
2011 stated you did not receive hearing
notice, this is why we have re listed the matter. Therefore hearing tomorrow
still stands.Any
further emails received will not be replied to and placed on file for hearing 9th August 2011 at 10:00am.Reagrds,
Lee Walker
Lee
WalkerEnforcements
SectionLiverpool
County Court0151 296
2472Cc:
enquiries@liverpool.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk Subject: Update/Fwd:
Complaint/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)Hi,
now Mr. Walker, from
Liverpool County Court, rang me on the phone, to reply to this e-mail.I think if I send an e-mail then I should get a reply by e-mail.
I think there's definetly something wrong in this process.
Just as an update.
Regards,
Erik Ribsskog
———- Forwarded
message ———-From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 11:10 PM
Subject: Complaint/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
To: enquiries@liverpool.
countycourt.gsi.gov.uk Cc: "adminappeals@tribunals.gsi.
gov.uk "
<adminappeals@tribunals.gsi.gov.uk >Hi,
I try to send this
complaint, (mentioned in the forwarded e-mail), again, to another e-mail
address, (adminappeals@tribunals.gsi.gov.uk ).Regards,
Erik Ribsskog
———- Forwarded message
———-From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer-daemon@googlemail.com>
Date: Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 11:03 PM
Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
Technical details of permanent failure:
Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient
domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further
information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server
returned was: 550 550 #5.1.0 Address rejected cust.ser.cs@gtnet.gov.uk
(state 14).—– Original message —–
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.213.8.135 with SMTP id h7mr319333ebh.108.
1312581782550; Fri, 05 Aug 2011 15:03:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.213.28.137 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Aug 2011 15:03:02 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 23:03:02 +0100
Message-ID: <CAGtfns5NbMY7JnwuJMvZ+OESKw=b
xaGCFmPeEv_AB+KPdvaVjA@mail. >gmail.com Subject: Complaint/Fwd:
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
To: adminappeals@tribunals.
gsi.gov.uk
<adminappeals@tribunals.gsi.gov.uk >Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=
0015174c4518e3397e04a9c9423d Hi,
I send this e-mail, as a complaint, to the Court Service Secretariat for
Crown, High, County Courts, regarding that I wasn't informed about the
hearing, on 1/8.
I think this should be dealt with first, before there is a new hearing.
Hope this is alright!
Yours sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Liverpool County, Enquiries <
enquiries@liverpool.
countycourt.gsi.gov.uk >Date: Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 4:26 PM
Subject:
To: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
**
Thank you for your previous emails.
Please note that as you did not attend the hearing on 1st August 2011, your
application was dismissed and the warrant of eviction is to proceed. However
as a further application was lodged in your email, we have now listed it
again on 9th August 2011 at 10:00am. It is in your own interest to attend
this hearing as if you do not the order may be the same and warrant for
eviction will proceed on this day.
I have placed your appellants notice on file, however there is no order to
appeal and this is why we have listed your application.
Please do not email any further documents and bring them to the hearing as I
cannot guarantee these will be placed on file and referred to a Judge before
the hearing and therefore it will be quicker to bring them to the hearing.
Regards,
Lee Walker
Lee Walker
Enforcements Section
Liverpool County Court
0151 296 2472
This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of
the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying
is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all
copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.
Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message
could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in
mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message
by e-mail.
This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure
Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in
partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case
of problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk.Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of
the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying
is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all
copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.
Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message
could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in
mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message
by e-mail.
This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained
by the Ministry of Justice. E-mailmonitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be
read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not
broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure
Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in
partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On
leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure
Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in
partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case
of problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk.Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.
This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of
the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying
is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all
copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.
Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message
could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in
mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message
by e-mail.
This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be
read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not
broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.
-
Gmail – Update/Fwd: Complaint/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Complaint/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Fail ure)
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Update/Fwd: Complaint/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Complaint/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Fail ure)
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 10:20 AM
To:
adminappeals@tribunals.gsi.gov.uk
Cc:
"Liverpool County, Enquiries" <enquiries@liverpool.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk>
Hi,now I got called, by the bailiff, Mr. Campbell, from Liverpool County Court.Apparently you haven't contacted them about this case, because they still want to go on with the hearing today.I think we should take one thing at a time.Could you please tell the court to take one thing at a time.Why wasn't I informed about the first hearing?Best regards,
Erik Ribsskog
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>Date: Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 11:07 AM
Subject: Complaint/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Complaint/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Fail ure)
To: adminappeals@tribunals.gsi.gov.uk Hi,
this judge is just lecturing me.I've gone to business-school, and I think this is inpolite, this isn't a matter of life and death, I think the judge should be civilised and polite, and follow the normal practise, that is to reply in the same way that one get the correspondence.I think it's strange that he calls, maybe he wants to hide something, I think then.He says this is urgent, but they forget to find out why I wasn't informed about the first hearing.I think we should find out about that, before this process goes on, and that's why I send about this to the Administrative Appeals.Please investigate this, and please inform the Liverpool County Court about this, as I don't want any bailiff on my door.Hope this is alright!Yours sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Liverpool County, Enquiries <enquiries@liverpool.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk >Date: Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 10:40 AM
Subject: RE: Update/Fwd: Complaint/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Fail ure)
To: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>Mr Ribsskog,
Please note communication can be by
telephone, letter and email. On this occasion it was by telephone as it is an
urgent matter.As I was saying on the phone there is a
hearing tomorrow, this will definitely be going ahead and you are required to
attend. If you don't attend an order will be made in your absence.Your email dated 5th August 2011 stated
you did not receive hearing notice, this is why we have re listed the matter.
Therefore hearing tomorrow still stands.Any further emails received will not be
replied to and placed on file for hearing 9th August 2011 at 10:00am.Reagrds,
Lee Walker
Lee Walker
Enforcements Section
Liverpool County Court
0151 296 2472
Cc:
enquiries@liverpool.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk Subject: Update/Fwd: Complaint/Fwd:
Delivery Status Notification (Failure)Hi,
now Mr. Walker, from
Liverpool County Court, rang me on the phone, to reply to this e-mail.I think if I send an e-mail then I should get a reply by e-mail.
I think there's definetly something wrong in this process.
Just as an update.
Regards,
Erik Ribsskog
———- Forwarded
message ———-From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 11:10 PM
Subject: Complaint/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
To: enquiries@liverpool.
countycourt.gsi.gov.uk Cc: "adminappeals@tribunals.gsi.
gov.uk "
<adminappeals@tribunals.gsi.gov.uk >Hi,
I try to send this
complaint, (mentioned in the forwarded e-mail), again, to another e-mail
address, (adminappeals@tribunals.gsi.gov.uk ).Regards,
Erik Ribsskog
———- Forwarded
message ———-From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer-daemon@googlemail.com>
Date: Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 11:03 PM
Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
Technical details of permanent failure:
Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient
domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information
about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was:
550 550 #5.1.0 Address rejected cust.ser.cs@gtnet.gov.uk (state 14).—– Original message —–
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.213.8.135 with SMTP id h7mr319333ebh.108.
1312581782550; Fri, 05 Aug 2011 15:03:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.213.28.137 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Aug 2011 15:03:02 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 23:03:02 +0100
Message-ID: <CAGtfns5NbMY7JnwuJMvZ+OESKw=b
xaGCFmPeEv_AB+KPdvaVjA@mail. >gmail.com Subject: Complaint/Fwd:
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
To: adminappeals@tribunals.
gsi.gov.uk
<adminappeals@tribunals.gsi.gov.uk >Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=
0015174c4518e3397e04a9c9423d Hi,
I send this e-mail, as a complaint, to the Court Service Secretariat for
Crown, High, County Courts, regarding that I wasn't informed about the
hearing, on 1/8.
I think this should be dealt with first, before there is a new hearing.
Hope this is alright!
Yours sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Liverpool County, Enquiries <
enquiries@liverpool.
countycourt.gsi.gov.uk >Date: Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 4:26 PM
Subject:
To: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
**
Thank you for your previous emails.
Please note that as you did not attend the hearing on 1st August 2011, your
application was dismissed and the warrant of eviction is to proceed. However
as a further application was lodged in your email, we have now listed it
again on 9th August 2011 at 10:00am. It is in your own interest to attend
this hearing as if you do not the order may be the same and warrant for
eviction will proceed on this day.
I have placed your appellants notice on file, however there is no order to
appeal and this is why we have listed your application.
Please do not email any further documents and bring them to the hearing as I
cannot guarantee these will be placed on file and referred to a Judge before
the hearing and therefore it will be quicker to bring them to the hearing.
Regards,
Lee Walker
Lee Walker
Enforcements Section
Liverpool County Court
0151 296 2472
This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of
the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying
is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all
copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.
Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message
could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in
mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message
by e-mail.
This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure
Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in
partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case
of problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk.Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of
the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying
is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all
copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.
Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message
could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in
mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message
by e-mail.
This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be
read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not
broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.
-
Gmail – Påminnelse/Fwd: Deres brev fra 12. juli/Fwd: Fw: Problemer med personalarkiv
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Påminnelse/Fwd: Deres brev fra 12. juli/Fwd: Fw: Problemer med personalarkiv
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 9:30 AM
To:
kristine.myhre@ica.no
Hei,ok, den er grei, mange takk for hjelp!Hvis jeg sier intranett da, skjønner dere hva jeg mener da?Det stod nok på intranettet, at jeg vant Rimi Gullårer, for andre halvår, 2001, (som butikksjef Rimi Langhus).
Det betyr nok at det stod på intranettet i januar 2002, vil jeg nok tippe på, hvis jeg husker riktig.Takk for svar uansett!Veldig fint hvis dere kunne ha funnet dette på intranett.
Mvh.Erik RibsskogPS.Kanskje Kjell Korsmo klarer å finne det, hvis han jobber den enda.Han er vel flink med sånt.Bare noe jeg tenkte på.
2011/8/9 <kristine.myhre@ica.no>Hei.
Arbeisbekreftelse blir sendt pr. post
i dag 08.08.2011. Når det gjelder Rimi nytt er det ingen som jobber her
nå som har kjennskap til dette.——————————
—— Ha en fin dag!!
Med vennlig hilsen:
Kristine Myhre
HR-Konsulent, ICA Norge
HR-Service
22891849
05.08.2011 00:15
Tokristine.myhre@ica.no
ccSubjectPåminnelse/Fwd: Deres brev fra 12. juli/Fwd:
Fw: Problemer med personalarkivHei,
jeg kan ikke se at jeg har mottatt noe svar på denne e-posten,
så jeg sender en påminnelse om dette.Mvh.
Erik Ribsskog
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: 2011/7/15
Subject: Deres brev fra 12. juli/Fwd: Fw: Problemer med personalarkiv
Hei,
jeg viser til Deres brev fra 12. juli, hvor De skriver
en arbeidsbekreftelse for meg.Den bekreftelsen inneholdt mange feil, så jeg skriver her, hva som er riktig:
For det første, så skrives etternavnet mitt med to s-er,
og ikke en, som i brevet deres.For det andre, så er mye av arbeidshistorikken helt feil.
Her er sånn det riktige er, (sånn som jeg husker det):
Desember 1992 – september 2003: Rimi Munkelia, Oslo. Butikkmedarbeider,
(deltid).September 1993 – juni 1994: Rimi Nylænde, Lambertseter.
Butikkmedarbeider, (heltid).Juni 1994 – Desember 1994: Rimi Nylænde, Lambertseter,
Oslo. Aspirant.Januar 1995 – mai 1996: Rimi Nylænde, Lambertseter, Oslo.
Assisterende ButikksjefMai 1996 – oktober 1998: Rimi Bjørndal, Oslo: Assisterende
Butikksjef.Oktober 1998 – oktober 2000: Rimi Nylænde, Lambertseter,
Oslo: Butikksjef.Oktober 2000 – mai 2001: Rimi Kalbakken, Oslo. Butikksjef.
Mai 2001 – Juni 2002: Rimi Langhus, Ski. Butikksjef.
Juni 2002 – Desember 2003: Rimi Bjørndal, Oslo. Låseansvarlig,
(deltid).Mars 2003 – August 2004: Rimi Langhus, Ski. Låseansvarlig,
(deltid).Håper dere kan rette opp dette!
Mvh.
Erik Ribsskog
PS.
Hadde dere kunnet sjekke de første utgavene av Rimi-nytt, i 2002, for der
står det nok det, at jeg vant Rimi Gullårer, andre halvår 2001, som butikksjef
Rimi Langhus.Skulle gjerne hatt papirer på det.
Hva har skjedd med kursbevis forresten, jeg var på mange kurs, i ledelse,
arbeidsrett, frukt, sikkerthet, etc., etc.———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: 2011/7/5
Subject: Fwd: Fw: Problemer med personalarkiv
Hei igjen,
forresten, det stod vel i 'Rimi-nytt' at jeg vant Rimi
Gullårer, som butikksjef, Rimi Langhus, for andre halvår, 2001.Kanskje dere kunne være så snille og funnet det der, siden
dere ikke har brevet jeg fikk fra Stein Erik Hagen da jeg vant det konkurransen?Bare noe jeg tenkte på.
Mvh.
Erik Ribsskog
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: 2011/7/5
Subject: Re: Fw: Problemer med personalarkiv
Hei,
ja, jeg kan godt få en arbeidsbekreftelse.
Jeg synes forresten det er rart at dere ikke har de andre
papirene.Hva kan dette komme av?
Kanskje dere har noen andre kursbevis, eller lignende, i mappa mi, som
dere kan sende?Mvh.
Erik Ribsskog
2011/7/5 <kristine.myhre@ica.no>
Hei.
Vi har dessverre ikke noe kopi av de dokumentene du ber om i din mail.
Dette er også dokumenter som vi ikke er pålagt å oppbevare i våre arkiver.
Hvis du ønsker en arbeidsbekreftelse på dine ansettelsesforhold hos oss
kan jeg få utarbeidet dette. Attest er det kun den nærmeste leder som kan
utforme.Gi beskjed hvis du ønsker en slik arbeidsbekreftelse.
——————————
—— Ha en fin dag!!
Med vennlig hilsen:
Kristine Myhre
HR-Konsulent, ICA Norge
HR-Service
22891849
Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
05.07.2011 12:07
Tokristine.myhre@ica.no
ccSubjectRe: Fw: Problemer med personalarkiv Hei,
personnummeret mitt er 250770 30568.
(Min ny adresse i England er forresten:
Erik Ribsskog
Flat 3
5 Leather Lane
Liverpool
GB-L2 2AE
Storbritannia
I tilfelle dere trenger den.
Dere kan eventuelt også bare scanne dokumentene og maile dem hvis det er
enklere).Bare kontakt meg hvis dere trenger noe mer informasjon.
Mvh.
Erik Ribsskog
2011/7/5 <kristine.myhre@ica.no>
Hei Erik.
Må be deg om å sende oss fullt personnummer slik at vi kan se om
vi får søkt deg opp i våre systemer.——————————
—— Ha en fin dag!!
Med vennlig hilsen:
Kristine Myhre
HR-Konsulent, ICA Norge
HR-Service
22891849
—– Forwarded by Kristine Myhre/KRM00/ICA/NO/ICA on 05.07.2011 09:19
—–Inkommande e-post 04.07.2011 12:00.
Till
hrservice@ica.no
Kopia
Dold kopia
Från
Tina Mjørud/TMJ00/ICA/NO/ICA
Ärende
Fw: Problemer med personalarkiv
Brevtext
Tar dere tak i dette? Vennligst svar kunden direkte og ikke via meg.
Med vennlig hilsen
Tina Mjørud
ICA Customer and Store Service Department Norway
Telefon direkte: +47 22 89 18 09
—– Forwarded by Tina Mjørud/TMJ00/ICA/NO/ICA on 04.07.2011 11:58 —–
Inkommande e-post 04.07.2011
Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
2011-06-30 23:27
To:
ica@ica.se
cc:
post@arbeidstilsynet.no
Subject: Problemer
med personalarkivHei,
jeg ser i Aftenposten.no at mange på ICA's hovedkontor, i Norge, på Sinsen,
har fått sparken:http://www.aftenposten.no/
okonomi/article4160852.ece Kanskje de som tuller med meg der, har fått sparken, tenker jeg nå.
Så jeg prøver igjen.
Kan dere være så snill å sende meg fra min mappe i personalarkivet:
– Kopi av brev fra Stein Erik Hagen, som jeg fikk da jeg vant Rimi Gullårer,
som butikksjef, Rimi Langhus, andre halvår 2001.– Kopi av kursbevis, (som f.eks. kurs i praktisk butikkledelse og arbeidsrett
for butikksjefer holdt av Jon Bekkevoll i 2001 vel).– Attest for at jeg har jobbet fire år som butikksjef i Rimi, på Rimi Nylænde,
(1998 til 2000), Rimi Kalbakken, (2000 til 2001) og Rimi Langhus (2001
og 2002). Og at jeg jobbet seks år som assistent og aspirant/låseansvarlig,
og at jeg jobbet til sammen fra jula 1992 til høsten 2004, i Rimi, i en
rekke forskjellige stillinger og butikker, i Oslo og Follo.Driver også å prøver å få LO til å ta arbeidssaken min mot ICA, for jeg
ble tullet med av distriktsjef Fjellhøy, med flere, som butikksjef, så
mye at jeg måtte slutte, syntes jeg.Så sender kopi til LO.
Og til Arbeidstilsynet, som Jussbuss har anbefalt meg å kontakte, for å
få dere til å sende disse papirene, (men som ikke svarer).Håper dette er i orden!
Mvh.
Erik Ribsskog
ATTENTION:
This e-mail may contain confidential information that is intended solely
for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete
this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution
of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.ATTENTION:
This e-mail may contain confidential information that is intended solely
for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete
this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution
of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.ATTENTION:
This e-mail may contain confidential information that is intended solely
for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete
this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution
of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.ATTENTION:
This e-mail may contain confidential information that is intended solely
for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete
this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution
of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.
-
